So what are you watching?

Watching Chainsaw Man.

TWO REASONS :
It's original content and can stand on its own two feet.
The vibes that it gives me are that it's the closest thing we have to an Evil Dead animated series.

I will follow with the anime Zom 100: Bucket List of the Dead , I will also give the benefit of the doubt to the live-action movie since even though its Netflix.
 
Three Stooges,





Here they are mocking the Nazi's.

Worst,cruel monster started woth mocking prussian death hussarls and kaiser,then mocked german/Moronia/,then entire Europe/see map/ ,and in final fight over Earth they mocked also their opponents,which i think supposed to be England,France,Italy and soviets.

How could they!!!!!!!!!!

P.S Poland do not fight here,but i suppose,that we were woo-woo country.
 
Last edited:
Worst,cruel monster started woth mocking prussian death hussarls and kaiser,then mocked german/Moronia/,then entire Europe/see map/ ,and in final fight over Earth they mocked also their opponents,which i think supposed to be England,France,Italy and soviets.

How could they!!!!!!!!!!

P.S Poland do not fight here,but i suppose,that we were woo-woo country.
It's the Three Stooges they mock Everybody. They are quite progressive like that. No matter your race, creed, color, religion, orientation, or any thing else....they will mock it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ATP
Watched some horror movies. Terrifier 2 and Suspiria.

Terrifier and its sequel are an interesting franchise. I saw the first Terrifier and it wasn't really... scary. The nemesis, Art the Clown, was fine and the first movie had a bit of an original charm to it and it had some quirky characters and victims but its main hallmark, outside of the antagonist, was obviously the gore. Now, I'm not a big fan of 'torture porn' or gore porn... and even things like 'Body Horror' kinda skeeve me out. I'm not a big fan of the Saw movies and never saw anything like Hostel or even The Dentist. I would cringe too much. I've only seen The Fly once even and I thought that movie was neat.

But Terrifier, I saw the first one once and the kills were really graphic and gorey and practical and I thought it was pretty neat actually though I had to avert my eyes a few times. But I did like it enough that when I saw I could watch Terrifier 2 off of streaming for free, I was actually kind of intrigued to check it out, fully knowing it would likely be more of the same.

And I liked it! Art the Clown, the horrible torturing mutiliating murderer, was a fun character and the kills were graphic... one of them... Wow... it wasn't as horrific as one of the kills in the first movie... but it was far more prolonged. So much so I even darkly laughed at one bit where Art just went overboard without breaking the movies festively murderous atmosphere. Another interesting thing about Terrifier is that it actually expanded the lore and worldbuilding and usually that is what kills my interest in slasher films, when they explain too much. But here, it really improved the films quality and gave it an actual story beyond a murderous clown murderhobo'ing people to death and it worked.

I ah... would recommend it, if your into... real gore filled films. You should probably watch the first Terrifier film though, just so you know what your getting into and also knowing the second film is better and more.. fleshed out so to speak.



Also saw Suspiria. The 1977 version mind you. People keep talking about this Dario Argento film and its great filmmaking and I'm just too dumb to get it. Don't get me wrong, there are some parts of it I like and I'm sure proper filmmaking appreciators like it but... it was just too boring for me. Too stylistic for me I guess. Not liking this film makes me feel like a Philistine.
Watching Cocoon (1985).
 
So watched the new superman cartoon, my adventures with superman.

It was not bad. The art style is a big plus snice it is getting away from Rick and Morty and the more recent amercain styles. Instead it reminds me of a mix of Ainme and early 2000's DC cartoons. A nice change of pace.

They made some changes like Lois being an intern instead of an established reporter. She also is more idealistic and manic then in other versions. But she still is recognizable as Lois.

Clark is still figuring out history and powers. Which is frist a out side of having a teen Clark like Smallville.

One thing that made me laugh was that Jimmy was race swapped. While not a big deal the fact thay Hollywood did it again to a red head just adds fuel to the meme. In all Honesty with how much it happens I am pretty sure they ran the numbers and figured race swapping red head would give them X more black people and just said do it.

The plot lines are not bad. There seem to be an overarching plot line with Waller and a villain of the week. The romance is a out what you expect for a show targeting kids. There are enough jokes thay work to make the show fairly light hearted.

