Alternate History Vivat Stilicho!

Circle of Willis

Well-known member
The First Crusade is winding down, but Fitna is not.

Can't go wrong with patronage of artists to enhance the public image of your dynasty and make sure history looks at your bloodline favourably, it sure worked for Tudors. Kicking off the age of chivalry is just a side benefit.
Most certainly, being a conquering warlord (even one with some brutal sackings under one's belt) & an icon of chivalry are not necessarily exclusive in history. As exemplified by this old webcomic about Edward the Black Prince, whose atrocities weren't even aimed at Muslims but at neighboring Christians in France, yet that dude is still popularly remembered as a model of chivalry in Western Europe.

n8ABgMv.png

The Chaldeans really aren't looking healthy, with the Romans wanting to wash hands of them, and fighting a civil war in the middle of their revolution. Aloysius I guess isn't hugely ambitious in being willing to concede Egyptian independence albeit without Alexandria. If he already has a red sea port at Elath/Aqaba, I guess it's not a strategic necessity, though Egypt as personal property of the Emperors bankrolled the entire Augustinian agenda.


If he were just enobled, he either shouldn't have a nobiliary particle, or be von Caipha indicating his new fief I would think.



A blacksmith becoming lord of Ibelin, eh? Does he look like Orlando Bloom too? Guess Kingdom of Heaven won't be so egregiously ahistoric now.
Man's gotta leave some conquests to his descendants so that they can get the glory in future crusades, after all.

Also, good point re: Theodor's German nobiliary particle, I've gone back & slightly changed that.
 

ATP

Well-known member
Thanks for great chapter ! it seems,that Egypt would survive,but Caliphate would not.And new chaldean heretics would be later crushed by muslims.

Aside from that,what abput polan and ruthenians? if they finished their little war,their coming could made possible of taking more territory.

And,remember about free cities in Chad

And Kanem Bornu empire



Both in OTL become muslim,but in 937 were still pagan - and could become christians here.Or heretics.Why not both?
 
Last edited:

PsihoKekec

Swashbuckling Accountant
Most certainly, being a conquering warlord (even one with some brutal sackings under one's belt) & an icon of chivalry are not necessarily exclusive in history. As exemplified by this old webcomic about Edward the Black Prince, whose atrocities weren't even aimed at Muslims but at neighboring Christians in France, yet that dude is still popularly remembered as a model of chivalry in Western Europe.

n8ABgMv.png


Man's gotta leave some conquests to his descendants so that they can get the glory in future crusades, after all.

Also, good point re: Theodor's German nobiliary particle, I've gone back & slightly changed that.

Can't go wrong with Hark! A Vagrant for making a point.
 

ATP

Well-known member
For everybody here,but especially @Circle of Willis - there is QQ porn sites,which still have few interesting,not-porn AH stories.

Here,one of them - dude from XXI entury get into body of merchant from 1190 Florence in TL where Barbarossa do not die,but captured Jerusalem.
And Richard Lionheart become even more moronic.

Here:
MC is interesting,becouse he is not important enough to change things,but could influence it.
 
931-935: The Ascent of Angels

Circle of Willis

Well-known member
931 brought with it the climax of the crusaders' campaign in Syria, where all eyes were on the ongoing Siege of Damascus. Negotiations with both the Egyptian government of Al-Farghani and the defending commanders for the peaceable handover of the city and the evacuation of its garrison back to Egypt through Roman-held Palaestina, even if the fighting was to continue elsewhere, broke down in February of this year and the army of the Counts & Prince Michael consequently made preparations to storm the walls in the spring (specifically, one week and one day after Easter) instead. Despite initial success in storming the Gate of the Sun the city had to be taken district by district, and unlike Jerusalem which fell in one extremely sanguinary day once the assault began, parts of Damascus held out for weeks. Mir Abu Hidja ibn Bilal and Shams al-Din Belek held out for two more months inside the Damascene citadel, so that the crusaders could not proclaim a total victory over the city even when they were celebrating Pentecost inside its Great Mosque (which was also traditionally held to be the burial site of the head of John the Baptist, and formerly – as well as now, once more – a cathedral dedicated to him).

Only after Abu Hidja died in a daring but ill-advised night raid against the Christians encamped near said Great Mosque, where his escape was cut off and his own head followed suit at the hand of Michael, did Shams al-Din yield. He was allowed to exit the largely devastated city, only to immediately resume command over the remaining Iraqi forces still holding out in eastern Syria. Meanwhile, Aloysius IV reorganized the Syrian conquests into two great duchies: one was granted to Cassian de Tolosa and governed from Aleppo ('Syria Prima', replacing the Antioch-based fiefdom of the same name which was then re-dubbed 'Coele-Syria'), while the second was assigned to Ansemundo and would be ruled from Damascus ('Syria Secunda'). Roman control in the region was not fully stable due to the lingering Islamic presence in Raqqa and other settlements across the east of Syria, as well as a peace agreement or truce with Ja'far remaining elusive, necessitating the continuation of hostilities on the part of the newly-promoted Dukes and Prince Michael.

With Cassian taking the lead as their strategist and the indomitable Michael riding at the head of their vanguard, the Christians proceeded to soundly defeat Shams al-Din in the Battles of As-Saffira (henceforth restored to its old Roman name of 'Sipri'), Khanasir ('Chenneseri'), Ithriya ('Seriana'), Palmyra, Sergiopolis[1] and finally Raqqa itself. Before departing from Damascus, the now twenty-one-year-old prince had taken it upon himself to swear an additional religious oath, along with six of the closest friends he had made on the campaign trail (five fellow knights and one monk, Clement of Cluny), in the 'House of Judas' on the Straight Street of Damascus where Saint Paul was cured of his blindness by the hands of Saint Ananias and dedicated his life to Jesus: the founders pledged that they would forsake the riches and pleasures of the world in favor of pursuing purity and fighting to protect Christendom from the Saracen for the rest of their days, imitating the monastic rules observed by their friend Clement. Supported in this endeavor by the clergy who were marching with them, some of the local Syrians and Michael's own father (who thought that a brotherhood of crusading knights represented both a nearly-free extra army and a good place to put surplus sons away before they could threaten their brothers & nephews' inheritance), their band grew from seven knights to nearly 100 by the time of the Christian victory at Raqqa on Michaelmas (29 September) this year. This then was the founding of the first and most famous of the military orders to have emerged in the Chivalric Age: the Most Puissant Order of the Holy Knights of Saint Michael the Archangel, whose elite fighters built for themselves a reputation as fearless warrior-monks of God, always the first to charge onto the battlefield with heathens and heretics and last to leave (if at all).

OXbMXj8.png

The standard of the Order of St. Michael, which would soon become one of the most familiar and iconic sights on the battlefields of the medieval Levant. Garbed in white mantles bearing scarlet crosses, these knights garnered fame as 'lions at war and lambs at the hearth', combining crusading zeal with knightly skill at arms and a monastic-inspired discipline to rival that of the imperial legions (from whose veterans they also recruited)

In the south, Aloysius IV and his generals made one final push to try to take Egypt from Al-Farghani and his new puppet Caliph Al-Abbas, son and successor of the late Al-Mansur. Reinforced by Elan's division, the primary Roman army on this southern front scattered their opponents in the Battle of Athyria[2], then pushed onward to Bilbeis and finally the ruins of Heliopolis, bringing them within sight of the redoubtable fortifications of Al-Qadimah. Alas, it was also around this time that Al-Farghani managed to break the Second Siege of Alexandria in a furious battle with the Moors (in the process killing Tomo of Ghana and most of his contingent of 'Blackamoor' volunteers, who fought as part of the rearguard to cover Stéléggu's retreat), after which he turned his army around to engage the Romans preparing to break down the gates of his capital. While Aloysius had the numbers to ensure that any battle fought outside Al-Qadimah would be a bloody one and that their chances of victory were about even, he seemed to think those odds were not good enough and was furthermore fearful of the possibility that the Stilichians could further massively expand their power by acquiring Egypt (or even just parts of it, such as Alexandria) if they pressed on, and so once more resumed negotiations for peace with the Egyptian Vizier rather than give battle there and then.

Dwindling manpower from crusaders breaking off to go home or to lay down roots in the Levant & the ongoing war with the Iraqi Hashemites represented additional concerns for the Emperor, further motivating him to bring hostilities with Egypt to an end for now. The Iraqis for their part attempted to move against the divided Chaldeans, but although the less numerous and organized Ionians were at a disadvantage against the followers of Musa and the Hashemites both, they still had strength enough to hold their ground against the former and to overcome the latter in the Battle of Al-Rusafa. Michael's victories over Shams al-Din also brought hope to the Ionians of Mesopotamia, for the prince swore that he would not rest until they had been freed from Islamic oppression and seemed to come closer to realizing that goal with each victory he won. Ja'far meanwhile was further distracted from exploiting the Christian infighting in Chaldea by the escalating attacks of Ibn Junaydah in Arabia, which threatened to further squeeze his garrisons in Mecca & Medina: he was able to resupply the Holy Cities this year, but needed to squander many men who he could have otherwise deployed onto the Syrian or Jordanian fronts or against the Chaldeans on guarding the supply caravans proceeding down the Hejazi coast instead.

