Wait, what? Got a link?Prince Andrew specifically interfered on behalf of Epstein to try and get charges against him thrown out.
Because if Andrew was trying to run cover for Epstein...wow.
Wait, what? Got a link?Prince Andrew specifically interfered on behalf of Epstein to try and get charges against him thrown out.
Here is a link. Prince Andrew ‘lobbied US government for better plea deal for Jeffrey Epstein’Wait, what? Got a link?
Because if Andrew was trying to run cover for Epstein...wow.
...that adds a whole new layer to this clusterfuck of a criminal case.Here is a link. Prince Andrew ‘lobbied US government for better plea deal for Jeffrey Epstein’
Prince Andrew 'lobbied US government over Epstein plea deal'
Prince Andrew 'lobbied the US government for a favourable plea deal for Jeffrey Epstein' when the pedophile was jailed for procuring underage prostitutes in 2009, new court files allege.www.dailymail.co.uk
Oh I have no question that before this mess is over. A whole lot of people in the Media, Hollywood, Politics and Industry are gonna get outed. This is gonna be the mother of all bombshells....that adds a whole new layer to this clusterfuck of a criminal case.
Oh I have no question that before this mess is over. A whole lot of people in the Media, Hollywood, Politics and Industry are gonna get outed. This is gonna be the mother of all bombshells.
He already proved he is innocentHonestly, I'm skeptical about that. I think a few select scapegoats are going to be hit, and I'm sure they're trying to make Trump the top name on that list of scapegoats. Otherwise she'd also wind up suicided in her jail cell.
Then they'll just need to "prove" that he's guilty. Remember, we're talking about people who have no problem lying to the American people; even when it's blatantly obvious that they are. Because they always get away with it.He already proved he is innocent
Uh... How? They had a falling out? Coz either the falling out was about something else entirely in which case it proves nothing, or they had a falling out about the issue, which proves nothing more than that Trump knew about it but said and did exactly nothing except stop hanging out with him. Which would legally make him an accomplice.He already proved he is innocent
He never went to the islandUh... How? They had a falling out? Coz either the falling out was about something else entirely in which case it proves nothing, or they had a falling out about the issue, which proves nothing more than that Trump knew about it but said and did exactly nothing except stop hanging out with him. Which would legally make him an accomplice.
What proves that, and even if he didn't,what do you think that proves? There's plenty of accounts of abuse happening elsewhere.He never went to the island
I mean, circumstantial evidence has been screamed forth. Which is the exact same level of evidence that's been used to link Epstein to anyone. It's pretty much undeniable that Epstein and Trump used to be friends, given the pics of them hanging out and all, and the conversations that are publicly known between them.The democrats spend 4 years desperately digging for dirt on Trump, to the point they passed multiple state laws and fought a case up to the SC to try and get ahold of his tax returns, apparently on the theory that if they could prove he wasn't really a billionaire his entire supporter base would just collapse or something.
If there was even the slightest shred of evidence that he was criminally involved with Epistien, Rachel Maddow would be screaming it from the rooftops.
LOL at that courtroom sketch.
View attachment 998
They made her look like a creepy, hunched little weasel.
LOL at that courtroom sketch.
View attachment 998
They made her look like a creepy, hunched little weasel.