Leftist Child Grooming

[Jormungandr]

> White people who notice the "secret" (via gaslighting) genocide of their people might become racist in the future

I am shocked, shocked I tell you, that it could ever happen.

of course one leads to the other. calling them nazies for noticing is just going to make things worse. the actual solution is to stop genociding them.

Yep. Pattern recognition is a thing.

• It's not "racism" to notice that Whites are being persecuted and marginalized in culture, governments, and the legal systems all over the West
• It's not "racism" to feel anger on hearing that Whites are being assaulted, raped, or even outright murdered in the streets by other ethnicities because they're White
• It's not "racism" to feel appalled and disgusted that fuck knows how many Black people have gone fucking insane in the last ten years because they realized they can get away with being outright racist shitheels now, and that sane members of Black communities are ostracized for being "Uncle Toms" and "Oreos" for not devolving into outright race-based savagery
• It's not "racism" to feel fucking disgusted that governments are handing everything over to "refugees" (who conveniently are all men and teenaged boys of fighting age wearing the latest clothes and possessing the latest Android or Apple phones) on a silver platter, while the country itself is collapsing due to overpopulation, infrastructure decay, and when the native people are making the choice between rent, eating, or heating on a daily basis
• It's not "racism" to notice that many government leaders who aren't White are either outright corrupt or have race-based agendas -- yes, I'm looking specifically at the UK here, with our various Ministers and the London Mayor

 

[Cherico]

Yep. Pattern recognition is a thing.

• It's not "racism" to notice that Whites are being persecuted and marginalized in culture, governments, and the legal systems all over the West
• It's not "racism" to feel anger on hearing that Whites are being assaulted, raped, or even outright murdered in the streets by other ethnicities because they're White
• It's not "racism" to feel appalled and disgusted that fuck knows how many Black people have gone fucking insane in the last ten years because they realized they can get away with being outright racist shitheels now, and that sane members of Black communities are ostracized for being "Uncle Toms" and "Oreos" for not devolving into outright race-based savagery
• It's not "racism" to feel fucking disgusted that governments are handing everything over to "refugees" (who conveniently are all men and teenaged boys of fighting age wearing the latest clothes and possessing the latest Android or Apple phones) on a silver platter, while the country itself is collapsing due to overpopulation, infrastructure decay, and when the native people are making the choice between rent, eating, or heating on a daily basis
• It's not "racism" to notice that many government leaders who aren't White are either outright corrupt or have race-based agendas -- yes, I'm looking specifically at the UK here, with our various Ministers and the London Mayor

You know there was a country that pulled some thing similar that country was mexico the leader Profio Diaz it ended in a ten year long revolution...that killed around a million people or close to it.

Non mexician citizens are still not allowed to own land in mexico to this day...

 

[KilroywasNOTHere]

You know there was a country that pulled some thing similar that country was mexico the leader Profio Diaz it ended in a ten year long revolution...that killed around a million people or close to it.

Non mexician citizens are still not allowed to own land in mexico to this day...

this right here is what I'm afraid of.

 

[Jormungandr]

You know there was a country that pulled some thing similar that country was mexico the leader Profio Diaz it ended in a ten year long revolution...that killed around a million people or close to it.

Non mexician citizens are still not allowed to own land in mexico to this day...

The sheer amount of anger in the UK is staggering, and it's openly leaking out onto soc-med now.

 

[Cherico]

The sheer amount of anger in the UK is staggering, and it's openly leaking out onto soc-med now.

I think the UKs royal family will survive this.

Parlament....them I have doubts about.

 

[Jormungandr]

I think the UKs royal family will survive this.

Parlament....them I have doubts about.

Despite the dip in popularity because of Charles (he's basically seen as a 'placeholder' until William ascends the Throne) and others (like Harry being a whipped cunt for an ex-whore), William's and Kate's popularities are still sky high. People really do like them, and despite the naysayers about "Republicanism is as strong as ever in the UK!" I guarantee you that if you went into a pub and said you were a Republican, you'd be looked at as though you just announced you liked anal-fucking cows.

Parliament, however... well, MP's are actually hiring bodyguards now when they go outside. I think that says it all.

