lol at "artificial wombs". With that and modifying babies in the womb, it's easy to see how that would mold into a nightmare fuel trans-human ant colony slave dystopia
As to MGTOW in general and male/female mating dynamics, it is important to remember that monogomy first came about in neolithic times as a means to keep ever growing agricultural societies stable and functional. Because, compared to paleolithic tribes where an alpha male could mate all the available females because all the other males would have to accept this just to survive (the other option was a group of younger males just going out onto the frontier on their own. the Indo-Aryan koryos being an example, likely a large contributing factor to the Indo-Aryan expansions), in larger agricultural societies, if most of the males did not have access to female mates, they would revolt and have their leaders' heads on spears. Thus, wise leaders realized that giving the majority of men access to female mates, creates a stable and functioning larger society.
This worked out for men in that it gave a larger percentage of men than ever before, access to female mates. However, for females, all it did was move more of them out of the harem of very powerful men, and force more of them into what was basically servitude and birthing children to more average men in exchange for a roof over their head. This goes against female biological drives. However, since this move to monogamous societies was necessary for larger societies to grow and the increasing specialization of labor and tools and technologies and, by extension, the technological, logistic, and martial ability of said society to out compete other societies and to expand into new lands and resources, this societal structure was positively selected for.
At a biological level, this was always against female imperative. But they had no choice but to accept it. But note: why did societies move into monogomous structures in the first place? because, simply put, the majority of men in growing agricultural societies were not willing to work, fight, and die for a society, without access to female mates and reproduction. As societies industrialized, the same could be said.
However, nowadays, working American men are being cucked. And the government has taken the place of the caregiver and provider to modern American women. Ergo: women do not need to settle down with a man they probably do not like, in exchange for a roof over their head anymore. The government - or, should i say, the tax dollars of millions of random men she will probably never see or interact with - will provide a roof over her head. And, to add on to it, legal structure actually incentivizes females to only settle with men they do not like, for the sake of financially fucking them over. Or even if they get with men they do like, they can still legally fuck him over. The vast majority of the legal and social power, but very little of the responsibility of keeping society running, is now in female hands.
Although I will say, amongst younger "zoomer" girls, less and less of them are even bothering with men at all. Yeah, some get a man or two to know them up and then mooch off of child welfare benefits for having more and more kids. But many girls are just not bothering with men at all. They work simple jobs, and live together. More and more of them are bi-sexual. They only have eyes for other girls...except the occasional hot, athletic, high powered man. Which brings me to my next point: younger American "zoomer" girls are, with more and more frequency, instinctively forming harems. That is, they form large groups of other bi-sexual girls, they all are in "open relationships" with each other, and they work simple jobs, get some government benefits, or both...and often live with each other (so, instead of a man and women living together pooling resources, you have multiple girls living together pooling resources). The result is you have an ever increasing amount of young girls that not only do not need men in their immediate vicinity, they are happy without them. At least in the short term anyways
However: the second an attractive, athletic, high powered man comes into the picture - you know, the kind of man who has that "presence" to him - all of these girls start throwing themselves at him. They want his attention; they want to be loved by him; they want to have his babies. And they do this as a group - as a harem. This is the only kind of man that truly turns them on - as biology dictates it should. This type of man biological triggers the "tribal alpha" criteria that turns girls on, whether they consciously know it or not.
Very few men fit that criteria. There are a lot of try hards out there, all those "game" sites to "up your game to get with women". lol. You either have "it", or you don't. And girls - particularly if they are in groups around a bunch of other girls feeling the same things - can recognize "it" in mere moments.
The result? Very few men are getting with younger American women. The small percentage that are, can "slay", have some threesomes, some orgies, or just go from girl to girl. And because they can do so, many of these men that have "it", do so. Although, even then, there is still risk in that these girls have the legal system on their side. And not all men are willing to take the risk of having their lives fucked with over a bunch of sex. Not to mention STDs.
All the meanwhile? the majority of the working male cuck populace continues working and supporting all of this. And here is the key point: why did societies switch to monogomy in the first place? Because the majority of the working male populace was not willing to work, support and die for a system that didn't directly benefit them with access to females and continuing their genetic lines. The only reason this change happened to begin with, is because men made it happen.
