"TradWives" Triggering Unhappy Feminists

If you're going to continue to pull that specific percentage, then I want sources. I want links, and sources verified by multiple researchers and outlets. If you're going to quote something, it needs to be cited. We'll treat this like a proper debate if need be, but I've not seen a single cited source from you on this topic.

I second this demand!
 
If you're going to continue to pull that specific percentage, then I want sources. I want links, and sources verified by multiple researchers and outlets. If you're going to quote something, it needs to be cited. We'll treat this like a proper debate if need be, but I've not seen a single cited source from you on this topic.
I found his source

db7.jpg
 
legal under certain can be anything from 2nd trimester to rape/incest/health exceptions only. the further breakdown is the biggest secion is legal in only a few at 36%.

the breakdown based on the gallup poll
34% all circumstances is fine I.E. kill that parasite at 9 months it isn't people
13% most circumstances fine I.E they break off based on viability
36% in a few circumstances I.E. the exceptions and maybe the morning after pill
13% in no circumstance I.E. no baby murder is bad
3% no opinion I.E. please don't ask me this I don't want to think or talk about it

looking at the breakdown of who they polled they have heavily skewed older, more educated, wealthier than average population. they look to have saturated the Rs with Rinos because of this and skewed the independents in a manner like Bernie Sanders is technically an independent even if he caucuses, supports, and raises money on behalf of the democratic party.
 
Last edited:
That poll and article doesn't support your position of.
Failing that, I'll just remind you that your position is the fringe, and 85% of the population is all for giving women bodily autonomy.
In fact, reading into that article, it specifically states that it's a 52% and 44% split with the slight majority of people favoring Abortions. That's not putting those who are Pro-life at a fringe group. That's a minor majority. So, your numbers are proven false by your own article. What will you say now? After all, given your position of.

They are not attached to another being for existence, and I have already addressed that it can lead to some disturbing ideas like legalized infanticide if taken too far. But since nobody is taking it that far, and pro-choice activists are only concerned with ensuring that women don't get forced to bear the children of their rapists or mistakes, we can let that lie for now.

Later, of course, we can deal with it. But personally, I don't think a child is a person until the umbilical cord is cut anyway. Until then, I treat it as just another extension of its mother. And of course, all individuals have full autonomy over their own bodies and souls.

You've basically been pushing for infanticide in your opinion and debates. Because by your definition, a Child isn't a person until "The umbilical cord is cut"

Regardless of what other arguments you have for or against the argument. You are hypocritical in your own posts.

And finally, regardless of the scientific, ethical, and logical arguments people have brought against you, you insist on bringing it back to Christianity or "UnChristianlike Sex". I won't deny that I'm a Christian, but most of the people here haven't brought 'Christian' or 'religious' arguments against the Abortion argument. Do you know why that is?

It's because arguing with people who aren't Christians from a biblical standpoint doesn't work normally. So they use logic, and science, and everything that has been proven through real and validated research to disprove people on this subject. If an Athiest and a Christian agree on a subject, they might have the same views. That doesn't make them someone who wants to 'legislate' from Scripture.
 
Last edited:
They don't want the responsibility they don't get the authority. What women have forgotten and the media has downplayed is how soft power works and the fact women once had loads of it. Sure Og went out to hunt or fish or farm but his wife was back home making sure things were good and the next generation was ready with help from the clan. Because those children were important.

Tending house, tending the sick and injured, teaching children, etc, etc, etc, the same job women had for centuries from the queens of Europe to the lowliest peasant.

But now? Hollywood has sold them on hard power and what a heady drug that is forgetting that you also need soft power as well.
 
They don't want the responsibility they don't get the authority. What women have forgotten and the media has downplayed is how soft power works and the fact women once had loads of it. Sure Og went out to hunt or fish or farm but his wife was back home making sure things were good and the next generation was ready with help from the clan. Because those children were important.

Tending house, tending the sick and injured, teaching children, etc, etc, etc, the same job women had for centuries from the queens of Europe to the lowliest peasant.

But now? Hollywood has sold them on hard power and what a heady drug that is forgetting that you also need soft power as well.

What we are seeing I think, is men slowly taking the soft power as their hard power is eroded, it's why "soft guy era" and stuff like "drizzle drizzle" is trending. It's why more and more young men are gatekeeping relationships.

We are seeing something akin to a male sexual revolution, or perhaps a male relationship revolution. It really is looking like women are going to have to try and become the societal breadwinners or crash and burn alone, as men reject masculine women who still demand feminine treatment.
 
One day, feminists will proudly announced their newest ‘discovery’: traditional femininity.

And I will laugh myself sick.
Oh, we've already had elements of that.

"How dare you ban abortion, you know what, we won't have sex with you anymore unless you take responsibility!"

"You mean like marriage?"



"It's not fair that a woman has to do so much work taking care of children, and around the house, and still have a job. She should get supported in that!"

"You mean like marriage?"


Feminists didn't like all the laughing their complaints brought.
 
One day, feminists will proudly announced their newest ‘discovery’: traditional femininity.

And I will laugh myself sick.
I literally saw an interview with a prominent feminist recently which was basically going on about how feminism made a huge mistake and directed women to self harm.
And that chastity and marriage are far better for feminists.

Duh, of course they were better.
 
I literally saw an interview with a prominent feminist recently which was basically going on about how feminism made a huge mistake and directed women to self harm.
And that chastity and marriage are far better for feminists.
Making policy decisions just to spite your enemies is, as we have all seen first hand, a really stupid idea. Sure, you really showed them misogynists, but the price really isn't worth it.

Cutting your nose to spite your face isn't a sensible political strategy.
 
Oh, we've already had elements of that.

"How dare you ban abortion, you know what, we won't have sex with you anymore unless you take responsibility!"

"You mean like marriage?"



"It's not fair that a woman has to do so much work taking care of children, and around the house, and still have a job. She should get supported in that!"

"You mean like marriage?"


Feminists didn't like all the laughing their complaints brought.
There's a movement coming out of South Korea of all places which is trying to basically be the female version of MGTOW (appropriating it). I think it's called "5 S" or something?

Yeah, it's not catching on for obvious reasons, and the the hilarious thing these women can't understand is that by leaving men alone, men who have already basically abandoned dating, marriage, or even interacting with women, they think it'll have a reverse psychology effect where it'll get those men interested in them. :unsure:

They're giving those men what they fucking want. :ROFLMAO:
 
There's a movement coming out of South Korea of all places which is trying to basically be the female version of MGTOW (appropriating it). I think it's called "5 S" or something?

Yeah, it's not catching on for obvious reasons, and the the hilarious thing these women can't understand is that by leaving men alone, men who have already basically abandoned dating, marriage, or even interacting with women, they think it'll have a reverse psychology effect where it'll get those men interested in them. :unsure:

They're giving those men what they fucking want. :ROFLMAO:

Sounds like they imagine that men are like women. Ignoring a woman will make her want to get attention from you.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top