 

[KilroywasNOTHere]

Despite the dip in popularity because of Charles (he's basically seen as a 'placeholder' until William ascends the Throne) and others (like Harry being a whipped cunt for an ex-whore), William's and Kate's popularities are still sky high. People really do like them, and despite the naysayers about "Republicanism is as strong as ever in the UK!" I guarantee you that if you went into a pub and said you were a Republican, you'd be looked at as though you just announced you liked anal-fucking cows.

Parliament, however... well, MP's are actually hiring bodyguards now when they go outside. I think that says it all.

to be frank. You can have your king and culture. I just want a farm in the middle of nowhere preferably off grid.

 

[Jormungandr]

to be frank. You can have your king and culture. I just want a farm in the middle of nowhere preferably off grid.

Sounds good in theory; in practice, people, especially the US government, won't leave you alone.

 

[KilroywasNOTHere]

Sounds good in theory; in practice, people, especially the US government, won't leave you alone.

worth a shot.

 

[Cherico]

Sounds good in theory; in practice, people, especially the US government, won't leave you alone.

There will come a time when the people stop asking and start taking.

 

[Scottty]

Sounds good in theory; in practice, people, especially the US government, won't leave you alone.

worth a shot.

Joking aside, your best bet there might be to homestead someone that the busybodies and would-be enslavers of mankind cannot reach to, or would never think to look.

 

[strunkenwhite]

There was a 24 year old guy in the States recently who masqueraded as an 11 or 12 year old to lure a known kiddie-fucker (37 year old dude) to a park. He promptly shot the known kiddie-fucker in the face and is being tried for murder.

'Vigilante', 24, is charged with murdering convicted pedophile

James Lewis Spencer, 24, admitted to murdering Sean Connery Showers, 37, after the convicted sex offender's boy was found in Houston on May 29.

www.dailymail.co.uk

This guy was an actual confirmed and convicted kiddie-fucker, not someone and anyone who's labeled as one by the Left for, say, liking anime or slim women.

Yeah, this is how laws work. He murdered a guy because the guy "had it coming" and now he is facing the consequences. He can ask for a pardon or commutation. Even if this guy was on target I think refusing to prosecute an obvious premeditated murder would be too close to officially endorsing vigilante killings, which I think would backfire badly.

You could walk down the high street of every major city in the world, and the chances of walking past someone actually afflicted with gender dysphoria? You've got more chance of winning the lottery repeatedly.

I suspect you underestimate how many people you'd be walking by.

 

[Jormungandr]

Yeah, this is how laws work. He murdered a guy because the guy "had it coming" and now he is facing the consequences. He can ask for a pardon or commutation. Even if this guy was on target I think refusing to prosecute an obvious premeditated murder would be too close to officially endorsing vigilante killings, which I think would backfire badly.

I suspect you underestimate how many people you'd be walking by.

Yeah, he should go to trial, and in a just/sane world he'd be pardoned or commuted... but we all know how this is going to turn out in this day and age. Legally he was in the wrong. Legally. But ethically and morally? The legal system failed the populace by letting that monster run free, he was all too willing and able to molest and rape actual children, and if the public has to do this sort of thing as vigilantes in the first place, you know your legal system is a failure.

This guy basically saved fuck knows how many children's lives.

No, I didn't underestimate how many people walk down, say, Shibuya Crossing in Tokyo in one day, and I suspect you underestimate how many actual gender dysphoria sufferers there are in the world compared to transtrenders.

 

[strunkenwhite]

No, I didn't underestimate how many people walk down, say, Shibuya Crossing in Tokyo in one day, and I suspect you underestimate how many actual gender dysphoria sufferers there are in the world compared to transtrenders.

All right, what percentage of the population do you say actual sufferers make up? (Or whatever way you'd like to express the proportion other than percentage.)

As for the other, I await the outcome of the case before judging the severity of the sentence; but I agree that society is not doing a good enough job of dealing with sexual offenders, both in failing to pursue cases and in failing to monitor likely recidivists post-release.

 

[Jormungandr]

All right, what percentage of the population do you say actual sufferers make up? (Or whatever way you'd like to express the proportion other than percentage.)

Unfortunately, finding accurate statistics is impossible these days because pretty much all organizations and government agencies include transtrenderism as part of their numbers: I could come out and say I'm "gender dysphoric" tomorrow to my GP, and I guarantee you my declaration would be entered as part of the official numbers of "gender dysphoria sufferers in the UK."

Anyway, by estimate? Not even a single percent world-wide. At a stretch, I'd say half a percent. But let's be generous and say a whole percent.

