Police Corruption Thread.


Richard Hy aka Angry Cops has broken his silence on a number of issues dealing with the buffalo ny school system and child endangerment.
the schools are not reporting incidents ranging from abuse, kidnapping, rape, and other issues. the lawyers are covering it up. Rich is at the end of his rope, and is willing to spill publicly.
 
Hey, remember that combat vet with dementia that a cop decided was on drugs and beat the shit out of?



In spite of a crooked DA still trying to charge this man and the media gaslighting on the police department's behalf, those charges have finally been dropped and there's a lawsuit on the way, because as you might guess, beating and knocking this old dementia patient out caused permanent injury. He now suffers from seizures.

There's also additional body cam footage showing that the officer made up an accusation of assault that he first approached this man with. Also that he later admitted to his witness (who lied for him on a statement) that he was a missing dementia patient. He also repeatedly accused him of biting his hand, yet declined to have a paramedic on scene look at the alleged bite. Also, he lied to the paramedics about him losing consciousness, and in spite of the paramedics recommending he be taken to the hospital, he took him to jail for "housing" in spite of knowing he was the subject of a silver alert, then lied on his report about the paramedics clearing him (of concussion). Also, in spite of a negative test result for any illegal drugs, he was still charged for it.
 
Update on the case of an elderly woman being literally tossed out of a jail and into a concrete collision barrier and left to writhe in pain:



Turns out she broke her hip and was hospitalized for three months. Of the 6 officers involved, only the one who actually tossed her was punished in any way by being put on leave for a while before finally being fired.
 

An example of a win. Parents called for an ambulance for their son, who was having a psychotic break, and the dispatch sends a Sheriff's deputy instead, who tazes the son the instant he sees him. Apparently after the original story was posted by The Civil Rights Lawyer, the deputy resigned shortly afterwards due to the local public outrage. Of course, he never received any official punishment from his department for the violation of his department's use of tasers policy, or the use of excessive force as defined by numerous case law in his state, but his family was able to sue, and the department settled before going to trial for $58,000. Wouldn't be surprised if this guy ended up going down the road somewhere and becoming a law enforcement officer again.


Meanwhile another Deputy was indited by the Feds, but a jury let him off. His family then sent The Civil Rights Lawyer hate mail. At the time he did the first video, he as unable to FOYA the body cam footage. However, now that the trial is over, he was able to do so. I think it's a disappointment that this man was not convicted to put it lightly. I do not understand how a jury can look at this footage and vote "not guilty" unless they're just some mindless "back the blue" morons, or literally members of the police union just covering for their bro. The TL;DW is that a hotel complained about people making too much noise and wanted them kicked out. Most of them were awake and were escorted off of the property, but one of them was sleeping in one of their hotel rooms. He thought his friends were pranking him, and soon found out it was actually the cops when they beat the ever-locing shit out of him, before putting him and cuffs. After he was in cuffs, this deputy continued to use force on this man, including pepper-spaying him, and then lied about the order that happened in his report. Conveniently there was no body cam footage from the deputy, because the deputy's body cam stopped recording (or so the sheriff's department claims) just as the man wakes up and pushes what he thinks is one of his friends away. Some footage from the other deputies was available, which shows them acting like a bunch of frat boys. The deputies later lied under oath about what they meant about giving this man "the solution" incidentally, but they did admit that he was already prone and handcuffed when they pepper-sprayed him and delivered more punches and kicks to him. But the jury decided to acquit him, so this psycho is still out there policing that community.
 
An example of a win. Parents called for an ambulance for their son, who was having a psychotic break, and the dispatch sends a Sheriff's deputy instead, who tazes the son the instant he sees him.
A bit inaccurate.

The son starts running away the moment he sees the cop.
the cop tases him as soon as he starts running away.
which is still illegal as the local laws explicitly forbids tasing someone for running away from the cops. they need to do something more serious to justify tasing.
but not as anger inducing towards the cop.

also, worth noting there was a warrent for the arrest of the son in question.
they didn't send the sheriff just for the lulz.
still was wrong of them, they should have sent BOTH an ambulance AND a cop in the case of a warrant for someone requesting an ambulance. instead of only a cop and no ambulance.
 
Meanwhile another Deputy was indited by the Feds, but a jury let him off. His family then sent The Civil Rights Lawyer hate mail. At the time he did the first video, he as unable to FOYA the body cam footage. However, now that the trial is over, he was able to do so. I think it's a disappointment that this man was not convicted to put it lightly. I do not understand how a jury can look at this footage and vote "not guilty" unless they're just some mindless "back the blue" morons, or literally members of the police union just covering for their bro. The TL;DW is that a hotel complained about people making too much noise and wanted them kicked out. Most of them were awake and were escorted off of the property, but one of them was sleeping in one of their hotel rooms. He thought his friends were pranking him, and soon found out it was actually the cops when they beat the ever-locing shit out of him, before putting him and cuffs. After he was in cuffs, this deputy continued to use force on this man, including pepper-spaying him, and then lied about the order that happened in his report. Conveniently there was no body cam footage from the deputy, because the deputy's body cam stopped recording (or so the sheriff's department claims) just as the man wakes up and pushes what he thinks is one of his friends away. Some footage from the other deputies was available, which shows them acting like a bunch of frat boys. The deputies later lied under oath about what they meant about giving this man "the solution" incidentally, but they did admit that he was already prone and handcuffed when they pepper-sprayed him and delivered more punches and kicks to him. But the jury decided to acquit him, so this psycho is still out there policing that community.
To convict someone you need a unanimous decision of all 12 jurors.
So if 11 said the cop is guilty but 1 of them said the cop is innocent. then the cop walks free.

