Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum

[ATP]

Imagine what they could be like if they were not being fucked by communism.

No,thank you.
They would rule world.Tang China had big jewish diaspora - and later they were all assimilated and become good chineese.
No,they not simply murdered them,like Russia,only really assimilated.

No other country manage to assimilate jews,they were always minorities there.
And,it mean,that China could assimilate and turn into chineese everybody.
Thank you,i prefer to remain polish catholic.

 

[Zachowon]

Nukes kind of make that moot.

Nukes don't make one first world.
North Korea example

 

[Scottty]

No,thank you.
They would rule world.Tang China had big jewish diaspora - and later they were all assimilated and become good chineese.
No,they not simply murdered them,like Russia,only really assimilated.

No other country manage to assimilate jews,they were always minorities there.
And,it mean,that China could assimilate and turn into chineese everybody.
Thank you,i prefer to remain polish catholic.

I think the way it would work might be that you could stay Polish and Catholic, but your children , grandchildren, etc would increasingly become Sinicized.

But even in the West, there are lots of people with Jewish ancestry, who don't personally identify as Jewish at all, either in religion or ethnicity. The Melting Pot at work.

 

[ATP]

I think the way it would work might be that you could stay Polish and Catholic, but your children , grandchildren, etc would increasingly become Sinicized.

But even in the West, there are lots of people with Jewish ancestry, who don't personally identify as Jewish at all, either in religion or ethnicity. The Melting Pot at work.

Part of population - yes.But chineese turned entire population into chineese.Well,they did the same with nestorians.
And without any big pogroms - Russia for example get rid of all jews under Ivan the terrible coward,but he simply drown them all.

 

[Scottty]

Part of population - yes.But chineese turned entire population into chineese.Well,they did the same with nestorians.
And without any big pogroms - Russia for example get rid of all jews under Ivan the terrible coward,but he simply drown them all.

 

[Cherico]

Would not be the strangest thing if they were telling the truth.

 

[Ixian]

Would not be the strangest thing if they were telling the truth.

I mean, a simple dna test would prove or disprove it.

 

[ATP]

I mean, a simple dna test would prove or disprove it.

unless there was many italian sailors visiting them after Marco Polo....

 

[Iconoclast]

The CIA orchestrated a color revolution in Ukraine, deposing the democratically elected Yanukovych, and then put the puppet Poroshenko in power, and our politicians still have the gall to say "democracy, democracy, democracy".



Our leaders collude with the WEF, who are actively working to turn the planet into a post-liberal, neofeudalist, algocratic surveillance state hellhole, and they still have the gall to say "democracy, democracy, democracy".



Our institutions censor people, violate their constitutional rights, and call legitimate dissent a product of "foreign influence operations", but they still have the gall to say "democracy, democracy, democracy."

Exposed: Media Ruled by Robust PsyOp Alliance

Investigative journalist Michael Shellenberger has exposed Renée DiResta, research director for the Stanford Internet Observatory (SIO), as one of the

freedomfirstnetwork.com

These people don't give a damn about democracy. They never did. They are kleptocrats wearing our democracy like a cheap suit.

 

[Zachowon]

The CIA orchestrated a color revolution in Ukraine, deposing the democratically elected Yanukovych, and then put the puppet Poroshenko in power, and our politicians still have the gall to say "democracy, democracy, democracy".

He was democratically elected in that Putin is.
Russians made sure he won.

 

[ATP]

The CIA orchestrated a color revolution in Ukraine, deposing the democratically elected Yanukovych, and then put the puppet Poroshenko in power, and our politicians still have the gall to say "democracy, democracy, democracy".



Our leaders collude with the WEF, who are actively working to turn the planet into a post-liberal, neofeudalist, algocratic surveillance state hellhole, and they still have the gall to say "democracy, democracy, democracy".



Our institutions censor people, violate their constitutional rights, and call legitimate dissent a product of "foreign influence operations", but they still have the gall to say "democracy, democracy, democracy."

Exposed: Media Ruled by Robust PsyOp Alliance

Investigative journalist Michael Shellenberger has exposed Renée DiResta, research director for the Stanford Internet Observatory (SIO), as one of the

freedomfirstnetwork.com

These people don't give a damn about democracy. They never did. They are kleptocrats wearing our democracy like a cheap suit.

