Great Reset General: A One Stop Shop

[Terthna]

this by the way is why we have the second amendment because the police will not protect you when shit goes down.

Their only job is to enforce the law, and hunt down those who may be guilty of violating it; anything else is just a byproduct of needing corporation from the communities they police in order to do it effectively. It's very much a "you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours" arrangement; one that the police seem very keen to abandon as of late, in favor of more barbaric tactics.

 

[Typhonis]

Their only job is to enforce the law, and hunt down those who may be guilty of violating it; anything else is just a byproduct of needing corporation from the communities they police in order to do it effectively. It's very much a "you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours" arrangement; one that the police seem very keen to abandon as of late, in favor of more barbaric tactics.

Part of that was the War on Drugs and War on Terror. They allowed the police to be more easily militarized. Look at the police before 9/11 and then compare them to today. There is a marked difference. The police no longer see themselves as part of the community. The Sheep dogs think they are wolves and don't need the backing of the sheep.

 

[Urabrask Revealed]

Part of that was the War on Drugs and War on Terror. They allowed the police to be more easily militarized. Look at the police before 9/11 and then compare them to today. There is a marked difference. The police no longer see themselves as part of the community. The Sheep dogs think they are wolves and don't need the backing of the sheep.

And we all know what was done with wolves that attacked human communities and goods.

 

[DarthOne]

The Great Reset Is Underway

• The Davos Agenda - WEF
• Klaus Schwab Brags About His Influence And "Penetrating Cabinets" - Video
• Penny Mordaunt: Brexiteer and grassroots favourite - BBC

• Penny Mordaunt - WEF
• What is a ‘vaccine passport’ and will you need one the next time you travel? - WEF
• Covid passports - Institute for Governement
• New rules on the validity of EU Digital COVID Certificate and the coordination of safe travel in the EU - EU

• U.S. Public Health Agencies Aren't ‘Following the Science,’ Officials Say - Common Sense News
• Can climate change action lead to better inclusion? - WEF
• Plant-based diets will be essential to the planet's future, report says - WEF
• UK government to pay older farmers to retire - BBC
• Good for Dutch farmers for fighting back against a gov’t bowing to enviro-radicals - New York Post
• Mark Rutte - WEF
• Why I ride my bike to work, by the Prime Minister of the Netherlands - WEF
• Water shaped my country's past, but it will shape the future for all of us - WEF
• Sri Lanka PM: This is how I will make my country rich by 2025 - European Sting
• Sri Lanka protests set to topple the government: Why it happened and what comes next? - CBS News
• Pope Francis Tells Young Europeans That Eating Meat Is “Self-Destructive,” Bad For The Environment - Valiant
• Pope Francis - WEF
• In 2030, You’ll Own Nothing And Be Happy About It - Wounded Healer
• Biden economic adviser claims inflation is part of the 'effective strategy against the pandemic' - Fox News
• As Inflation Soars, So Do Corporate Profits - Huffpost
• Biden Sells Oil to China from the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve - Institute for Energy Research
• The pandemic may have caused 200,000 business closures — fewer than expected - Insider

 

[TheRomanSlayer]

I felt disgusted by one of Wounded Healer’s articles about the Great Reset. Sounded like it is endorsing this kind of thing. Although I wonder if it might be better to deny the global elites control of the entire planet by means of actually destroying the planet wholesale.

 

[KilroywasNOTHere]

I felt disgusted by one of Wounded Healer’s articles about the Great Reset. Sounded like it is endorsing this kind of thing. Although I wonder if it might be better to deny the global elites control of the entire planet by means of actually destroying the planet wholesale.

Eh Part of me says let it play out (or at least don't sweat it too much if it comes to pass.) These people aren't evil genies masterminds, they are a bunch of boomers who never grew up, never had a real job in their entire life, and have no idea how the real-world works. The great Reset will blow up in their face. The best thing we can do is try to work together a parallel economy and be as self-sustaining as possible so that when crap hits the fan, we are inconvinced at best, and then can swoop in to rebuild when the dust settles.

As Razorfist said in his last video: Don't Cry About the Culture. BECOME The Culture.

Note: Part of the reason why the depression was so bad was A. due to the dustbowl and B. People had so much debt and all of their assets tied into the system. My advice would be to get out of as much debt as possible and try not to accumulate new debt if you can help it.

 

[Typhonis]

No plan survives contact with the real world. Hell, how many have been at work, management has claimed the new system will work wonderfully, only to have it be a piece of overengineered shit.

 

[Bassoe]

The problems identified, specifically humans requiring resources and producing pollution with more humans and/or higher qualities of life for individual humans requiring more resources and producing more pollution are real. Likewise the fact that there literally aren't enough resources.
However, the proposed solution has three flaws;

1. It gives the oligarchs proposing it absolute totalitarian control of society as feudal lords and utterly removes the possibility of social mobility. Rather than paying once and actually owning products, the majority of the population subscribes and rents. The oligarchs own everything and everyone else labors for them in exchange for a paycheck that just covers rent of their assets. Civil rights may technically exist but in practice don't since the oligarchs can legally have anyone turned out of their rented pod apartment to starve in the street at any time by being 'private companies refusing to sell their products' to dissidents when they're the only ones available.
2. The oligarchs demonstrably aren't competent to manage the logistics of modern civilization, let alone a civilization where they've centralized all power with themselves. Between everything being dependent on supply chains that encircle the planet and rely on trade with hostile foreign nations and the sort of fucking idiotic ideological purity that supports digitizing everything in a country currently without electricity, how long do you think it'd take them to create a global holodomor?
3. It doesn't actually solve the problem. Resources are still finite and still being consumed, Slower than if the majority of humanity wasn't beggared, but still happening. The consequences of running out have been delayed, not prevented.

 

[Bear Ribs]

The problems identified, specifically humans requiring resources and producing pollution with more humans and/or higher qualities of life for individual humans requiring more resources and producing more pollution are real. Likewise the fact that there literally aren't enough resources.

Note that the resource they're measuring in that link is entirely Carbon Footprint, ie. fairy dust. It explicitly doesn't measure cropland, fishery depletion, or other actually useful numbers.

And if you go off actual carbon footprint... the richest 10% produce around half of all the carbon emissions while the poorest 50% produce about 15% of the carbon. They could actually fix that presumed problem by giving up their private jets, fleets of personal gigantic gas-guzzling limos, and generally reducing their own grotesque consumption instead of demanding reductions from the people who don't have much to give up anyway.

‘Carbon footprint gap’ between rich and poor expanding, study finds

Researchers say cutting carbon footprint of world’s wealthiest may be fastest way to reach net zero

www.theguardian.com

 

[Abhorsen]

Likewise the fact that there literally aren't enough resources.

This is honestly not a problem. As the resource in question runs out, the price will rise, and either people will invent new ways of extracting it (look at how peak oil is always five years in the future), or invent new methods that use less or none of the material, pushing the price down (natural gas from fracking replacing a fair bit of oil's use).

 

[Cherico]

This is honestly not a problem. As the resource in question runs out, the price will rise, and either people will invent new ways of extracting it (look at how peak oil is always five years in the future), or invent new methods that use less or none of the material, pushing the price down (natural gas from fracking replacing a fair bit of oil's use).

heres my solution

 

[LordsFire]

Likewise the fact that there literally aren't enough resources.

No, this is just another Malthusian lie that leftists and other authoritarians like to rely on. Much like 'peak oil' has hit us basically every decade since the stuff first started being pumped out of the ground.

Earth has more than enough resources to support a population multiple times its current size; there are enormous swathes of land still mostly or even wholly undeveloped, we have a minimum of hundreds of years worth of extractable oil in the ground, and most metals are recyclable.

Even if we do get to the point where the population starts to strain limits, better technology has a consistent pattern of being more resource efficient. On top of that, we haven't even started trying to be hyper-efficient out of fear of resource depletion; when every city has entire districts of vertically stacked greenhouse farms, then we can start talking about potential resource shortages.

