Leftist Child Grooming

While I'm 100% positive that pornography is harmful at a societal level, and can be harmful at an individual level, I'm also fully aware that banning it is outright impossible.

Plus, regardless of anything else, Cherico has a point that, historically, large numbers of single men with zero chance to find a long term romantic partner, and zero chance at having a family typically means very very big problems for the national stability of their nations.

Gross as it is, pornography is probably one of the few things keeping that shit from spiraling into hell.

Again:
If it means society gets down to the brass tacks of course correcting, I’m completely on board for taking away that particular bit of bread and citruses.

Edit:
3. Don't threaten me with a good time.
 
Again:
If it means society gets down to the brass tacks of course correcting, I’m completely on board for taking away that particular bit of bread and citruses.
No, he says it's more preventing (even more) mass rioting. More mass rioting won't cause course correction.
 
3. Don't threaten me with a good time.
What a fucking brainlet argument.
>we
>outlaw
If you get to outlaw things, *you* are the oligarch.
You can however get the progressives to do it and use media control they have to scapegoat the likes of you as the reason for it if their popularity among young men falls to critical levels which is where it is going.

So, no, i for one would not want you as an ally in politics, you are too self-absorbed in own accelerationist style fantasies and hot takes to play political games with the leftist snakes, they will run circles around you, you are a liability to any political movement dumb enough to listen to you.
 
What a fucking brainlet argument.
>we
>outlaw
If you get to outlaw things, *you* are the oligarch.
You can however get the progressives to do it and let them scapegoat the likes of you as as the reason if their popularity among young men falls to critical levels which is where it is coing.
So, no, i for one would not want you as an ally in politics, you are too self-absorbed in own accelerationist fantasies and hot takes to play political games with the leftist snakes, they will run circles around you, you are a liability to any political movement dumb enough to listen to you.

As opposed to your solution, which seems to be to plug your fingers in you ears while insisting that is okay and can still be fixed even as it all crumbles around you.

And if I am an ‘accelerationist’, it’s not by choice and I am a damn mild one at that.

The difference between you and me is this: I recognize that the state of affairs of Western Society cannot last, that we’re chest deep into it and that the System is going to fight tooth, nail and claw before it lets us fix things.

By which point we’ll be up to our EARS in it at LEAST and it will be even harder to fix things by then. Trying to play political games and slowly fix things won't work. Best to wake people up sooner then later and get it over with.

Of course I’d love if that was the case and that such actions won’t be necessary. I WANT to be proven wrong in this.

But the past few years- indeed the past decade or more- has shown that the easy way is unlikely to happen.

Nor can we fix things by just voting our way out via Just Election by the Right Guy.

Sure, it will help, but the System as a whole isn’t going to make it easy for us or them.

Again, the political game is going to be too slow and will play to their advantages. They will find a reason to scapegoat us ANYWAY.
 
You are talking about tons of people dying and being harmed. And no, pain is not a good teaching aid. It does not teach good lessons. Most revolutions have a valid injustice they complain about, but end up with more problems afterwards.

They are already in pain and will be in more pain if we don’t take action.

Which is why revolutions always end in failures and we still have God-Kings! Oh wait.

And believe me there are many many more injustices to be found, some of which the spread of pornography and the blurring of the line between it and general society have played a part. But that is outside of the scope of this discussion.
 
