First, Nazis bad. I am half Dutch, so I am no fan of Nazis.
Second, "antisemite" is anyone who says anything Jewish people do not want said- Marlon Brando's comment, while true, was branded "anti-semitism." The idea is to literally create a group of people who cannot be criticized in any way, shape, or form, which is in fact a master race concept. Imagine if black people were condemned if any black guy ever criticized white people.
Hopefully this won't get me banned.
well, the whole woke/intersectionality concept boils down to a hierarchical ranking of ethnic & cultural groups. The higher tiers are reserved for those deemed more worthy by virtue of being, or being descended from, 'victims' of those lower on the hierarchy. (It is, like most marxism, more a distortion of christian moral teaching than anything else). As a (presumably) gentile Dutch, you are several rungs below the rung occupied by Jews on the hierarchy. Perhaps if you were also handicapped, gender confused, and a suitably exotic religious minority you might be able to argue for a higher tier. As is, the dominant social mores dictate that you can not criticize those who are more victimized (virtuous, hierarchically superior) than you. UNLESS, of course, you do so 'on behalf' of those who (by virtue of being even more victimized) are considered to be of a higher tier. Hence much of the enthusiasm (amongst those who evidence no concern for other refugee groups) for the Palestinian "Cause". It is a get-out-of-cancellation free card for those who wish to criticize jews or the jewish state.
Notes:
1. In all fairness, there is a long history of nasty and often violent antisemitism, especially in Europe and the 'middle east', so hypersensitivity on the topic is to be expected. What the British did to the Irish doesn't come close to what folks did to the Jews, and I can confirm that my extended family will still be holding a grudge over that after old-blighty sinks beneath the waves.
1.a. We can argue as to why the jews were/are so often targeted, but I expect a combination of deliberate cultural separatism combined with a cultural focus on education and hard work, which often led to strong presence in mercantile and later financial classes made them easy, and lucrative targets. People might despise paupers, but the don't normally bother with trying to wipe them out and take their stuff (after all, they have nothing to take, that is what makes them paupers). A distinct, wealthy, minority who also happen to hold most of the (armed) governing class's debt? What a
convenient target. For a non-jewish example, see the Knights Templar - who were probably wiped out more due to their role in holding debt for the Frankish crown, and a general ignorance of banking (the grand templar treasure that various idiots keep searching for never existed, and was a figment of medieval ignorance of how financial intermediation works) than the frankly (pun intended) fantastical tales of idolatry and blasphemy.
2. Given the enthusiasm* for the Palestinian cause, and the Israeli temerity to be militarily successful and politically independent of their 'betters' in Europe, the charge of 'anti-semitism' has lost much, if not most, of its bite on the continent.
2.a. An enthusiasm, helped no doubt, but several decades of middle eastern oil money.
2.b. And of course immigration. Not sure how importing large number of folks from a different cultural milieu, while forswearing any serious effort at integration, much less assimilation, will work in the long run, but neither history nor human nature give much grounds for optimism. It seems near-certain to get pretty ugly before it all works out.
2.c. Not that the US is doing so much better of late. For reasons of factional political expedience much of the self-proclaimed elite has rather ostentatiously abandoned the entire concept of assimilation, which is now running more on inertia than anything else.
