Please clarify. Im not sure what you are getting at.
What the hell would that green movement do or want, and how would you put that at peace with needs of reindustrialisation?
State and private partnerships work just fine. Variations of Dirigism are models used by japan and korea.
Maybye in Asia, with its culture and political system. In western world you get France at best. And French industry is not an example you want to aspire to, certainly not when you're doing better than that already.
The USA builds an effective system of state healthcare.
Effective or state, its unrealistic to expect both, even if it seems tempting as you have neither. There is a right wing solution to solve a lot of these problems that no one talks about - smacking the whole field with a massive club of deregulation.
How the American Medical Association deliberately created a U.S. physician shortage in order to protect jobs and inflate pay.
www.theamericanconservative.com
Because whether state, private, or hybrid as it is now, that won't solve the problem of overpriced, supply strangled healthcare, just tinker with the question of who pays the overpriced bills that shouldn't exist in the first place and who's stuck with the business end of the shortages that should be filled.
Women embrace feminism in order to increase thier social status. This has created a feminism that greatly benefoits corporations by encouraging women to enter the workforce thus decreasing labour costs. In this feminism a womans value and status is reduced to her ability to generate GDP. It is demoralising, dehumanising and ultimately self defeating.
The fact is, barring some unforseen even feminism is here to stay. We need to create a feminism where women can find an increase is social status and esteem through more traditional avenues. This will decrease competition in the labour market, boost the fertility rate, drop the crime rate and improve the mental health of men, women and children.
Yes, its a culture war issue. If, say, conservative right would take over the media and cultural institutions and use them to advertise their ideas instead of glorifying feminism, following feminist tropes would be reducing one's social status, hence it would get less popular. However i have no idea why would you call such a change in cultural trends "feminism" despite the sheer confusion caused by it.
No, there needs to be a vast reform of the laws dealing with men's issues. This will become a growing issue with time, and embracing it early will be of great benefit.
Yes, feminism inspired legal changes need to go, absolutely. However there is no reason to tie it to labels that mean much more than just this, causing some completely unnecessary confusion.