Now, the global population is projected to be 8,019,876,189 since Jan this year, so 1% of that is 80198762 (just over 8 million) people, rounded up, globally. That sounds a lot, right? To use Shibuya Crossing as the example again, it has 2.4 million people cross it every day in total, so walking down it would mean you'd encounter roughly 2,500 people in one instance (this data was recorded from an actual Japanese government survey, IIRC).

In that one instance, statistically there'd be 25 people who would be sufferers of Gender Dysphoria in those 2,500 people you'd walk by. But let's be real -- the chances of there actually being 25 sufferers in that 2,500 crowd is so remote that you're more likely to be killed by a stray firework out of the blue. Would it eventually happen if you walked down that crossing every day for a year? Yes, since that's probability coming into play. But an occasional jaunt? Nope.

Watch out for stray fireworks instead, in the middle of the day, out in the open... yeah.

And, remember, this is being generous by using a single percent. The real number is probably less than a half.

 

[strunkenwhite]

In that one instance, statistically there'd be 25 people who would be sufferers of Gender Dysphoria in those 2,500 people you'd walk by. But let's be real -- the chances of there actually being 25 sufferers in that 2,500 crowd is so remote that you're more likely to be killed by a stray firework out of the blue. Would it eventually happen if you walked down that crossing every day for a year? Yes, since that's probability coming into play. But an occasional jaunt? Nope.

Watch out for stray fireworks instead, in the middle of the day, out in the open... yeah.

And, remember, this is being generous by using a single percent. The real number is probably less than a half.

Sure, I'm willing to adjust it down, but remember we're adjusting it down from 25 in a single pass. Whereas you had said it was vanishingly unlikely to walk past even one if one were to "walk down the high street of every major city in the world."

Did you perhaps mean "any" instead of "every"?

 

[Jormungandr]

Sure, I'm willing to adjust it down, but remember we're adjusting it down from 25 in a single pass. Whereas you had said it was vanishingly unlikely to walk past even one if one were to "walk down the high street of every major city in the world."

Did you perhaps mean "any" instead of "every"?

Makes more sense, yeah. But still, even if you did walk down every major city's high street once, realistically the chances are still incredibly, incredibly low. Possible, but low.

Point is, actual dysphoria sufferers are a tiny amount of the global population compared to what's claimed by everyone supporting transtrenderism. shrug

 

[Doomsought]

Yeah, this is how laws work. He murdered a guy because the guy "had it coming" and now he is facing the consequences. He can ask for a pardon or commutation.

In the past, the had it coming argument has made Juries rule for justifiable homicide.

 

[Jormungandr]

In the past, the had it coming argument has made Juries rule for justifiable homicide.

Well, they did acquit that guy in Texas for beating his six year old daughter's rapist to death.

 

[Terthna]

Unfortunately, finding accurate statistics is impossible these days because pretty much all organizations and government agencies include transtrenderism as part of their numbers: I could come out and say I'm "gender dysphoric" tomorrow to my GP, and I guarantee you my declaration would be entered as part of the official numbers of "gender dysphoria sufferers in the UK."

Anyway, by estimate? Not even a single percent world-wide. At a stretch, I'd say half a percent. But let's be generous and say a whole percent.

Now, the global population is projected to be 8,019,876,189 since Jan this year, so 1% of that is 80198762 (just over 8 million) people, rounded up, globally. That sounds a lot, right? To use Shibuya Crossing as the example again, it has 2.4 million people cross it every day in total, so walking down it would mean you'd encounter roughly 2,500 people in one instance (this data was recorded from an actual Japanese government survey, IIRC).

In that one instance, statistically there'd be 25 people who would be sufferers of Gender Dysphoria in those 2,500 people you'd walk by. But let's be real -- the chances of there actually being 25 sufferers in that 2,500 crowd is so remote that you're more likely to be killed by a stray firework out of the blue. Would it eventually happen if you walked down that crossing every day for a year? Yes, since that's probability coming into play. But an occasional jaunt? Nope.

Watch out for stray fireworks instead, in the middle of the day, out in the open... yeah.

And, remember, this is being generous by using a single percent. The real number is probably less than a half.

For comparison's sake, around 1% of the world's population are autistic; and yet we don't get anywhere near the amount of publicity or consideration (let alone the outright worship) transgenders do.