The Problems of Higher Education

SergeantBrother

Notorious Member
Recently there has been some public debate over forgiveness of college loans. I am of two minds on this topic, because on one hand these college loans are, without a doubt, predatory. Young barely adults are told that higher education is the end all and be all of success and then pushed into signing away their future, going tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars of debt, to spend 4 years (often more) of the most precious years of their lives to very often receive an education that is close to being worthless. These young adults were lied to and tricked into getting, or trying to get because about half of people who attend college drop out, these worthless degrees for a job market that doesn't demand them. On the other hand, should the people who didn't have a chance to go to college at all be forced to pay these ridiculously high debts, which have increased in expense at ten times the rate of inflation over the half century, for people often richer than them? Also, considering the vast expense and questionable utility of college, forgiving student debt is just going to eventually push up tuition fees even higher and encourage even more young adults to go into massive debt to get increasingly useless degrees.

The answer to me is obvious regardless of whether or not we forgive student debt. The higher education bubble needs to burst, these colleges and universities need to be taken down several notches and be removed from the high position they have in society. Far too many people go to college now, people who should be learning trades or other useful job skills, things which they may well have to do anyway after the spend outrageous sums of money and prime years of life getting a piece of paper.

Unfortunately, despite the fact that very few job skills are taught in college and increasingly few careers require such an education as a part of the job, there is a genuine pressure for people to get degrees because when people apply for many jobs, they will be competing with people who have four year degrees. Such a great amount of importance is wrongly placed on these degrees and with the power within the job market still largely in the hands of the employers, someone without a degree will have difficulty getting hired even if the college graduates have no appreciable advantage in job skills. There is some slight useful basis in this bias, because a college degree does serve as an IQ test of sorts, and a test of character too, because someone with a degree has at least the intelligence and/or work ethic to complete that degree. It's a very expensive test though, which becomes increasingly less useful as the pressure for more degrees and more students and more money pushes down academic standards and causes an explosion in useless majors. These sorts of tests would be even more useless if there were better ways for people to gain or prove their abilities - job training, work experience, apprenticeships, even old fashioned IQ tests.

Do some people need to go to college to get the job they want? Yes - doctors, lawyers, engineers, etc. They are the exceptions and even those fields could do with some major streamlining with regard to education.

I would contend that the "underwater basket weaving" degrees are even than even useless. They in fact have a very negative effect upon society and students. One thing is that as more money flows into higher education to give young people useless degrees, the more power higher education will have over society and the more ostracized people will be for not buying into this terrible system. This creates an economic death spiral as more people get useless degrees, which become increasingly useless but also increasingly desired as more people get them, and a larger and larger part of our economy and fraction of our lives is dedicated to this parasitic system.

Another even more insidious effect is the propaganda that is ubiquitous with higher education across the nation, and likely the entire western world. Here leftist professors, often literal communist, sometimes apologists for mass murder, are paid to indoctrinate young adults at one of the most vulnerable times in their lives. Universities are festering nests for some of the world's most vile ideologies to grow and spread - social justice, feminism, intersectionality, Marxism, post modernism, and general hatred for the west, whites, men, Christianity, freedom, and logic. Universities are increasingly dogmatic echo chambers as well, where dissenting opinion is harshly punished and the students are eitehr punished for their beliefs or taught to be closed minded to opposing views. Young adults are at the stage where they yearn to become full adults, where they want to prove their intelligence and wisdom, then they are placed into an environment where all of their peers and authority figures push an increasingly radical and extreme agenda. These vile ideologies likely couldn't survive in a free market, but they are supported both by the government and by misguided students (or their parents) who pay into the system in the hopes of gaining useful skills.

To make the situation worse, overt leftism isn't the only sort of hidden lesson the students are receiving. Universities are very often dens of iniquity where degeneracies of all kind are encouraged. I'm sure the thing that is jumping to many people's minds are alcoholism and promiscuity. Once again, teenagers who have just left their parents home and are full of hormones and unused to this kind of freedom are easily influenced by the university subculture.