Of course ! oligarchs ALWAYS wonted to enslave others.

One good thing - current order s falling,and whoever win,those assholes would die.Becouse we could have world caliphate,China empire,even kgb empire - but no those retards ruling over planet.
It is not enough to be evil to rule over world - you must be at least partially competent,too.

 

[Marduk]

The CIA orchestrated a color revolution in Ukraine, deposing the democratically elected Yanukovych, and then put the puppet Poroshenko in power, and our politicians still have the gall to say "democracy, democracy, democracy".

Do not spread the Russian state narrative, they won't pay you for it, it just makes you look like meme grade contrarian teenager NPC.

 

[Iconoclast]

Do not spread the Russian state narrative, they won't pay you for it, it just makes you look like meme grade contrarian teenager NPC.

I don't care about the Russian narrative. They're not my source. Wikileaks are.

I know for a fact that the CIA starts color revolutions because they did it more than once, in various places across the globe, using the same people.

After Otpor/CANVAS led the overthrow of Slobodan Milosevic, our oligarchs decided, "let's hire these people and have them do it again, wherever we want".

Here's Srdja Popovic in front of Otpor's fist logo:



Here's the same logo as seen in Russia, Libya, Venezuela, Georgia, Ukraine, Egypt, et cetera:



Here's an email from the leaked Stratfor files, about how Srdja Popovic is a pawn for the CIA and private intelligence firms:

The Global Intelligence Files - Re: INSIGHT - VENEZUELA: CANVAS analysis

From: Marko Papic [mailto:marko.papic@stratfor.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 5:15 PM
To: Fred Burton
Subject: Re: INSIGHT - VENEZUELA: CANVAS analysis
CANVAS is basically the same as OTPOR.

OTPOR (means resistance) were a group of students from Belgrade who took
down Milosevic. They were tangentially connected to U.S funding sources
like NED, Freedom House and the Albert Einstein Institute and, through
them, the U.S. Agency for International Development and the U.S.
Department of State. BUT, the US funding sources more lached on to them
after realizing their potency than other way around.

After they toppled Milosevic, the kids who ran OTPOR grew up, got suits
and designed CANVAS - Center for Applied Non-Violent Action and
Strategies... or in other words a "export-a-revolution" group that sowed
the seeds for a NUMBER of color revolutions. (they even have a website:
Canvas – Center for Applied NonViolent Actions and Strategies) They are still hooked into U.S. funding and
basically go around the world trying to topple dictators and autocratic
governments (ones that U.S. does not like

I hooked into them in late 2007 and they have been feeding us intel on
Venezuela, Georgia, Serbia, etc. Meredith expressed interest and so I
arranged a meeting between CANVAS main guy (Srdjan Popovic) and
George/Meredith in Denver around spring 2008. The meeting went well,
George invited them to come talk to the analysts on how they run
revolutions. They have accepted and I am gaming out when to bring them
over here to Austin.

Exposed: Globally Renowned Activist Collaborated With Intelligence Firm Stratfor

An exclusive Occupy.com investigation reveals that Srdja Popovic, one of the leading architects of the overthrow of Slobodan Milodevic, has served as an intelligence gatherer for Strator and the U.S. government, informing on activists worldwide.

www.occupy.com

Lesser known, an exclusive Occupy.com investigation reveals that Popovic and the Otpor! offshoot CANVAS (Centre for Applied Nonviolent Action and Strategies) have also maintained close ties with a Goldman Sachs executive and the private intelligence firm Stratfor (Strategic Forecasting, Inc.), as well as the U.S. government. Popovic's wife also worked at Stratfor for a year.

These revelations come in the aftermath of thousands of new emails released by Wikileaks' "Global Intelligence Files." The emails reveal Popovic worked closely with Stratfor, an Austin, Texas-based private firm that gathers intelligence on geopolitical events and activists for clients ranging from the American Petroleum Institute and Archer Daniels Midland to Dow Chemical, Duke Energy, Northrop Grumman, Intel and Coca-Cola.

Referred to in emails under the moniker "SR501," Popovic was first approached by Stratfor in 2007 to give a lecture in the firm's office about events transpiring in Eastern Europe, according to a Stratfor source who asked to remain confidential for this story.

