War Film recommendations

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
Unquestionably great movie...Top 5 'War Movie', though? I dunnow. It kind of goes heavy on spy-genre stuff for a lot of the runtime before becoming an action-fest, and is kind of the height of 'killin' naw-sees' 70s awesome where themes and messages takes a backseat to bursting blood-packets and explosions (at least after it spends the first half doing Cold War spy-shenanigans that just happen to be set in dubya-dubya-deuce)...and that all seems like it sets it apart enough to be one-upped or more by another film that's a bit more...'War Movie-y'? Developed? Iunnow.

Like, this is no knock against Where Eagles Dare because it's awesome fun and great moviemaking...but seems like better alternates exist for explicitly the best 'War Movies' as a genre.

It feels like a "heist" or "action/adventure" movie or yes, a spy thriller as opposed to a War Film. It's about as War as the James Bond film The Living Daylights or maybe closer to films like Inglorious Basterds or Indiana Jones. Like one step below something like The Dirty Dozen or Kellys Heroes since they don't really even have 'battle' or large set action scenes depicting warfighting.

Ehhhhhh, I dunnow about even putting this in the top five. Platoon is good. Powerful movie that's done well, etcetera... but suffers from being even more...pretentious(?) might be the word?...than Apocalypse Now while it kind'a does a lot of the same 'things' in terms of its direction. Which is a really high bar to cross because Apocalypse Now is very pretentious(?) and high-handed in everything it's doing.

I could see Platoon making a lot of Top Fives. I think with all of the inter-character drama and Oliver Stone's moralizing really influenced a whole decade or two or Vietnam War films and propagated certain perceptions of the Vietnam War and its veterans from that point of view. It certainly, IMHO, had the best action/war scenes I feel then many of its contemporaries and a more grounded and fleshed out narrative and distinctive characters then said contemporaries as well. And by contemporaries I mean Deer Hunter, Apocalypse Now, Hamburger Hill, Full Metal Jacket, Casualties of War and other Vietnam War flicks that kinda came around that time.

Bridge Too Far being at or second-to the top seems appropriate. And I have heard good things about The Duelists from a couple places, but have yet to see it, so that'd be one I'd be interested in checking-out.

I'd agree. In fact it was in my second post in this very thread!

I'd contend Bridge Over the River Kwai is one that should be in these top fives somewhere (perhaps it gets mentioned as an also-ran or honorary or something, admittedly didn't listen to the YT element yet). Could take the spot of Where Eagles Dare and I wouldn't object.

The Bridge Over the River Kwai might be one of my favorite movies period even though the "war" scenes aren't really prevalent in the film until the end. Lots of people like David Lean's other movie, Lawrence of Arabia, which is really good but I actually liked The Bridge Over the River Kwai alot more and strangely enough I even liked it as a kid. That's when it really impacted me, especially with how the Colonel Nicholson interacted with the Japanese and how he managed to extort and get the Japanese to compromise and yet still was collaborating with them. It really eclipsed the entire secondary storyline involving the gruff American hero leading the British commandos back on their sabotage mission. And the Doctor at the end calling it "Madness. Pure Madness." Beautiful movie. Great characters. Really knocked it out of the park the entire ridiculousness of War and conflict and unlike Oliver Stone or other great directors, didn't even have to throw in egregious rape scenes to sell the anti-war sentiments.

Though I guess David Lean's Lawrence of Arabia did have a sexual abuse scene strongly implied in it... :unsure:
 

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
I was watching war movies heavily as a kid heh.
Thin RedLine is a good one honestly, and I recommend it as it shows the lesser known battles the Army went through in the Pacific
 

ATP

Well-known member
Panfilov's 28. The story of 28 Guardsmen in front of Moscow in November 1941 who held a village against a German armored attack just long enough for reinforcements to fill the gap. Allegedly a true story, actually a propaganda forgery. Still very well done and a good lesson in how to stop tanks if you don't have anti-tank guns.

