Star Wars Star Wars Discussion Thread - LET THE PAST D-! Oh, wait, nevermind

And there is that lovely shot from Kenobi, where he pulls a ship that just launched back to the ground with the force, then force-tears it's hatch open.
Right, not doing that is the part where he let them go. Basically, he clearly didn't intend to let Ezra and Kanan go, but when they managed to knock him down and get to the shuttle, he chose to let the shuttle go because tracking down the rest of the cell was more important.
 
Right, not doing that is the part where he let them go. Basically, he clearly didn't intend to let Ezra and Kanan go, but when they managed to knock him down and get to the shuttle, he chose to let the shuttle go because tracking down the rest of the cell was more important.
There are two Vaders: The first are the years after Revenge of the Sith, and the latter are the years leading up to the original Trilogy.

In the former, a younger Vader (ironically, he still has more Anakin traits here) was far more vengeful and vicious, willing to hunt down Jedi (and by extension Kenobi) by any means necessary -- he even defied Sidious on multiple occasions to do this. This is the Vader we see in Kenobi, as a good example; calculated recklessness.

The latter is when he had become more patient, cool, and calculating. We see this Vader in Rebels and the original Trilogy, letting Jedi escape so he can hunt them and their fellows/other rebels down later, creating plans where they could track them to rebel outposts and bases, et cetera.

He mellowed out from being a hothead over time, but the rage, viciousness, and hatred were still there -- just tempered by wisdom and time and experience.
 
The latter is when he had become more patient, cool, and calculating. We see this Vader in Rebels and the original Trilogy, letting Jedi escape so he can hunt them and their fellows/other rebels down later, creating plans where they could track them to rebel outposts and bases, et cetera.

He mellowed out from being a hothead over time, but the rage, viciousness, and hatred were still there -- just tempered by wisdom and time and experience.
This development on Vader's part is one of the rare good things Disney did the franchise right, especially since it set the stage for Vader making his first power play against Sidious after ANH. Unlike in Legends where Vader stayed a content little puppet for Sidious (much to the latter's displeasure), Vader's ambition sparked after Sidious made him responsible for the loss of the Death Star. This tied together all the experience he'd gained over the past couple of decades, leading him to build an impressive power base that only got exposed when Doctor Aphra ratted him out to Sidious.

And even then, Sidious was so impressed at what Vader had managed to put together under his nose, and satisfied that Vader was finally, truly thinking like a Sith, that he didn't hold it against him. Instead, he 'rewarded' Vader by telling him who it was who ratted him out, causing Doctor Aphra to run like hell.
 
Yep.

In less than a decade after acquiring the license, they killed their own golden goose. They can't even do a "redo" of the sequel shits because of Carrie's passing, so we'll never see Luke, Han, and Leia on screen together again outside of CGI deep fakes.

The sequels also basically killed Daisy R's career, too -- everything she's done after Wars have basically been low-exposure projects in comparison to the A List stuff you'd have expected.
 
It's actually kinda worse. Hayden was stuck with poorly-written lines, but the prequels had an overall solid plotline. The sequels were just crap through and through, so much so that even ripping off Dark Empire couldn't save the last movie.
Exactly. The prequels where a good-to-mediocre story told poorly. The Sequels were just bad, as well as lacking a coherent overall vision.
 
Exactly. The prequels where a good-to-mediocre story told poorly. The Sequels were just bad, as well as lacking a coherent overall vision.
"George! You can type this shit, but you sure can't say it! Move your mouth when you're typing!"
- Harrison Ford

George always knew what he wanted to show on the screen, but he apparently had a problem putting his vision into words to be spoken with what was on the screen.
 
"George! You can type this shit, but you sure can't say it! Move your mouth when you're typing!"
- Harrison Ford

George always knew what he wanted to show on the screen, but he apparently had a problem putting his vision into words to be spoken with what was on the screen.
Yeah and by the time of the prequels, everyone was afraid of stepping up and helping him. Either out of fear of screwing up the franchise or other reasons.
 
