The Most Dangerous Amendment Proposal in America

Have it your way, I am still not into romanticising primitivism and your sort of white collar is way too advanced and safe compared to the loads of child labor and health issue types of before

That said, it’s nice to know that those of different social classes in the West, really are of a different experience to the Twitter obsessed douchebags of ghe middle to upper class.....so many champagne socialists who in the end are more cut off from everybody else and will probably stab each other in the back for social credit points from guys who are FAR from loyal or even close to fans

Not even about money

Like what happened with Vic Mignogna at Rooster Teeth....I think he really felt betrayed over there

That said, I think the group solidarity or friendship can still occur or exist, even in higher tech jobs. Look at KyoAni, the guys who actually treat their employees like humans and have really good friendships and product as a result, and they exist in Japanese work culture.

Hell, fandoms or clubs dedicated to a specific entertainment, probably can have that genuine solidarity too.....just make sure you know for sure who or what you are dealing with.....SJWs managed to destroy fandoms way better than their Moral Guardian counterparts by essentially sort of infiltrating them
 
Last edited:
The thing about automation, though, is that if they do it too much, there won't be enough people who can actually afford to buy the shit that's being made.
They’ll just make consumers robot, they are already handing out citizenships...
 
Passing that would mean that corporations would pack up and leave the US for Canada, Europe, Australia, South Korea or Japan. Which would mightily suck for the cockroach parasite socialists as the source of funding for their socialist programs ceases to exist and poverty will go up through the roof.

I don't think even Sanders or Warren would be this fucknut insane to sign this.
 
The Amendment is just calling for reasonable common sense free speech control laws that all Americans can find common ground on. Combine it with safe space zones where free speech isn't allowed and buybacks of privately controlled independent media dissemination devices and we'll all be safer for it. (y)
 
And shit like this makes me either want to go to Mars or try to move into some remote area of Canada or the USA in the hopes of being missed by it all.
 
And shit like this makes me either want to go to Mars or try to move into some remote area of Canada or the USA in the hopes of being missed by it all.
That... isn't going to happen. If shit really gets down, then you are more likely to die of intense radiation poisoning or getting weaponized anthrax dumped on you than surviving.

I should know, Montana from the Rockies on eastward is one giant red zone, where you die of intense radiation poisoning... just to spite the world because of reasons.
 
That... isn't going to happen. If shit really gets down, then you are more likely to die of intense radiation poisoning or getting weaponized anthrax dumped on you than surviving.

I should know, Montana from the Rockies on eastward is one giant red zone, where you die of intense radiation poisoning... just to spite the world because of reasons.

That is a completely inaccurate understanding of a nuclear war even during the 1980s heights of arsenals. These days the situation is yet still much better.
 
That is a completely inaccurate understanding of a nuclear war even during the 1980s heights of arsenals. These days the situation is yet still much better.
When one of the players involved has been reported to have plans to fuck the world even more just out of spite (USSR/Russia)... that isn't far off the mark. I've seen the radiation charts of a possible nuclear apocalypse and I've seen that everything east of the Rockies in Montana is one giant red zone until you start hitting the Dakotas.
 
Weren't 70's and 80's nuclear weapon effects projections proven to be severly overblown? Same with nuclear winter theory.

Yes. The maps that A.F. is likely referencing were made in the late 50s from US projections of what an enemy attack could look like and were the basis of a lot of assumptions in the 70s and 80s, but that was based on very heavy hydrogen bombs deployed by bombers; instead, ICBMs with smaller warheads began the norm. Now, smaller warheads are less efficient so they reduce more radioactive material, but the reduction in the size and scale of the groundbursts on hardened targets is a substantial gain despite that. The pattern also changes to be more focused on the midwestern silos.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top