strunkenwhite

Well-known member
There are situations where a dog can stun an escaping suspect and give officers time to catch him.
Or it can even be safer to use the dog instead of trying to get officers closer.
Because dogs are smaller and faster then humans.
I'm not here to argue that there is no possible legitimate use of attack dogs. But I don't think it's worth it. But for the sake of educating me more on this topic, "stun"?
 

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
I'm not here to argue that there is no possible legitimate use of attack dogs. But I don't think it's worth it. But for the sake of educating me more on this topic, "stun"?
It stos them in thertracks in the most non lethal means.
Dogs help prevent more shootings.
 

49ersfootball

Well-known member
Well, there was technically that thing for a few days, but no, I think he simply means that when the state of California was added to the Union (became a state instead of territory), it was as a "free state" instead of a "slave state"; in other words, "free state" means "no slavery".
Ah-ha. Yet CA still had lots of issues that included the good ole trigger button pushing such as banning affirmative action, racial quotas, minority-owned businesses & entrepreneurships prevented from receiving state government contracts, etc.,
 

strunkenwhite

Well-known member
Ah-ha. Yet CA still had lots of issues that included the good ole trigger button pushing such as banning affirmative action, racial quotas, minority-owned businesses & entrepreneurships prevented from receiving state government contracts, etc.,
It's a common modern-day misconception that "anti-slavery" correlated to "not very racist" (by our standards) back then.
 

Cherico

Well-known member
Ah-ha. Yet CA still had lots of issues that included the good ole trigger button pushing such as banning affirmative action, racial quotas, minority-owned businesses & entrepreneurships prevented from receiving state government contracts, etc.,

And so did the rest of the country, that doesn't mean I'm going to feel guilty for something we didn't fucking do.
 

Robovski

Well-known member
I don't see any restitution being proposed for the Chinese labor used in California to build railroads and that seems more legit than slave reparations for people who were never slaves in a state where slavery was not legal and would have to be paid by people who never had slaves.
 

Cherico

Well-known member
I don't see any restitution being proposed for the Chinese labor used in California to build railroads and that seems more legit than slave reparations for people who were never slaves in a state where slavery was not legal and would have to be paid by people who never had slaves.

Chinese laborors were given money to do a job.

Yes the job was kind of shit, but you don't give people reperations because their ansestors had shit jobs. Because everyones ansestors worked shit jobs.

If your looking for an actual comparison, then you want the japanese internment camps during the second world war, and even that's pretty iffy.

(The conditions were no where near as bad as what slaves endured.)
 

Robovski

Well-known member
Chinese laborors were given money to do a job.

Yes the job was kind of shit, but you don't give people reperations because their ansestors had shit jobs. Because everyones ansestors worked shit jobs.

If your looking for an actual comparison, then you want the japanese internment camps during the second world war, and even that's pretty iffy.

(The conditions were no where near as bad as what slaves endured.)
If the "job" terms were anything like the ones my Slavic ancestors had when they came to Pennsylvania to dig coal then I'd say it's still a fairer claim than the proposed restitution for slavery in California. Why? Because poeple were misled and exploited, which is more than something that didn't happen in California to people it didn't happen to. What I am saying is that the plan is wild smoke blown by redistributionists wanting gimmie and buoyed by white guilt. At least with the internment camps it actually happened here in California. They want to do some kind of group mea culpa for anti-black racism? Go ahead, California's institutions seems to have a deep hand in treating blacks poorly historically and failing to fix problems when found but calling it slavery reparations is just pure bullshit. Maybe the LA Times, the police pension fund, and Holywood can foot the bill instead?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top