Leftist Child Grooming

[mspence]

This is what kids are being taught (WARNING: NSFW):

Viewer discretion: Kennedy makes Dem squirm with mentions of dildo, c--- while reading LGBTQ kids' books

Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., confronted Illinois Secretary of State Alexi Giannoulias with sexual excerpts of books found in public schools and public libraries that children can access.

www.foxnews.com

 

[Jormungandr]

This is what kids are being taught (WARNING: NSFW):

Viewer discretion: Kennedy makes Dem squirm with mentions of dildo, c--- while reading LGBTQ kids' books

Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., confronted Illinois Secretary of State Alexi Giannoulias with sexual excerpts of books found in public schools and public libraries that children can access.

www.foxnews.com

...Yeah, if that ain't grooming, I don't know what is.

Fucking freaks pushing this shit on kids (I don't mean mid/late teens who probably know this sort of shit already thanks to the internet, I mean actual kids).

 

[DarthOne]

...Yeah, if that ain't grooming, I don't know what is.

Fucking freaks pushing this shit on kids (I don't mean mid/late teens who probably know this sort of shit already thanks to the internet, I mean actual kids).

As far as I’m concerned the Internet as a whole could also do with some cleaning up.

Ideally via society viewing certain behaviors with less acceptance then they do now instead of the government sticking its nose in. Though at least some of the later is probably inevitable unfortunately.

 

[S'task]

So back on the entire poor innocent PornHub...



Long story short, they've had a loophole in their verification system for pornographers for years that's meant to prevent the uploading of porn made with unwilling participants, and everyone at PornHub knows about it, up to the CEO, and are willingly letting it persist because of the money they get from it.

So yeah, remind me again why we should take their side concerning having to conform to state laws requiring accurate age verification...

 

[Captain X]

So back on the entire poor innocent PornHub...



Long story short, they've had a loophole in their verification system for pornographers for years that's meant to prevent the uploading of porn made with unwilling participants, and everyone at PornHub knows about it, up to the CEO, and are willingly letting it persist because of the money they get from it.

So yeah, remind me again why we should take their side concerning having to conform to state laws requiring accurate age verification...

What does this have to do with this thread? What does what uploaders are doing have to do with people are are simply viewing?

 

[posh-goofiness]

What does this have to do with this thread? What does what uploaders are doing have to do with people are are simply viewing?

Because demand drives supply? That seems self-explanatory.

 

[mrttao]

So back on the entire poor innocent PornHub...



Long story short, they've had a loophole in their verification system for pornographers for years that's meant to prevent the uploading of porn made with unwilling participants, and everyone at PornHub knows about it, up to the CEO, and are willingly letting it persist because of the money they get from it.

So yeah, remind me again why we should take their side concerning having to conform to state laws requiring accurate age verification...

A lot of people are not paying attention to what that guy is saying.
He says
> we told the CEO and he was like "I won't get caught"

and people are taking it as if this guy himself is saying "I won't get caught" when he is actually attributing it as a quote to his CEO.
The guy is basically bitching about his bosses. (rightly so, sick bastards that they are)

 

[Captain X]

Because demand drives supply? That seems self-explanatory.

It's not to me. Explain it better. I especially don't get the part where I should have to buy a license to look at porn if I want to. And unless you can connect this to the topic beyond the typical Helen Lovejoy argument, I'm going to say that this is off topic.

 

[posh-goofiness]

It's not to me. Explain it better. I especially don't get the part where I should have to buy a license to look at porn if I want to. And unless you can connect this to the topic beyond the typical Helen Lovejoy argument, I'm going to say that this is off topic.

I should have been clear I was answering the second question (about uploaders vs viewers). I think this was posted to the hate news thread, so I'll limit replies on the topic there.

 

[Scottty]

It's not to me. Explain it better. I especially don't get the part where I should have to buy a license to look at porn if I want to.