The Roman-Egyptian truce held through much of 932, allowing for the two parties to hash out a peace agreement at long last. Despite having finally managed some limited pushback against the Christians, Al-Farghani was forced to concede nearly all the territories lost to them to date 'in perpetuity': that meant the whole of the Egyptian Levant and the Sinai Peninsula to the Archduchy of the Orient, and all of Libya as well as far-western Egypt up to & including Paraetonium and the Siwa Oasis to the Kingdom of Africa. He did manage to retain Alexandria, but was further compelled to restore religious liberty to the Ionian Christians of Egypt and to allow the Aloysian emperors to install new Patriarchs in that seat. Furthermore, Aloysius IV and his heirs were recognized as the universal defenders of the Christian faith, meaning that any move by the Egyptians to repress (Ionian) Christianity would certainly serve as a casus belli for renewed hostilities.

bhqGjv1.png

The Egyptian garrison of Alexandria sallying forth to battle the African crusaders in conjunction with the army of Al-Farghani, marking one of the rare Islamic victories of the First Crusade. Unfortunately for them, it came too late and proved insufficient to avert huge territorial losses and other concessions at the peace table

While these terms were surely more than a little harsh, Al-Farghani saw little choice but to accept them at this point, as he had precisely one field army of any significant strength left (the one he was leading outside Al-Qadimah) and engaging the host of Aloysius was a huge gamble: even if he prevailed against the odds the Christians had many more armies still (killing Aloysius himself would have done no good since not only did the man have many sons, but his eldest was nearby in the Holy Land), while if he lost, it would have certainly been the end for a Muslim Egypt. Of course, having to accept a loss of this magnitude still severely tarnished the already waning prestige of the Banu Hashim, and the Vizier in Al-Qadimah would spend as much of his remaining years fighting off various conspiracies to remove him & his puppet as he did on rebuilding Egyptian strength. Aloysius, for his part, had been leery of the prospect of having to deal with the Monophysite heretics who constituted the vast majority of Egyptian Christians in addition to his pre-existing concerns about empowering the Africans too much were they to insist on adding Egypt to their realm (or offending them grievously if he refused their demands), and so content to leave the reconquest of Egypt and all the headaches that came with deciding how to control/divide it to his descendants. Said Africans should have no cause for complaint in his mind, since the acquisition of all Libya and stretches of western Egypt still represented a 50% increase in the territory they controlled, even if they couldn't add Alexandria as an Egyptian jewel for the crown of the Dominus Rex.

In any case, with Egypt now dealt with, the Holy Roman Empire could refocus the whole of its strength against Iraq, and at a time where Ja'far and Abd al-Aziz could ill-afford contending with them for much longer at that. Michael captained the push out of Syria and Mesopotamia into Assyria, retaking the mighty but scarcely-defended fortresses of Dara & Nisibis with ease that surprised even himself before advancing toward Beth Nuhadra[3] and placing Mosul under siege this year. In a preview of how a Roman occupation of Egypt would most likely have gone, the crusaders found the Syriac Nestorians who comprised the majority not only of the Christian demographic in the Nineveh Plain which they were pushing into, but actually the majority of the population there overall. Yet, having enjoyed religious tolerance and even the ability to climb a ways into the Hashemite government under 'Ilmi Islamic rule, they were fearful of the return of the Ionian authorities and the repression which they had once brought, and so proved generally passive and unhelpful to Michael's forces even as the native Ionians of the region greeted the crusaders with flowers & dancing in the streets. Michael himself was unimpressed by the reluctance of the Nestorians to rise up en masse in support of him and described them as 'sheep' in scathing letters to his father.

In Chaldea, warfare continued unabated amid the marshes between the Ionians, the Chaldean heretics and occasional Hashemite forays into southern Mesopotamia. Musa and his zanj followers controlled Basra (where they purged everyone who failed to reaffirm allegiance to the Great Holy Judge and his doctrines after their victory) and much of the countryside, but the Ionians had consolidated themselves under the military leadership of a former country gentleman by the name of Yohannan Yoalaha and controlled most of the other towns of the region, devastated though they might have been. Another Hashemite incursion made it as far as the Chaldean Ionians' provisional capital at Wasit before it was decisively routed by Yoalaha in a battle outside that city, after which Ja'far reopened negotiations with Aloysius IV out of fear at getting squashed flat between the Chaldean insurgents and Michael's army in Assyria.

eYkT0vl.jpeg

Norman knights of Michael's army storming a breach in the stout but poorly-defended defenses of Nisibis, proving once more that walls are only as strong as the men defending them

In turn he found that Aloysius' demands had largely not changed from before, save that he now wanted to also preserve his fourth and most warlike son's gains in the north of Mesopotamia. This was (almost certainly rightly) interpreted by Ja'far as a warning that he had best make peace with the Christians before they took any more territory, because they certainly weren't going to give it back unless militarily forced to. However, the Emperor's continued insistence that he be acknowledged as the defender of Christians in Iraq as he was in Egypt proved a sticking point, as did Yoalaha's unwillingness to disarm and trust any amnesty issued by Ja'far: he preferred either to be acknowledged as the prince of a self-governing Ionian vassal state in Chaldea, or else to attain safe passage to Roman territory with all who would follow him, rather than place any trust in the Vizier's ability to honestly abide by a peace agreement and not kill them all the instant they let their guard down.

While the First Crusade was winding down and the Romans were striving to consolidate their vast reconquered territories, the True Han dynasty of China had more or less completed its own process of internal consolidation and now began to flex their rebuilt muscles externally as of 932. An attempt by the Jurchen to shake off their tributary status was smacked down with great force and alacrity by a Chinese army under the general Li Zhizhong, augmented with thousands of Turco-Mongolic mounted auxiliaries recruited from the Uighur lands and (ironically) the Khitan population subordinated to the Jurchens. Following this victory, not only did the Emperor Renzong of Han double the Jurchens' tribute as punishment, but he also carved out an autonomous Khitan principality centered around Linhuang to further undermine their power. Li was also assigned to march into Korea to once more place that peninsula under Chinese vassalage, and so impressed/intimidated the King of Silla that he bent the knee without bloodshed. All this paled in comparison to the buildup of military forces in the south against Nam Việt, which Renzong was planning to assail & restore to Chinese possession with the support of the allies he'd cultivated in Kambuja and Champa.

ugsiTmT.png

An elegant ceremonial feast at the True Han court. Having unified and consolidated China once more, the Emperors could now both promote high culture at home and seek outward conquests, in hopes that theirs would ultimately be the dynasty to bring about another golden age for Chinese civilization like their namesake

In 933 the Christians captured Mosul without excessive bloodshed after the city's governor surrendered to Prince Michael, who was honor-bound to respect the terms of their agreement and hold back any attempt among his army to sack the city even if he would personally much rather have stormed & conquered it in glorious battle. Under direct orders from his father he even refrained from harassing the Nestorians who comprised the majority of Mosul's Christian population, despite his contempt for their passivity and unwillingness to answer his prior entreaties for an uprising within the walls. It was the intention of Aloysius IV to eventually suppress the Monophysite & Nestorian churches not through force (at least not entirely), but by reconciling those misguided sheep who held to these heretical creeds to Ionian orthodoxy, and not driving said heretics back into the arms of the Muslims through unnecessary atrocities was certainly part of his plan: the diplomatically-minded Emperor believed that gaining the allegiance of the Christians of the Middle East would be critical to re-entrenching Roman control over the region, and that their unwillingness to fight for the Eastern Roman authorities (though he faulted the inability of said authorities to achieve a 100% conversion rate to Ionian Christianity for this, not a lack of religious tolerance per se) was a major factor in the loss of the Levant in the first place.

From Mosul, the crusading army in Assyria pushed onward to secure the rest of the Nineveh Plains. The 'Michaelites', as the fourth-born Aloysian prince's followers came to be known, consistently volunteered to ride in their vanguard and played an important role in the Battle of Beth Khdeda[4], where their furious charge shattered the front line of the larger but ill-trained Iraqi army and drove them into a rout. Michael himself took Shams al-Din prisoner in his pursuit of the Muslims, much to his amusement, although the Islamic general was released in a prisoner exchange before the end of the year; unlike Al-Farghani Ja'far was not in the habit of executing incompetent lieutenants who had failed him, and in any case Shams al-Din was an ardent loyalist of his, whose service (poor though it may be) he needed in the field. The crusaders spent the remainder of 933 mopping up Saracen resistance in the Plains and also in clearing the Sinjar Mountains with support from Cassian's Syrian forces before the court in Kufa agreed to another ceasefire with Emperor Aloysius, one which also extended to no longer mounting operations against the Ionians of Chaldea.

p9BoKA0.jpeg

The Knights of Saint Michael leading the decisive Christian charge at the Battle of Beth Khdeda, through which they broke Islamic control over the Nineveh Plains

While the First Crusade continued to wind down towards its conclusion, fighting elsewhere in the Islamic world was continuing to ramp up, much to Vizier Ja'far's chagrin. Despite losing Bamyan to the Indo-Romans in the spring, the Northern Alids managed to fend off their foe's march on Kunduz and also won the Battle of Ghazni in autumn. Heightened Uighur incursions against his Tocharian vassals compelled Belisarios III to seek a peace settlement so he could secure his northern flank, and after negotiations which lasted from summer into early autumn Abu al-Faraj concluded a peace treaty with Belisarios that freed him up to go after the senior Hashemites. That he had to cede any territory at all to the Indo-Romans, even temporarily, certainly hurt his image considering that his entire claim to the Chair of the Prophet was supposedly based on his martial superiority & dynamism compared to the indolent Abd al-Aziz in Kufa, but he hoped to compensate for the blows to his prestige with victory in the west. To bolster his ranks after all that campaigning in the mountains of Afghanistan, Abu al-Faraj signed treaties reminiscient of a Roman foedus with several Oghuz Turkic warlords dwelling to the north of Khorasan and Khwarezm, promising them generous land settlements and that he would not even try to break up their tribes when they came to live as his vassals in exchange for their military support against the senior Hashemite branch in Iraq.