The whole farce is just another way of trying to scare people into giving them authority over their entire lives.

 

[Cherico]

No, this is just another Malthusian lie that leftists and other authoritarians like to rely on. Much like 'peak oil' has hit us basically every decade since the stuff first started being pumped out of the ground.

Earth has more than enough resources to support a population multiple times its current size; there are enormous swathes of land still mostly or even wholly undeveloped, we have a minimum of hundreds of years worth of extractable oil in the ground, and most metals are recyclable.

Even if we do get to the point where the population starts to strain limits, better technology has a consistent pattern of being more resource efficient. On top of that, we haven't even started trying to be hyper-efficient out of fear of resource depletion; when every city has entire districts of vertically stacked greenhouse farms, then we can start talking about potential resource shortages.

The whole farce is just another way of trying to scare people into giving them authority over their entire lives.

it also ignores the fact that there is an entire solar system filled with resources just begging to be used.

 

[Carrot of Truth]

Seems like certain rich people tend to be control freaks that just want you to live in ze pods and eat ze bugs, So they feel better about themselves I guess?

 

[Bacle]

it also ignores the fact that there is an entire solar system filled with resources just begging to be used.

Space-based resource extraction and processed goods still have to come back down a gravity well at some point to be useful.

Which runs into the issue of someone taking inspiration from Char Anzable or Marco Inaros and weaponizing gravity in that manner with otherwise benign objects.

Asteroid mining will happen, likely before the end of the century, however I expect a lot of new treaties to be put together regarding what can and cannot be done in terms of laying claim to mineral deposits/objects and trying to bring goods down a gravity well.

 

[Cherico]

Space-based resource extraction and processed goods still have to come back down a gravity well at some point to be useful.

Which runs into the issue of someone taking inspiration from Char Anzable or Marco Inaros and weaponizing gravity in that manner with otherwise benign objects.

Asteroid mining will happen, likely before the end of the century, however I expect a lot of new treaties to be put together regarding what can and cannot be done in terms of laying claim to mineral deposits/objects and trying to bring goods down a gravity well.

there is no such thing as a perfect system but using the resources of space is the only viable long term solution to a growing lack of resources.

 

[Bear Ribs]

Note that the value of the asteroid field tends to be heavily, heavily overstated. The entire asteroid field combined is only 3% of the mass of the moon, well under 1% of the mass of Earth's crust. Ceres alone is about 40% of the entire asteroid field's mass, and Ceres, Vesta, Pallas, and Hygiea amount to 60% of the entire thing. They rapidly diminish in size from there so there's millions of rocks the size of somebody's hand millions of miles from the next rock the size of a guy's hand, ie. not worth mining.

There just isn't that much mass in there to work with (granted asteroids are richer in some metals than Earth is, notably the heavy ones that sank down to the core when Earth was all molten) and what there is has been concentrated in a handful of spots. We can expect maybe the top 10-20 asteroids to be scooped up by major mining concerns and then fully mined in a relative eyeblink with nothing else worth going after. There aren't centuries of resources there, I fully expect that people alive when the first asteroid is mined will still be alive when the last asteroid mine is shut down.

 

[Cherico]

Note that the value of the asteroid field tends to be heavily, heavily overstated. The entire asteroid field combined is only 3% of the mass of the moon, well under 1% of the mass of Earth's crust. Ceres alone is about 40% of the entire asteroid field's mass, and Ceres, Vesta, Pallas, and Hygiea amount to 60% of the entire thing. They rapidly diminish in size from there so there's millions of rocks the size of somebody's hand millions of miles from the next rock the size of a guy's hand, ie. not worth mining.

There just isn't that much mass in there to work with (granted asteroids are richer in some metals than Earth is, notably the heavy ones that sank down to the core when Earth was all molten) and what there is has been concentrated in a handful of spots. We can expect maybe the top 10-20 asteroids to be scooped up by major mining concerns and then fully mined in a relative eyeblink with nothing else worth going after. There aren't centuries of resources there, I fully expect that people alive when the first asteroid is mined will still be alive when the last asteroid mine is shut down.

