Leftist Child Grooming

Vanderbilt Health Is Gender-Bending Tennessee Minors Without Parental Consent


When patients turn 13, they can hide their health records and schedule private appointments with doctors who can begin the process of gender transition.

My nonprofit dedicated to protecting children from exploitation and fighting trafficking, Freedom Forever, has been investigating the alarming truth of what’s happening at Vanderbilt Health, including Vanderbilt’s Pediatric Transgender Clinics. It appears that destructive California policies have officially made their way to Tennessee.

We discovered that Vanderbilt Health started implementing what parents have called a “mature minor” doctrine starting in 2021. Parents told us this policy allows minors, starting at age 13, to effectively take full control of their medical decisions while keeping parents in the dark.

To greet you at some of these offices you’ll see a sign warning you, “Parents of Pre-Teens Be Aware” followed by, “When your 12-year-old turns 13 you will lose access to your My Vanderbilt account. You and your teen must present yourself to the front desk with your ID and fill out a MHAV 13-17 Form to retain access.”

After this, parents report that their kids can make their own medical decisions, hide their health records, and schedule private one-on-one appointments with doctors who can begin the process of gender transition treatment without parental consent once they turn 13.

So-called “mature minor” doctrines around the country have led to dangerous drugs being prescribed without parents knowing about it and even procedures being performed without their knowledge. Once in the room with a doctor, your teen will see a sign notifying them that “We provide medical chaperones for all sensitive procedures” and assurance that “We’ll talk with you about this.”

You’ll notice on the sign illustration that no parent is in the room for this “talk.” The possible ways this could be abused seem endless. Why would a child need a chaperone that’s NOT their parent for a “sensitive” procedure?


Vanderbilt Health did not respond to a request for comment.

Is the Medical Establishment More Powerful Than State Law?
State laws didn’t even have to formally change in order for the removal of parental rights to take effect at Vanderbilt Health. When it comes to accessing children and making life-altering and potentially life-threatening medical decisions, Vanderbilt’s policies essentially mandate that parents have no rights or authority once their child turns 13.

When the parent-child connection is usurped by a higher authority injecting a new power dynamic, families experience devastating effects and all of this is happening during one of the most critical times in their child’s development. Parents bring their children in for care, and it quickly becomes evident that their involvement as the parent is not valued or necessary in the eyes of the medical establishment. This hierarchal attitude of subverting the parent’s authority, met with the hyper-fluctuating hormones of a teenager and sprinkled with gender theory confusion, makes a cocktail for family division and future, pervasive mental-health struggles for the child.

Multiple parents have reached out to me and my nonprofit, Freedom Forever, asking for guidance and support. One thing all these parents have in common is the fear of retribution from politically motivated medical professionals and/or being denied health care access for their children if they speak out. If you fear your system of health care, is that truly an ethical medical system?


One mother told me:

All of our daughter’s life we’ve been attending Vanderbilt-affiliated pediatric practices. At the stroke of midnight on our child’s 13th birthday, Vanderbilt made it known that parents are secondary to the child and they force you & your child to sign the ‘Mature Minor Consent Form.’
Essentially, this is a permission slip for the parent. Without our minor child’s signature, Vanderbilt simply strips our parental authority away. After signing the form, our daughter is still asked each appointment if she gives her consent to have us in the room. It’s just shocking. Our daughter is 13. She’s not on the eve of being an adult. She’s just entering her teens and, more than likely, the most confusing time of her life yet this is the precise time when Vanderbilt inserts themselves directly between the child and his or her parent.
Over the course of our conversations with this parent, we learned that while this document says a parent or guardian will accompany the minor, the reality is that Vanderbilt will not share information as simple as a child’s upcoming appointment time without the child signing a consent form allowing their parents to have this information. They still allow parents to pay the bills, but they won’t share the details of what they’re paying for.

