"TradWives" Triggering Unhappy Feminists

King Arts said:
You guys ae being kinda mean to Wily. I mean saying "I don't know if I believe you were really abused." Is kinda shitty. Unless you are literally on the Jury for a wife beating case now which we aren't.
Click to expand...
They entered a thread and started accusing forum goers of stuff that nobody actually said, with a story that cannot be verified, with common anti-male shaming tactics.
 
No, she's female alright. I can tell.

At any rate, this thread is basically revolving around our version of those "pagan revivalists". It's a farce, but a farce that is psychologically comfortable for hundreds-thousands of men of a certain type. A type that is only ever going to be either unwitting pawns or knowing-but-uncaring pawns for the real Powers That Will Be of politics.

I would suggest you move off it, but I know fully well that nobody has ever changed their political views online. Still, I'll leave this here as a sign that I tried.
 
SoliFortissimi said:
No, she's female alright. I can tell.

At any rate, this thread is basically revolving around our version of those "pagan revivalists". It's a farce, but a farce that is psychologically comfortable for hundreds-thousands of men of a certain type. A type that is only ever going to be either unwitting pawns or knowing-but-uncaring pawns for the real Powers That Will Be of politics.

I would suggest you move off it, but I know fully well that nobody has ever changed their political views online. Still, I'll leave this here as a sign that I tried.
Click to expand...

The fact that you believe this just goes to show how foolish you ‘principled conservatives’ are.
 
DarthOne said:
The fact that you believe this just goes to show how foolish you ‘principled conservatives’ are.
Click to expand...
"Realistic Conservatives" may be a better title. Because we live and deal with the real world, not your social media spheres.

My leaders aim to direct policy across the planet. Yours aim to get into social media squabbles.
 
SoliFortissimi said:
"Realistic Conservatives" may be a better title. Because we live and deal with the real world, not your social media spheres.

My leaders aim to direct policy across the planet. Yours aim to get into social media squabbles.
Click to expand...

Ah yes the old ‘the internet isn’t the real world’. While that’s certainly true to a point, it’s also more and more false by the year. Much like the way a British Loyalist in the old Colonial days would dismiss the would-be-revolutionaries planning in bars and the like.

In this day and age, with surveillance and woke thought-policing on the rise and so many people on the internet, it’s a lot more reflective of the real world under the mask then you give it credit.
 
SoliFortissimi said:
LMAO, you didn't even deny that you don't deal with the real world.

Yeah, looks like you'll remain our pawns after all.
Click to expand...

I didn’t say that because it obviously wasn’t true. Also you completely miss the point. Furthermore, you are a pawn just as much as we are, only more so. Because you support the status quote, even as it chokes the life out of you and civilization.
 
DarthOne said:
Furthermore, you are a pawn just as much as we are, only more so
Click to expand...
More like a Rook, actually. I'm perfectly fine with the world where my leaders win, where the religious and reactionaries will be our pawns to keep the Bolsheviks down.

You can either join us or.....well, would you rather deal with the Marxists?
 
SoliFortissimi said:
More like a Rook, actually. I'm perfectly fine with the world where my leaders win, where the religious and reactionaries will be our pawns to keep the Bolsheviks down.

You can either join us or.....well, would you rather deal with the Marxists?
Click to expand...
You aren’t that different from the marxists and communists are a system of failure so maybe we let them eat your plutocrats and we do nothing but wait for the nation to collapse like the Soviets did.
 
King Arts said:
You aren’t that different from the marxists and communists are a system of failure so maybe we let them eat your plutocrats and we do nothing but wait for the nation to collapse like the Soviets did.
Click to expand...
No, you won't. You're a lot more dependant on us than the other way around. Without us, you can't direct policy. Without you, we'll just crush the Marxists with police and the FBI. But not before religion and reactionary politics is completely stamped out as a political force.

So either be my leaders' knights, or be their pawns.
 
SoliFortissimi said:
No, you won't. You're a lot more dependant on us than the other way around. Without us, you can't direct policy. Without you, we'll just crush the Marxists with police and the FBI. But not before religion and reactionary politics is completely stamped out as a political force.

So either be my leaders' knights, or be their pawns.
Click to expand...

You know what? I don’t believe you. I don’t believe any of this crap you are spewing out. And I very much doubt that you’re anywhere near a position of power. Certainly not in reality.

You sound more like some edgy teenager trying to sound all cool and mysterious with all your nonsense talk about pawns. Or someone LARP-ing.
 
DarthOne said:
And I very much doubt that you’re anywhere near a position of power
Click to expand...
I told you, I am not. I'm just aligning myself with the ones who are.

We're all just little people here, sheep looking for shepherds. Except I've got a Shepherd, and you don't. So tell me, which one will the Wolves eat first?
 
DarthOne said:
Cool story bro. In reality, you’re tying yourself onto the failing paradigm.
Click to expand...
Let me put it this way: I'm not going to get whacked by HR, and may get a better job or higher pay if the people I vote for win. And that's why I'll vote for them. The people you vote for will never win, and you'll get only a fraction of what you want if they win- if at all. And if they don't, the Marxists will ban you from social media. I, meanwhile, will just parrot whatever they say and get on.

Does that illustrate the difference between two powerless little people who support different factions of the same movement? It's why we are Real Conservatives, and you're just the people the big men string along like a woman that's being ghosted after a one night stand.
 
SoliFortissimi said:
Let me put it this way: I'm not going to get whacked by HR, and may get a better job or higher pay if the people I vote for win. And that's why I'll vote for them. The people you vote for will never win, and you'll get only a fraction of what you want if they win- if at all. And if they don't, the Marxists will ban you from social media. I, meanwhile, will just parrot whatever they say and get on.

Does that illustrate the difference between two powerless little people who support different factions of the same movement? It's why we are Real Conservatives, and you're just the people the big men string along like a woman that's being ghosted after a one night stand.
Click to expand...

Which is going to work out great. Keep ignoring people pushing for reform and actually trying to save civilization. That won’t piss people off and radicalize them at all. Never mind that you’ll just get pushed aside by the newest diversity hire at your job.

You speak with the arrogance of a man who can’t see past his blinders, but thinks he knows the world.
 
DarthOne said:
Keep ignoring people pushing for reform and actually trying to save civilization.
Click to expand...
You sound like a leftist.

Worry about saving yourself, not your civilization. And forget about inane things like "reform".

Edit: and if our guys win, there won't be any diversity hires anymore, because that doesn't benefit the shareholders.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top