I said entire solar system, not just the belt.

 

[Carrot of Truth]

Is there a thread for theoretical exploitation mining ect of the solar system on here?

 

[DarthOne]

15-minute cities and personal consumption reduction targets

15-minute cities and personal consumption reduction targets

While not discussed on mainstream news, 15-minute cities have become a major discussion point and concern within alternative media. What is a 15-minute city? ‘The climate crisis and global COVID-19 pandemic combined to accelerate consideration and implementation

theodoreatkinson.substack.com

While not discussed on mainstream news, 15-minute cities have become a major discussion point and concern within alternative media.

What is a 15-minute city?

'The climate crisis and global COVID-19 pandemic combined to accelerate consideration and implementation of the 15-minute city.
In July 2020, the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group published a framework for cities to "build back better" using the 15-minute concept.'
— 15-minute city, Wikipedia
Please see my previous article regarding the origin of 15-minute cities and their overarching Totalitarian philosophy.

Within the Agenda 2030 framework, there is an initiative to reduce personal consumption through utilitarian targets.

• Goal 12.
  Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns.

Organizations within the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group have specified possible consumption reduction targets in detailed reports.

The research sets out science-based targets for cities for GHG emissions reduction that are consistent with the 2015 Paris Agreement ambitions, and identifies key previously untapped opportunities for cities to address the impact of urban consumption whilst delivering multiple other benefits for their citizens. It also maps how urban stakeholders can work together to deliver these changes.

The Future of Urban Consumption in a 1.5C World has been co-created and co-delivered by C40, Arup and University of Leeds with funding from Arup, University of Leeds and Citi Foundation.
— The Future of Urban Consumption in a 1.5°C World
This is a link to their report.

Below is a summary of "ambitious" 2030 targets from the report for those living in these so-called futuristic 15-minute cities.

Section 6.3 Buildings and infrastructure

Table 2 Consumption interventions for buildings and infrastructure and associated targets.

Column Ambitious Target in 2030:

1. Reduction in steel and cement use of 35% and 56% respectively.
2. 20% reduction in demand for new buildings.
3. 90% of residential and 70% of commercial are timber buildings.
4. 61% of cement replaced with low-carbon alternatives.
5. 22% reduction in virgin metal and petrochemical-based material.

Section 6.4 Food

Table 3 Consumption interventions for food and associated targets.

Column Ambitious Target in 2030:

1. 0 kg meat consumption.
2. 0 kg dairy consumption (milk or derivative equivalent) per person per year.
3. 2,500 cal per person per day.
4. 0% household food waste.
5. 75% reduction in supply chain food waste.

Section 6.5 Clothing and textiles

Table 4 Consumption interventions for clothing and textiles and associated targets.

Column Ambitious Target in 2030:

1. 3 new clothing items per person per year.
2. 75% reduction in supply chain waste.

Section 6.6 Private transport

Table 5 Consumption interventions for private transport and associated targets.

Column Ambitious Target in 2030:

1. 0 private vehicles.
2. 50-year lifetime for body of vehicle (shell & interior).
3. 50% reduction in use of metal and plastic materials.

Section 6.7 Aviation

Table 6 Consumption interventions for aviation and associated targets.

Column Ambitious Target in 2030:

1. 1 short-haul return flight (less than 1500 km) every 3 years per person.
2. 100% sustainable aviation fuel adopted (or other equivalent low carbon technology or fuel).

Section 6.8 Electronics and household appliances

Table 7 Consumption intervention for electronics and household appliances and associated target.

Column Ambitious Target in 2030:

1. 7-year optimum lifetime of laptops and similar electronic devices.

---

Who is implementing this?