The Northern Alid entry into the war was of little consequence to the Roman crusaders, but it did pose a huge new risk to both the Iraqi Hashemites and the zanj. Huge masses of fresh Turkic and Persian soldiers emerging from Al-Jibal made quick work of both the Iraqi armies and Musa's militias in the field, inflicting significant defeats upon the former at the Battle of Hulwan and the latter at Ramhurmuz and Tustar. By the year's end Alid forces were besieging Samarra, raiding around Baghdad and Al-Ahwaz, much to the consternation and horror of both Ja'far and Musa. That the Iraqis had agreed not to attempt any new offensives against Chaldea as a condition for their latest truce with Aloysius IV helped the Vizier mitigate his losses somewhat by freeing up troops who would otherwise be sent to fight & die in the marshes to combat the Alids instead, and since the Ionians of Yoalaha stood between him and Musa, the Hashemites of Kufa now found themselves on perfect (if precarious) grounds to enter into an unofficial alliance of convenience with the zanj: for reasons of legitimacy neither could formalize a coalition with the other, of course, but as long as Abu al-Faraj was on their backs they could & would avoid re-engaging hostilities in favor of throwing everything they had at the newcomer.

Further south in Africa, the Nubians were striving to profit from the disintegration of Hashemite authority beyond the Red Sea. Having expanded a ways into Upper Egypt already, King Hêlias went to war with the fractious sultanates and emirates emerging from former Caliphal Abyssinia, many of which had begun to fight one another for territory and resources even before he came onto the scene. Nubia did not have the strength to revive the Aksumite Empire in full, but it proved strong enough to completely subjugate or otherwise root out the Muslims of the eastern & southern Abyssinian Highlands, expanding beyond Lake Tana to conquer the market town of Gondar and ultimately pushing so far as to recapture the ruins of old Axum itself before their advance was contained by resistance from the Sultanates of Aussa and Shewa. The Jewry of Abyssinia also took the opportunity to reassert their own independence for the first time in many centuries following Aksumite and Islamic subjugation, reviving their ancient Kingdom of Semien west of Axum.

oXDBn2a.jpeg

Though the rebuilding of the Aksumite Empire in its full glory still lay beyond their grasp, the victories of the First Crusade and consequent crumbling of the Hashemite Caliphate did give the Christians of Abyssinia breathing room to effect a cultural & spiritual revival under the aegis of their Nubian brethren, pushing the Saracens from large parts of their mountain homeland and revitalizing many churches which had been left in ruins or converted into mosques over the past centuries

In Western Eurasia at least, 934 was a year dominated by the complex peace negotiations between Aloysius IV and Ja'far. The Emperor did not budge from his initial demands: the concession of all territories thus far reconquered by the Romans (now adding Assyria to Anatolia, the South Caucasus, Upper Mesopotamia, parts of Transjordan and eastern Syria in the case of Iraq), the restoration of the Babylonian Patriarchate and religious freedom for Ionians within Iraq's borders. The difference was that now, the situation for Ja'far and the Kufan court had deteriorated to the point where he saw no option but to accept these demands, lest the war actually end with the Christians marching into Kufa. More complicated was the situation with Yoalaha and the Chaldeans – Aloysius' demand that they be granted self-governance in far southern Iraq once the heretics of Musa were dealt with really was a bridge too far for Ja'far, but in turn neither the Augustus Imperator nor Yoalaha himself were any more willing to trust the Vizier's offer of amnesty now than they were a few years ago when the subject was first broached. An offer to send crusader forces through Iraq to suppress the heretics was also shot down out of hand, as Ja'far found the prospect of a Christian army moving unhindered through his domain and probably entrenching their puppet in part of it totally unacceptable.

Ultimately, the involved parties reached a delicate compromise on the matter late in the year. Ja'far would indeed issue an amnesty to the Chaldean Ionians who would lay down their arms, and not seek vengeance against them so long as they bent the knee and went back to being good, tax-paying subjects of the Caliphate. Those who did not trust anything less than the safety which came with living in a Christian-ruled kingdom could depart for Roman territory, led by Yoalaha, and the Vizier further pledged that they could pass through his territories unmolested: this turned out to be a much larger group than Ja'far had hoped or expected, numbering in the many thousands. In exchange, Iraqi forces would be allowed to peaceably re-occupy the Chaldean territories presently held by Ionian militias, which they would then promptly use against both the Northern Alids and Musa's heretics. Ja'far conceded to Aloysius on every other point for the sake of peace and the removal of Roman pressure all along his western flank, freeing up thousands more troops for redeployment against his enemies on other fronts and averting continued crusader advances on Arbil[5] or Kirkuk. Thus, this 'Peace of Nineveh' – signed in the remains of that ancient city, now a Christian district of Mosul – brought a formal conclusion to the First Crusade, seventeen years after it had begun.

ZPgMvCe.png

Caliph Abd al-Aziz receiving terms from Aloysius IV in Kufa, while the Grand Vizier Ja'far stands next to him. The latter's enemies in the Islamic world likened him to a cockroach, both for his odious & scheming nature and for his ability to survive many simultaneous crises that would have destroyed anyone else

Ja'far's acceptance of the Emperor's peace terms did not sit well with the Islamic world, where his many enemies now had more ammunition with which to paint him as an inept and illegitimate usurper-in-all-but-name ruling through a feckless puppet and giving their hard-won conquests away to the deplorable Rūmī. The Turkic tribes settled by his predecessor across Anatolia & Arminiya, who had since been displaced by the crusader advance (unless they bent the knee to Aloysius, converted to Christianity and agreed to settle down as tenant farmers bound to the returning Greek & Armenian elites), obviously took issue with his surrender of the territories they had once been given and joined up with their kindred in the army of Abu Al-Faraj. Together they stormed Samarra and viciously sacked that city in a great outpouring of their frustrations, though they could not bring a decisive blow down on the heads of Ja'far and all who still followed him – the Vizier successfully defended Kufa and Shams al-Din defended Baghdad from their attacks.

The First Crusade was not the only long-running war to finally reach its official conclusion this year, as the new Salankayana Samrat Nagavaloka achieved a final victory in the Battle of Halawar[6] before going on to ink a peace treaty with the Southern Alids' Sultan Abu Ja'far in Ujjayini[7] in the summer of 934. According to the terms of the Treaty of Ujjayini, Abu Ja'far had to concede many territories south and east of Delhi to the triumphant Salankayanas, although he did continue to hold that particular city and its environs as the lynchpin of his realm's newly truncated eastern frontier. Nagavaloka had not failed to notice that the Chandras of Bengal had failed to assist him in this latest struggle with the Muslims, not that he particularly minded since it meant he did not have to split the spoils of victory; still, they had by far been one of the weaker dynasties in India and he thought it was high time he annexed the eastern lands into the Salankayana empire. It was the Samrat's ambition to unify India, or at least the myriad lands once held by the Hephthalites, into a more properly consolidated and durable empire which would be better-equipped to contain or better still, roll back the eastern border of Dar al-Islam.

xB9L5Gt.jpeg

An Indian maiden places a garland of flowers around the neck of a golden statue of Nagavaloka. Though the Samrat had won much esteem among his subjects already for achieving the biggest Indian victories over the Muslims since the time of his ancestor Simhavishnu, there was still much to do in his lifetime, for he was certain that in order to further build on his triumphs, India had to be reunited under one dynasty much like Christendom had been under the Aloysians

935 dawned over a very uneasy peace between the Christian world and the Banu Hashim. Ja'far actually kept his end of the deal struck with Aloysius IV and did not immediately attack the Chaldean Ionians the instant they exited their fortifications, not necessarily because he had a strong sense of honor but simply for the sake of pragmatism: he needed every soldier he could muster to hold off the Alids, Kharijites, Zanj, etc. and was grateful to finally have the Romans off his back & Yoalaha's Ionians out of his hair. Yoalaha himself and his followers (not only warriors but also their families as well as non-combatants, such as Ionian clergy) were able to march through the central Mesopotamian countryside with a minimum of harassment & skirmishes with the Iraqis, often related to the Ionian militiamen 'foraging' for additional supplies at the expense of local Mashriqi Arab villagers. Perhaps a time would come when Iraq found itself in a strong enough position to once more crack down on these Christians, but that time was clearly quite far off still.

The real trouble started once Ja'far barred passage around Kufa into the western desert and towards the Syrian border, citing these periodic clashes between his men and Yoalaha's over supplies. The Ionians instead entered northern Iraq, large parts of which were now under Alid occupation, on their road to Assyria – and Abu Al-Faraj, of course, had signed no treaty with the Emperor, nor was he inclined to guarantee safe passage to this newfound mob of armed Christians trespassing through territory which he intended to claim (even if the need to preserve his forces against the senior Hashemites also compelled him to not attack them unless it became necessary). Alid cavalrymen shadowed the Christian column, initially without attacking them, until Yoalaha ran out of supplies and pillaged the town of Al-Ishaqi near Samarra for more. The Sultan took a definitively hostile stance against the Ionian Chaldeans from then on and personally led his army to defeat Yoalaha in the Battle of Samarra when they crossed near the city not long afterward, killing and enslaving thousands. News of this event was well-received at the court in Kufa, where Ja'far certainly had no problem with one of his enemies battling another faction that used to be his foe until yesterday and would doubtless be an enemy to his descendants; the more they bled each other, the better for his faction of the Banu Hashim, in his view.

Yoalaha was among those who escaped the slaughter outside Samarra, but the Alids did not let up and although Abu al-Faraj soon found himself busy with new battles around Baghdad, he assigned the Turkic warlord and Islamic convert Qasim ad-Dawla Atsiz to continue trailing and harassing the dwindling Christian column as it hastened toward the safety of Roman Assyria. Violent skirmishes with their pursuers, hunger and disease wore the Ionians down to scarcely more than 3,000 (of whom perhaps 300 were veterans of the war in Chaldea) by the time they approached the Assyrian border, an 80% reduction from their original number upon departing Wasit. These ragged survivors would certainly have been doomed when Qasim ad-Dawla went in for the kill on the eve of autumn, storming toward the Christians in force shortly after they passed the village of Qayyarah, had it not been for Prince Michael having also kept an increasingly close eye on their progress and electing to intervene even without orders from his father, and despite such intervention technically violating the terms of the Peace of Nineveh since he hardly sought Ja'far's permission either.