What is my solution? Well, as individuals we need to stop going to college. The educational industrial complex needs to be broken, and with it the chains that it uses to bind us and make us its slaves. This is going to involve some hardship, because these are vast and powerful institutions and they aren't going to go down without a fight. Young people who wisely decide not to go to a university are going to suffer certain disadvantages. Then again, being $100K in debt for a history degree has some disadvantages too. Those of you who know me know that I have children and I will be discouraging them from seeking higher education unless there are some exceptional circumstances that motivate them to do so. Hopefully more people can make this same decision and the power that higher education has over our society can be diminished before it destroys us.
 

Cherico

Well-known member
Beyond the poltical I think a major problem is that we use colleges as research insitutions and insitutions of public education.

As some one who has worked in academia I can tell you that the two goals often conflict. Many times professors who are great teachers are shit researchers, and professors who are great researchers are often shit teachers because those two things are completely different skillsets.

Maybe the ideal outcome is to make college education mostly an online thing and turn the physical colleges into places of research. On line colleges are already in many ways cheaper then the physical so maybe that's the future we should be encouraging.
 

SergeantBrother

Notorious Member
Beyond the poltical I think a major problem is that we use colleges as research insitutions and insitutions of public education.

As some one who has worked in academia I can tell you that the two goals often conflict. Many times professors who are great teachers are shit researchers, and professors who are great researchers are often shit teachers because those two things are completely different skillsets.

Maybe the ideal outcome is to make college education mostly an online thing and turn the physical colleges into places of research. On line colleges are already in many ways cheaper then the physical so maybe that's the future we should be encouraging.
Yeah, I completely forgot to mention research. You are right, research and teaching are usually different skill sets and the combination often exists in higher education. From what I have seen, that is a lot of highly questionable research coming from universities, often ideologically biased, purposeless, with so many methodological flaws as to be useless. I'm about to go to bed soon, but maybe tomorrow I can find a recent study that suggests that a lot of research and conclusions drawn in some fields can't be reliably reproduced. I've personally been involved in university research and also have seen how questionable it can be. There is also the fact that for many fields there is no clearly definable purpose for their research or standard by which is can be objectively accessed. My thoughts on peer review could be an entire rant as well. No doubt, this is another thing driving up costs of higher education and perhaps leading to bad information as well.
 

Terthna

Professional Lurker
Here's the thing; I went to DeVry, got a degree in Electronics and Computer Technology, and was promised extensive help after graduation in finding a job. In fact, I was promised that as long as I got top grades, I'd be on the dean's list; which they said meant that companies would come to me.

This did not happen, despite the fact that I had managed to earn a 4.0 GPA; instead, the people who were supposed to help me find a job were confused, as they had never even heard of a "dean's list". Also, they apparently had been expecting that I would spend much of my time to that point networking, and in general doing the job that I had been promised they were going to do, instead of focusing on my actual education.

Long story short, I never managed to find a job, and found myself with a debt I could only somewhat pay with my disability money. It was only years later, after I had sunk several thousand into a debt that kept growing, that one of the homeless I volunteer to help hand out food to every Monday told me that because I receive disability, I could get my loans forgiven. All I had to do was give up any future ability to take out government loans for education, as well as promise not to work for three years.

Needless to say, that's what I did; and over the years I've received two tiny checks from class action lawsuits against DeVry, for their false advertising. At 35, I still don't have a job; and I doubt I ever will at this point.
 

Arch Dornan

Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
Here's the thing; I went to DeVry, got a degree in Electronics and Computer Technology, and was promised extensive help after graduation in finding a job. In fact, I was promised that as long as I got top grades, I'd be on the dean's list; which they said meant that companies would come to me.

This did not happen, despite the fact that I had managed to earn a 4.0 GPA; instead, the people who were supposed to help me find a job were confused, as they had never even heard of a "dean's list". Also, they apparently had been expecting that I would spend much of my time to that point networking, and in general doing the job that I had been promised they were going to do, instead of focusing on my actual education.

