Who else dreads this year?

Dunno if this should be here or in the election thread or the covid one but it seems the firm making the vaccine has a partisan bent to it and would rather inform Biden about the vaccine before the health department which had to find out via media.

 
What i dread is there are still people that think Kyle Rittenhouse was provoking for having a weapon on him.
O just got in an argument about it and they are saying he provoked the crowd by having a fire arm.

So having a weapon to defend yourself from the mob is provoking the mob? So not being anything but meekly submitting and letting them wail on you is provoking them?
 
So having a weapon to defend yourself from the mob is provoking the mob? So not being anything but meekly submitting and letting them wail on you is provoking them?
Thier argument was "If he did not have a weapon they would not have done anything to him!"

I did explain it somewhat bad but I told one that if he wants information on it I can get it for him
 
Thier argument was "If he did not have a weapon they would not have done anything to him!"

I did explain it somewhat bad but I told one that if he wants information on it I can get it for him

Usually it is the opposite. People don't tend to pick fights with those who are armed better than them, unless they have false bravado.
 
WExactly! I was getting heated because they were going "He obviously went there to provoke" and "He should not have gone with a gun," and "Property is more important then life."

I think them attacking proves he was right to be armed. And the whole life is more important than property is for normal circumstances, not when people are burning down cities and actually killing people doing so.
 
I think them attacking proves he was right to be armed. And the whole life is more important than property is for normal circumstances, not when people are burning down cities and actually killing people doing so.
I had told them they started attacking him because he put out a fire in a dumbster and that they threw a Molotov at him. They though I meant they threw it at him AFTER he shot at them, not before. The then say because he had a gun
 
I had told them they started attacking him because he put out a fire in a dumbster and that they threw a Molotov at him. They though I meant they threw it at him AFTER he shot at them, not before. The then say because he had a gun

They still threw a molotov cocktail which they had no right to have on their person. That is clear intent to commit a crime.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top