Michael took just about the entirety of his order's strength – by now reinforced to around 200 knights, and further including over three times that number in lowborn 'sergeants' recruited from the ranks of both the Auxilia Christi and local Ionians living in Assyria, for a force that was just shy of 1,000 strong – with him on this unauthorized incursion into nominally Iraqi (though in practice Alid-controlled) territory. The Battle of Qayyarah which followed, while not counted among the battles of the First Crusade since it happened after the Peace of Nineveh, solidified the Michaelites' reputation for courage and zeal in the face of poor odds: their appearance forced Qasim ad-Dawla to break off his planned attack on the crude wagon-fort the Ionian Chaldeans had desperately pulled together around themselves, and though he was outnumbered 5:1 Michael caught his foe by surprise in leading the knights, assembled into an offensive wedge, on a charge which broke the Alid lines before Qasim could finish reforming for a field battle.

7HyA2kv.jpeg

Michael of Constantinople staring down the Alid cavalry detachment shadowing him and the Chaldeans he is escorting toward Assyria, confident in the knowledge that they would not dare attack after he mauled their allies at Qayyarah

Qasim himself was hurriedly trying to rearrange his front line when the Michaelites smashed into his formation and consequently was among the first Muslims to fall, slain by the lance of Michael himself, after which his leaderless army soon scattered. Fortunately for the Christians, that Michael prevailed with this single decisive blow meant he did not have to rely on his enthusiastic but barely trained Assyrian volunteers or even involve them in the battle significantly, which would surely have caused him trouble. Yoalaha & his few remaining followers sang the Michaelites' praises as the latter escorted them back to Assyria, immortalizing the knights as heralds of salvific victory to their fellow Christians and dreadful angels of death in the eyes of the Saracen. Meanwhile Michael himself lamented that he could go no further as apparently Deus did not yet Vult a Christian reconquest of Mesopotamia any more than He did Egypt; no matter, he promised to the Chaldeans, one day the chi-rho would once more fly over the Persian Gulf as it once did in the day of Emperor Sabbatius.

While his second-youngest son was off on that unauthorized Iraqi adventure, Aloysius IV himself had been consolidating Christian control over their last acquisitions in Assyria, which he organized into a new duchy with Beth Khdida as its capital. The Emperor selected one of the first Assyrian magnates to convert to Ionian Christianity, Eliyah Maroghin, to rule as its first Duke in order to highlight the benefits of conversion & collaboration to the still-Nestorian majority of the locals; Yoalaha & the Chaldean refugees meanwhile were to be settled among them, hopefully impart some knowledge of war unto the Assyrians who had been a demilitarized population and thus inexperienced in military matters until now, and could expect to be installed as lords in southern Mesopotamia if a future crusade should expand Christendom's border toward the Persian Gulf. He also upbraided Michael for the latter's recklessness in charging into Islamic Iraq without so much as informing him, but immediately followed by praising him for taking the initiative to save their Chaldean brethren in the faith. The Augustus Imperator did also issue a formal charter acknowledging the Michaelite Order and authorizing them to recruit & establish offices throughout Christendom at this time, starting with the Al-Aqsa Mosque which he awarded to his son so that it might serve as their headquarters in the Levant.

The Michaelites were not the only Christian military order to take off toward the end of the First Crusade. Sigmar von Feuchtwangen, now Lord of Sepphoris, had taken no wife and sired no children even in his mid-life years; but it is said that he was struck by the beauty and devotion of Aloysius' eldest daughter, now Sister Maria, upon seeing her enter his new fief to honor the Virgin Mary as part of her Holy Land pilgrimage. Unfortunately for him, not only was she now a nun and by all accounts stridently devoted to her religious calling, but even if she were not a lowly knight of no great lineage had no realistic chances of wedding an imperial princess of the Domus Aloysiani. Still, they managed to strike up a friendship over the feast Von Feuchtwangen had prepared to welcome Maria into his new keep and were inspired by word of her brother's deeds to seek another charter for their own military order: the Most Valiant Order of Knights of Saint Gabriel of the Annunciation. Centered around Sepphoris and the hospital & orphanage which Maria would found in Jerusalem at the conclusion of her pilgrimage (and indeed where she would remain for the rest of her days), these 'Gabrielites' were distinguished from the Michaelites by their greater emphasis on hospitaller duties (while Clement of Cluny did become the rector of a hospital in Damascus, his order was perceived as one more exclusively warlike than that of St. Gabriel) and their recruitment base being in the Germanic kingdoms, as opposed to the latter which would chiefly attract recruits from the Latin realms under the jurisdiction of the Roman See such as Gaul, Burgundy, the British Isles and Italy.

I479top.png

The standard of the Order of St. Gabriel, popularly considered to be the slightly less violent and more hospitaller-inclined 'brother-order' of the Michaelites. Together they formed the senior half of the great crusading orders of the Chivalric Age, though it would be some time still before their 'junior brothers' named after the remaining Cardinal-Archangels would emerge

While Aloysius prepared to finally go home and turn his attention back to domestic affairs after eighteen years on the campaign trail and the emergence of military orders further symbolized the renewed ascendancy of Christendom in the Levant, the Islamic world remained mired in bitter internecine conflict and decline. Ja'far managed to defeat Abu Al-Faraj in the Second Battle of Baghdad by surprising his siege camp with a nighttime march & reinforcements from Al-Urdunn while Shams al-Din sallied from behind the walls, but they still lacked the strength to expel the Alids from northern Iraq even after Michael's intervention (which the Vizier officially denounced, though he took no further action against the Christians and was secretly grateful for anything that weakened his newest adversary). Hashemite and Zanj forces moved into the forts and towns vacated by Yoalaha's forces, pushing the front line of the Zanj Rebellion back south of Wasit for the first time in years; that said, clashes between the two remained sporadic as the Alid threat was still their shared priority, something stressed by the latter's brutal conquest of Al-Ahwaz and further devastation of that city in this year, though it had already been greatly damaged by the initial zanj takeover and then infighting. Ja'far also diverted additional troops from the Hejaz for a major counter-offensive aimed at regaining Samarra, though this further hindered his ability to repel the escalating Kharijite attacks around the Holy Cities.

====================================================================================

[1] Resafa.

[2] The former site of Avaris.

[3] Duhok.

[4] Qaraqosh.

[5] Arbela – Erbil.

[6] Alwar.

[7] Ujjain.
 

PsihoKekec

Swashbuckling Accountant
Thus ends the first and probably the grandest of crusades, but muslim woes are far from over. I reckon that even with full out war, the opportunistic raiding into Chrisitian territory will start soon enough.
 

ATP

Well-known member
Well,Zanji survived,interesting for how long.To be honest,i do not thought that they keep figting.And,after some of them get Spartacus treatment,iexpected their loss.

Two knight orders - good,but ,since one of them is german,they should conqer prussian now!
And lithuanians and other baltic people,too.
They were not united yet - and considering everytching,never would be here.
 

shangrila

Well-known member
The Teutons as the hospitallers is amusing. And I guess the Aloysian distrust of the Stilichians is going to be Egypt's greatest defense for some time.

Also, I don't think Baghdad would exist in this timeline. Baghdad's founding was caused by the internal politics of the early Abbasid Caliphate. The (historical) Alids, that is proto-Shia, backed the Abbasid overthrow of the Umayyad Caliphate with the understanding that an Alid would become Caliph, but were betrayed. Kufa was a bastion of pro-Alid support, and so the Abbasids needed to move their capitol elsewhere, and thus founded Baghdad for that purpose. Without (yet) a Sunni-Shia conflict or any anti-government movement in Kufa, there would be no reason to found a new capitol city. Ctesiphon-Seleucia would remain the primary metropolis on that stretch of the Tigris.
 

Circle of Willis

Well-known member
Funny enough, the RL Teutons did actually get their start by running a hospital (the Hospital of St. Mary of the German House in Jerusalem - their motto of 'Help, Defend, Heal/Helfen, Wehren, Heilen' even seems to take after this history), though of course that was largely overshadowed in short order by their attempts at state-building. As well it was historically the Hospitallers who predated the Templars by a couple years, not the other way around. But regardless, the military orders surely won't be lacking for work in the future.

Re: Baghdad, my thinking for its existence ITL was that old Ctesiphon would have been badly ravaged earlier than was the case historically due to the early fall of the Sassanids followed by mismanagement & civil strife under the Hephthalites, a very short period of recovery under the Eastern Romans, and then getting flattened by the even more destructive Southern Tiele Turks before the final Arab conquest of the region. But that is a good point that having comfortably settled at Kufa, the Banu Hashim don't really have much need to build a whole new capital at Baghdad, and even if the ancestors of the Mashriqi Arabs of Iraq prefer to settle there it still wouldn't grow to the Ctesiphon-overshadowing extent that it reached under the RL Abbasids. Going forward I might just refer to the main Muslim city in that part of Iraq as Al-Mada'in (the Arab name for the broader Ctesiphon-Seleucia metropolis) instead.
 

PsihoKekec

Swashbuckling Accountant
So Baghdad would remain one of many cities along Tigris, unless it's good position draws some changes in the future.
 

PsihoKekec

Swashbuckling Accountant
I was thinking, having proven their effectiveness during the Seven Years War and the First Crusade (probably called The Crusade by the people, until the second happens), does anyone intend to copy the longbowmen? It wouldn't be easy though, it's not enough to learn how to make yew longbows and give men a bit training, you have to establish a tradition of training from youth, can't really do it with serfs.
 
Last edited:

ATP

Well-known member
I was thinking, having proven their effectiveness during the Seven Years War an the First Crusade (probably called The Crusade by the people, until the second happens), does anyone intend to copy the longbowmen? It wouldn't be easy though, it's not enough to learn how to make yew longbows and give men a bit training, you have to establish a tradition of training from youth, can't really do it with serfs.
Yep.That it why it not worked expect England in medieval times,and die there when they become protestants.
But here? every country with free farmers could copy them.

