GA Guidestones damaged/destroyed

[Zachowon]

The monument that is often called satanic has been bombed today.
GBI, the state FBI who are better and actually work for the state itself are investigating.

GBI releases video showing Georgia guidestones explosion, suspect vehicle leaving scene - NewsBreak

ELBERTON, Ga. — UPDATE: JULY 6. The GBI has released more surveillance video of the Georgia Guidestones prior to the explosion. The video shows a suspect...

www.newsbreakapp.com

 

[Sailor.X]

The monument that is often called satanic has been bombed today.
GBI, the state FBI who are better and actually work for the state itself are investigating.

GBI releases video showing Georgia guidestones explosion, suspect vehicle leaving scene - NewsBreak

ELBERTON, Ga. — UPDATE: JULY 6. The GBI has released more surveillance video of the Georgia Guidestones prior to the explosion. The video shows a suspect...

www.newsbreakapp.com

Good. That temple of Molech needed to be bombed

 

[Husky_Khan]

Looks like they tore it down.

Oh well. 🤷‍♀️

 

[Zachowon]

Yep.
The bomb caused it to not he structurally safe if I was to guess and took it down.

GBI releases surveillance videos of explosion at Georgia Guidestones, car speeding away

The bomb destroyed part of the mysterious structure, which was later demolished for safety reasons.

www.wsbtv.com

 

[strunkenwhite]

Good. That temple of Molech needed to be bombed

So it's your position that a random citizen who sufficiently dislikes this or that religious display is justified in literal bomb-throwing?

 

[Sailor.X]

So it's your position that a random citizen who sufficiently dislikes this or that religious display is justified in literal bomb-throwing?

So your position is to side with Molech? Sorry I will never condemn anyone fighting Molech.

 

[Cherico]

I don't think I'm allowed to criticize what happened because I live in california and I know our assholes do worse on a pretty regular basis.

 

[Captain X]

As long as no one was hurt, I can't say I really care that monument to future genocide was bombed. The only thing I'll lament is the impossibility of figuring out just who is responsible for it. I also don't doubt that it will be rebuilt.

 

[Battlegrinder]

I'm actually surprised it took this long for someone to do this, and even more surprised that serious vandalism only started in 2014 (and that was just paint, this escalated to explosives real fast), I assumed that thing would have been on conspiracy nuts target list for a while.

As long as no one was hurt, I can't say I really care that monument to future genocide was bombed. The only thing I'll lament is the impossibility of figuring out just who is responsible for it. I also don't doubt that it will be rebuilt.

I actually disagree with all of this.
1. It's bad to go around blowing stuff up and destroying stuff, no matter how much you disagree with it.

2. I don't think this was intended as a "monument to future genocide", given it was set up during the cold war, I find it far more likely that they designers felt that nuclear war was likely to reduce the human population to well below half a million without their involvement or action, and this was supposed to be a set of principles for the survivors to follow.

3. It's very likely they'll find the parties responsible. The site is under CCTV surveillance and they got the bombers car on camera, and explosive sales are heavily monitored (and even less regulated stuff like tannerite leaves a paper trail). It will not be hard to connect the dots on this.

4. It's not lively to be rebuilt. The orginal was built 40 years ago on the dime of what's probably one individual kook, or at most a small group of them, and they're almost certainly dead by now. It's unlikely anyone else cares to rebuild it to keep their vision alive.

if the money does get raised, I'll bet it's less "we, the shadowy New World Order propaganda council, will pay to have our guidestones rebuilt" and more "idiots on reddit crowdfunding a replacement to dunk on the guys that blew it up". The only motive to rebuild the guidestones would be petty spite.

And finally, even if the money is available, someone has to actually do it job, and I don't think anyone will do that. Not many people re willing to risk getting bombed to fulfill the will of some nutcase from 1979 and/or a bunch of cringe redditors.

 

[Hlaalu Agent]

You know, I probably shouldn't at all be deriving any pleasure from this, or condoning it, etc. Since it is the very act that in most cases I oppose- the destruction of monuments. I hated it when they were doing it in my country to our heroes, in the USA to various historical figures (including national heroes), ISIS did it to priceless historical monuments from ancient times, also the Taliban doing the same thing...

It is probably hypocritical of me to support what is essentially a form of the iconoclastic savagery that I oppose. Especially, since it would be under the same pretext as those I oppose. So, maybe it is best to say, "This was wrong, and unjustifiable, but good riddance.". And avoid being a hypocrite, at least as much as I can.

 

[LordsFire]

Whoever did this should be up on vandalism charges.

