United States George Floyd Protests, Reactions and Riots

Of course not, but you can’t allow yourself to be the one to start the fight, but you can be the one to end it.

Just so you know, I'm referring to the Far Left, they'll make people forget and take advantage of people NOT looking

Not antifa, it's far beyond their mental capacities, but organisations that back them up and are conduit for their finanancing, like BAMN.



This guy who was a Former BLM Organizer mentioned Soros and Clinton as being the sponsors of movements like BLM & ANTIFA....said that he hated that they were meant to be used as foot soldiers and that they may end up getting shot....because right wingers own guns

And now this video of him has been taken down



Found another link though
 

This just keeps getting worse.



Police getting radicalised?



Looney tunes shit. He sets up a shitty bomb for a drive-by bombing but someone has a defty hand to snatch it and throws it back in the car.
 
Last edited:

A wet dream the journos have been wanting ever since the movie came out. Too late. White Clowns aren't in season.


More to come.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:

Fuck you why don't you find out and let people in to help themselves to your home? Let them take your credit card?




Biden thinking he knows better than a cop in handling an attacker.
Motherfucker's never heard of a femoral artery, has he.
 
Alas I'm sure you're right. Honestly all we can do is hope that not too much damage is done and not too many people are hurt or even worse die before this thing runs out of steam .
All we can do hope
If the situation wasn't so serious it sounds rather cute in the Japanese way.
Some of the ladies here in the Army look cute in it already
@Zachowon this the police man you're talking about? He has this respectful presence looking at his picture.


Yep him.
 
"This charge of systemic police bias was wrong during the Obama years and remains so today. However sickening the video of Floyd’s arrest, it isn’t representative of the 375 million annual contacts that police officers have with civilians. A solid body of evidence finds no structural bias in the criminal-justice system with regard to arrests, prosecution or sentencing. Crime and suspect behavior, not race, determine most police actions.

In 2019 police officers fatally shot 1,004 people, most of whom were armed or otherwise dangerous. African-Americans were about a quarter of those killed by cops last year (235), a ratio that has remained stable since 2015. That share of black victims is less than what the black crime rate would predict, since police shootings are a function of how often officers encounter armed and violent suspects. In 2018, the latest year for which such data have been published, African-Americans made up 53% of known homicide offenders in the U.S. and commit about 60% of robberies, though they are 13% of the population.

The police fatally shot nine unarmed blacks and 19 unarmed whites in 2019, according to a Washington Post database, down from 38 and 32, respectively, in 2015. The Post defines “unarmed” broadly to include such cases as a suspect in Newark, N.J., who had a loaded handgun in his car during a police chase. In 2018 there were 7,407 black homicide victims. Assuming a comparable number of victims last year, those nine unarmed black victims of police shootings represent 0.1% of all African-Americans killed in 2019. By contrast, a police officer is 18½ times more likely to be killed by a black male than an unarmed black male is to be killed by a police officer.

The latest in a series of studies undercutting the claim of systemic police bias was published in August 2019 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The researchers found that the more frequently officers encounter violent suspects from any given racial group, the greater the chance that a member of that group will be fatally shot by a police officer. There is “no significant evidence of antiblack disparity in the likelihood of being fatally shot by police,” they concluded.
A 2015 Justice Department analysis of the Philadelphia Police Department found that white police officers were less likely than black or Hispanic officers to shoot unarmed black suspects. Research by Harvard economist Roland G. Fryer Jr. also found no evidence of racial discrimination in shootings. Any evidence to the contrary fails to take into account crime rates and civilian behavior before and during interactions with police."

WSJ (Paywalled)
 
Last edited:

Fuck you why don't you find out and let people in to help themselves to your home? Let them take your credit card?

Heh, it is something to think about. How many of us would truly, with all our hearts, agree to give up everything we have to spare the life of a stranger?

Because the gist I got from that remark is that the speaker is rhetorically asking why people are more upset about the rioting and destruction of property than the murder of a man by police. And it brings to mind something Machiavelli wrote in "The Prince", that men are more disposed to forgive the killing of their father than the seizure of their property.
 