Considering how effective they were against irish,i expect many longbowmens there.
 

shangrila

Well-known member
Improving the crossbow would be much easier than trying to replicate the longbowman on a larger scale, which nobody in real life ever managed despite the English Longbow's equally decisive successes.

Chinese crossbows were much more mechanically efficient than Western crossbows for instance, and so could achieve much higher rates of fire with similar power. Western crossbows were horrendously inefficient because (1) the primitive trigger forces a very short power stroke, which (2) forces an extremely short and heavy bow to achieve sufficient power, which (3) forces a very heavy string to handle the strain. The heavy bow and string waste a lot of energy to move, forcing the system to need more energy to impart necessary force to the projectile, meaning a heavier bow, heavier string, etc etc. The cycle ultimately results in needing extremely complex loading mechanisms for projectile energy not that much greater than a longbow.

It's not implausible for healthier silk road trade to cause more tech spread, and the large centralized Roman fabricae to mass produce the result. It's actually kind of weird that Chinese crossbow triggers never made it to the west, considering it was invented around the time of Alexander the Great, though it's true all the intervening peoples were horse archer societies with no use for crossbows.
 

PsihoKekec

Swashbuckling Accountant
I realised that the ''how often do you think of Roman republic/empire'' is for me ''how often do you think of Roman republic/empire/Vivat Stilicho''. So the latest thing I found myself ruminating about is that with muslims in Egypt being reduced to the parts of the country that are not exactly abundant in trees, thus the shipbuilding in muslim controlled part of Mediterran is next to dead so the best they can hope for is some limited piracy, which means Mediterran is once again a Roman lake.
 

shangrila

Well-known member
Well, once the Nile-Red Sea canal silts up again because the central government can't afford maintenance at least. If the Caliphate manages to reunite, their remaining territory can still support plenty of ships, and can bring in ships and wood to support a campaign in the Levant.
 
936-940: The Great Emancipator

Circle of Willis

Well-known member
Come 936, with the First Crusade now having reached its definitive conclusion, Christendom once more began to turn its attention inward. Upon landing in Constantinople Aloysius IV went on a lengthy overland march, practically an imperial progress packed with one victory parade after another all the way from the eastern capital back to his own at Trévere, with the biggest celebration happening in Rome as the apex of his looping movement through Italy: there the Senate awarded him and the imperial army a proper triumph, and he also turned over an assortment of relics, treasures and captured Islamic banners to Pope Leo IV, who then died satisfied with knowledge of the Crusade's success a few months later. Once reunited with his wife and youngest children there, the first policy which the Augustus Imperator issued was one of tax relief: after a thorough accounting of the riches gained from looting of their enemies' possessions and the sacking of cities such as Antioch & Jerusalem, he determined that the crusaders (and of course his own imperial treasury) had accumulated enough wealth that he could in fact afford to waive the collection of taxes & tribute for this entire year and probably the next too. This was naturally an enormously popular policy across the Christian world, with even the smallest and sleepiest hamlets now welcoming the volunteers who departed their hovels as conquering heroes who also brought back non-taxable income in the form of plunder, even as they also alternately mourned and celebrated the martyrdom of those who did not return.

Aloysius was not done however, and next moved on to the long-term project nearest and dearest to his heart since he was young: further attacks on the institution of slavery. Though long advised by all but his most fervently abolitionist British advisers that total abolition was not feasible, the Emperor had committed to as much of an anti-slavery course as he imagined was possible and now having won a decisive victory over the Islamic empire whose fortune was built on slavery as much as old Rome's, he finally had amassed the political capital to push some major structural reforms through. Speaking extensively of how the march of the crusaders had freed many tens, nay, hundreds of thousands of Christians held in bondage by the Saracen wherever they advanced and praising the rebel zanj who had converted to (Ionian) Christianity at the behest of Mar Shimoun & fought for their freedom (while studiously ignoring the heretics of Musa), Aloysius presented and passed laws which – while not forbidding slavery entirely – would forevermore forbid the enslavement of Christians within the borders of the Holy Roman Empire without exception. Slaves who had undergone baptism at any point in life were to be freed immediately, which meant the vast majority of the pre-war slaves on the latifundiae of Southern Europe (many of whom were of Slavic extraction) would now lose their chains, and funds were allotted from the Emperor's share of loot from the Crusade to compensate their owners.

Henceforth serfdom would come to definitively supplant slavery as the most common mode of unfree labor across Christian Europe, since most of the new freedmen ended up having to work for their old masters again or, ironically, for fellow Slavic landlords should they return to the Balkan kingdoms due to lack of other opportunities. But at least they could keep a greater part of the crops they reaped and enjoyed some legal protections now, something which could not be said for their replacements – assorted Saracens & Jews carried off from the Middle East as war captives by the returning crusaders, or pagans (northeastern Slavs, Finno-Ugric peoples, Turks, etc.) sold to Italian and Khazar merchants by Polish, Ruthenian or Caucasian raiding parties. Aloysius' emancipatory reforms did unintentionally create a perverse incentive for masters to now never allow their remaining slaves anywhere near a Bible, priest or baptismal font, which he seems to have been at least somewhat aware of, because he also pushed through an additional 'law of the free womb' that dictated that any child born to a slave on Roman soil should be immediately baptized like any free-born infant and be brought up as a Christian – necessarily meaning they'd be free under his first great anti-slavery law. Creation of another perverse incentive to launch endless wars & raids against non-Christian lands to seek out replacement slaves since no more could be born in the Empire's borders aside; his passage of these laws earned Aloysius IV the nickname by which he would be remembered for all time, 'The Great Emancipator'.

WCAkffq.jpeg

Priests armed with Aloysius IV's edict on the immediate emancipation of Christian slaves freeing such slaves in the streets of Rome. The Emperor claimed the Crusade's success proved that God was with him in his lifelong endeavor to liberate those bound in slavery, and personally regarded this to be as big of an achievement on his part as taking back Jerusalem

While the Christians enjoyed the spoils of victory, a break from taxes and the loosening of many a chain in their sphere, the heart of the Islamic world remained mired in both despair over their latest defeat – the most crushing in Muslim history so far – and, of course, the turmoil of continued civil war & rebellion. Ja'far and his generals, including Shams al-Din, went forth from Al-Mada'in[1] with the reinforcements they had gathered from Al-Urdunn and Hejaz this year to push the Northern Alids out of north-central Iraq. Their efforts culminated in the successful Siege of Samarra, where he was able to avoid taking excessive losses which he could ill-afford by browbeating & bribing the defenders into giving up with a slice of the wealth he had gathered over his lengthy tenure as Grand Vizier (indeed, next to survival, self-enrichment was also one of his great successes while in office). Abu al-Faraj was further distracted by an additional threat on the other side of his sprawling kingdom in the form of his own kindred, as Abu Ja'far was no longer at war with the Indians and could now fight to reunite the Alids under his own leadership.

However, it was not all smooth sailing for the Iraqis this year. Ibn Junaydah took advantage of the depletion of the Hashemite defenses in the Hejaz to ratchet up his attacks in the region, and while he was unable to immediately seize Mecca and Medina as he might have hoped, the Kharijites were able to expand into Najran and the 'Asir region, the latter of which they conquered with surprisingly little bloodshed simply by flipping the allegiance of the Azdi tribes living there. Critically, a great wave of warriors bursting out of the Nejd and Rub al-Khali deserts under Ibn Junaydah's command were able to drive a geographic wedge between the Holy Cities apart late in this year, surging all the way up to Jeddah. That great port's defenses had been neglected and allowed to decay under the more recent Hashemite Caliphs, who believed it could never be threatened due to their secure control over the lands around the Red Sea, so Ibn Junaydah was able to storm & sack it without great difficulty. The rapid fall of Jeddah not only astonished the Kufan court, which had assumed the forces they left in Hejaz should still be sufficient to keep the barbaric Khawarij at bay, but it also left Mecca dangerously isolated – Jeddah was the main port of entry for not only pilgrims, but also supply caravans bound for that southernmost of the two Holy Cities of Islam, and between both its loss and the Kharijites' control over the territories south of Medina, they now had no way to reinforce or resupply their garrison down there.

UXDQhAo.jpeg

Kharijite raiders confronting a caravan of pilgrims in the Arabian desert, bearing a simple demand: they will hand over their money & goods, or their lives. While the zealot Ibn Junaydah would prefer to simply kill all who he denounced as idolaters and heretics, he had enough practical sense to want to build up his war-chest first

In 937, the aging Aloysius took some time to sort out some final family matters in-between enforcing the new laws he had passed the previous year. His youngest son Septimus, now a man grown, had been too young to participate in the Crusade at all and instead remained at home alone out of the Aloysian household's boys, where with his sisters he had been a source of consolation for Elena in the nearly-twenty years that his father and older brothers were off fighting in the Middle East; unfortunately for him, this doomed him to a reputation as not only the last but also the least of the sons of Aloysius the Emancipator and Helena the Fair. Aloysius himself did not share the low opinion of the chroniclers however, and named this fifth son of his Duke of Hamaland (a large territory to which the counties of Brabant and Hainaut were assigned) – making him lord of the ancient homeland of the Chamavi tribe of Franks from which the Aloysians were descended, just as his new neighbors the Merovingians of Flanders ruled the Salian Frankish homeland.

As for his third daughter and youngest child Theodora, who turned fifteen this year, the Emperor and Empress sought a worthy match for her hand. While her sister Serena had married inside the Holy Roman Empire, she would not, for such a match was found in the independent Slavic realms to the east – by now Poland and Ruthenia had concluded their second war over Volhynia, with the latter prevailing and recapturing the lands lost to the former in their first bout. It was decided that, since not only was Ruthenia the victor this time but Poland had already obtained Aloysian blood ties with the wedding of their king Bożydar to his great-grandaunt Scantilla in the eighth century, Theodora should now wed Daniel Yaroslavovich, the popular eldest son and heir of the Grand Prince of the Ruthenians. Yaroslav and Daniel both had to swear to support the Romans whenever they waged war against heathen and Saracen again as part of the agreement for this marriage, however.