Jury system is mainly designed to make it really really hard for the govt to convict an innocent person who slighted someone in power and is being falsely accused.
 
The son starts running away the moment he sees the cop.
So how much time elapsed between the cop emerging from the door before he lifted his taser and fired?

also, worth noting there was a warrent for the arrest of the son in question.
they didn't send the sheriff just for the lulz.
The warrant was not on the up-and-up either considering that it was this department involved who issued it, basically for the last time he had a psychotic break, and which he and his parents were unaware of at the time this happened. So as far as anyone at the time knew, they called for an ambulance and the police show up and immediately taze their son, cuff him, and haul him away in their vehicle.

still was wrong of them, they should have sent BOTH an ambulance AND a cop in the case of a warrant for someone requesting an ambulance. instead of only a cop and no ambulance.
Exactly. The dispatcher should be sued, too, IMO.

To convict someone you need a unanimous decision of all 12 jurors.
So if 11 said the cop is guilty but 1 of them said the cop is innocent. then the cop walks free.

Jury system is mainly designed to make it really really hard for the govt to convict an innocent person who slighted someone in power and is being falsely accused.
Yeah, well, either way it's appalling that anyone can look at what happened and the other evidence and just ignore it, as they must have done to come back with a "not guilty" verdict.
 

Meanwhile another Deputy was indited by the Feds, but a jury let him off. His family then sent The Civil Rights Lawyer hate mail. At the time he did the first video, he as unable to FOYA the body cam footage. However, now that the trial is over, he was able to do so. I think it's a disappointment that this man was not convicted to put it lightly. I do not understand how a jury can look at this footage and vote "not guilty" unless they're just some mindless "back the blue" morons, or literally members of the police union just covering for their bro. The TL;DW is that a hotel complained about people making too much noise and wanted them kicked out. Most of them were awake and were escorted off of the property, but one of them was sleeping in one of their hotel rooms. He thought his friends were pranking him, and soon found out it was actually the cops when they beat the ever-locing shit out of him, before putting him and cuffs. After he was in cuffs, this deputy continued to use force on this man, including pepper-spaying him, and then lied about the order that happened in his report. Conveniently there was no body cam footage from the deputy, because the deputy's body cam stopped recording (or so the sheriff's department claims) just as the man wakes up and pushes what he thinks is one of his friends away. Some footage from the other deputies was available, which shows them acting like a bunch of frat boys. The deputies later lied under oath about what they meant about giving this man "the solution" incidentally, but they did admit that he was already prone and handcuffed when they pepper-sprayed him and delivered more punches and kicks to him. But the jury decided to acquit him, so this psycho is still out there policing that community.


That cop is clearly overcompensating for a lack of something.
 
Nah, he's the kind of guy who was a smartass bully in school, and he never grew up, and that's what he still is.
 
So how much time elapsed between the cop emerging from the door before he lifted his taser and fired?
How much time it took is irrelevant.
You clearly see in the video the man starts running the moment he sees the cop and THEN gets tased AFTER he starts running.

What does matter though is that it is also illegal in that jurisdiction to tase someone for running away.

But it does change it from
> evil cop tases someone for fun
to
> it is possible the cop was just ignorant and did not know he was not allowed to tase someone for running. Or he made a wrong split second decision.
 
Or there was a history there and the cop always planned on tazing him so they wouldn't have to chase him again.
 
Or there was a history there and the cop always planned on tazing him so they wouldn't have to chase him again.
No, that theory is not based on what we saw.
Which is FIRST the running THEN the tasing.

For your theory the opposite should have been the case.
 
And? that is the opinion of the lawyer.
Which is incongruent with the facts we have seen with our own eyes from the same video.
Did you even watch the video? I'm starting to wonder. Because it wasn't just his opinion.
 

Police choke a man to death during a traffic stop that was basically a fishing expedition to try to connect to him to some kind of drug crime. They immediately pulled their guns on this guy, told him to get off his bike, and when he didn't do it fast enough for them, because he was literally connected to his bike by one of those airbag jackets. During their struggle with him, one of them literally says "I'm going to choke you out" and wouldn't you know it, he suddenly goes limp and the cops start to panic as they realize they probably killed him. Later, this officer tells his colleagues/supervisor that he was "just trying to get his helmet off," making out like he accidentally choked this guy to death. Even later than that, his department told the public that this man OD'd. Meanwhile, the autopsy came back that this man died of asphyxia. Unsurprisingly, they investigated themselves, and cleared themselves of any wrongdoing.
 

A woman reports that a man who dated her 20 years ago kicked in her door, assaulted her, and took off on foot. The police put a warrant out for him, and he shows up thinking he can sort out this obviously false report out at the police station, because he's been in a wheelchair for 25 years. The room-temperature IQ officer who took the original report, cuffs him and drags him out of his chair. Another officer who actually has a brain comes along and is nice enough to help the man back into his chair, and attempts to inform his LT that they should really let this guy go because it's an obvious false report. The LT can't even be arsed to look at the man himself and ignores his officer with a brain, and tells room-temperature IQ officer to continue with the arrest, claiming that the guy is faking his condition to avoid arrest. The man tells the officer that he can easily provide documentation that he has been paralyzed since he was shot back in 2000, the officer goes back to the lazy LT and tells him this, to which the LT changes from "he's faking it" to, "just because he's in a wheelchair doesn't mean he couldn't still cave in that lady's door and beat her up. The man is paralyzed from the chest down and doesn't even have abdominal control. Eventually, the officer that showed up to transport him lets him go and arranges for him to turn himself in later, so he thankfully didn't end up going to jail, because he was able to hire a lawyer and get the news out through the media.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top