Overall not bad and better then most recent adpations coming out of Marvel and DC.
 
So watched the new superman cartoon, my adventures with superman.

It was not bad. The art style is a big plus snice it is getting away from Rick and Morty and the more recent amercain styles. Instead it reminds me of a mix of Ainme and early 2000's DC cartoons. A nice change of pace.

They made some changes like Lois being an intern instead of an established reporter. She also is more idealistic and manic then in other versions. But she still is recognizable as Lois.

Clark is still figuring out history and powers. Which is frist a out side of having a teen Clark like Smallville.

One thing that made me laugh was that Jimmy was race swapped. While not a big deal the fact thay Hollywood did it again to a red head just adds fuel to the meme. In all Honesty with how much it happens I am pretty sure they ran the numbers and figured race swapping red head would give them X more black people and just said do it.

The plot lines are not bad. There seem to be an overarching plot line with Waller and a villain of the week. The romance is a out what you expect for a show targeting kids. There are enough jokes thay work to make the show fairly light hearted.

Overall not bad and better then most recent adpations coming out of Marvel and DC.
 
So watched the new superman cartoon, my adventures with superman.

It was not bad. The art style is a big plus snice it is getting away from Rick and Morty and the more recent amercain styles. Instead it reminds me of a mix of Ainme and early 2000's DC cartoons. A nice change of pace.

They made some changes like Lois being an intern instead of an established reporter. She also is more idealistic and manic then in other versions. But she still is recognizable as Lois.

Clark is still figuring out history and powers. Which is frist a out side of having a teen Clark like Smallville.

One thing that made me laugh was that Jimmy was race swapped. While not a big deal the fact thay Hollywood did it again to a red head just adds fuel to the meme. In all Honesty with how much it happens I am pretty sure they ran the numbers and figured race swapping red head would give them X more black people and just said do it.

The plot lines are not bad. There seem to be an overarching plot line with Waller and a villain of the week. The romance is a out what you expect for a show targeting kids. There are enough jokes thay work to make the show fairly light hearted.

Overall not bad and better then most recent adpations coming out of Marvel and DC.
I'll second this. They're doing an interesting thing with alien (Kryptonian?) technology as the driving force behind the villains and plot. They've also wasted no time on will they/won't they crap with Lois and Clark. All in all a good spin on the original formula, much like X-men Evolution. Though, much like X-men evolution some of the changes don't really work out. Would recommend.
 
So watched the new superman cartoon, my adventures with superman.

It was not bad. The art style is a big plus snice it is getting away from Rick and Morty and the more recent amercain styles. Instead it reminds me of a mix of Ainme and early 2000's DC cartoons. A nice change of pace.

They made some changes like Lois being an intern instead of an established reporter. She also is more idealistic and manic then in other versions. But she still is recognizable as Lois.

Clark is still figuring out history and powers. Which is frist a out side of having a teen Clark like Smallville.

One thing that made me laugh was that Jimmy was race swapped. While not a big deal the fact thay Hollywood did it again to a red head just adds fuel to the meme. In all Honesty with how much it happens I am pretty sure they ran the numbers and figured race swapping red head would give them X more black people and just said do it.

The plot lines are not bad. There seem to be an overarching plot line with Waller and a villain of the week. The romance is a out what you expect for a show targeting kids. There are enough jokes thay work to make the show fairly light hearted.

Overall not bad and better then most recent adpations coming out of Marvel and DC.
Assuming you've watched the CW shows?
 
Assuming you've watched the CW shows?

Only parts. I watched the frist couple of seasons of Supergirl, and some Flash. The only one I have seen all of was Smallville. I keep meaning to watch more of them but have not gotten around to it yet.


So I decided to check out Lionness on Parmount. It is a nrw spy thriller by Taylor Sheridan the guy behind Yellowstone. I saw a reveiw in Variety that said it sucked amd was full of red state propaganda. So just like CBR and Anime if a place like Variey hates it the show is most likely decent.

Overall it strayed out decent. It does follow some basic trops loke making the hard decsions and some others. But they are well done overall.

The action is decent with standard level big t.v. production action and effects. The frist two episodes are mainly set up but it held my interest enough to give the rest of the season a try.
 