Section 8 Delivery of consumption interventions

1. City government.
2. Urban residents.
3. Business.
4. Civil society groups.
5. National government.

Cities can work together with individuals, business and other levels of government to achieve dietary change.​

Concluding remarks

This framework treats you like livestock that must be measurably monitored and controlled. Does this look like a world you or your descendants should live in?

• 0 kg meat consumption.
• 0 private vehicles.
• 3 new clothing items per person per year.
• 1 short-haul return flight (less than 1500 km) every 3 years per person.

These centralized top-down systems do not work. It is high-tech communism that will produce the opposite of each stated goal.

You will have:

1. Poor building and crumbling infrastructure.
2. Inadequate low nutrition food.
3. No private transportation or ability to freely move.
4. Old worn out clothing.
5. Highly restricted access to aviation.
6. Approved and controlled electronic surveillance devices.

No one is coming to save us.

In Canada there is an existing Smart Cities Challenge with a large list of applicants. These are evaluation phases — this is closer to home than you may think.

These are their plans.
What are yours?

15-minute cities and what you should know, now!

15-minute cities and what you should know, now!

What is a 15-minute city? A 15-minute city is described as a city re-organized into distinct commutable districts. A district is a geographical region where all necessary amenities are available within 15 minutes of walking, biking or public transit to minimize travel.

theodoreatkinson.substack.com

What is a 15-minute city?

A 15-minute city is described as a city re-organized into distinct commutable districts. A district is a geographical region where all necessary amenities are available within 15 minutes of walking, biking or public transit to minimize travel.

Is that it?

No.

'The climate crisis and global COVID-19 pandemic combined to accelerate consideration and implementation of the 15-minute city.
In July 2020, the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group published a framework for cities to "build back better" using the 15-minute concept.'
— 15-minute city, Wikipedia
The purpose of a 15-minute city is related to the ability to provide immediate response to one or more crises. This implies the city is equipped with policy and tools that can monitor and control specific aspects of infrastructure and civil activity.

Where did this idea come from?

United Nations and Agenda 2030

15-minute cities — as well as other initiatives — are an implementation satisfying a high-level framework proposed by the United Nations (UN).

This framework is called Agenda 2030.

Agenda 2030 is a plan of action containing 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) and 169 targets. It is a declaration by UN members to radically transform economic, social and environmental policy under a unified idealized vision.

The goals are broad and long-term, which address supposed existential threats to UN members, e.g., climate change, pandemics, gender equity, social injustice etc.

It is a vision that prescribes actions to maximize happiness and well-being.

This is a form of Top Down Management, where decisions are centrally commanded from a small leadership team. There is no opportunity to question, discuss or provide feedback from decisions or visions delegated from the top.

Philosophy

Utilitarianism is an ethical philosophy that prescribes actions to maximize happiness and well-being for all affected individuals. The primary goal of this philosophy is to maximize utility, which creates a supplementary objective to quantify, compare and measure happiness or well-being.

Utility is described as:

"That property in any object, whereby it tends to produce benefit, advantage, pleasure, good, or happiness ... [or] to prevent the happening of mischief, pain, evil, or unhappiness to the party whose interest is considered."
— Jeremy Bentham
Under a utilitarian rule, your individual value is determined by a computed score produced by a scheme or algorithm.

Such scheme could be derived from models based on:

1. Economics.
2. Social distributive fairness.
3. Environment.

See Chapter 3: Social, Economic, and Ethical Concepts and Methods from Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change for model specifics.
[Referred hereon as IPCCWG3].

Agenda 2030 and Goal 9/11

The 15-minute city solution primarily falls under the scope of:

1. Goal 9.
   Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation.
2. Goal 11.
   Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable.

15-minute cities can also satisfy secondary goals through policy.

For example:

1. Goal 6.
   Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.
2. Goal 10.
   Reduce inequality within and among countries.
3. Goal 12.
   Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns.

IPCCWG3 provides a high level Summary for Policymakers and a Technical Summary containing aggregate data and models — subsequent chapters provide further detail. In relation to Goals 9/11, section SPM.4.2.5 provides policy rationale based on climate crisis risks, which a 15-minute city would satisfy.