In the same vein, T-34. A group of Russian slave laborers are being used by the Germans to clean the remains of the crew out of knocked-out tanks. One of the Germans has a brilliant idea; use the Russians driving a Russian T-34-85 (stripped of ammunition of course) as a live target for training gunners. Only, the Germans screw up and miss one of the ammunition bins that has four APCR and two HE rounds in it. The whole story is permeated by a sly sense of humor that is rather appealing.

Yes,one of soviet propaganda stories.In reality there were more then 100 with few AT guns,they repelled first tank attack and run after more tanks arrived.Germans never used planes,artillery or infrantry there.
Many of soviets surrender,at least one fought for germans later.
And why 28? becouse 28 manage to widraw.
Only reason why it was remembered was that till that time soviets usually break after first attack.

Considering that soviet had real stories,like with soviet 24infrantry dyvision stopping german 19 panzer dyvision for 5 days on Belarus in 1941,i dunno why they lied.
Maybe they just liked lying
 

prinCZess

Warrior, Writer, Performer, Perv
Oh, yeah--the de Ruyter Admiral movie is well-done. There's some great performances, there's some pretty good work with boats and battles, and it doesn't skimp-out on the clusterfuck politics of the Netherlands.

Haven't seen the Admiral movie about Kolchak, but have seen it referenced before and have been curious about it.
The ever-growing list of media I don't have enough time to ever start shrinking grows once more...
 

LTR

Don't Look Back In Anger
Administrator
Staff Member
Founder
We were soldiers

Funny thing about We Were Soldiers. I love that movie as well. So I saw a channel called 'History Buffs' was reviewing the movie and it was mostly positive, but then twenty one minutes in, he started to really criticize some aspects of the movie as being "eye rolling" and that "He was enjoying the movie and then they'd spoil it by going SO OVER THE TOP!" and then stated how there was one scene, the death of Lieutenant Harry Herrick, that he described as being so out of place because it was "so brimming with American Patriotism that it made his eyes roll to the BACK OF HIS HEAD."

We Were Soldiers Page 95 said:
"He was lying beside me on the hill and he said: 'If I have to die, I'm glad to give my life for my country.' I remember him saying that. He was going into shock, hit in the hip and in a lot of pain. He didn't live long."

Then two seconds later he states how the movie "slapped in another generic war movie death scene."

We Were Soldiers Page 134 said:
"Sergeant Sam Hollman Jr, a native Pennsylvanian, knelt beside his mortally wounded buddy Jack Gell and heard him gasp "Tell my wife I love her."

History Buffs: "COME ONNNNN! I know it sounds like I'm nitpicking here but it sounds so cliched! If you have to write a death scene, then do it in an original way! This feels like it's ticking a box of what to include in a war movie!"

He then posted some British comedy video ridiculing the death scenes as over dramatized.

His silly rant starts at 21 minutes in.



It seems pretty obvious that even popular history youtubers like him often likely don't even do the basic research for their videos because if he just read the book that the movie was based off of, he wouldn't of been so trite in legitimately mocking the actually accurately portrayed death scenes of those two characters in the film.
 

BlackDragon98

Freikorps Kommandant
Banned - Politics
Funny thing about We Were Soldiers. I love that movie as well. So I saw a channel called 'History Buffs' was reviewing the movie and it was mostly positive, but then twenty one minutes in, he started to really criticize some aspects of the movie as being "eye rolling" and that "He was enjoying the movie and then they'd spoil it by going SO OVER THE TOP!" and then stated how there was one scene, the death of Lieutenant Harry Herrick, that he described as being so out of place because it was "so brimming with American Patriotism that it made his eyes roll to the BACK OF HIS HEAD."



Then two seconds later he states how the movie "slapped in another generic war movie death scene."



History Buffs: "COME ONNNNN! I know it sounds like I'm nitpicking here but it sounds so cliched! If you have to write a death scene, then do it in an original way! This feels like it's ticking a box of what to include in a war movie!"

He then posted some British comedy video ridiculing the death scenes as over dramatized.

His silly rant starts at 21 minutes in.



