If you agree with the "Pro" more than the "Con" or vice versa, you can choose otherwise.
Probably because the LGBT activists tie sexual orientation to gender. Again, part of why this quiz is better than the 8Values is it tells you what the quiz will assume about you when you choose "agree" or "disagree." There's no room for ambiguity.
It seems you like free market capitalism a lot.
I just went with no opinion on those two
meh, I'm pretty sure the inevitable end state of Anarcho-Capitalism is the Corpus from Warframe... I slaughter them by the thousands, very not nice people.
I went with "no opinion" on a lot of the questions as well. Many of them were some variation of "who will lead the communist revolution, comrade?"
I can agree to that, but there are dangers to government intervention being too low. Power vacuums tend to be filled by somebody.
I wouldn't say good. But yeah, here are my actual results.
8values.github.io
politicalsextant.com
The link under "more information" takes you this article.
How in the fuck do I line 88% up with him.
You answered all the questions about violent revolution and reform in the way Bernstein would have.
I feel like part of the purpose of the site is to introduce you to all these niche left wing ideologies.
What does Paleoconservative mean to you? I mean it seems better than Neo-con, which is what I got.
Paleoconservatives are those conservatives that oppose the neoconservative elements of the American Right wing that dominate the New Right movement. It was born out of post-Cold War politics, and its members included former presidential candidate Pat Buchanan, scholars like Mel Bradford and Paul Gottfried, and journalists like Samuel T. Francis and Thomas Flemming. They are mainly social conservatives that hold the opposite positions from neoconservatives on free trade, immigration, and foreign policy. That is, objectively speaking, what the paleoconservatives are.
I am fine with immigration to a degree, I don't think we should have none but certainly not mass immigration or illegal immigration, free trade can be good when it's actually free trade, but when it leads to you having home industries more loyal to foreign governments than your own that's clearly a problem, on gender I think it's clear men and women are different and socially should be seen as such and shouldn't be encouraged to participate in the work force so heavily, race I think that policies of affirmative action and forcing equality are worthless and cause more division, and I think we encourage every race and culture but European descendants to be proud, embrace there identity and be racially conscious, unless white and that does not sit right with me at all. Faltering birth rates are a massive problem too. In terms of race personally I don't think it's all that relevant, I think culture matters vastly more and I am certainly invested in my religious identity and it's values. Foreign policy I would agree we shouldn't subsidize or build an empire overseas, and should be focused much more on the home. Where do you think that puts me?
Oh well count me in on that. The welfare state is a poison.
Guess I'm a filthy liberal according to this. Funny thing is, I said as much over on the SF Debris forums, but the regressive leftists over there insist on calling me alt-right.