The judge could overturn but he knew Chauvin would do better in Appeal thanks to a congress critter calling for violence
United States George Floyd Protests, Reactions and Riots
- Thread starter Urabrask Revealed
- Start date
PsihoKekec
Swashbuckling Accountant
Didn't he wave his right to appeal in order not to get sent to federal prison?
Bigking321
Well-known member
It was a absolute disgrace of a trial. There was SO much wrong with it.
It should have been declared a mistrial.
It should have been declared a mistrial.
They offered it last I checked. Don't know if he took it
This is just the begining its going to get a whole lot worse.
PsihoKekec
Swashbuckling Accountant
Being part of the swamp has it's advantages.
As I said before many times, the Democrats have gone full on... I'm not sure whether they're socialist, communist, fascist, or a bizarre mix of the three as all their actions line-up with moves from the pre-Nazi German and pre-Soviet Russian playbooks -- especially with using escape goats, manipulating the people, having their own wings of "revolutionaries" in BLM and AntiFa...
I can see America going down four paths:
I can see America going down four paths:
- It's subsumed by Leftard ideology and becomes a twisted parody of America which will inevitably collapse anyway -- although we're seeing twisted shit like Critical Race Theory and indoctrination being taught in schools and the like, I think this is the least likely option
- You guys have a coup, but while it would remove the Leftist rot from the top if it's successful, it could also put people who are Far-Right/Alt-Right in charge -- that would just be as bad
- Civil unrest keeps occurring until the victimized portion of the population, namely Whites, snap back hard and it'll make the racism, sexism, and homophobia seen in the past (e.g. 18th--20th) look like a fucking child's birthday party in comparison
- Outright civil war, albeit a dirty one that'd be divided mostly between towns, cities, the countryside, and ideological lines. If the influence in one state far out-strips that of the opposition, state to state warfare may be on the cards, too
Because U.S. law and precedent on incitement to violence is very narrowly defined against free speech interests, and that does in fact apply to aggressive rhetoric from *all* sides of the political spectrum.
PsihoKekec
Swashbuckling Accountant
It's also pretty unambiguous that law doesn't apply to all people equally.
Ok, this 2nd civil war stuff has gotten wildly off topic. I'll be splitting that off into its own thread, in the meantime please keep your commentary focused on the actual topic of this thread.
That criminal was high on fentanyl and meth, on top of the COVID already in his body. Surprised he didn't drop dead the moment he walked into the store. Would have save a lotta trouble for America.
Murder of George Floyd - Wikipedia
You telling me that the amount of fentanyl and meth in his body isn't lethal?
Cause unless you're a certified professional of that sort, I strongly doubt your "interpretation", which clearly REEKS of BLM and Antifa propaganda.
The guy's bloodstream was more drugs than blood (okay, that's a hyperbole). He was so intoxicated on very dangerous, very potent drugs that I'm surprised he didn't shit his heart out of his rectum when sneezing.
Even before the "murder" went down, the guy was a dead man walking.
Megadeath
Well-known member
No, I'm not a certified professional. You know that the court case did involve such professionals though? Testimony was provided to the effect that the amount he'd taken would absolutely kill most people if it was their first exposure, but also that like with many drugs a tolerance is built up with prolonged use, and the evidence suggests that while it may have had an impact on his death it was not the leading cause.
Not what the actual professionals and experts said, nor is his behaviour leading up to his death consistent with a fatal overdose of opioids. An amount of drugs can be fatal in one person, and barely effective in another. This is especially true with opioids.
LordsFire
Internet Wizard
Before or after they were pressured to change their testimony?
Also, which experts and professionals? Because plenty have also said that his behavior and symptoms were absolutely consistent with overdose, most notably the actual coroner before he was pressured to modify his report.
"I can't breathe."
Then how the shit is he talking if he can't breath?
He was up to his neck in drugs.
That's what killed him.
And you ain't a sentient being if you don't believe that.
Not pressured. That isn't the correct term, my friend.
Threatened with death by lynching from thousands of Neo-Black Panther, No-Good Communist BLM shits is the right term.
Derek Chauvin made a mistake that day, that is true.
He should have taken a step back and let Floyd kick the bucket on his own.
Never ever, ever go rushing into the fray. It always ends badly.
Dude, the guy was OD'img. Yes, the cop shouldn't have done what he did, but that scumbag, who was not a hero or a martyr, was a dead man walking already.
The county coroner wrote that he had at least 11ng/ml of fentanyl in his blood: The lethal dose is 10--20/ng/ml without other substances being present, which there were in his blood-stream in abundance.
For a hardened career criminal, scumbag, and drug-addict, could he have survived if it were just the fentanyl? Yes, I wouldn't be surprised if he were able to have survived -- but that's still a high and near-lethal dose. Drug-tolerance can only go so far with these types of narcotics.
The presence of other drugs meant that he had no chance: The guy would have offed himself if he took a shit on the crapper instead of trying to add another tally to his criminal record.