United States The Left Can't Meme

DarthOne

☦️
I still don't grok why they backed France getting rid of Gaddafi. It utterly destroyed American credibility when it came to making deals with some of these dictators to de-weaponize/militarize. Gaddafi had actually played ball when it came to getting rid of Islamic terrorists and reducing WMDs, and all we had to do was let him have his African hellhole, and we couldn't even do that... and the worst part is that the country is now WORSE OFF than it was under him and his government.
I’ve heard claims that Gaddafi was going to create an alternative currency to the Glorious Petrol-Dollar. And the globalist establishment just couldn’t allow that.
 

ATP

Well-known member
I’ve heard claims that Gaddafi was going to create an alternative currency to the Glorious Petrol-Dollar. And the globalist establishment just couldn’t allow that.
I hear the same about Saddam.Well,almost the same - he supposed to sell oil for yuan,not dollar.
Could be true or not,but i still think,that american deep state simply wanted islamists there....
 

Zyobot

Just a time-traveling robot stranded on Earth.
trump-won-election-meme.jpg
 

Scottty

Well-known member
Founder
I hear the same about Saddam.Well,almost the same - he supposed to sell oil for yuan,not dollar.
Could be true or not,but i still think,that american deep state simply wanted islamists there....

Or Communists. Consider how Cambodia was developing economically under its king, before the CIA got Pol Pot to take over.
I'm starting to think there's a pattern through the 20th and 21st centuries - any leader who tries to build up his country for the benefit of his own people will get deposed in a coup by the American intelligence agencies, because they are operating on a zero-sum mindset: for American Big Business to win, everyone else must lose.
 

DarthOne

☦️
Or Communists. Consider how Cambodia was developing economically under its king, before the CIA got Pol Pot to take over.
I'm starting to think there's a pattern through the 20th and 21st centuries - any leader who tries to build up his country for the benefit of his own people will get deposed in a coup by the American intelligence agencies, because they are operating on a zero-sum mindset: for American Big Business to win, everyone else must lose.
All more reason why the CIA needs to be disbanded. With extreme prejudice.
 

Typhonis

Well-known member
No...we do something worse with them. America does need inteligence on it's enemies after all. Also it doesn't help that a Soviet agent helped create the CIA playbook. So...we allow the CIA to continue to exist...only we 'downsize' them to help 'balance the budget'. Afterall they need , what? Only 10 agents to cooordinate the data they gather? No need for them to leave the US at all I would think.
 

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
Except we do.
The amount of information both the NSA and the CIA ger via all thier means is huge.
Let me put it this way.
There are not enough people in either agency to sift through everything.
Not even with DoD help.
 

Zyobot

Just a time-traveling robot stranded on Earth.
Or Communists. Consider how Cambodia was developing economically under its king, before the CIA got Pol Pot to take over.
I'm starting to think there's a pattern through the 20th and 21st centuries - any leader who tries to build up his country for the benefit of his own people will get deposed in a coup by the American intelligence agencies, because they are operating on a zero-sum mindset: for American Big Business to win, everyone else must lose.

Definitely one of the worse things the CIA has perpetrated.

That said, I’m pretty sure the ChiComs funneled more support to the Khmer Rouge than Western governments ever had. Not accusing you of being one, but it’s always funny how Commies seem to “innocently forget” that, in favor of always bashing the US and Capitalism as a whole. :cautious:
 

Scottty

Well-known member
Founder
Definitely one of the worse things the CIA has perpetrated.

That said, I’m pretty sure the ChiComs funneled more support to the Khmer Rouge than Western governments ever had. Not accusing you of being one, but it’s always funny how Commies seem to “innocently forget” that, in favor of always bashing the US and Capitalism as a whole. :cautious:

I am not a Communist, nor aligned with their objectives. But I don't think we can say the same thing with certainty about some of the people in the CIA.
 

Zyobot

Just a time-traveling robot stranded on Earth.
I am not a Communist, nor aligned with their objectives. But I don't think we can say the same thing with certainty about some of the people in the CIA.

I literally just said I wasn’t accusing you of being a Communist. “Not accusing you of being one”, remember?

Otherwise, you raise an interesting point about the CIA. Surely, they’re aware of the KGB’s Long March through the Institutions by now — though I’m curious as to why it was allowed to happen. :unsure:
 

Blasterbot

Well-known member
I literally just said I wasn’t accusing you of being a Communist. “Not accusing you of being one”, remember?

Otherwise, you raise an interesting point about the CIA. Surely, they’re aware of the KGB’s Long March through the Institutions by now — though I’m curious as to why it was allowed to happen. :unsure:
the more power the government gets the more power and money their agency gets. if they believe they are doing good that is a positive result for them. if they believe they want more money for when they retire to the private sector they also approve. it takes a very rare sort to say we have enough or don't need as much.
 

Zyobot

Just a time-traveling robot stranded on Earth.
the more power the government gets the more power and money their agency gets. if they believe they are doing good that is a positive result for them. if they believe they want more money for when they retire to the private sector they also approve. it takes a very rare sort to say we have enough or don't need as much.

Eventually, I think things will get more than bad enough for government agents who were extracting excess money and getting cushy private-sector positions one day to regret being so greedy the next. It’ll probably take a few more decades, but ultimately, people don’t put up with that shit forever.

Other than that, I’m not seeing anything here on why the CIA seems to have done little to address KGB ideological subversion? No doubt they’re aware it exists, with the best-case scenario I can think of being that they might not have caught on immediately and only realized it was there after the fact. And even then, the truth is probably a good deal worse than that. :(
 

ATP

Well-known member
Or Communists. Consider how Cambodia was developing economically under its king, before the CIA got Pol Pot to take over.
I'm starting to think there's a pattern through the 20th and 21st centuries - any leader who tries to build up his country for the benefit of his own people will get deposed in a coup by the American intelligence agencies, because they are operating on a zero-sum mindset: for American Big Business to win, everyone else must lose.
That happened earlier - everybody is taking about german moneys and Lenin,but we forget,that Trocky and Wall Street money win revolution for soviets.
Becouse otherwise reformed Russia would become 1th economic power of world about 1950.

And,giving Poland and rest of central Europe for nothing after 1945.

Optymist.They planned exactly for that - but,normalization made by deep state,not KGB.
I fear,that it could work.
 

Zyobot

Just a time-traveling robot stranded on Earth.
I dunno, I feel like that one's not a terrible meme. It's still a rather overcluttered but gets its message across without being too overly wordy.

Same here.

Think if they just had the Tweet and no background, that'd have gotten rid of the clutter.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top