Some things never change
As to MGTOW in general and male/female mating dynamics, it is important to remember that monogomy first came about in neolithic times as a means to keep ever growing agricultural societies stable and functional. Because, compared to paleolithic tribes where an alpha male could mate all the available females because all the other males would have to accept this just to survive (the other option was a group of younger males just going out onto the frontier on their own. the Indo-Aryan koryos being an example, likely a large contributing factor to the Indo-Aryan expansions), in larger agricultural societies, if most of the males did not have access to female mates, they would revolt and have their leaders' heads on spears. Thus, wise leaders realized that giving the majority of men access to female mates, creates a stable and functioning larger society.
This worked out for men in that it gave a larger percentage of men than ever before, access to female mates. However, for females, all it did was move more of them out of the harem of very powerful men, and force more of them into what was basically servitude and birthing children to more average men in exchange for a roof over their head. This goes against female biological drives. However, since this move to monogamous societies was necessary for larger societies to grow and the increasing specialization of labor and tools and technologies and, by extension, the technological, logistic, and martial ability of said society to out compete other societies and to expand into new lands and resources, this societal structure was positively selected for.
At a biological level, this was always against female imperative. But they had no choice but to accept it. But note: why did societies move into monogomous structures in the first place? because, simply put, the majority of men in growing agricultural societies were not willing to work, fight, and die for a society, without access to female mates and reproduction. As societies industrialized, the same could be said.
However, nowadays, working American men are being cucked. And the government has taken the place of the caregiver and provider to modern American women. Ergo: women do not need to settle down with a man they probably do not like, in exchange for a roof over their head anymore. The government - or, should i say, the tax dollars of millions of random men she will probably never see or interact with - will provide a roof over her head. And, to add on to it, legal structure actually incentivizes females to only settle with men they do not like, for the sake of financially fucking them over. Or even if they get with men they do like, they can still legally fuck him over. The vast majority of the legal and social power, but very little of the responsibility of keeping society running, is now in female hands.
Although I will say, amongst younger "zoomer" girls, less and less of them are even bothering with men at all. Yeah, some get a man or two to know them up and then mooch off of child welfare benefits for having more and more kids. But many girls are just not bothering with men at all. They work simple jobs, and live together. More and more of them are bi-sexual. They only have eyes for other girls...except the occasional hot, athletic, high powered man. Which brings me to my next point: younger American "zoomer" girls are, with more and more frequency, instinctively forming harems. That is, they form large groups of other bi-sexual girls, they all are in "open relationships" with each other, and they work simple jobs, get some government benefits, or both...and often live with each other (so, instead of a man and women living together pooling resources, you have multiple girls living together pooling resources). The result is you have an ever increasing amount of young girls that not only do not need men in their immediate vicinity, they are happy without them. At least in the short term anyways
However: the second an attractive, athletic, high powered man comes into the picture - you know, the kind of man who has that "presence" to him - all of these girls start throwing themselves at him. They want his attention; they want to be loved by him; they want to have his babies. And they do this as a group - as a harem. This is the only kind of man that truly turns them on - as biology dictates it should. This type of man biological triggers the "tribal alpha" criteria that turns girls on, whether they consciously know it or not.
Very few men fit that criteria. There are a lot of try hards out there, all those "game" sites to "up your game to get with women". lol. You either have "it", or you don't. And girls - particularly if they are in groups around a bunch of other girls feeling the same things - can recognize "it" in mere moments.
The result? Very few men are getting with younger American women. The small percentage that are, can "slay", have some threesomes, some orgies, or just go from girl to girl. And because they can do so, many of these men that have "it", do so. Although, even then, there is still risk in that these girls have the legal system on their side. And not all men are willing to take the risk of having their lives fucked with over a bunch of sex. Not to mention STDs.
All the meanwhile? the majority of the working male cuck populace continues working and supporting all of this. And here is the key point: why did societies switch to monogomy in the first place? Because the majority of the working male populace was not willing to work, support and die for a system that didn't directly benefit them with access to females and continuing their genetic lines. The only reason this change happened to begin with, is because men made it happen.
Some things never change
