Who else dreads this year?

Tzeentchean Perspective

Well-known member

Here's a page dedicated to live updates on the latest sino-indian border clashes. Modi must really be betting on the Three Gorges Dam breaking soon to boost India's chances in large-scale operations.
 

Harlock

I should have expected that really
From the article

Britain’s nationalized healthcare service now denies medical care to those deemed “racist, sexist, or homophobic.”

That is a lie, and if they lie about that to scare you then take everything else they say with a grain of salt. It is at best bad research, at worst deliberately rabble rousing in an already tense time.
 

JagerIV

Well-known member
From the article



That is a lie, and if they lie about that to scare you then take everything else they say with a grain of salt. It is at best bad research, at worst deliberately rabble rousing in an already tense time.

Is it a lie that that's not the direction they want to go in, is it a lie in the sense they haven't been able to fully implement the program yet? Because I clearly remember them talking about how their moving in that direction.
 

Lanmandragon

Well-known member
"Californa declares it's independence and secedes from the Union."

"OK. Cut off all power going to California from Arizona and Nevada. Cut off all water going there from Arizona and Nevada. Call in all debt California owes the US government and refuse entry of all California citizens who lack proper passports. Do the Same for Washington and Oregon if they Secede. Then wait and threaten any country that tries to back them. The people will do the work for us."
Uh huh so because LA and Frisco are commie scum. We should throw all rye Americans who dont live In those shit holes away? How about we don't betray and abdaon Americans because LA is full of scum. Better to just purge the cities and not screw millions of Americans. All of this comes from large urban centers.
 
Uh huh so because LA and Frisco are commie scum. We should throw all rye Americans who dont live In those shit holes away? How about we don't betray and abdaon Americans because LA is full of scum. Better to just purge the cities and not screw millions of Americans. All of this comes from large urban centers.

not even the kinda big cities, more like megaplexes ran by PROGRESSIVES. We don't need to swallow any more pills or ringing the bells of revolution. We just need to assure MAD hangs over everyone's heads via the 2nd amendment and make sure the leaders on high never forget it. It's amazing how an epidemic and the threat of a shotgun have done more to halt progressives in the past four years than all of the talk and philisphying has done in the past twenty.
 

Lanmandragon

Well-known member
not even the kinda big cities, more like megaplexes ran by PROGRESSIVES. We don't need to swallow any more pills or ringing the bells of revolution. We just need to assure MAD hangs over everyone's heads via the 2nd amendment and make sure the leaders on high never forget it. It's amazing how an epidemic and the threat of a shotgun have done more to halt progressives in the past four years than all of the talk and philisphying has done in the past twenty.
Sure but when I say City I mean Chicago. So it's just semantics really I agree with your point though.
 

PsihoKekec

Swashbuckling Accountant
That is a lie, and if they lie about that to scare you then take everything else they say with a grain of salt. It is at best bad research, at worst deliberately rabble rousing in an already tense time.
It's an USA article and it is how it was reported in America, the rest of the world got used to ameriburgers getting us wrong. And honestly, it goes for all countries, we are full of misconceptions about USA as well.

I mean, how many people outside UK know that in many urban areas, the beligerent drunks abusing the medical personnel that are obliged to suck up and help them is an acute problem?
 

Harlock

I should have expected that really
Is it a lie that that's not the direction they want to go in, is it a lie in the sense they haven't been able to fully implement the program yet? Because I clearly remember them talking about how their moving in that direction.
Yeah, its a very bad misrepresentation designed to make it look like leftist institutions are working against people labelled unjustly. The true story is that medical staff can refuse to treat people if they are being aggressive and abusive, and that includes racist etc abuse to their faces.

This doesn't apply to emergency treatment, people who have mental issues like dementia who can't control what they say, and it isn't permanent just until they calm the hell down. There is a situation where medical staff are getting abusive behavior and outright attacks thrown at them, this is designed to protect them so they can keep doing their jobs.

Not sure if this sort of process exists elsewhere, that you can refuse non essential services to arsehole customers, but in my old job we could tell people to get lost if they started being dicks. This is what this is about, protecting staff from aggression not punishing opinions.
 

Tzeentchean Perspective

Well-known member

Interestingly enough, I believe an operation like this was planned last year only to get leaked. Now it went off without a hitch. Really makes you think...


Where do these pedos keep coming from?
 

Tzeentchean Perspective

Well-known member
Some people may recall the time Trump said "I have a lot of powerful enemies". He didn't say something quite as alarming today. but this is still concerning:



We know the Flight Plan of these people, but what if they were trying to get noticed, like getting caught was part of their plan? It also makes you wonder if those "stupid rich people" funding antifa are really in charge of them at this point.
 

JagerIV

Well-known member
Yeah, its a very bad misrepresentation designed to make it look like leftist institutions are working against people labelled unjustly. The true story is that medical staff can refuse to treat people if they are being aggressive and abusive, and that includes racist etc abuse to their faces.

This doesn't apply to emergency treatment, people who have mental issues like dementia who can't control what they say, and it isn't permanent just until they calm the hell down. There is a situation where medical staff are getting abusive behavior and outright attacks thrown at them, this is designed to protect them so they can keep doing their jobs.

Not sure if this sort of process exists elsewhere, that you can refuse non essential services to arsehole customers, but in my old job we could tell people to get lost if they started being dicks. This is what this is about, protecting staff from aggression not punishing opinions.

I will remain skeptical at this point. I've seen way to many "we don't mean it that ways" and "we'll never take it that far" from the left to believe them when they make such claims. Maybe were at the camel getting its nose in stage. Maybe its a mote and bailey, where the law is giving them an "option" which as the culture gets further corrupted will turn into a rule. Maybe there is no camel and leftists don't actually want all icky old people/right wingers/enemies to die.

Given past actions and current rhetoric, I very much doubt it. When were already at "political enemies shouldn't have bank accounts" as their starting to roll out, "political enemies shouldn't have health care" is just the logical progression of current trends. The only real question I think is if they've gotten enough power to implement it, not their desire to implement it.
 

Cherico

Well-known member
I will remain skeptical at this point. I've seen way to many "we don't mean it that ways" and "we'll never take it that far" from the left to believe them when they make such claims. Maybe were at the camel getting its nose in stage. Maybe its a mote and bailey, where the law is giving them an "option" which as the culture gets further corrupted will turn into a rule. Maybe there is no camel and leftists don't actually want all icky old people/right wingers/enemies to die.

Given past actions and current rhetoric, I very much doubt it. When were already at "political enemies shouldn't have bank accounts" as their starting to roll out, "political enemies shouldn't have health care" is just the logical progression of current trends. The only real question I think is if they've gotten enough power to implement it, not their desire to implement it.

and the definition of political enemies continues to grow and become larger with every day.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top