Saw the 1973 movie The Crazies directed by none other then George Romero himself. I've actually seen the 2010 remake The Crazies which I thought was decent enough, but while a lot of people seemed to like it I thought it was somewhat underwhelming with how it handled the entire outbreak being managed by the town and too focused on the main characters and their adventure instead as the main drawback.

The 1973 version The Crazies actually, to my pleasant surprise, had a broader scope which is what I wanted from the remake but unfortunately the movie was just... kinda dumb? Romero was a legend and all but his grasp of military and action scenes has always been borderline cringe and while I appreciated some of the general ideas brought up about bureaucratic mismanagement and general government incompetence, it was all pretty overbearing to an almost eye rolling degree. I just couldn't quite accept the idea that 1500 supposedly well trained troops couldn't control a town of... like two thousand people.

With that forcibly pushed from my mind, I actually did appreciate the (dated by todays standards) film in the respects of the chaos and madness that was gripping the small town as the main characters here attempted to escape the area and there were some nice action scenes with the crazy people fighting the military and whatnot that one could find entertainment in if they turned their brains off. And the overall themes and whatnot were appreciated, the characters and their struggles interesting to follow. It's just the amatuerish nature you see in this Romero film seems pretty common in a lot of his work and is a pretty big flaw IMHO. Didn't prevent the film from being watchable though.
 
Saw the 1973 movie The Crazies directed by none other then George Romero himself. I've actually seen the 2010 remake The Crazies which I thought was decent enough, but while a lot of people seemed to like it I thought it was somewhat underwhelming with how it handled the entire outbreak being managed by the town and too focused on the main characters and their adventure instead as the main drawback.

The 1973 version The Crazies actually, to my pleasant surprise, had a broader scope which is what I wanted from the remake but unfortunately the movie was just... kinda dumb? Romero was a legend and all but his grasp of military and action scenes has always been borderline cringe and while I appreciated some of the general ideas brought up about bureaucratic mismanagement and general government incompetence, it was all pretty overbearing to an almost eye rolling degree. I just couldn't quite accept the idea that 1500 supposedly well trained troops couldn't control a town of... like two thousand people.

With that forcibly pushed from my mind, I actually did appreciate the (dated by todays standards) film in the respects of the chaos and madness that was gripping the small town as the main characters here attempted to escape the area and there were some nice action scenes with the crazy people fighting the military and whatnot that one could find entertainment in if they turned their brains off. And the overall themes and whatnot were appreciated, the characters and their struggles interesting to follow. It's just the amatuerish nature you see in this Romero film seems pretty common in a lot of his work and is a pretty big flaw IMHO. Didn't prevent the film from being watchable though.

I like both the original and the remake. The 2010 version as a big emphasis on civilians' complancency and government incompetency for the beginning AND a scene clearly shows how disposable common folk are to the pencil pushers in the capital. Which in my opinion leaves the 2010 version very relevant after the last 3 years.
 
Only parts. I watched the frist couple of seasons of Supergirl, and some Flash. The only one I have seen all of was Smallville. I keep meaning to watch more of them but have not gotten around to it yet.


So I decided to check out Lionness on Parmount. It is a nrw spy thriller by Taylor Sheridan the guy behind Yellowstone. I saw a reveiw in Variety that said it sucked amd was full of red state propaganda. So just like CBR and Anime if a place like Variey hates it the show is most likely decent.

Overall it strayed out decent. It does follow some basic trops loke making the hard decsions and some others. But they are well done overall.

The action is decent with standard level big t.v. production action and effects. The frist two episodes are mainly set up but it held my interest enough to give the rest of the season a try.
I always liked watching The Flash on the CW and still have the DVR recording of their Series Finale from May 24.
 
Flash on TV is certainly better than the movie.

Also doesn't have (as far as I know, I haven't watched it yet but with that MANY seasons I can't get hold of it yet) unsavory individuals such as Ezra Miller.
 
Last edited:
Flash on TV is certainly better than the movie.