But don't you understand? It would be a new stream of revenue for the Administrative State. Not anti-government, are you?
They could have a whole new department dedicated to selling the porn licenses and managing the issuing of them. The funds thus collected would, of course, go mainly towards the salaries and operating expenses of the people who were employed in collecting them.
This would mean that Government.Inc would have an incentive for porn-watching to be as widespread as possible. They might even decide to make buying the allowed-to-see-porn license mandatory for the entire population, rather than have to bother with tracking down anyone who might be looking at naughty things without paying.

If you object to the suggestion that your private vices should be something that Big Government should tax and regulate, you are most likely doing so on a premise that the Administrative State not only does not share, but is probably incapable of understanding to start with - it would be a form of thoughtcrime for them: the notion that there is any aspect of human life from which their busybodying should be barred, that you, as a human being, should have any rights at all.

 

[DarthOne]

Rempel Garner condemns people protesting all ages drag show in Calgary

Rempel Garner condemns people protesting all ages drag show in Calgary

Conservative MP Michelle Rempel Garner said hate has no place in Calgary or anywhere else after people held a rally against a family-friendly drag event on Sund

www.westernstandard.news

Conservative MP Michelle Rempel Garner said hate has no place in Calgary or anywhere else after people held a rally against a family-friendly drag event on Sunday.
"A wise queen once said, 'If you can't love yourself, how the hell you gonna love somebody else?'" said Rempel Garner in a Monday tweet.

Canadian "Conservative" MP Michelle Rempel Garner condemns people protesting drag shows for kids.

 

[King Arts]

Rempel Garner condemns people protesting all ages drag show in Calgary

Rempel Garner condemns people protesting all ages drag show in Calgary

Conservative MP Michelle Rempel Garner said hate has no place in Calgary or anywhere else after people held a rally against a family-friendly drag event on Sund

www.westernstandard.news

Canadian "Conservative" MP Michelle Rempel Garner condemns people protesting drag shows for kids.

I think you mean cuckservative.

 

[colorles]

A Big New Report on American Children Is Out. It’s Horrific.

the article summarized is basically "boo hoo parents and school teachers discipline their children and boo hoo children of farming families grow up working on the family farm"

but the last paragraph really sums it up nicely:

"Protect the children" is a rallying cry in right-wing circles at the moment, implying all sorts of boogeymen: liberal educators, books featuring gay penguins, drag queens in libraries, child sex traffickers using Wayfair armoires and pizza restaurant basements. In reality, it's adults—and disproportionately conservative adults—who are making life much more perilous for children by failing to protect them from guns, from violence at home and in schools, from early marriage, from early and forced motherhood, from backbreaking labor, and from life behind bars.

family values are bad and abusive, kids. the state has your best interests in mind, kids. go ahead and report your parents to the authorities, kids. classic communist rhetoric

 

[Jormungandr]

They're really not even trying to hide this anymore. smh

 

[Cherico]

They're really not even trying to hide this anymore. smh

The left isnt having children so their going more and more insane as their basically kicked out of power by demographics. Pretty soon they will give up on the idea of democracy intirely.

 

[DarthOne]

The left isnt having children so their going more and more insane as their basically kicked out of power by demographics. Pretty soon they will give up on the idea of democracy intirely.

And that’s where the ‘fun’ begins.

 

[Cherico]

And that’s where the ‘fun’ begins.

you and I have very different defintions of fun, its going to be a hard suck...but it wont last forever because nothing ever does.

 

[DarthOne]

you and I have very different defintions of fun, its going to be a hard suck...but it wont last forever because nothing ever does.

I was being sarcastic.

 

[Cherico]

I was being sarcastic.

ah sorry about that then.

 

[Jormungandr]

The left isnt having children so their going more and more insane as their basically kicked out of power by demographics. Pretty soon they will give up on the idea of democracy entirely.

Do you mean the Left as a whole or Leftoids within the Left? The latter... well, the children they are having are being indoctrinated from birth into basically having their nuts and tits cut off, so those particular lineages are tragically ending there.

The issue is that these Leftoids groom and transform other people's children to replace their demographics.

The former? Yeah, they're not having kids over all (in the numbers game).