As opposed to your solution, which seems to be to plug your fingers in you ears while insisting that is okay and can still be fixed even as it all crumbles around you.
Out of all things, yes, it is ok, it is a non-issue compared to all the problems western civilization is facing. If theoretically, by some impossible conjunction of electoral scheming you got a porn ban, it would do absolutely nothing to help against the left, only let leftists tell everyone that in the end it wasn't them who took away their fun, it was those dastardly religious rightoids.
And if I am an ‘accelerationist’, it’s not by choice and I am a damn mild one at that.
Your political views are your choice, can't wiggle your way out of that...
The difference between you and me is this: I recognize that the state of affairs of Western Society cannot last, that we’re chest deep into it and that the System is going to fight tooth, nail and claw before it lets us fix things.
And that's why picking fights in the name of something that maybe has support of what, maybe tenth to third of most radical of your own side are fucking pointless, unless you are trying to start a wider scale of exactly what we are seeing in this very thread - a fucking pointless quarrel inside the political right out of which absolutely nothing beneficial (for the right) can possibly come.
The other side, if it is present, is cackling like mad while devouring popcorn seeing stuff like this.
By which point we’ll be up to our EARS in it at LEAST and it will be even harder to fix things by then. Trying to play political games and slowly fix things won't work. Best to wake people up sooner then later and get it over with.
And how does doing the above serve this goal?
Of course I’d love if that was the case and that such actions won’t be necessary. I WANT to be proven wrong in this.

But the past few years- indeed the past decade or more- has shown that the easy way is unlikely to happen.

Nor can we fix things by just voting our way out via Just Election by the Right Guy.

Sure, it will help, but the System as a whole isn’t going to make it easy for us or them.

Again, the political game is going to be too slow and will play to their advantages. They will find a reason to scapegoat us ANYWAY.
The leftists sure as hell won't make it easy for us, and that's even more reason to not make it needlessly harder for ourselves by picking fights that achieve nothing but to divide our own faction.
So, if you want to make people angry, at least fucking make sure you are making them angry against the leftist establishment, not against you or your allies.
 
Which is why revolutions always end in failures and we still have God-Kings! Oh wait.
Literally, there has been one violent revolution that improved stuff, maybe 2. That's the American Revolution, with the South/Central American ones vs Spain being a maybe.
 
Pain is an extremely effective teaching tool. That doesn't make it a preferred tool, but it's the one fools always end up forcing themselves into.

How much that applies to a given topic varies.
Pain teaches 'don't get caught doing this behavior', that's about it. Riots aren't going to be linked to porn by the minds of the masses though, so no, it won't teach that. It likely won't teach anything except riots suck for most people. Shocker, we already know. But the people who cause a riot? They sometimes benefit, and other peoples pain teaches them how to do it again.

So no, it isn't an effective teacher. It doesn't tell why not to do something, just to not do it, and if the pain is separated from the action sufficiently, it doesn't even teach that.
 
Pain teaches 'don't get caught doing this behavior', that's about it. Riots aren't going to be linked to porn by the minds of the masses though, so no, it won't teach that. It likely won't teach anything except riots suck for most people. Shocker, we already know. But the people who cause a riot? They sometimes benefit, and other peoples pain teaches them how to do it again.

So no, it isn't an effective teacher. It doesn't tell why not to do something, just to not do it, and if the pain is separated from the action sufficiently, it doesn't even teach that.
'Don't do that' is a very important lesson some people need to learn.
 
Except the easiest way to not get caught is to not do it.

Unless something is a necessity or you REALLY REALLY want it. Then pain can be a good deterrent.
Unless, as I stated before, there's no chance anyone will link the two together. Also, instigators of riots win from riots, and learn to cause more. It's the participants that tend to learn not to join. Look at Sharpeton. He can't wait to racebait again for profit.
 
Basically were in the "pretty rat stage" of human development.

Stanford did an experiment once with rats where they were allowed to breed and had food, water.

We're like that now.

Our cellphones have taken away so much of human connection.

Like the rats that would spend their days grooming themselves.

We now have parents who'd rather ticktock than talk to their children.

Batshit crazy people who want control are still sane, and they're doing everything they can to further break humanity mentally.

There may be more openness now about it.

But they've been doing slowly since the 1960s.

It's a counter movement to religious based wholeness.

The only difference is, now the principal can openly take a peek at you.

Back then, Father Tom copped a feel and Billy was too scared to tell anyone about it.

Same coin, different side.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top