This concerned mother said when she asked Vanderbilt for more information about the policy she was told, “This is Vanderbilt Policy. If you don’t sign, you cannot be with your child.” No one was able to explain to the parents how Vanderbilt could lawfully transfer care from adult to minor without cause. If a child can govern their own health affairs, what else can a 13-year-old child consent to without their parents’ knowledge or consent?

Pandora’s box has been opened. The boundaries of consent and parental rights are now in the hands of the medical establishment.

In Tennessee, a child can’t get their ears pierced without their birth certificate and a parent present giving consent yet we allow them to assume responsibility for all of their medical care? The life-altering effects of what these gender clinics are doing has far more devastating effects than a piercing.

Experimentation in the Name of ‘Tolerance’
There are hundreds of pediatric gender clinics in North America according to The Gender Mapping Project, where children as young as 13 are being given surgical referrals. The lack of transparency, the obvious enticement, and the incentives being used to find “new patients” are both unethical and immoral. From promoting services to kids at local Pride events or even appointing special advocates that they match minors up with, it’s clear the medical establishment is working alongside an embedded political agenda.

Transitioning children is quickly becoming the fastest-growing medicalized social-political initiative in America. This is medical experimentation being carried out on minors under the guise of “scientific advancement” and “tolerance.” These procedures, which lack long-term safety studies, are being done in many cases without parental consent or knowledge.

This includes mental health care and the new gold standard of “affirmative care” therapy. “Affirmative Care” only affirms what a child feels they are at any given moment and hormonally vulnerable teens and even pre-pubescent kids are overwhelmed with waves of propaganda telling them that they’ll be happier if they change genders. They’re even presented with a path marked with rainbows, unicorns, and praise for bravery and authenticity. To reject the propaganda is to yield to your lame parents giving you boundaries and telling you what you can and can’t do or be.

One mom said it best:

It’s upsetting to lay it out bare — that we’re in an adversarial relationship with our daughter’s medical team and that Vanderbilt views themselves as more important than the parents. She’s a patient at the endo clinic for a chromosomal abnormality. This is the same clinic that advertises its transgender clinic for minors and willingly prescribes hormones to confused children. With their Mature Minor policy, I have no idea if these treatments are being done with or without parental permission. You’re so scared as a parent. … I fear that if I’m not with my child, she could be coerced into a decision that’s not in her best interest or that could potentially be dangerous.
In the heart of the nation’s health care capital, children are watching as parental authority is being systematically removed. At the same time, they’re also being handed a newfound power they aren’t emotionally or physically ready to acquire. In the end, removing parents from a decision-making role in the medical care of their children is an extremely dangerous path.

We must speak up now to demand our parental rights or forever lose them as this snowballs into full normalization.


Landon Starbuck is the President of Freedom Forever, a non-profit dedicated to protecting children from exploitation. She’s a national advocate, speaker, thought leader & mother of 3.

Be a real shame if something were to happen....
 


""Countless children were sexually assaulted and raped. They were deliberately humiliated and degraded. They were shared and trafficked. They were subjected to violence and their families were threatened."

"Other key report findings include:

Teachers and social workers being discouraged from reporting abuse
Offenders becoming "emboldened" by the absence of police action, with abuse continuing for years without concerted response
Exploitation was not investigated because of nervousness about race, that investigating concerns against Asian men, in particular, would inflame "racial tensions"
Even after an investigation leading to seven men being jailed for child sex crimes West Mercia Police and Telford & Wrekin Council scaled down their specialist teams "to virtual zero" in order to save money"
 


""Countless children were sexually assaulted and raped. They were deliberately humiliated and degraded. They were shared and trafficked. They were subjected to violence and their families were threatened."

"Other key report findings include:

Teachers and social workers being discouraged from reporting abuse
Offenders becoming "emboldened" by the absence of police action, with abuse continuing for years without concerted response
Exploitation was not investigated because of nervousness about race, that investigating concerns against Asian men, in particular, would inflame "racial tensions"
Even after an investigation leading to seven men being jailed for child sex crimes West Mercia Police and Telford & Wrekin Council scaled down their specialist teams "to virtual zero" in order to save money"
I like how the authorities in Telford think they can simply apologize their way out of having to suffer any consequences, for having helped to perpetrate the abuse of children for decades. Sadly, they're probably correct in that assumption.
 