Long story short, I never managed to find a job, and found myself with a debt I could only somewhat pay with my disability money. It was only years later, after I had sunk several thousand into a debt that kept growing, that one of the homeless I volunteer to help hand out food to every Monday told me that because I receive disability, I could get my loans forgiven. All I had to do was give up any future ability to take out government loans for education, as well as promise not to work for three years.

Needless to say, that's what I did; and over the years I've received two tiny checks from class action lawsuits against DeVry, for their false advertising. At 35, I still don't have a job; and I doubt I ever will at this point.
It's at this point I begin to wonder about education and employment.

I didn't get as high a grade as you in my degree related to engineering. I was not prepared in knowing how to get a job. One of the most tedious was the online applications which involve waiting after submission and then doing a psychometric test.

Eventually I began to wonder about my own capability if I can't really hack it. I did manage to get a job but overseas with average pay in a maintenance job which involves more paperwork and machine interaction with communication.

Looking back at what I do I just feel more like a drone doing simple tasks that is practiced to get more familiar with the work and gets me wondering if I could have learned much better and cheaper with trade school.
 

CarlManvers2019

Writers Blocked Douchebag
As I’ve said before and this time decide to elaborate

Replace ALL education with online stuff, you can learn how to do accounting and investments without wasting thousands of dollars and spending years in a place that will require you to take other courses that may not even be relevant to any job you may take
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
Beyond the poltical I think a major problem is that we use colleges as research insitutions and insitutions of public education.

As some one who has worked in academia I can tell you that the two goals often conflict. Many times professors who are great teachers are shit researchers, and professors who are great researchers are often shit teachers because those two things are completely different skillsets.

Maybe the ideal outcome is to make college education mostly an online thing and turn the physical colleges into places of research. On line colleges are already in many ways cheaper then the physical so maybe that's the future we should be encouraging.

Having a physical location is just much too important for serious free flow of ideas, and also for studying in the STEM fields, where you need physical experience.

The real issue at hand is that we currently have a system, fundamentally broken, which does not assign different values to different degrees. We also have an ideology which teaches that a college education is an opening to success at life (primarily because of virtue-signalling rather than actual need). So we waste huge sums of money teaching people who cannot do anything with their education in fields which do not contribute to society. The Liberal Arts are enormously important, mind you, but of course the average bachelor's student in them comes out with nothing more than a pastiche of a few prevailing theories in a single field when they go to a large school to study them. It would be better for State run schools to become exclusively Polytechnics and for Liberal Arts to retrench to the domain of the private, small, liberal arts college where the free flow of ideas is unhindered by politics and where admissions can be selective enough to guarantee the student body are actually people who, upon completing their education, can make major contributions to the thought, art, and condition of humanity in society.
 

Sol Zagato

Well-known member
A. Never create a class of debt-peons. That never works out well. All the debt should be retroactively bankruptable. This will also have the benefit of reducing the availability of college funding.

B. This chart, and related charts (I can't find the really nice-looking one) tell us something has gone horribly wrong.

tkiHqrR.jpg


Education is not 4-10 times better (comparing college to other inflation categories as a baseline) than in 1980. It makes health care costs, which are also unacceptable, look tame. There's a lot of fat to trim. I'll enjoy watching the hordes of tax-dollar-fattened 'administrators' and 'Dean's of X' getting thrown out on the street. It will happen, because this kind of trend is unsustainable.

C. College is now more credential than education. Originally, universities were for training priests- your ideology disseminators. Then they became places mostly for indoctrination of the elite- with a side of technical training. Now most people go for the stamp, not because the education is useful. This is a bad thing.

D. College serves too many people. Assuming we're halfway competent at college screening: as the proportion going to college increases, marginal utility decreases. We bring in people who benefit, but benefit less and less from the education, until now we have large numbers for whom college is a clear net negative, even counting the rubber-stamp-of-approval.

With more people getting the rubber stamp, the value of the darn thing declines too. This is why more people are getting their master's degrees, and the signaling value of that is declining too.