In the Holy Land, the sons of Aloysius IV who remained were taking steps to further strengthen their hold on their Levantine territories (which the Frankish crusaders, themselves included, popularly referred to as 'Outremer' – 'beyond the sea') and to prepare for a future round of hostilities with the Muslims, which they collectively believed to be inevitable should said Muslims ever regain their footing. Aloysius Caesar presided over the reconstruction of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre (sticking as closely to the original building plan of Constantine I and his mother Helena as humanly possible), and also managed a careful balancing act of both rewarding those crusaders who sought to settle in the Holy Land to their satisfaction and recruiting the local Christians into positions of some authority so as to retain their loyalty. Most notably he further organized his personal conquests beyond the Jordan into the County of Oultrejourdain, which he awarded to his trusted friend and lieutenant Renier (Old Ger.: 'Raginheri', Gal.: 'Rainier') de Triecht[2] to govern from Charach, but not before first gaining the co-operation of or at least reasonably friendly relations with the local populace, who by this point were largely Bedouin nomads.

Constantine meanwhile not only tended to the spiritual needs of the Christians (new and old both) of Bethlehem, where the Church of the Nativity was repaired and expanded with the help of faithful pilgrims, but also formed part of a larger team of clerics & sages studying a substantial collection of Islamic works captured by the Christians (the ones which they hadn't put to the torch, at least) so that they might be better understood and if need be, refuted. While quite a few useful things would in time be learned from researching this pool of knowledge, one of the first that Constantine determined was that Islam was not merely an iconoclastic Christian heresy, but in fact so distinct that it had to be recognized as an entirely separate rival religion; his publications would henceforth alter Christendom's outlook on its relations & wars with the Islamic world. His twin Michael was eager to expand the ranks of his own military order, attracting recruits from both Europe and the Middle East to fight beneath the standard depicting God's chief general smiting the Devil. In order to support the highborn knights and common sergeants against the mounted archers of the enemy, the Prince & Grandmaster worked to revive Syria's ancient reputation for archery and cultivate a corps of expert Syriac bowmen, mostly on foot, while also recruiting Arab Christians and Turkic converts who had bent the knee to his father to serve as auxiliary horse-archers & camelry – units which were collectively dubbed 'Turcopoles', the 'sons of Turks'. He also sought to popularize the habit of fastening great 'wings' made of wood and feathers onto the saddle, once famously done by Aloysius I and now revived by himself, among his fellow knights, thereby lending them the appearance of avenging armored angels; this he found to greatly intimidate the Saracens and their steeds both in previous battles, but of course there had been no time for him to get the trend to catch on back then.

5yC4lFa.jpeg

A Turcopole of the growing Michaelite ranks, one of the Christian Turks (probably one with a Christian Arab, Caucasian or Greek mother) who were rarest among their kind after the Christian Arabs & native Syriac Christians. In general, the twin sons of Aloysius IV took leading roles in integrating the Outremer back into the Christian sphere in their own very different ways

In Iraq, Ja'far turned to unorthodox solutions to try to escape the corner he was increasingly being pushed into between the Alids, the Zanj and the Kharijites. He started the year with additional offensives against Abu al-Faraj – the Holy Cities were in more danger than he had originally anticipated, true, but as far as he was concerned, he had no hope of coming to their relief (or if need be, retaking them from his enemies) unless he first saved himself & his Iraqi power-base. The Grand Vizier had some more luck in pushing the Northern Alids back, winning the Battle of Daskara al-Malik[3] and recapturing Tikrit in another bloody engagement which destroyed that city's central Green Church (although to appease the Romans & demonstrate that he would not violate the Peace of Nineveh's terms anytime soon, Ja'far allowed the local Christians to rebuild it with their own funds). By the year's end the Iraqis had regained control of their northern territories back up to the Roman border, on the edge of the Nineveh Plain.

This however was merely the first step in Ja'far's new strategy for dealing with the Northern Alids. Having proven that the cause of the Banu Hashim was not quite as dead as may have been thought toward the end of the First Crusade, he now had some grounds on which to secretly negotiate with the Turkic vassals of Abu al-Faraj and strive to turn them to his side. That the Southern Alids were also marching through the lightly-defended eastern border provinces of Abu al-Faraj's kingdom and soon threatened his capital of Herat also made it look less likely that his would be the winning side, and thus there might be more profit to be had from siding with Kufa. Ja'far pledged to recognize the young & ambitious Saif al-Islam Ghazi as Atabeg of Kirkuk, promised both Hasan ud-Din Bursuq and Fakhr ad-Dawla Toghan rule over Erbil behind one another's backs, and promised various other chiefs far larger stretches of Persia than Abu al-Faraj dared to ever consider giving away. The Vizier was prepared to promise these warlords just about anything under the Sun to get them to turn their coats; though knowing his character, he no doubt also planned to betray those who demanded too much in his view, and as the example of Erbil demonstrated, he certainly was not above trying to cheat and make mutually exclusive promises to rival parties while determining which one he should honor and which one he should stab in the back later.

ua9wJzE.png

Saif al-Islam Ghazi and his wives enjoying some of Ja'far's gifts. The Grand Vizier's corrupt habits may not have been healthy for the Caliphate as a whole, but it did provide him with a handsome slush fund for buying off his enemies in critical times such as these

In 938, while the Christians continued to enjoy the fruit of their victory (in a literal case of this, returning Spanish crusaders planted pomegranates in Bética[4]), the situation worsened still for Abu Al-Faraj as his capital at Herat fell to the army of Abu Ja'far. Though efforts had been made to reinforce the weak garrison with hastily recruited militiamen and allied Pashtun tribes from the mountains, the poorly-equipped locals were insufficiently trained by the time the Southern Alids showed up and the Pashtuns never even made it to the city, having began fighting one another after an insult over the dining table reignited rivalries among these fractious allies. Abu Ja'far also captured Abu Al-Faraj's family, although he treated them kindly since they were technically his kin as well, and with this victory felt sufficiently confident to declare himself Caliph in the Sindh region. The Sultan of the Northern Alids was aware that his erstwhile allies & vassals were doubtless coming to think of his cause as a sinking ship and so would soon seek lifeboats to the banners of Abu Ja'far, so he doubled down on trying to bring down Ja'far in Iraq to turn his ship around and regain their confidence.

These developments played to Ja'far's advantage, as it also helped him convince the wavering Turkic warlords in Abu al-Faraj's service that they were certainly making the right decision in betraying their present overlord for him. The Grand Vizier engaged Abu Al-Faraj's desperate offensive back toward Kufa in the Battle of the Zamwa Plain[5], on a battlefield surrounded by high mountains and hills, where he had dug the Sultan's grave ahead of time and was now striving to bring his intrigues to fruition. The Iraqi army's apparent vulnerability on the low ground invited the Alids to rush upon them from all sides, but their charge was repelled by the defenders' carefully arranged formation and the treachery of the various Turkic warbands (beginning with Saif al-Islam) sowed great confusion & terror in their ranks. Abu al-Faraj himself fled the field upon seeing what was happening, causing his remaining loyalists (including the Turks whose tribes had been settled in Anatolia originally and fled the crusader advances, giving them cause for enmity toward the uncaring government in Kufa) to melt away and flee in all directions, while the Hashemites & their new allies promptly decimated their routing foes in a great slaughter on the plain.

The Sultan tried to return to friendly territory in Persia, but was tracked down in the mountains around Zamwa by those same Turks who had just backstabbed him and his head brought back to Ja'far. In turn he then boasted that while his enemies likened him to a roach, they did so at their own peril, and that he fancied himself more of a leviathan (that is, a great whale): no matter how fiercely a storm might rage and the waves crash at sea, he was enough of a titan to comfortably lumber through it all. The Alids claimed that it was ability and not necessarily birthright which demonstrated which party Allah favors; had he not just demonstrated his the senior Hashemites' superiority by their own rules, then, even if he had to use his brain & intrigues rather than pure martial muscle? The Grand Vizier had even taken the opportunity to use the fog of battle to eliminate those warlords he found to be uncontrollable, chief among them Fakhr ad-Dawla who had threatened to go back to Abu al-Faraj and expose their plot if Ja'far didn't double his territory; Ja'far at first politely agreed, then made sure to have this would-be double-crosser struck down and immolated by a handpicked naffatun unit (who were supposedly aiming for the Alid troops around him) in the chaos on the Zamwa Plain, which incidentally also allowed him to avoid any conflict over Erbil with Hasan ud-Din and to bury all knowledge of his double-dealing behind the latter's back. Though not yet entirely out of the woods, Ja'far had radically turned his own fortunes around from the extremely troubled straits he was in just a few short years ago, and now set about unleashing his new vassals to go claim the territories he promised them while formerly-Alid Persia descended into anarchy.

DoZdzhZ.png

A model of Ja'far ibn al-'Awwam in his senior years, still standing tall (though the Islamic world groans beneath the weight of the most troubled period in its history up to this point) as the 'Leviathan of Iraq', much to the consternation of his many enemies

Ja'far did still have some difficulties in this otherwise triumphant year however, as the Kharijites to the south continued to tighten their grip on Hejaz. Control over Jeddah not only prevented the Hashemites from trying to resupply Mecca by sea, but it also gave Ibn Junaydah control over the main port of entry for pilgrims undertaking the Hajj, now representing a much-needed supply of income; although reverence of the Ka'aba and Islamic saints (wali) was tantamount to heretical idolatry as far as this puritanical warlord was concerned, unlike some of his lieutenants he was politically flexible enough to allow the Hajj to proceed, in exchange for hefty ransoms and 'protection' fees of course. These funds inevitably went into recruiting more tribes into his army, with which he aggressively raided the environs of the Holy Cities and drove the village-dwellers there behind their walls, though those walls still held fast as Ja'far promised their defenders relief sometime soon. First, however, he intended to crush the Zanj who now represented the next-closest threat to Kufa now that the Northern Alids were out of the picture.