"George! You can type this shit, but you sure can't say it! Move your mouth when you're typing!"
- Harrison Ford

George always knew what he wanted to show on the screen, but he apparently had a problem putting his vision into words to be spoken with what was on the screen.
What Lucas desperately needed was an editor to clean up the dialogue.

Even if you changed absolutely nothing else about the prequels, the dialogue no longer being dreadfully wooden or horribly cheesy would make them a thousand times better.

Other than that, the prequels are pretty solid films with some minor issues.

Hell, Jar-Jar isn’t that annoying. Even kinda funny. Even if he is largely kindergarten humor. And kid Anakin wasn’t that bad. At least the kid didn’t get many lines to fuck up?

Look, all I’m saying is that even the worst parts of the prequels are tolerable when compared to Rat Wars.
 
but the prequels had an overall solid plotline.
Ehh...

I'd push back on that a bit. There are honestly quite a few problems with the plot.

But there is a solid core there. Really solid.

Palpatine sneaking his way to power, controlling both sides of the war, and killing the Jedi with order 66 were brilliant ideas.

How did the empire take over? By weaking both sides, the loyalists and the separatists, with a long drawn out war that destroyed the strength and leadership of both sides and then completely eliminating the leadership of one side leaving only himself in a position of power and easily consolidating control over a devastated galaxy.

How did he destroy the Jedi? By having the Jedi attached to the army and suffer a long drawn out attrition with battles and intelligence he controlled. All while developing trust with clone troops that were completely loyal to the Jedi until order 66 triggered and they went instantly from valued comrades they fought with for years to ruthless assassins without any warning catching the Jedi totally off guard.

These are fantastic ideas.

But everything about the movies were executed terribly. And ideas are only as good as their execution and a good foundation doesn't matter if everything built on it is garbage.
Look, all I’m saying is that even the worst parts of the prequels are tolerable when compared to Rat Wars.
When compared to the sequels? Absolutely. They look like the Mona Lisa next to literal trash.

Objectively? Still not good movies.
 
Last edited:
What Lucas desperately needed was an editor to clean up the dialogue.

What George Lucas desperately needed was to still have Marcia Lucas on board; she was literally one of the best script doctors and editors in the business.

Among other things, she's *entirely* responsible for the pacing of the Death Star battle in A New Hope. Y'know the whole constantly rising tension with the repeated cuts back to the Death Star and the Rebel Command center with the countdown to when the Death Star will be in range? That's entirely Marcia's work, made entirely in post-production.
 
It's all somewhere in the middle. The prequels have serious flaws, and if you focus on those, you can easily make the case that they really suck, as films. They do have very good 'skeleton', though, and some elements that really do dazzle. If you focus on those parts, you can make the case that they're actually very good at what they're meant to achieve. (And note that what Lucas meant to achieve is not, by definition, what most of the audience expected.)

The issue is that you have prequel haters who only focus on all the bad stuff, to the point of accentuating even the tiniest (and often imagined) 'flaw'... and in the other hand, you have prequel defenders who will try to argue that George's crap dialogue is actually "Shakespearean".

Fortunately, these extreme positions aren't actually that over-represented (although the haters rode the wave of the burgeoning internet for a few years). Most people just agree that the prequels are flawed films, but very far from irredeemable dog-shit. They were made with love, and with a vision.
 
Never said the prequels were perfect. They were flawed films, especially the second one (like watching very bad soap in some parts), but overall? Not bad, they had a coherent overall plotline and the major characters were all solid and rounded out. Windu...? Yeah, he's totally badass...but he's also a colossal asshole that played right into Sidious' hands. Sidious himself...? A true evil mastermind and one of the most powerful Dark Lords of the Sith...but also a touch too arrogant, underestimating Windu and leading to getting his face melted off by having his own lightning turned back against him. Likewise for Anakin...the Chosen One of the Force, a nascent god in mortal form...also an arrogant, entitled, whiny prick with major issues that end up biting him in the ass sooner or later, but those same issues don't exist just because. I mean, hey, who'd have thought an ex-slave with phenomenal cosmic power wouldn't have issues?

So on and so forth...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top