E. We do not have good substitutes for college due to certain strains of anti-racism, and it's not clear to me where the substitutes will come from- maybe just more certifications and cheaper job training. Testing of job applicants was mentioned up-thread. That's mostly illegal if not directly related to job skills, because of disparate impact. It's not all of why higher ed is over subscribed, but it's why many people find college necessary.

Edit: here's one of the charts I was after:
k9s92EU.png


More than double the costs in twenty years after dividing by inflation.
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member

Guest
My own sob story is that I have a master's degree in mechanical engineering, but for all the jobs in mechanical engineering I've been applying for (including some that are specifically entry level), most just outright reject my application, and at most I've gotten a couple of phone interviews.


I've noticed that hiring is ruthlessly based on internships. I really lucked out to get the position which let me establish a career record. Now as I pass five years of employment with the same employer I am much more confident about my ability to go out and command a salary and job prospects. All I can say is that you might need to accept a technician position and then use your degree to achieve an internal promotion to an actual engineering position.
 

Tyrus Rechs

Active member
Here's the thing; I went to DeVry, got a degree in Electronics and Computer Technology, and was promised extensive help after graduation in finding a job. In fact, I was promised that as long as I got top grades, I'd be on the dean's list; which they said meant that companies would come to me.

This did not happen, despite the fact that I had managed to earn a 4.0 GPA; instead, the people who were supposed to help me find a job were confused, as they had never even heard of a "dean's list". Also, they apparently had been expecting that I would spend much of my time to that point networking, and in general doing the job that I had been promised they were going to do, instead of focusing on my actual education.

Long story short, I never managed to find a job, and found myself with a debt I could only somewhat pay with my disability money. It was only years later, after I had sunk several thousand into a debt that kept growing, that one of the homeless I volunteer to help hand out food to every Monday told me that because I receive disability, I could get my loans forgiven. All I had to do was give up any future ability to take out government loans for education, as well as promise not to work for three years.

Needless to say, that's what I did; and over the years I've received two tiny checks from class action lawsuits against DeVry, for their false advertising. At 35, I still don't have a job; and I doubt I ever will at this point.

Like others here my higher education has not really translated into career prospects. While my chosen subjects (my focus tended to be history and politics) likely weren't as employable as STEM subjects, the help given by universities for finding careers does not seem to be adequate, at least from what I experienced. The fact that even many entry level jobs these days seem to require previous experience does not help matters. I don't think I have had one job yet that I have needed my master's degree for.
 
Last edited:

Edgeplay_cgo

Well-known member
I like the idea of college loans being dischargeable in bankruptcy. They used to be, before the government started guaranteeing them. The guarantees should be eliminated. Any credentials obtained through the defaulted on loans, should be revoked and the college course transcripts expunged. The college should be financially responsible for part of the default. This would severely limit the availability of "Fries with That" degrees. One of my daughters has a BA in Psychology. She works in a factory 50 miles from home. Another has an AB in Ancient History. She does clerical work. At least they don't have ruinous loans.

I'se a retired Civin Injunear. (Yes, an oxymoron.) The profession was good to me, but I wonder whether I would have done as well in the Trades. My father was a Master Electrician. He learned his trade in Trade High School. My ex wife got her LPN through Trade High. This was back when LPNs could actually do stuff. Now, I think they can clean bedpans under supervision. She was charge nurse of the CCU and ER (not at the same time.)

It used to be, that a Liberal Arts program gave you an education. You may not have learned anything directly applicable to your eventual job, but you learned how to learn, how to argue logically, and how to write well. You may never use the Beowolf saga again.

That situation no longer applies. The plethora of "Fries with That" majors that are highly ideoligized don't teach the same logical arguing skills, as politically incorrect thought is shouted down. It is indoctrination, not education. In addition, the inflation of the student body has lowered standards so much that the kids don't learn to read and write any more. I've seen crap written by recent grads, that would have shamed my seventh grade classmates.
 

Cherico

Well-known member
My own sob story is that I have a master's degree in mechanical engineering, but for all the jobs in mechanical engineering I've been applying for (including some that are specifically entry level), most just outright reject my application, and at most I've gotten a couple of phone interviews.