I like how the authorities in Telford think they can simply apologize their way out of having to suffer any consequences, for having helped to perpetrate the abuse of children for decades. Sadly, they're probably correct in that assumption.
They will be untouchable until the moment they very much aren't.
 
They will be untouchable until the moment they very much aren't.
It's the crowd verses madman with a gun problem. The madman is making all sorts of insane demands and threats, but do you really want to rush him? He'll likely kill the first couple people that try.

No one wants to be the first to rush up and take a bullet. The leftist organizations make sure to make enough examples of people to ensure that. They make sure that you are atomized enough to not want to risk your self to dolve an issue for everyone.
 
It's the crowd verses madman with a gun problem. The madman is making all sorts of insane demands and threats, but do you really want to rush him? He'll likely kill the first couple people that try.

No one wants to be the first to rush up and take a bullet. The leftist organizations make sure to make enough examples of people to ensure that. They make sure that you are atomized enough to not want to risk your self to dolve an issue for everyone.
Except he started firing into the crowd, and people went "maybe if I stand perfectly still, and don't say anything, he won't shoot at me?"
 
It's the crowd verses madman with a gun problem. The madman is making all sorts of insane demands and threats, but do you really want to rush him? He'll likely kill the first couple people that try.

No one wants to be the first to rush up and take a bullet. The leftist organizations make sure to make enough examples of people to ensure that. They make sure that you are atomized enough to not want to risk your self to dolve an issue for everyone.

the problem for the madman is simply this there is a difference between to dangerous to fuck with and too dangerous to let live and once you hit the latter every one murders your ass out of self preservation.
 
Parent Who Exposed Pornographic Library Books Sues After School Bans Him From Property



'This government entity believes that it can shut a citizen out of public life entirely if he challenges them, their decisions, or their authority,' says lawyer

A Maine parent is suing his local school board after he was banned from district property for speaking out against school library books that promote transgenderism and pornography.

In the wake of those complaints, Shawn McBreairty received a criminal trespass notice from the school district, according to a copy of the notice and the lawsuit. The Maine father of two daughters, who has campaigned against sexualized lesson plans in public schools, said during an April school board meeting that the books were "grooming students on premature sexual ideology," referencing a pornographic book the library marked as appropriate for all age groups.

The school board demanded that McBreairty leave for playing a recording of a conversation between him and Chairman Heath Miller, saying his descriptions of the books involved "vulgarity and obscenity." McBreairty said government-run school libraries should not offer the books, which the school board deemed too inappropriate to discuss among adults, to minors.

"I'm not anti-LGBTQ," McBreairty told the Washington Free Beacon. "I'm not anti-anything, but when somebody tries to use our tax dollars to indoctrinate kids with hypersexual materials, to me, that's nonsense."

The Hampden, Maine, school district is one of many nationwide to face pushback from parents over sexual library books. Florida parents in April demanded the Osceola and Orange County school boards remove from the library controversial books such as Gender Queer, the story of a person with "e/em/eir" pronouns, which parents said included "pornographic" details. A Virginia Beach, Va., school district removed Gender Queer and similar books from its libraries after parents complained in May. Parents in Frisco, Texas, also protested sexually explicit books in their children's school libraries.

McBreairty raised concerns about the district's Reads Three Reading Challenge, which awards K-12 students for reading books like All Boys Aren't Blue, which has been removed from libraries in at least eight states for concerns about "sexually graphic material, including descriptions of queer sex," and Hurricane Child, in which a 12-year-old girl falls in love with another girl.

