Except no, you absolutely need to roll back laws, you need to deal with the control social media has over the discussion, with how the education system is structured, with how immigration is in the United States as all of these pose absolute existential threats to the ability to have America look remotely how you want it to be.
Abraham is said to be the father of many nations not one, it says that God divorces both Israel and Judea, these are two different nations following the split, Judaism comes directly from the Pharisee sect, rather than any of the other disparate Hebrew groups. And again, the Talmud and Rabbinic Judaism is formed post dating Christianity. The Israelites were the Israelites, the Jews come specifically out of Judea/Judah, Jeremiah talks about how God as divorced the people of both kingdoms, Jesus says that those outside of the land of Israel will be sitting with Jacob, Isaac, and Abraham in heaven while those within will find themselves in hell.
Not the case. Actually, Trump lost LGBT votes from Romney who was perceived as a more socially conservative candidate who was against Gay Marriage while Trump wasn’t and made up exactly zero ground over 4 years of shilling from many LGBT pundits that have found themselves on the right. Meanwhile there were gains made in the black and Latino community, who are in higher opposition the LGBT issues and more socially conservative. What typically keeps them from voting is the hands off government free market politics that run through, other than the propaganda that R is all super racist and hates them. As such, economic populism and taking up positions that are about doing what’s best for the American people and not large corporations and special interests and social conservatism seems to be a better play to get more minority votes, who again, polling shows are often less in favor of LGBT issues than whites, rather than trying to appeal to the LGBT.
Not the case lol. As I outlined the LGBT voted more for Romney who was opposed to gay marriage and more socially con than Trump who said it was a done deal, and he made up literally zero ground with them from 2016-2020. Opposition to gay marriage runs strongly through both socially conservative blacks and Hispanics who still vote democrat. You’d almost certainly make up more votes among them than lost by not LGBT shilling which makes up a tiny fraction of the GOP base provided you also go for economic populism which is more broadly appealing to these groups as well. I’m sorry, the strategic argument of “you must shill for the LGBT and drop social conservatism” doesn’t pan out, especially if you can just get enough of that sector of the right to opt not to vote provided that it goes that way. Shilling for the LGBT has not remotely panned out well, it’s a tiny fraction of Trump voters who will vote based on opposition to gay marriage, there is a vastly larger potential voting block where ground has been made up among blacks and hispanics who oppose gay marriage and are more socially conservative. And the same applies really. Are you gonna vote D even if you get 95% of what you want except for gay marriage? It floats the same exact way lol, and given your voting block you like is still way smaller and hasn’t shown actual appeal or viability whereas the other has, I don’t see how your strategy is remotely valid.
Last edited:
