Leftist Child Grooming

DarthOne

☦️
Horrifying moment female field hockey player has her TEETH knocked out by male player on girls' team - leaving her hospitalized with 'severe dental and facial injuries'


  • A female hockey player screamed in agony after suffering facial injuries
  • The player was injured by a full-force shot from a male opponent
  • The incident sparked backlash over Massachusetts' gender in sports laws
A female student hockey player has suffered horrific facial injuries after being struck by a shot from a male opponent.


Footage of the horror accident saw the woman collapse and scream in agony after the ball hit her face, with the male player's participation sparking backlash despite being allowed under Massachusetts law.


The incident occurred Thursday between two varsity teams at Swampscott High School and Dighton-Rehoboth Regional High School, with the former coming out on top thanks to two goals scored by the male player.

In an email after the incident, Dighton-Rehoboth Superintendent Bill Runey told alarmed parents that the injury to their student 'dramatically magnifies the concerns of many about player safety.'



Many viewers of the footage have reacted with fury at the male player's presence on the field, due to the unfair physical advantage he holds after going through puberty.

In the footage, a female player from Dighton-Rehoboth passed the ball to their male teammate, who controlled it before releasing a vicious shot.

The ball immediately struck an opponent across the face, leaving her with grisly facial injuries, including losing two teeth, that sent her to the hospital. Her condition is unclear.

Shocked teammates could be seen leaning their hands on their knees and comforting each other after witnessing the grisly injury.

Despite the harrowing scenes, the male player's place on the team was defended by Swampscott Public Schools Athletic Director Kelly Wolff, who said he has 'the exact same right to participate as any player on the team.'

Wolff identified the player, who is not believed to be transgender, as a 4-year varsity player and a co-captain of the team, according to WCVB.

The athletic director's stance that he is allowed to compete is correct under Massachusetts law, which has zero restrictions to preventing a male athlete from competing in female sports.

Amid the backlash, the Massachusetts Interscholastic Athletic Association (MIAA) issued a statement to explain the legal ground which allows males and females to play sport in alternatively-sexed teams.

'Massachusetts General Law was originally enacted to protect students from discrimination based on sex, and later expanded to protect students based on gender identification,' the MIAA statement read.

'As a result of this law, and consistent with the interpretive guidance offered by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, athletic opportunities must be afforded to students in accordance with their identified gender, not necessarily their birth-assigned gender.'


In response, Runey said the law is clear but overlooks the potential for decreased player safety by allowing male players to compete against females.

'For any male athlete that's participating in a female sport, there are zero restrictions,' he said.

'So, I'm looking for the MIAA to facilitate some conversations to have some middle ground in terms of player safety.'

He continued: 'In speaking with a representative of the MIAA this morning, she shared that the MIAA handbook has a legal note explaining how the Massachusetts Equal Rights Amendment makes the participation of males on female teams legal.'

The superintendent said he decided to speak out after seeing 'the horror in the eyes of our players and coached upon greeting their bus last night', which he said is 'evidence to me that there has to be a renewed approach by the MIAA to protect the safety of our athletes.'


Runey cited previous rules around girls' volleyball to how the situation could be handled, where male players were allowed to compete but could not play on the front line 'because their ability to spike the ball created a higher level of risk.'


Those conditions were deemed illegal and are no longer in effect, Runey added.


Wake up Soccer Moms… wake up and…smell the ashes.
 
This shit needs to end.

Women, and I mean actual women, are getting seriously injured.

How long will it be until a woman gets her neck broken? Suffers from a ruptured artery?

Wake up, Leftoids: You are going to get women killed.


devil's advocate. Sports related injuries and fatalities happen all the time to men it just gets swept under the rug... why should women be exempt from that if they want to play?
 

Jormungandr

The Midgard Wyrm
Founder
devil's advocate. Sports related injuries and fatalities happen all the time to men it just gets swept under the rug... why should women be exempt from that if they want to play?
Common sense: You don't go into a car crash derby when they're using monster trucks and you're in a Volkswagen Beetle, whether the rules allow it and the organizers encourage it or not.
 
Common sense: You don't go into a car crash derby when they're using monster trucks and you're in a Volkswagen Beetle, whether the rules allow it and the organizers encourage it or not.

But if you're in the Volkswagen and insisting to do a crash derby then you learn real quick to either build that Volkswagen up as best you can or concede you'll never be a derbirst and quit. Why is it that men can suffer all sorts of dibilitating injuries no one bats an eye. Why should Men be the more disposable gender?

Let me be clear on my actual standing: I think competitive sports is stupid and does none of the things people claim it does to justify it's existence the older I get and the more stories I hear the more this is enforced.
 
Last edited:

Marduk

Well-known member
Moderator
Staff Member
devil's advocate. Sports related injuries and fatalities happen all the time to men it just gets swept under the rug... why should women be exempt from that if they want to play?
Many sports with highest chances of injury by other person have weight classes for a damn reason. In some others the sex division is a proxy weight class. They are important both for fairness, competitiveness and safety, without them competitive sports of many kinds would be for roided out hulks only.
That's besides the point that in most fields women's sports exist solely to allow women to compete for the podium. Without that, what's the fucking point, just make it one division that will be dominated by men, at least it will be normal men.
 

Jormungandr

The Midgard Wyrm
Founder
But if you're in the Volkswagen and insisting to do a crash derby then you learn real quick to either build that Volkswagen up as best you can or concede you'll never be a derbirst and quit. Why is it that men can suffer all sorts of debilitating injuries no one bats an eye. Why should Men be the more disposable gender?
Sadly enough, that's always been the case throughout our species' history.
Many sports with highest chances of injury by other person have weight classes for a damn reason. In some others the sex division is a proxy weight class. They are important both for fairness, competitiveness and safety, without them competitive sports of many kinds would be for roided out hulks only.
This.

For example, a woman's heavyweight in boxing isn't the same as a man's heavyweight in boxing, despite the titles being the same and the classification (officially) being over 200lbs. If a woman heavyweight boxer wanted to get into the ring with a male heavyweight, it's pretty much a suicide run or a cry for a mental health examination at the very least.

One punch would cave that woman's face in.
 

Jormungandr

The Midgard Wyrm
Founder
And? Perhaps it's prime time humanity evolve. If we don't I have a feeling a new species will overtake us whether they are actually better or not. I speak of the android species.
It's partly nature, partly common cultural from nature which is reflected in civilization, any civilization, as a whole.

Men were the ones expected to hunt/go off to fight rivals, be it for a mate or with the family against an opponent outside of the tribe/family. We were built to protect women, and since we can knock up multiple women while women themselves can only give birth one at a time (barring twins plus)... well, nature's a dick, lol. We're expendable in comparison.

Women, meanwhile, are biologically weaker in strength than men, and were assigned the roles by nature and evolution to carry the species forward. They propagate the species one kid, our kids, at a time, and it's a instinctual drive to propagate our genes. It's also why a lot of men, when they find out they've been cucked by an unfaithful wife or girlfriend, suddenly lose all the love they felt for "their" kids like a switch had been flipped.

To be blunt, and a lot of feminists and "modern women" will deny this thinking it makes them inferior in some way: Men are meant to be providers, women are meant to be nurturers; and being different and complementary to the other doesn't mean being inferior, and they can't understand that.

Unfortunately, modernity has screwed up that dynamic, which has existed since we were shit-flinging apes, completely, which is one of the many causes why things are crumbling in the West.

It's part of human nature. It ain't gonna change.

Edit: Also, the anti-pedo/lolicon song. I'm surprised Leftists and groomers aren't losing their minds more over it.

Original Japanese:

English cover by a third-party, accurate lyrics:
 
It's partly nature, partly common cultural from nature which is reflected in civilization, any civilization, as a whole.

Men were the ones expected to hunt/go off to fight rivals, be it for a mate or with the family against an opponent outside of the tribe/family. We were built to protect women, and since we can knock up multiple women while women themselves can only give birth one at a time (barring twins plus)... well, nature's a dick, lol. We're expendable in comparison.

Women, meanwhile, are biologically weaker in strength than men, and were assigned the roles by nature and evolution to carry the species forward. They propagate the species one kid, our kids, at a time, and it's a instinctual drive to propagate our genes. It's also why a lot of men, when they find out they've been cucked by an unfaithful wife or girlfriend, suddenly lose all the love they felt for "their" kids like a switch had been flipped.

To be blunt, and a lot of feminists and "modern women" will deny this thinking it makes them inferior in some way: Men are meant to be providers, women are meant to be nurturers; and being different and complementary to the other doesn't mean being inferior, and they can't understand that.

Unfortunately, modernity has screwed up that dynamic, which has existed since we were shit-flinging apes, completely, which is one of the many causes why things are crumbling in the West.

It's part of human nature. It ain't gonna change.

Edit: Also, the anti-pedo/lolicon song. I'm surprised Leftists and groomers aren't losing their minds more over it.

Original Japanese:

English cover by a third-party, accurate lyrics:


Technological advancement is continually making the better part of human nature obsolete and that's the problem.
 

Jormungandr

The Midgard Wyrm
Founder
Technological advancement is continually making the better part of human nature obsolete and that's the problem.
I wouldn't say making it "obsolete" but horribly fucking it and social norms up, yeah (or trying to twist social norms into something repulsive, such as what Groomers United are pushing for with children).

I mean, as an example, hookup culture is not only enabled by women because they control access to sex (while men control access to relationships/commitment), but technology, such as soc-med, Tinder, et cetera, has made it as easy as sending an e-mail or clicking a box.
 
I wouldn't say making it "obsolete" but horribly fucking it and social norms up, yeah (or trying to twist social norms into something repulsive, such as what Groomers United are pushing for with children).

I mean, as an example, hookup culture is not only enabled by women because they control access to sex (while men control access to relationships/commitment), but technology, such as soc-med, Tinder, et cetera, has made it as easy as sending an e-mail or clicking a box.

Dude for the first time in human history we are voluntary unaliving ourselves en mass and not breeding, there is a population crisis going on world wide and where human connection once filled certain wants and needs technology is now filling that gap. It doesn't matter if it's actually doing it well or not just that it is just well enough at a lower risk to bring us to extinction.

Morality aside if you need to get your rocks off would you risk investing so much time and resources on a relationship that could just as easily fail...or would you just go to the gym and work out, or boot up the computer and watch some porn?

IF (just to make it clear I don't personally believe this) the sole point of getting a wife is to fulfill; child bearing and raising needs as well as domestic duties Which is the path of least resistance? getting involved with a woman and all the risk that comes with it with the hopes of getting married and having kids or donating some sperm and/or skin cells, hiring a nanny, and getting a dishwasher?
 
Last edited:

King Arts

Well-known member
Sadly enough, that's always been the case throughout our species' history.

This.

For example, a woman's heavyweight in boxing isn't the same as a man's heavyweight in boxing, despite the titles being the same and the classification (officially) being over 200lbs. If a woman heavyweight boxer wanted to get into the ring with a male heavyweight, it's pretty much a suicide run or a cry for a mental health examination at the very least.

One punch would cave that woman's face in.
To be fair even if men were expendable they received certain benefits women did not and had rights women did not have. So it balances out. Now with equality why the fuck should we care or be willing to help society? Sounds like being a NEET is the way to go.
 

Terthna

Professional Lurker
Edit: Also, the anti-pedo/lolicon song. I'm surprised Leftists and groomers aren't losing their minds more over it.

Original Japanese:

English cover by a third-party, accurate lyrics:

...That's not an anti-pedo song, not exactly at least. It's more of a tongue-in-cheek parody of a particular fetish that involves little girls (or more realistically, older women pretending to be little girls) abusing older men.
 

Jormungandr

The Midgard Wyrm
Founder
...That's not an anti-pedo song, not exactly at least. It's more of a tongue-in-cheek parody of a particular fetish that involves little girls (or more realistically, older women pretending to be little girls) abusing older men.
It's basically calling out all the pro-kiddie fuckers in the anime community (the actual lolicons) as being disgusting degenerates. Look at the English translation.
 

Terthna

Professional Lurker
It's basically calling out all the pro-kiddie fuckers in the anime community (the actual lolicons) as being disgusting degenerates. Look at the English translation.
Okay, I need to let you in on some backstory. Shigure Ui is an artist/Vtuber (she designed Hololive's Oozora Subaru's character model) who jumped on a trend that was popular for a while amongst Vtuber of pretending to be a much younger version of herself for a stream. This proved to be very popular with her audience, who decided it was really funny to act like extremely creepy lolicons towards her, which she responded to by calling them all disgusting in various ways in a somewhat playful manner. This is the context behind the song; it's an in-joke between her and her audience, not a serious condemnation of lolicons everywhere (who I want to stress are usually only interested in 2D little girls, not real ones).

Another thing important to keep in mind is the fact that being regarded with disgust by girls is a somewhat popular fetish in Japan. If you've ever heard of I Want You To Show Me Your Panties With a Disgusted Face (and if you haven't, it's exactly what it says on the tin), that's what I'm referring to. So the idea of being told that they're disgusting by the object of their affection is actually very appealing to a number of lolicons; the only thing that would make it better is if she stomped their genitals into paste (or zapped them with her Ui Beam) before calling the cops on them.
 

hyperspacewizard

Well-known member
Okay, I need to let you in on some backstory. Shigure Ui is an artist/Vtuber (she designed Hololive's Oozora Subaru's character model) who jumped on a trend that was popular for a while amongst Vtuber of pretending to be a much younger version of herself for a stream. This proved to be very popular with her audience, who decided it was really funny to act like extremely creepy lolicons towards her, which she responded to by calling them all disgusting in various ways in a somewhat playful manner. This is the context behind the song; it's an in-joke between her and her audience, not a serious condemnation of lolicons everywhere (who I want to stress are usually only interested in 2D little girls, not real ones).

Another thing important to keep in mind is the fact that being regarded with disgust by girls is a somewhat popular fetish in Japan. If you've ever heard of I Want You To Show Me Your Panties With a Disgusted Face (and if you haven't, it's exactly what it says on the tin), that's what I'm referring to. So the idea of being told that they're disgusting by the object of their affection is actually very appealing to a number of lolicons; the only thing that would make it better is if she stomped their genitals into paste (or zapped them with her Ui Beam) before calling the cops on them.
Isn't there also the urban legend/trope/meme about little girls in Japan realizing how powerful them calling an older man a lolicon is and threatening or tricking innocent men into doing or buying things for the them
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top