Arlos
Sad Monarchist
I don’t know, a whole bunch of Silicon valley stuff went down for a while, like youtube.Californication?
I don’t know, a whole bunch of Silicon valley stuff went down for a while, like youtube.Californication?
Global child sex abuse network uncovered with ties to US
A tip earlier this year from the United States has led to the uncovering of a major child sex abuse network in Australia with ties to the U.S., Canada, Asia, Europe and New Zealand.According t…thehill.com
"but...but...pizzagate was supposed to be fake!"
In DC? Probably not.What in the actual...
Can you throw a rock without hitting a pedophile ring?
In DC? Probably not.
Finally, a CNN scoop we can hope is true.
What i dread is there are still people that think Kyle Rittenhouse was provoking for having a weapon on him.
O just got in an argument about it and they are saying he provoked the crowd by having a fire arm.
Thier argument was "If he did not have a weapon they would not have done anything to him!"So having a weapon to defend yourself from the mob is provoking the mob? So not being anything but meekly submitting and letting them wail on you is provoking them?
Thier argument was "If he did not have a weapon they would not have done anything to him!"
I did explain it somewhat bad but I told one that if he wants information on it I can get it for him
WExactly! I was getting heated because they were going "He obviously went there to provoke" and "He should not have gone with a gun," and "Property is more important then life."Usually it is the opposite. People don't tend to pick fights with those who are armed better than them, unless they have false bravado.
WExactly! I was getting heated because they were going "He obviously went there to provoke" and "He should not have gone with a gun," and "Property is more important then life."
I had told them they started attacking him because he put out a fire in a dumbster and that they threw a Molotov at him. They though I meant they threw it at him AFTER he shot at them, not before. The then say because he had a gunI think them attacking proves he was right to be armed. And the whole life is more important than property is for normal circumstances, not when people are burning down cities and actually killing people doing so.
I had told them they started attacking him because he put out a fire in a dumbster and that they threw a Molotov at him. They though I meant they threw it at him AFTER he shot at them, not before. The then say because he had a gun
But he had a gun so obviously he was provoking themThey still threw a molotov cocktail which they had no right to have on their person. That is clear intent to commit a crime.
But he had a gun so obviously he was provoking them
I doubt they think that, I did bring up the Trump supports killed and they go "Why were they not on the news?" because no MSM would report it I told themHe obvious was, the dastardly alt-right neonazi trump supporter.