SPM.4.2.5 — Human settlements, infrastructure and spatial planning:

1. Urbanization is a global trend and is associated with increases in income, and higher urban incomes are correlated with higher consumption of energy and GHG emissions.
2. The next two decades present a window of opportunity for mitigation in urban areas, as a large portion of the world's urban areas will be developed during this period.
3. Mitigation options in urban areas vary by urbanization trajectories and are expected to be most effective when policy instruments are bundled.
4. The largest mitigation opportunities with respect to human settlements are in rapidly urbanizing areas where urban form and infrastructure are not locked in, but where there are often limited governance, technical, financial, and institutional capacities.
5. Thousands of cities are undertaking climate action plans, but their aggregate impact on urban emissions is uncertain.
6. Successful implementation of urban-scale climate change mitigation strategies can provide co-benefits.

There are various initiatives being evaluated to satisfy these concerns.

2030 District

One such initiative is the 2030 District, which establishes energy, water and emission reduction targets for participant member cities.

For example, a new building in a 2030 District shall:

1. Reduce energy use by 70% below national average.
2. Reduce water use by 50% below current district average.
3. Reduce CO2 emission by 50% below current district average.

Existing buildings and infrastructure have similar targets.

SMART City

"A smart city is a technologically modern urban area that uses different types of electronic methods and sensors to collect specific data.
Information gained from that data is used to manage assets, resources and services efficiently; in return, that data is used to improve operations across the city.
This includes data collected from citizens, devices, buildings and assets that is processed and analyzed to monitor and manage traffic and transportation systems, power plants, utilities, water supply networks, waste, criminal investigations, information systems, schools, libraries, hospitals, and other community services."
— Smart city, Wikipedia
A SMART city focuses on digital monitoring and control of:

1. Energy production and distribution.
2. Transportation and traffic.
3. Buildings, utilities and amenities.
4. Environmental impact.
5. Productive human activity.

A series of SMART cities already exist with varying levels of technological implementation. Under Agenda 2030, the success of these methods, in relation to goals and targets, are assessed for feasibility of future endeavours.

15-minute city

The 15-minute city was proposed by Carlos Moreno at the COP21 conference in 2015.

It has four principles:

1. Proximity.
   Things must be close.
2. Diversity.
   Land uses must be mixed to provide a wide variety of amenities.
3. Density.
   Must be enough people to support a diversity of businesses in a compact land area.
4. Ubiquity.
   Must be so common they are affordable and available to anyone who wants to live in one.

According to some studies, proposed topological designs would be fractal with well defined and tuned network parameters.

---

Sounds great! What's wrong with it?
Utilitarianism is not the only philosophical idea employed by UN decision making.

The UN claims that irreversible climate change will induce food and resource shortages for an exponentially growing population.

This idea originates from Malthusianism, which asserts that since population growth is exponential and other resources are linear, eventually a reduction in the standard of living reaches a critical point causing populations to die off.

This justifies the need for:

1. Preventative population control.
   Reduce fertility rates, e.g., celibacy, chastity, contraception, infanticide, abortion.
2. Positive population control.
   Any circumstance that shortens the human life span.

Neo-Malthusianism is closer to the UN's stated objectives, which advocates for human population planing to ensure resource and environmental integrity.

In IPCCWG3 Chapter 3 under Values and wellbeing, 3.4.7 Valuing population provides the rationale for scoring the utility of human populations.

"Average utilitarianism gives no value to increasing numbers of people. The implicit or explicit goal of a great deal of policy-making is to promote per capita wellbeing (Hardin, 1968).
This is to adopt average utilitarianism. This goal tends to favour anti-natalist policies, aimed at limiting population. It would strongly favour population control as a means of mitigating climate change, and it would not take a collapse of population to be, in itself, a bad thing."
— 3.4.7 Valuing population, IPCCWG3
This is similar to the claim Bill Gates made during a TED talk regarding limiting population growth using:

1. Vaccines.
2. Healthcare.
3. Reproductive services.

"First, we've got population," he said during the talk organized by TED, a non-profit organization devoted to spreading ideas. "The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent. But there, we see an increase of about 1.3."
— Bill Gates, Reuters Fact Check
During the talk, he also stated that reducing the economic standard of living, by targeting consumption and demand, is another method of achieving emission targets. This is in line with IPCCWG3 SPM.4.2.5 item 1.
i.e., Shift advanced populations to lower standards of living.