Probably about the best reason to get charged vandalism there is, though.

 

[Battlegrinder]

Probably about the best reason to get charged vandalism there is, though.

I mean, if we're talking purely in terms of which statue or monument that deserves to be destroyed the most, I'm sure there's dozens of cringey anti-Trump "art" peices that deserve that spot over some granite slabs out in the middle of nowhere.

 

[AnimalNoodles]

There was a time i would have been appalled. But after watching mobs backed by the sort of people who believe this shit destroy statues and burn down churches, all i have to say is "More"

 

[Hlaalu Agent]

I mean, if we're talking purely in terms of which statue or monument that deserves to be destroyed the most, I'm sure there's dozens of cringey anti-Trump "art" peices that deserve that spot over some granite slabs out in the middle of nowhere.

Well, if we are talking about something egregious. What many would consider providence took care of that, I of course, don't- to me it was merely a hilariously random circumstance, involving a well-placed lightning bolt...

Though, I am not sure merely cringey art has any merit in destroying- except in the metaphorical sense. They deserve to be destroyed through our mockery.

 

[strunkenwhite]

So your position is to side with Molech? Sorry I will never condemn anyone fighting Molech.

My position is pretty much what Battlegrinder articulated. Regarding Molech specifically, I don't think this monument had anything to do with it, but taking for the sake of argument that it did it would still not be a good idea to condone criminal violence against it. Keep in mind that people you don't like can be vigilantes too.

 

[Cherico]

My position is pretty much what Battlegrinder articulated. Regarding Molech specifically, I don't think this monument had anything to do with it, but taking for the sake of argument that it did it would still not be a good idea to condone criminal violence against it. Keep in mind that people you don't like can be vigilantes too.

People who hate us have been doing that sort of thing for years now.

 

[strunkenwhite]

People who hate us have been doing that sort of thing for years now.

And what do you think of the people on Twitter who say, "Good for them"?

 

[Battlegrinder]

The other reason why this shouldn't be condoned or approved of is that what this person or persons did was incredibly dangerous. Messing around with explosives is not smart, and it's very fortunate that whoever did this only blew up the monument and not the monument and themselves, an if they'd had any sort of accident while transporting whatever bomb they'd built, they could have very easily kind innocent bystanders.

 

[Captain X]

I actually disagree with all of this.
1. It's bad to go around blowing stuff up and destroying stuff, no matter how much you disagree with it.

I never said that I supported blowing it up, just that I'm not sorry to see that it happened.

2. I don't think this was intended as a "monument to future genocide", given it was set up during the cold war, I find it far more likely that they designers felt that nuclear war was likely to reduce the human population to well below half a million without their involvement or action, and this was supposed to be a set of principles for the survivors to follow.

You have a very strange way of thinking. The "monument" was very straightforward in its language, and was entirely in line with the goals of the globalist agenda. I doubt it had very much to do with the Cold War outside of perhaps one of the rationalizations for wanting to reduce the human population to such a low number. I can't help but that that you simply want there to be some mundane explanation for the guidestones. The thing is, if that was the case, there wouldn't be this mystery behind them because whoever had them built would have been crowing about it all along.

3. It's very likely they'll find the parties responsible. The site is under CCTV surveillance and they got the bombers car on camera, and explosive sales are heavily monitored (and even less regulated stuff like tannerite leaves a paper trail). It will not be hard to connect the dots on this.

Probably. But what I was getting at is how it has not been possible for anyone to find who was responsible for the monument itself. As in, its design, construction, and maintenance.

4. It's not lively to be rebuilt. The orginal was built 40 years ago on the dime of what's probably one individual kook, or at most a small group of them, and they're almost certainly dead by now. It's unlikely anyone else cares to rebuild it to keep their vision alive.

What do you base this assumption on? It has needed repair previously, and that work was done to it.

if the money does get raised, I'll bet it's less "we, the shadowy New World Order propaganda council, will pay to have our guidestones rebuilt" and more "idiots on reddit crowdfunding a replacement to dunk on the guys that blew it up". The only motive to rebuild the guidestones would be petty spite.

People have done a lot based on petty spite. But the fact is that no one actually knows the motivation for building the thing to begin with.

And finally, even if the money is available, someone has to actually do it job, and I don't think anyone will do that. Not many people re willing to risk getting bombed to fulfill the will of some nutcase from 1979 and/or a bunch of cringe redditors.

 

[Scottty]

So your position is to side with Molech? Sorry I will never condemn anyone fighting Molech.

I dunno about it being Moloch.
I think Moloch would want there to be as many woman as possible popping out babies and throwing them into furnaces.