Here's an article from the Guardian from 19 years ago, back when the media still had the balls to admit what was being done:

Ian Traynor: US campaign behind the turmoil in Kiev

Analysis: Ukraine, traditionally passive in its politics, has been mobilised by young democracy activists and will never be the same again.

www.theguardian.com

But while the gains of the orange-bedecked "chestnut revolution" are Ukraine's, the campaign is an American creation, a sophisticated and brilliantly conceived exercise in western branding and mass marketing that, in four countries in four years, has been used to try to salvage rigged elections and topple unsavoury regimes.

Funded and organised by the US government, deploying US consultancies, pollsters, diplomats, the two big American parties and US non-government organisations, the campaign was first used in Europe in Belgrade in 2000 to beat Slobodan Milosevic at the ballot box.

Richard Miles, the US ambassador in Belgrade, played a key role. And by last year, as US ambassador in Tbilisi, he repeated the trick in Georgia, coaching Mikhail Saakashvili in how to bring down Eduard Shevardnadze.

This is how they do it: a bunch of DC "pro-democracy" NGOs funded by our oligarchs anonymously through donor advised funds (and the CIA, through USAID and the US State Department) wrangle up and train a bunch of agents-provocateurs under a pretense of "nonviolent conflict resolution", and then they send them in to start protests and riots to depose some dictator that our intelligence services want removed from power.

I am incensed about this shit. These CIA and oligarch motherfuckers collapsed Libya to the point where they went from having a functioning society to having open-air slave markets, and after Benghazi, they abandoned them and left them to rot.

I watched this happen live on TV in Libya like thirteen years ago. The media kept crowing about how protests in the Arab Spring were organized on Facebook, and my immediate impression was "Langley sock puppets organized the riots from thousands of miles away", and, "If they could do it in Libya, they could do it here, right in our own backyard".

As a matter of fact, they did do it here, with Antifa and BLM rioting and burning down buildings. Same network. Same dial-a-color-revolution bullshit.

 

[Vyor]

I don't care about the Russian narrative. They're not my source. Wikileaks are.

>russia isn't my source
>I just use this russian source

 

[Zachowon]

>russia isn't my source
>I just use this russian source

But you see Vyor.
Wikileaks is thr truth to all that the west does!!!!/s

 

[Iconoclast]

>russia isn't my source
>I just use this russian source

Julian Assange's files were all authentic leaks.

I don't think you understand where I'm coming from. Look out your window, right now. Picture if there was a coup and a subsequent civil war in your country and all the houses around you were rubble and there were fighter jets and cruise missiles flying overhead. What would you do? Where would you go?

Our oligarchs are murderous psychopaths. They willingly, deliberately collapsed multiple countries and turned their populations into refugees. They destroyed the living standards of millions of innocent people throughout MENA. That could be you. That could be happening in your own backyard, all depending on the whims of some psychopath with deep enough pockets to hire his own rioters.

That's not democracy.

 

[Marduk]

I don't care about the Russian narrative. They're not my source. Wikileaks are.

So Russian state narrative with an extra degree of separation.
Ask Assange why RuGov leaks don't end up on Wikileaks.

I know for a fact that the CIA starts color revolutions because they did it more than once, in various places across the globe, using the same people.

That would be CIA narrative if i was in charge of an agency full of useless DIE hires but still have to make it look useful.
Every time a shitty government gets a bad case of unrest, make sure it somehow gets tied to us, send them a symbolic briefcase of cash even, so it seems like we actually can do something impressive.

After Otpor/CANVAS led the overthrow of Slobodan Milosevic, our oligarchs decided, "let's hire these people and have them do it again, wherever we want".

Here's Srdja Popovic in front of Otpor's fist logo:

View attachment 1919

Here's the same logo as seen in Russia, Libya, Venezuela, Georgia, Ukraine, et cetera:

View attachment 1920

Here's an email from the leaked Stratfor files, about how Srdja Popovic is a pawn for the CIA and private intelligence firms:

The Global Intelligence Files - Re: INSIGHT - VENEZUELA: CANVAS analysis

Exposed: Globally Renowned Activist Collaborated With Intelligence Firm Stratfor

An exclusive Occupy.com investigation reveals that Srdja Popovic, one of the leading architects of the overthrow of Slobodan Milodevic, has served as an intelligence gatherer for Strator and the U.S. government, informing on activists worldwide.