Heh, it is something to think about. How many of us would truly, with all our hearts, agree to give up everything we have to spare the life of a stranger?

Because the gist I got from that remark is that the speaker is rhetorically asking why people are more upset about the rioting and destruction of property than the murder of a man by police. And it brings to mind something Machiavelli wrote in "The Prince", that men are more disposed to forgive the killing of their father than the seizure of their property.

well theres that and the fact that the rioting has ended up killing more innocent lives, on top of the destruction of property.
 
So, remember those BLM demands that were being passed around? Seems people realized how retarded they were. Instead they took a page from the Hong Kong protesters and made a much briefer note with the demands they want. Unlike the BLM ones these actually hold up to more than 2 seconds of thinking.

e5ka53eb5k251.png


Demands 1 and 3 sounds the most viable. 2 is good in theory but it's hard enough to get people to sign up to be cops so putting barriers doesn't sound good. 4 is one of those "sounds good, doesn't work" and just leads to violent criminals walking all over the police. As for the 5th I think it's a bit of a mouthful and to be honest I don't quite understand it.

Overall a 7/10/
These look more like reasonable demands than the previous ones of "give us random free stuff and change the entire fabric of society to accommodate our whims". I'd say these proposals are even worth looking at regardless of the riots, some of them (possibly not all) are worthy of serious consideration.
 


May this be the fate of all cuck politicians.


He didn't deserve to see all he worked for gone to shit.

He did not. The video we have of him dying the guy filming had called 911 to try and save him. If Trump is saying a Black man died, why is he racist?
"This charge of systemic police bias was wrong during the Obama years and remains so today. However sickening the video of Floyd’s arrest, it isn’t representative of the 375 million annual contacts that police officers have with civilians. A solid body of evidence finds no structural bias in the criminal-justice system with regard to arrests, prosecution or sentencing. Crime and suspect behavior, not race, determine most police actions.

In 2019 police officers fatally shot 1,004 people, most of whom were armed or otherwise dangerous. African-Americans were about a quarter of those killed by cops last year (235), a ratio that has remained stable since 2015. That share of black victims is less than what the black crime rate would predict, since police shootings are a function of how often officers encounter armed and violent suspects. In 2018, the latest year for which such data have been published, African-Americans made up 53% of known homicide offenders in the U.S. and commit about 60% of robberies, though they are 13% of the population.

The police fatally shot nine unarmed blacks and 19 unarmed whites in 2019, according to a Washington Post database, down from 38 and 32, respectively, in 2015. The Post defines “unarmed” broadly to include such cases as a suspect in Newark, N.J., who had a loaded handgun in his car during a police chase. In 2018 there were 7,407 black homicide victims. Assuming a comparable number of victims last year, those nine unarmed black victims of police shootings represent 0.1% of all African-Americans killed in 2019. By contrast, a police officer is 18½ times more likely to be killed by a black male than an unarmed black male is to be killed by a police officer.

The latest in a series of studies undercutting the claim of systemic police bias was published in August 2019 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The researchers found that the more frequently officers encounter violent suspects from any given racial group, the greater the chance that a member of that group will be fatally shot by a police officer. There is “no significant evidence of antiblack disparity in the likelihood of being fatally shot by police,” they concluded.
A 2015 Justice Department analysis of the Philadelphia Police Department found that white police officers were less likely than black or Hispanic officers to shoot unarmed black suspects. Research by Harvard economist Roland G. Fryer Jr. also found no evidence of racial discrimination in shootings. Any evidence to the contrary fails to take into account crime rates and civilian behavior before and during interactions with police."

WSJ (Paywalled)
IT IS RACST! Says every Antifa and BLM protester/rioter.
These look more like reasonable demands than the previous ones of "give us random free stuff and change the entire fabric of society to accommodate our whims". I'd say these proposals are even worth looking at regardless of the riots, some of them (possibly not all) are worthy of serious consideration.
4 adn 5 are going to be a huge issue to try and keep it busy
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top