The criminal trespass notice against McBreairty, which bans him from all virtual and in-person school-related meetings, violates his First Amendment rights, according to the lawsuit. The district should let McBreairty express his ideas and allow the community to judge the books for themselves, said Marc Randazza, who is representing McBreairty in the U.S. District Court for Maine.

"This government entity believes that it can shut a citizen out of public life entirely if he challenges them, their decisions, or their authority," Randazza told the Free Beacon. "It shouldn't matter what he's advocating for. If you can't advocate your position before the government without being told you're now locked out of public life, because you challenged us, well, that's not what freedom is."

In the recording McBreairty played at the April board meeting, Miller justified pornographic excerpts of a library book in the Hampden High School library, saying, "If you were to read it in the context of the whole book, it would have a different meaning." The board cited the incident to justify the criminal trespass notice, but no official policy against playing a video or recording during a school board meeting exists, the lawsuit states. Randazza said the board tried to add limitations to its policies to stop McBreairty from criticizing the library books.

The library at the district's Reeds Brook Middle School offers The Other Boy, a book about a 12-year-old boy who was born a girl and tries to conceal that he is transgender when his family moves towns; Middle School's A Drag: You Better Werk, the story of a young gay entrepreneur who starts his own junior talent agency with a 13-year-old aspiring drag queen as his first client; and Rick, a book about a boy who joins a "Rainbow Spectrum club, where kids of many genders and identities can express themselves." It also offers It's Perfectly Normal: A Book About Changing Bodies, Growing Up, Sex, and Sexual Health, which McBreairty read at a different school board meeting.

Another district library, Leroy H. Smith Elementary School, includes My Maddy, in which a child celebrates her "genderfluid" parent who is neither a mom nor a dad; My Rainbow, in which a mom "creates the perfect rainbow-colored wig for her transgender daughter"; and Julián Is a Mermaid, about a boy who wants to dress as a beautiful mermaid. It also offers Rise Up: The Art of Protest, which teaches children to protest for "gender equality, civil rights, LGBT rights, refugee and immigrant rights, peace, and the environment."

"Eight-year-old kids who don't know how to spell ‘blue' are basically being asked to do art for protests," McBreairty said.

The Regional School Unit #22 school district and 2022 Maine Teacher of the Year Kelsey Stoyanova, who crafted the Reads Three program, have appealed to "intellectual freedom" in defense of the library books. But McBreairty said the intellectual freedom argument is a Trojan horse for the Maine Department of Education's radical agenda.

"Their program is to indoctrinate kids while they're young without parental permission," he said. "Don't try to force that stuff on me or my daughters with my tax dollars."

Regional School Unit #22 did not respond to a request for comment. Miller did not respond to a request for comment.
 
At least 181 K-12 educators charged with child sex crimes in first half of 2022


140 of the arrests, or 77%, involved alleged sex crimes against students

At least 181 K-12 educators, including four principals, were arrested on child sex-related crimes in the U.S. in the first six months of 2022, ranging from child pornography to raping students.

An analysis conducted by Fox News Digital looked at local news stories week by week featuring arrests of principals, teachers, substitute teachers and teachers’ aides on child sex-related crimes in school districts across the country. Arrests that weren't publicized were not counted in the analysis, meaning the true number may well be higher.

The analysis found that at least 181 have been arrested between January 1 and June 30, which works out to exactly an arrest a day on average.

The 181 educators included four principals, 153 teachers, 12 teachers' aides and 12 substitute teachers.

At least 140 of the arrests, or 77%, involved alleged crimes against students.

Men also made up the vast majority – 78% – of the arrests.

Many of the arrests involved especially heinous allegations.

Roger Weaver Freed, the 34-year-old former principal at Williamsport Area High School in Pennsylvania, was arrested in June and charged with sexual contact with a student, corruption of a minor, furnishing liquor to a minor, sexual assault and aggravated indecent assault without consent.

Freed is accused of having a years-long sexual relationship with a male student.