Also doesn't have (as far as I know, I haven't watched it yet but withat MANY seasons I can't get hold of it yet) unsavory individuals such as Ezra Miller.
They did butcher Iris' character to the point where people are now saying that "Savitar did nothing wrong in killing Iris", so yeah. :ROFLMAO:
 
Saw Oppenheimer in theater. I was ambivalent on watching it, thinking it was geared towards history nerds like me, but I couldn't see myself enjoying a three hour long historical biopic about a scientist who I really didn't have much interest in learning about generally. And I saw the reviews by Red Letter Media and Critical Drinker and others who were positive on it, but they had their own reservations voiced. Finally one of my friends saw it (in an IMAX) and said it was really good so I decided to give it a watch.

After taking a few hours taking it in, I think Oppenheimer is the best movie I've seen in a long time, like maybe years. I liked it that much. Like others have said, its a beautiful, visually stunning, well crafted and edited movie but the criticisms that it felt awkward or the characters weren't well developed, I disagree fully. All of the characters were very well developed and I think their dialogue and interactions were utterly fascinating. RLM stated the musical score eclipsed the dialogue but I didn't really get that when I was watching the film. Anything relating to non-linear storytelling that people bring up about Christopher Nolan... it wasn't an issue in the least. It accentuated the quality of the film. Christopher Nolan did a great job editing and piecing the film together to make it an even stronger story.

Amazing acting. Amazing characters. Great story. Not boring in the least. Now the main reservation when I say this is the best movie I've likely seen in years, I'm not talking about my "favorite" movie as in entertainment value. This movie was entertaining, but it's not the same kind of entertainment you'd get from an amazing space opera, comedy, horror or superhero film. Just a great piece of cinema, as the smug auteurs would say.

The best part of these biopics is that it brings historical characters to life and one of my worries going into this film is that while I like history, I'm not terribly interested in the personalities or scientists involved in the Manhattan Project. But this film... it made me very interested in all of these characters. The movie might've been titled Oppenheimer but there's twenty or so scientists, plus Congressmen, military leaders, lawyers, academics etc, that are portrayed by amazing and recognizable actors in beautifully directed scenes. And I was fortunate enough to watch this film with an engineer who knew waaaaaay more about the characters onscreen then I did.

I've heard of Teller and Enrico Fermi, and General Groves and Neils Bohr, Heisenberg etc but I could barely tell you what anyone of them are known for. When Enrico Fermi came up, I legit said... "Oh he helped invent the television right?" :poop: Anyways she survived that comment and not only were those known names in there, but other scientists too played by super recognizable actors. Robert Downey Jr. as Lewis Strauss, Josh Harnett as Lawrence, Olivia Thirlby as Hornig, Rami Malek as David Hill, Josh Peck as Kenneth Bainbridge, David Krumholtz as Isaac Rabi, Matthew Modine as Vannevar Bush. I was so happy I was sitting with an Engineer that these peoples identities could settle in my mind. And there were historical characters played by actors who you recognize and didn't know the name of. Serber, Klaus Fuchs, Hans Bethe, Neddermeyer, Condon etc and folks like Boris Pash, Lloyd Garrison, Roger Robb etc.

Also seeing Secretery of State Stimson, President Truman, even fucking Albert Einstein in scenes. Whoa. I recognized the lines Truman used in regards to meeting Oppenheimer from reading books on the Cold War. What a treat seeing it on film.

Overall, highly recommend. I went into the movie thinking it might be kinda boring and talky... but I loved watching it from beginning to end, all three hours. The first twenty minutes in fact I thought was great film based storytelling. It was a very original way to passage the time and introduce Oppenheimer and the context of everything that was happening.
 
Last edited:
Only parts. I watched the frist couple of seasons of Supergirl, and some Flash. The only one I have seen all of was Smallville. I keep meaning to watch more of them but have not gotten around to it yet.


So I decided to check out Lionness on Parmount. It is a nrw spy thriller by Taylor Sheridan the guy behind Yellowstone. I saw a reveiw in Variety that said it sucked amd was full of red state propaganda. So just like CBR and Anime if a place like Variey hates it the show is most likely decent.

Overall it strayed out decent. It does follow some basic trops loke making the hard decsions and some others. But they are well done overall.

The action is decent with standard level big t.v. production action and effects. The frist two episodes are mainly set up but it held my interest enough to give the rest of the season a try.
Watching Columbo: Swan Song movie (1974).
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top