After reviewing Utilitarian and Malthusian "ethical" scoring of human life,
Do you want to live in a 15-minute city designed under UN Agenda 2030?​

If you value your life, then the answer should be no, because your value is not guaranteed to be consistent with the Agenda 2030 calculated value.

If however you are nihilistic, then 15-minute cities and other initiatives are simply a means to your end, "for the greater good."

---

How is this Agenda being sold if the goal is to "limit" and control the population?

Fear!

Why should we trust these people?

Who are they and what gives them the authority to dictate Truth?

Manage "misinformation" and ownership claim on science

Make no mistake.

Totalitarianism is here, arriving in a glittery rainbow package claiming to save humanity from itself by monitoring, controlling and enslaving it.

It has infected our government at every level.

"Though Canada has a relatively small population, it also has a large land mass with most of it located in the northern half of the northern hemisphere. These factors contribute to relatively higher energy and transportation costs.
Climate change is one of the most pressing global challenges humanity faces today. The science is conclusive. It tells us that swift action is needed to reduce greenhouse gases, improve climate resilience and protect our natural environment. "
— Canada and the Sustainable Development Goals, Government of Canada
Canada has a detailed plan to implement the UN Agenda 2030's goals.

"Local governments can advance progress on sustainable communities (SDG 11) through integrated planning, housing, sustainable transport, inclusive urbanization, waste management and inclusive and green public spaces.
Local governments across Canada are not only implementers of the 2030 Agenda, they are also policy makers who deliver direct programs and services to Canadians."
— Towards Canada's 2030 Agenda National Strategy, Government of Canada
Edmonton is planning 15-minute cities through districts and pilot parks.
Don't forget Toronto!

Make no mistake.

Totalitarianism is here, arriving in a glittery rainbow package claiming to save humanity from itself by monitoring, controlling and enslaving it.

It has infected our government at every level.

"Though Canada has a relatively small population, it also has a large land mass with most of it located in the northern half of the northern hemisphere. These factors contribute to relatively higher energy and transportation costs.
Climate change is one of the most pressing global challenges humanity faces today. The science is conclusive. It tells us that swift action is needed to reduce greenhouse gases, improve climate resilience and protect our natural environment. "
— Canada and the Sustainable Development Goals, Government of Canada
Canada has a detailed plan to implement the UN Agenda 2030's goals.

"Local governments can advance progress on sustainable communities (SDG 11) through integrated planning, housing, sustainable transport, inclusive urbanization, waste management and inclusive and green public spaces.
Local governments across Canada are not only implementers of the 2030 Agenda, they are also policy makers who deliver direct programs and services to Canadians."
— Towards Canada's 2030 Agenda National Strategy, Government of Canada
Edmonton is planning 15-minute cities through districts and pilot parks.
Don't forget Toronto!

Just remember. You do not have a choice.
It is happening whether people like it or not.

'Road blocks stopping most motorists from driving through Oxford city centre will divide the city into six "15 minute" neighbourhoods, a county council travel chief has said.
And he insisted the controversial plan would go ahead whether people liked it or not.
People can drive freely around their own neighbourhood and can apply for a permit to drive through the filters, and into other neighbourhoods, for up to 100 days per year. This equates to an average of two days per week.
A maximum of three permits a household will be allowed where there are several adults with cars registered to the address.'
— Traffic filters will divide city into "15 minute" neighbourhoods, Oxford Mail
Take into consideration this agenda with Canada's parallel plans to monitor and control human behaviour through embedded digital social credit systems.