www.occupy.com

Here's an article from the Guardian from 19 years ago, back when the media still had the balls to admit what was being done:

Ian Traynor: US campaign behind the turmoil in Kiev

Analysis: Ukraine, traditionally passive in its politics, has been mobilised by young democracy activists and will never be the same again.

www.theguardian.com

This is how they do it: a bunch of DC "pro-democracy" NGOs funded by our oligarchs through anonymous donor advised funds (and the CIA, through USAID and the US State Department) wrangle up and train a bunch of agents-provocateurs under a pretense of "nonviolent conflict resolution", and then they send them in to start protests and riots to depose some dictator that our intelligence services want removed from power.

There are more NGOs and wannabe activists in the West than there are interesting political movements in the world, so they rub shoulders with absolutely everyone who needs a shoutout or a dollar.
But to then go and ascribe the credit to them for all that happened just because they rubbed shoulders is a gross case of stolen merit.

I am incensed about this shit. These CIA and oligarch motherfuckers collapsed Libya to the point where they went from having a functioning society to having open-air slave markets, and after Benghazi, they abandoned them and left them to rot.

LMAO. Libya was a shithole held on a famously clownish dictator, and 2008 crisis with following Arab Spring threw him and many others in the region some logs under their feet that some failed to dodge.
Do not make those affirmative action hires look more competent than they are.

I watched this happen live on TV in Libya like thirteen years ago. The media kept crowing about how protests in the Arab Spring were organized on Facebook, and my immediate impression was "Langley sock puppets organized the riots from thousands of miles away", and, "If they could do it in Libya, they could do it here, right in our own backyard".

One absolutely can organize protests on Facebook. Certainly could in 2011. Even now it's doable if Zuck or US Govt don't hate your cause. This is why countries like Russia, China or Cuba don't allow open public access to any social media they don't control, it's the only way to not allow that. But some third world shitholes aren't as on point on tech stuff, Libya in 2011 certainly being one of them.

As a matter of fact, they did do it here, with Antifa and BLM rioting and burning down buildings. Same network. Same dial-a-color-revolution bullshit.

Just because they can, doesn't give them a monopoly.

 

[Iconoclast]

They don't just rub shoulders. CANVAS, Soros' Open Societies, NED, Freedom House, et cetera, train armies of activists. Who then go around and, essentially, complete military/intelligence objectives. In the case of Libya, they stirred enough shit for NATO to justify invoking the R2P and bombing Libya flat. Think about that logically for a minute. Security forces in Libya shot a couple hundred protesters with live ammunition, and we used that as justification to level the whole country, destroy all their infrastructure, and leave millions of people homeless and destitute. Israel fucking bombs Gaza flat and kills 34,000 people, mostly civilians, and not only is the R2P not invoked, we basically stand by and do nothing. Clearly, there is a double standard, here. Apparently, the R2P, like Schrödinger's cat, is in a state of superposition. It exists only when we need an excuse to bomb more Arabs.

8 myths about non-violent activism (from a movement that overthrew a dictator) | From Poverty to Power

I recently signed up to the New York Times 'Fixes' column ('solutions to social problems and why they work'). On a bad week, it can be a bit 'Ted talks' – whizzy tech solutions that underplay power and politics. But last week brought a fascinating piece on the myths around non-violent action, based on the work of Otpor (right), the Serbian movement that helped overthrew Slobodan Milosevic in 2000. Otpor's leaders have since founded the Center for Applied Nonviolent Action and Strategies (Canvas), training democracy activists from 46 countries, including a group of Syrian activists who attended a workshop with the NYT authors some years before the current bloodbath began.

Creative Chaos: How U.S. Planners Sparked the Anti-Government Protests of the So-Called Arab Spring in Syria | The Libertarian Institute

“I have been a refugee for 37 years due to my political engagement against the ruling Baath party. I cannot go back to Syria without being punished. But I see what the western countries, Turkey, and the Gulf states are now trying to do to my country. It has nothing…

libertarianinstitute.org

However, as I have shown elsewhere, claims of US inaction in the Syrian conflict that erupted in 2011 are a myth. The CIA did intervene massively in the conflict, by covertly pumping billions of dollars of weapons to Salafist armed groups, both directly and via allied regional intelligence agencies, in what is now acknowledged as the costliest covert program in the agency's history.