Shannon Hall, a 31-year-old former teacher at Jamaica Gateway to the Sciences High School in New York City, was arrested in June and charged with forcible touching, endangering the welfare of a child and aggravated harassment.

Hall is accused of grabbing a 14-year-old female student's breast inside his classroom and of sending texts to a 16-year-old student that said he wanted to have sex with her and threatening to kill her if she told anyone.

Norman Merrill, a 45-year-old former teacher at Green Mountain Union High School in Vermont, was arrested in May and charged with production of child sexual abuse material and possession of child sexual abuse material.

Merrill is accused of secretly video recording female students walking past him at school and of producing videos showing nude children.

John Doty, a 35-year-old former biology teacher at Career Academy South Bend in Indiana, was charged with two counts of rape, one count of attempted rape and six counts of child seduction on Feb. 9.

Doty is accused of repeatedly raping a 16-year-old female student and threatening to kill her. He is scheduled to stand trial in January 2023.

The analysis comes after the U.S. Department of Education released a report last month, titled, "Study of State Policies to Prohibit Aiding and Abetting Sexual Misconduct in Schools," which analyzed state policies prohibiting "passing the trash," or allowing suspected sexual abusers to quietly leave their jobs to possibly offend again in a different school district.

A bipartisan provision of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), which was originally proposed by Republican Sen. Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania, requires all states receiving federal education funding to enact law prohibiting the practice of "passing the trash."

The Education Department’s report, however, found that laws against the practice are varied across the states, and that while all states require prospective employers to conduct criminal background checks on educators, and most states – 46 – require fingerprinting, only 19 states require employers to request information from an applicants’ current and former employers.

Moreover, only 14 states require employers to check an applicant’s eligibility for employment or certification, and 11 require applicants to disclose information regarding investigations or disciplinary actions related to sexual abuse or misconduct.

Toomey, who pressured the Education Department to release its report for months, said he’s "deeply concerned" by the findings.

"While I appreciate that the Department of Education has finally fulfilled its obligation to investigate whether states have implemented policies, laws, or regulations to stop the heinous practice of ‘passing the trash,’ I am deeply concerned with these findings," Toomey said in a June statement. "Any educator who engaged in sexual misconduct with a child should be barred from ever teaching in a classroom again, yet too many states do not have policies to ensure that is the case. Releasing this report is only the first step—the department must hold states accountable and use the tools at its disposal to enforce the law."


Christopher Rufo, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, called for a new national study on child sex abuse in schools.

"This is a scandal that the political Left is doing everything in its power to suppress," he said in a statement to Fox News Digital. "The basic fact is incontrovertible: every day, a public school teacher is arrested, indicted, or convicted for child sex abuse. And yet, the teachers unions, the public school bureaucracies, and the left-wing media pretend that the abuse isn't happening and viciously attack families who raise concerns."

"It's time to take this problem seriously," he said. "I call on Congress to appropriate $25 million for a national study of child sex abuse in public schools, so victims can finally get justice and parents can have greater confidence that schools will be safe for their children."

The Department of Education last released a report on the topic in 2004, which claimed that nearly 9.6% of students are targets of educator sexual misconduct sometime during their school career.
 
history will judge us for how we treated our children,
I wish I could even say I was surprised, but after the lawsuite's around Paxil and the other things revealed about how SSRI's often made things worse for people who were forced onto them...

We 'trusted the science' and severely damaged a generation or more of young people by forcing these on them as 'happy pills'.

It's too late for many of those affected by this, because they already lost their battles; I just hope we can get some kind of 'survivors fund' going to help those who were fucked over by this.
 
Wow turns out "happiness" is a bit more complicated than just one chemical molecule! Who would have thunk it?
As someone who's been on them at one point, the doctors do know they aren't a magic pill. They also "knew" that everyone was different and getting the proper does often took trial and error.

Which in hindsight, makes sense as they apparently do nothing!
 
I wouldn't go so far as to say they do "nothing", but alone? Yeah they might as well do nothing.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top