On the other side of Eurasia, after many years of preparation Emperor Renzong of China finally embarked on a great campaign against Nam Việt, which he intended to return to the fold as the province of Jiaozhi. A Chinese army numbering over a quarter of a million men stormed towards the Red River delta by both land and sea, sweeping away the Vietnamese resistance they faced by both superiority of arms and sheer weight of numbers, while Khmer and Champan allies moved to chew up the border regions of far-western and southern Nam Việt respectively. By autumn the Chinese commander Zheng Shao reached Cổ Loa[6], the Vietnamese capital, where he found the Giáp royal court had evacuated along with the rest of the city's populace rather than try to fight his overwhelming forces. In letters composed within the ancient citadel of the Vietnamese kings Zheng boasted of his success and the apparent cowardice of their enemy to his liege, though in truth King Giáp Thừa Lang had merely withdrawn into the jungle-covered hills, mountains and river valleys of western Nam Việt where the Chinese would have great difficulty in following. There he had no intention of surrendering, but rather plotted to wage a lengthy guerrilla war to drive the returning would-be overlords out of his kingdom once more, taking advantage of efforts by his ancestors to settle & fortify the region precisely in preparation for this eventuality.

ho9AMwP.jpeg

Zheng Shao and his soldiers counting captives in Long Biên, one of many Vietnamese cities to fall to their initial advance. Between the massive numerical superiority of the Chinese army and attacks on other fronts, the Vietnamese king had little choice but to retreat to his western strongholds in much more defensible terrain

939 made it fully evident that the death of Abu al-Faraj in the mountains around the Zamwa Plain threw his dominion, which stretched from the Zagros Mountains to those which his former Persian subjects called the 'Hindu Kush', into bedlam. Abu Ja'far had thought that the Northern Alid emirs would surely fall in line behind his claim with their own claimant now out of the picture and his most immediate heirs trapped in a gilded cage in Mansura, but these hopes were dashed as only the southeasternmost governors bent the knee to him. Others worked to turn their emirates into independent fiefdoms, while the Turks ran rampant over the land at Ja'far's behest and the governor of Al-Jibal, Abu Ayyub al-Isfahani, tried to defect back to the Grand Vizier's side. Unfortunately for him, said Grand Vizier had already promised his territories to the Turkic warlord Hamid al-Din Chaghri, who then proceeded to assert the new order of things by vanquishing him in the Battle of Rayy.

By the year's end, the Hashemite Caliphate had once more extended its reach over much of western & central Persia as well as Khorasan on paper, but in practice the Turks had carved out their own sultanates across these lands. They might pledge nominal allegiance to the Caliph in Kufa and recognize him as the leader of the Islamic world, but in all other regards they were entirely independent, and their interpretation of Islam was a martial and meritocratic one that ironically had more in common with the view held by the Alids or even the Kharijites than the 'Ilm Islam of the Banu Hashim, which they regarded as an overly scholarly sect trapped in an ivory tower and too tightly insulated from reality. Aside from Hamid al-Din's dominion in the northern Zagros and Tabaristan which he elected to rule from Isfahan, Amin al-Din Arslan ruled Fars (southwestern Persia) from Shiraz, Baha' al-Din Burak reigned over Khorasan (northern & northeastern Persia) from the previously small and insignificant city of Sanabad[7] and Zahir al-Din Abaq ruled the far northern oases of Khwarezm from Urgench[8]. In establishing these kingdoms the Turks had to first overcome the governors left by the Northern Alids (who in more than a few cases were Alids themselves), which they did with great ferocity and martial skill, while Abu Ja'far and his loyalists remained to oppose them in Kerman and eastern Khorasan.

Gmklju8.png

The Shirazi court of Amin al-Din Arslan, new Turkic Sultan of Fars, which is clearly already beginning to incorporate Persian courtiers and culture

The situation in Iraq was little different, as although the central & southern lands around Kufa and Al-Mada'in remained under the Vizier's direct control, he had little choice but to accept the formation of similarly highly autonomous Turkic feudatories in the north around Kirkuk and Arbil as promised. Yet another Turkic chieftain, Mu'in ad-Din Sunqur, was sent against the Zanj with the promise of settlement around Basra; secretly the Vizier hoped they would destroy one another. There could be no doubt that these principalities (formally titled 'atabegates' rather than sultanates, implying a greater degree of submission to central Caliphal authority than the Turco-Persian kingdoms) further eroded Kufa's authority, but as far as Ja'far was concerned, that was a problem for his descendants to worry about – he was primarily interested in living to see another day. It was his hope that exposure to the Perso-Arabic high culture nurtured by the Caliphs would civilize the newly settled Turkic conquerors and make them more amenable to serving the government in fact as well as in name, as it had his own predecessors when they were but ghilman, but any transformation of the new sultanates into 'Persianate' entities was at least a few generations away at best.

As for the Zanj, Musa died this year from a poisoned Turkic arrow in a minor skirmish with Mu'in ad-Din's army, which he had initially laughed off. Since he had no children his widow Jamilah, who he had freed when he conquered Al-Ubulla and married soon after, claimed power but soon found her authority outside of Basra challenged in response to her issuance of a number of edicts that offended her late husband's lieutenants, mandating equality between and segregation of the sexes in addition to strictly forbidding concubinage and polygamy (an edict whose enforcement she began by having Musa's own concubines, who she had resented, killed). The most powerful of the Zanj warlords to challenge the regent and reject her teachings as unorthodox, self-serving deviations from Musa's own was one Yunus, who carved out a fiefdom in the eastern rebel-held territories centered around Al-Ahwaz. News of yet more infighting among the insurgents was music to the ears of the Grand Vizier, who encouraged Mu'in ad-Din to accelerate the campaign in the far south.

wsOE1ew.jpeg

Jamilah, the widow of Abba Musa and Zanj ruler of Basra following his demise. The loss of their Great Holy Judge was a huge blow to the morale of the remaining Zanj and infighting between her & his officers did not help with their situation, already made increasingly dire by the collapse of the Alids freeing up Ja'far to break their truce of convenience

In the distant east, Zheng Shao set out to pacify western Nam Việt with 80,000 men, but in his arrogance and overconfidence he marched directly through multiple Vietnamese traps and he was ultimately dealt a humbling defeat in the mountains of Mường La where as many as 15,000 Chinese soldiers were either killed in battle or picked off during the retreat. Giáp Thừa Lang had carefully spent the treasures he'd brought with him from Cổ Loa on cultivating alliances with the savage Tai-speaking tribes of these lands, normally autonomous from and hostile to the ancestors' authority, in order to bolster his ranks & forge a unified front against the Chinese – his efforts now paid dividends as the mountain tribesmen proved critical to his victory over Zheng on their home turf. While an annoyed Renzong replaced Zheng with another general, Yang Yuan, the Vietnamese king was thinking much bigger and hoped to instigate a broader uprising among the other Tai tribes of far southern China's wild frontier in order to tie up the numerically overwhelmingly superior Chinese armies & force them to back out of his kingdom.

Meanwhile in the even more distant west, conflict was brewing between the Mississippian Empire and the Pilgrim Kingdom of Annún. The newest Mississippian prince to vanquish all his brothers for the throne of the Šaánu-šaánuraan was a man no less ambitious and bloodthirsty than his forefathers, adopting the name Dakarukuúnu ('Great Bear'), but he thought the more primitive tribes around the great rivers of his empire and in the hill country to the east were not sufficiently worthy foes and instead hoped to test his strength against the Annúnites. This new Mississippian Emperor also had not given up his forefathers' hope of taming & raising his own herd of horses, on which he would build a real cavalry corps, and so gave the command for his warbands to begin raiding the Annúnite lands on their side of the Great Lakes – they would target both Annúnite homesteads and villages of Three Fires Wildermen living under the protection of Cité-Réial, seeking to carry off crops, slaves, horses and other farm animals wherever they could be found. Of course these developments outraged Édhoual (Old Brit.: 'Idfael'), the king of Annún, but when he dispatched envoys to Dakaruniku to demand an explanation, they were given a cool reception and nothing but excuses & empty promises to punish the perpetrators to take home. Since no punishment was forthcoming and the raids continued into the dreadful northern winter, war between these former allies – no longer united since the defeat of the Three Fires Confederacy left them with no common enemy – became increasingly inevitable.