It seems pretty obvious that even popular history youtubers like him often likely don't even do the basic research for their videos because if he just read the book that the movie was based off of, he wouldn't of been so trite in legitimately mocking the actually accurately portrayed death scenes of those two characters in the film.

i really liked the final battle scene of the movie.

The NVA using an Soviet supplied WW2 capture MG 34 was a good detail.

Right before the Hueys came in spray them with a hail of lead.
 

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
Funny thing about We Were Soldiers. I love that movie as well. So I saw a channel called 'History Buffs' was reviewing the movie and it was mostly positive, but then twenty one minutes in, he started to really criticize some aspects of the movie as being "eye rolling" and that "He was enjoying the movie and then they'd spoil it by going SO OVER THE TOP!" and then stated how there was one scene, the death of Lieutenant Harry Herrick, that he described as being so out of place because it was "so brimming with American Patriotism that it made his eyes roll to the BACK OF HIS HEAD."



Then two seconds later he states how the movie "slapped in another generic war movie death scene."



History Buffs: "COME ONNNNN! I know it sounds like I'm nitpicking here but it sounds so cliched! If you have to write a death scene, then do it in an original way! This feels like it's ticking a box of what to include in a war movie!"

He then posted some British comedy video ridiculing the death scenes as over dramatized.

His silly rant starts at 21 minutes in.



It seems pretty obvious that even popular history youtubers like him often likely don't even do the basic research for their videos because if he just read the book that the movie was based off of, he wouldn't of been so trite in legitimately mocking the actually accurately portrayed death scenes of those two characters in the film.

There is another one I will recommend to you once I get back to the barracks. The dude reads the book and is a professor of history. Dude is much better then history buffs.
As much as I ike history buffs, he doesnt do FULL research and just based off the era not the actual book
Reel History is his name
i really liked the final battle scene of the movie.

The NVA using an Soviet supplied WW2 capture MG 34 was a good detail.

Right before the Hueys came in spray them with a hail of lead.
The end is not fully historically accurate with the helicopters being gunships.
 
Last edited:

PsihoKekec

Swashbuckling Accountant
The end is completely bullshit, with American soldiers marching at the Vietnamese in shoulder to shoulder line, like it's 1815 and completely defeating the enemy. In reality, relief force fought their way to them, widened LZ so they could be helivaced and then exfiltrated on foot, getting badly mauled in an ambush.
 

bintananth

behind a desk

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
The end is completely bullshit, with American soldiers marching at the Vietnamese in shoulder to shoulder line, like it's 1815 and completely defeating the enemy. In reality, relief force fought their way to them, widened LZ so they could be helivaced and then exfiltrated on foot, getting badly mauled in an ambush.

The bayonet charge is Hollywood. But Landing Zone X-Ray was secured after the third morning. The PAVN suffered too many casualties in its attacks that it withdrew from the area. The Americans could've withdrawn then as in fact Hal Moore's battalion did just that.

But General Westmoreland didn't want to give the impression of bugging out, so he decided to have the remaining two battalions stay there and then march out and make new Landing Zones in unsecured territory instead of being helivac'd for some reason, thus leading to the separate Ambush and Battle at LZ Albany which with LZ XRay composed the total Battle of the Ia Drang Valley.

Oh actually...



There was a video that recently covered it pretty competently as well actually. Only first part was released but I'm sure the second part which you reference is going to be covered in part Two sooner or later.
 

BF110C4

Well-known member
The bayonet charge is Hollywood. But Landing Zone X-Ray was secured after the third morning. The PAVN suffered too many casualties in its attacks that it withdrew from the area. The Americans could've withdrawn then as in fact Hal Moore's battalion did just that.

But General Westmoreland didn't want to give the impression of bugging out, so he decided to have the remaining two battalions stay there and then march out and make new Landing Zones in unsecured territory instead of being helivac'd for some reason, thus leading to the separate Ambush and Battle at LZ Albany which with LZ XRay composed the total Battle of the Ia Drang Valley.
Classic example of a poorly thought political gesture negatively affecting sound tactical choices basically giving the NVA a face ambush that prevented them from calling the battle a total defeat thanks to the american general desire of not looking weak after a hard won victory.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top