Ok if you really want a job this is what you do, you go to a doctor and ask him to give you some kind of certification that your a transgendered woman. Then you go to the DMV and get your gender changed from male to female. The call backs will now start in earnest. When you get one got to the interview with either pink triangle or a rainbow pin and tell your interviewer that you are a masculine presenting transgendered lesbian. Be consolatory and tell them that you understand that will be a transition for some people.

The company will now gladly hire you because you now count as official woman in their records which means that you count towards a quota so they wont get sued by some feminist organization with an ax to grind.
 

Sol Zagato

Well-known member
That situation no longer applies. The plethora of "Fries with That" majors that are highly ideoligized don't teach the same logical arguing skills, as politically incorrect thought is shouted down. It is indoctrination, not education. In addition, the inflation of the student body has lowered standards so much that the kids don't learn to read and write any more. I've seen crap written by recent grads, that would have shamed my seventh grade classmates.
Like I implied in my last post, university has always been about indoctrination: providing the next generation's elite with an ideology / doctrine was the purpose long before consumer-driven certification/training. That's the original utility of a liberal arts degree- getting on the same page with all the other snobs.

Then in the 20th century we expanded higher ed way outside of the future elite. (This is NOT just about ability, but class too. You could always get in on ability because a smart elite will try to assimilate the next generation of talent. But elite colleges have always catered to well-heeled morons.) So we're literally overproducing the elite class, providing large numbers of people with an education utterly useless to them, because only a few get to be elite.

The only other difference is we've switched from feeding the students church doctrine, to feeding the students ancient classics and philosophy, (omitting some steps) and now to feeding them a poisonous new religion.

It's impossible to teach someone without also indoctrinating them, but a major purpose of Western Higher Education was indoctrination, from the beginning. It's part of the design.
 

Captain X

Well-known member
Osaul
I've noticed that hiring is ruthlessly based on internships. I really lucked out to get the position which let me establish a career record. Now as I pass five years of employment with the same employer I am much more confident about my ability to go out and command a salary and job prospects. All I can say is that you might need to accept a technician position and then use your degree to achieve an internal promotion to an actual engineering position.
I've been applying for those, too, actually. My masters degree was mostly paid for by my GRA position, so it's not like I'm completely inexperienced or anything either. It just apparently isn't enough, and the way one of my phone interviews went, it seems like that background in research and testing is actually keeping me out of some of the simpler entry-level jobs. I wouldn't be surprised if my advanced degree has been working against me when it comes to getting the technician jobs I've applied for, too.
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
I've been applying for those, too, actually. My masters degree was mostly paid for by my GRA position, so it's not like I'm completely inexperienced or anything either. It just apparently isn't enough, and the way one of my phone interviews went, it seems like that background in research and testing is actually keeping me out of some of the simpler entry-level jobs. I wouldn't be surprised if my advanced degree has been working against me when it comes to getting the technician jobs I've applied for, too.

You are correct in both cases. Operations, construction, design, assembly, that's where the jobs are unfortunately. My recommendation is to be extremely willing to move long distances and accept jobs with extremely high turnover and demand, even if the working conditions are quite bad for a few years.
 

Arlos

Sad Monarchist
Not sure how it is in the US but in my country we have way too many people graduating from colleges, and not enough from vocational school.
It result in the interesting situation where people from vocational school can land a cushy job quite easily, while people from colleges can’t find one, and when they do, it usually doesn’t pay well.
We don’t have debts problems here though...
 

Realm

Well-known member
Graduated with a computer science degree, I was close to a minor in philosophy but couldn't jimmy the credit hours well enough, but so it goes.

I do strongly believe that the arts course requirements in science degrees is positive (likewise with the opposite, science requirements in arts degrees) because university fits into an interesting spot in modern society where you can learn in general rather than train for a job.

On the job front, I took an unrelated job paying 52 to start, which I turned into a comp sci job paying 56 to start within 7 months of working at the place, which I'm fairly pleased at.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top