940 brought with it great tragedy for the Holy Roman Empire, as Aloysius IV passed away in his sleep this autumn at the age of sixty. Despite the extremely rocky start to his reign and his unusual lack of innate martial ability for an Aloysian dynast, this Augustus Imperator impressed his contemporaries and future generations by managing to diplomatically bind fractured Christendom back together after winning the Seven Years' War, demonstrating a keen ability to recruit & cultivate (or in the case of his own children, straight-up breed) military men to cover his great weakness, and do what the previous, far more militarily gifted Emperors could not – reversing two hundred years' worth of Islamic conquests in one stroke. That said, among the Church hierarchy and the Slavic nations he was greatly honored not just for starting the First Crusade and leading it to glorious victory, but also for taking major steps to cripple slavery in Chivalric-era[9] Europe. It was for these deeds that this generally amiable, kindly Emperor (although as episodes like the sack of Jerusalem demonstrated, the fiery temperament popularly associated with the Aloysians could also be brought out in him when sufficiently provoked) would be canonized as 'Saint Aloysius the Emancipator' shortly after his death, becoming the first Aloysian imperial saint ahead of the likes of even the first (while probably the greatest military mind of the dynasty so far, he was hobbled by his many personal vices) and second (a capable leader and a better man than his grandfather, but one tarnished by the loss of Jerusalem in the first place) Aloysiuses.

fc3lV6D.png

Flavius Aloysius Augustus Quintus, aged 42 at the time of his succession to the purple, said to resemble a physically stronger version of his late father. The crusading Emperor was also the last to still bother with adopting the nomen 'Flavius', as he represented the third 'Flavius Aloysius' to rule in a row

The newly-minted Aloysius V, having already made a name for himself as a warrior and commander in the Crusade, now departed Jerusalem to take up his father's crown in an appropriately lavish ceremony. Though he had many brothers, he had little to fear from them: Charles, by now King of Burgundy jure uxoris, was busy striving to secure the allegiance of that kingdom's lords, while the twins had taken vows which precluded them ever claiming his throne or having children of their own, and Septimus lacked the power & allies to meaningfully challenge him even if the latter wanted to. Elena also still lived to ensure that her sons remained at peace with one another, especially her eldest and youngest who though being the most distant from one another both in age & interpersonal relations, were also the closest to her (having both been mostly raised by her while Aloysius IV was away fighting in the Seven Years' War or the First Crusade respectively) – in particular, she had elected to personally breastfeed the fifth Aloysius, her firstborn, rather than give him over to a wetnurse, an unusual thing for a Roman Empress to do and which she did not repeat for her other children. In any case this generation of Roman leaders, at least, had seen firsthand from the Fitna of the Third Century just how quickly and terribly a poorly-timed civil war could reverse a dynasty's seemingly ascendant fortunes: it was among many of the lessons noted in the text Aloysius IV and V composed in the former's final years out of their shared correspondences, the Speculum Imperiale ('Emperor's Mirror'), which they intended to be a source of both practical & moral advice on rulership for their descendants.

Among the latest Aloysius' first moves as Emperor, he appointed another crusading friend to helm the Archduchy of the Orient in his absence: Godefroi de Wavre, Baron of Bethel. In general although he had to leave much of his inner circle behind in the Outremer where they'd laid down roots, he continued to count them among his most faithful friends for the remainder of his days and they figured prominently in his plans to keep the Holy Land securely within Christian hands – his own son, now the newest Aloysius Caesar, was by this time already married to Adela, daughter of Galilee's Norman lord Ogier de Louvain, who had just given birth to their first daughter a few weeks before Aloysius IV's passing. All that said, with Egypt still struggling to recover from the severe beating the crusaders had just meted out and Iraq mired in ongoing large-scale strife the Emperor was content to turn his eyes north for now and pressure the Norse kingdoms to accept Christianity, so as to bring them into the Romano-Christian fold and secure the Empire's rear in the event that another great holy war were to break out in the Near East.

Speaking of the Islamic world, initially the Iraqis continued to make incremental advances against the firmly-entrenched but divided Zanj this year. Mu'in ad-Din attempted to speed up his conquest of the lands promised to him & his tribe, only to charge into a trap prepared by Yunus of al-Ahwaz and die in the Battle of Al-Sus, a development which suited Ja'far just fine since he considered the latter's son Rukn ad-Din Artuq to be more pliant and a bloodied Turkic tribe would be easier to control than one at full strength. What did not suit Ja'far in the slightest, however, was that the Kharijites succeeded in capturing Mecca this year. After a few probing attacks on the walls made it clear that taking Mecca by force would certainly be a costly endeavor and wiping out a caravan of pilgrims who refused to pay him tribute, Ibn Junaydah hatched a scheme to disguise part of his army in their bloodied clothes, then have another detachment of light horsemen chase them to the besieged city's gates before retreating beneath the Hashemites' arrows. Naturally, his infiltration party would then attack their 'benefactors' later that day when the Kharijites launched a full-scale assault on the walls, causing enough chaos that he was able to gain a foothold along the defenses and eventually overwhelm the garrison by the next morning.

The Kharijites proceeded to viciously sack Mecca: among other outrages they devastated the Great Mosque built by the first Caliphs, desecrated the holy Zamzam Well by dumping the corpses of civilian pilgrims and soldiers alike in it, and stole the Black Stone from the Kaaba[10], which they would bring back to Diriyah among the fifty-camel caravan of plunder that Ibn Junaydah reserved for himself – there were enough looted riches from elsewhere around the city to satisfy the rest of his followers. Ibn Junaydah declared that this victory and the apparent lack of divine retribution for his massacres of those he deemed heretical idolaters was proof positive that not only was Allah on his side, but in fact he was no less than the Mahdi (Islamic messiah), sent by Him to save the Dar al-Islam from its myriad troubles and purge all evil from the Earth by any means necessary – did not the decadence of the Banu Hashim, the Fitna of the Third Century, the Alid uprisings and the First Crusade all portend the end times? Ja'far meanwhile strove mightily to redirect the inflamed wrath of the 'Ilmi faithful in Iraq, stoked to a fever pitch that even the crusaders couldn't reach by the fast-spreading news of Ibn Junaydah's cruelty against their fellows in Islam's holiest city, away from himself (for arguably allowing this to happen in the first place by prioritizing the Alids & then the Zanj) and harness it instead into a weapon with which to destroy the Kharijites and all his other enemies. Whoever prevailed now would doubtless have a tradition of renewed jihad to wield against their external foes, most certainly including the Holy Roman Empire.

JppvKD6.jpeg

Self-proclaimed Mahdi Sulayman ibn Junaydah stealing the Black Stone from the Kaaba following his sack of Mecca, an atrocity which enraged orthodox Muslims even more than the loss of Al-Quds to the Rūmī

====================================================================================

[1] The Seleucia-Ctesiphon metropolis.

[2] Ad Triecteinsem – Maastricht.

[3] Formerly Dastagird.

[4] Historically pomegranates were introduced to Andalusia by the Muslims, hence Granada's name and heraldic device.

[5] The site of modern Sulaymaniyah.

[6] Now part of northern Hanoi.

[7] Mashhad.

[8] Gurganj – not actually the modern city of Urgench in Uzbekistan but rather its pre-Mongol predecessor, located in Turkmenistan a ways northwest of the present-day city.

[9] I've decided that it makes more sense to call this period of European history the 'Chivalric Era' rather than the 'Middle Ages'/'medieval' ITL, since the latter implies that it was in the middle of two things – the fall of the Roman Empire and the modern period, a view which wouldn't make much sense in a timeline where the former never quite happened to begin with.

[10] More or less what happened when the Qarmatians sacked Mecca in 930 historically, although they were Shi'ites from the Bahraini coast rather than Nejdi Quranist sorts and rather than declaring himself the Mahdi, their leader accidentally gave that honor to some Persian fellow who turned out to be a Zoroastrian revivalist.
 

PsihoKekec

Swashbuckling Accountant
Jafar is such a great villain.
So now the independent Turkic persianates are the buffer zone between Hashemites and reunited Alids. Given how Jafar is more concerned about surviving and doing well, I reckon that after dealing with Zanj and Kharijites (which is going to be a gruelling campaign for his commanders) he will focus and solidifying his rule and recouping his monetary losses, so the the Fitna of the Third Century will end with broken away Egypt, East Africa and Alid dominions, with bunch Persianates paying a lip service to Kufa.

popularize the habit of fastening great 'wings' made of wood and feathers onto the saddle

And then the winged hussars knights arrived. The only surprise is that no one copied Aloysious Glorious sooner, but then his descendant, who emulates his martial prowesses the most, doing it, is the best possible homage.

Pashtuns never even made it to the city, having began fighting one another after an insult over the dining table reignited rivalries among these fractious allies.

Totally unrealistic 😜
Judging by modern day experiences Pashtuns must be even worse than the Irish and Balkanoids when it comes to the honoured tradition of infighting.
 
Last edited:

ATP

Well-known member
Well,after Jafar defeated all his enemies,he should get princess Jasmina as reward!
That aside - thanks for good chapter,and i wait for Tolteks joining fun in America wars.
And,Berbers too,when they discover searoad from Canaries to Carribeans.

P.S I think,that scandinavians could survive as christians,but baltic people probably not.They were too divided - only Lithuanians in OTL manage to unite,and it would not help them now.

Of course nobody would genocide them,but they become part of other nations and vanish in time.
 

shangrila

Well-known member
The Aloysians have learned that the Islamic border needs to be directly held. The Ghassanids certainly never had much luck holding it. The next thing to do with peace and a lot of goodwill built up is probably dealing with Greek autonomy. The Greeks sure can't say the Treveran regime hasn't done their part to protect and restore the Eastern Empire at this point. Finishing Charlemagne's canal (or whatever it's called) would bring Constantinople much closer to Trier, but it might be a good idea to straight up merge the Constantinople and Roman Senates and end any formal autonomy while the iron's still hot. Maybe have the unified Senate meet in Rome and Constantinople on alternating years to keep up appearances.

Now the Kharijites are interesting. The historical Qarmatians were doing really well before suddenly imploding because the Mahdi their warlord picked out turned out to not be such. Really neat historical proof that even mighty warlords really did believe their religion, no matter what modern agnostics think, though obviously it backfired severely there. It does bring into question the sincerity of belief in occultation though, with how helpful that doctrine is in not letting that happen again. Still, without that sudden implosion, were it not for how much Jafar's cockroachness is played up, the Kharijites really could do a full Ibn Khaldun style jihad out of the desert.
 
Last edited:

PsihoKekec

Swashbuckling Accountant
but it might be a good idea to straight up merge the Constantinople and Roman Senates

It would be a good idea and it would be bad idea. The problem is that any kind of change will lead to resentment among eastern elites that will last for generations. On the other hand, they might find excuse for resentment anyway and I'm sure future usurpers will again find support in Constantinople. I guess the best option would be to move both Senates to Trevere so senators will waste time travelling there and back each year, leaving them less time for scheming.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top