More importantly, there is clear evidence that US planners not only intervened in the Syrian conflict after it erupted, but that they covertly sparked the conflict itself. US planners prepared for years to ignite a sectarian civil war in Syria resembling that in neighboring Iraq, and successfully engineered the anti-government protests that erupted in March 2011 for this purpose. They then used these protests as cover to simultaneously launch an al-Qaeda led insurgency that quickly enveloped the country. It was hoped that this would spark a sectarian civil war that would pave the way for the fall of the Baath-led Syrian government and possibly even direct US military occupation of the country.

Any honest effort to understand the origins of the Syrian conflict must take account of this covert role played by US planners. Suggesting that any discussion of the US role amounts to promoting conspiracy theories, or denies the agency of Syrians, is not meant to shed light on the origins of the conflict but is meant to deliberately obscure them. For this reason, it is unsurprising that Robin Yassin-Kassab has been a vocal advocate of Western-backed regime change not only in Syria, but everywhere the Western powers have sought to intervene in recent years. As author Nu'man Abd al-Wahid observes, "Robin Yassin-Kassab has distinguished himself as one of Britain's leading regime-change propagandists. Whether it's Libya, Syria or Venezuela, Mr. Yassin-Kassab can be handsomely relied upon to supply the clever and poetic armoury to push forward narratives to facilitate Western imperialism militarily overhauling a nation-state not to its predisposition. For most of the last decade, Syria was his favoured target for spewing regime-change propaganda."

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17502977.2024.2304987

The claim that 'we really didn't know', so common in the wake of previous genocidal assaults (Woldt Citation2021), does not seem to be available to any reasonable observer of this case. In the immediate aftermath of the October 7 attack, the Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant promised to cut off water, food, and electricity to the 'human animals' within this small piece of land that is home to two million people (Karanth Citation2023). Over the period since then, calls for the total annihilation of the Gaza Strip and the people within it have been regularly aired by Israeli politicians and military figures (Narea and Samuel Citation2023). Leaders of the United States, United Kingdom and the European Union, amongst others, continue to provide moral support and military assistance to the Israelis on the grounds that Israel 'has the right to defend itself' against terrorism. The hypocrisy and double-dealing of Western powers in their response to Israel's atrocities in Gaza has intensified to a point that there is now widespread scepticism about the ongoing value of human rights and international law in general (Malik Citation2023).

So why is R2P largely absent from the debate around Israel's genocidal assault? Despite the intensity and significance of this violence, there have been no calls whatsoever from any R2P-related group for the imposition of sanctions or no-fly zones to restrain Israeli actions, nor any kind of military intervention to protect the Palestinians against the mass atrocities that are being perpetrated against them. To their credit, both the Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect (GCR2P) (Citation2023a) and European Centre for the Responsibility to Protect (ECR2P) (Citation2023) have signed on to open calls for a ceasefire. But aside from this, many of the R2P's most vocal advocates have been largely silent, aside from some strongly-worded social media posts from GCR2P director Savitna Pawnday and more calls for ceasefire and humanitarian access in the GCR2P's monthly 'Atrocity Alert' and 'R2P Monitor' publications (GCR2P Citation2023b; Citation2023c).

 

[DarthOne]

The CIA orchestrated a color revolution in Ukraine, deposing the democratically elected Yanukovych, and then put the puppet Poroshenko in power, and our politicians still have the gall to say "democracy, democracy, democracy".



Our leaders collude with the WEF, who are actively working to turn the planet into a post-liberal, neofeudalist, algocratic surveillance state hellhole, and they still have the gall to say "democracy, democracy, democracy".



Our institutions censor people, violate their constitutional rights, and call legitimate dissent a product of "foreign influence operations", but they still have the gall to say "democracy, democracy, democracy."

Exposed: Media Ruled by Robust PsyOp Alliance

Investigative journalist Michael Shellenberger has exposed Renée DiResta, research director for the Stanford Internet Observatory (SIO), as one of the

freedomfirstnetwork.com

These people don't give a damn about democracy. They never did. They are kleptocrats wearing our democracy like a cheap suit.

Vatnik! Putin lover! We needed to safeguard democracy by subverting it for the Greater Good!

/neo-cons

 

[49ersfootball]

Anyone else came here because of the Schwab commercials ?