Five minutes of hate news

The re-occurring problem for lefty-racists is that there is not enough racism. So it has to be manufactured.

This woman probably wants to be the next MLK jr. But she can't because there isn't any actual racism to fight, or the racism there actually is available to fight isn't glamourous (it's petty) or it's anti-white racism and fighting that is counter-narrative.

That's why nearly every 'hate crime' in the past like three decades has turned out to be either super petty 'I'm a teenage asshole and I wanted to bully someone/be edgy' or is a complete hoax, with a considerable amount of weight towards the latter.

It's like this for sexism, racism, most classism, and several '-phobias.'

It's fucking ridiculous. And explaining this to lefties just gets them to double down despite the mountains of evidence of much of it being hoaxes made up for clout.
 
Skitzyfrenic said:
The re-occurring problem for lefty-racists is that there is not enough racism. So it has to be manufactured.

This woman probably wants to be the next MLK jr. But she can't because there isn't any actual racism to fight, or the racism there actually is available to fight isn't glamourous (it's petty) or it's anti-white racism and fighting that is counter-narrative.

That's why nearly every 'hate crime' in the past like three decades has turned out to be either super petty 'I'm a teenage asshole and I wanted to bully someone/be edgy' or is a complete hoax, with a considerable amount of weight towards the latter.

It's like this for sexism, racism, most classism, and several '-phobias.'

It's fucking ridiculous. And explaining this to lefties just gets them to double down despite the mountains of evidence of much of it being hoaxes made up for clout.
Click to expand...

The phrase ‘careful what you wish for’ springs to mind. Because they’re going to keep calling people nonsense until one day people have enough and decide ‘then let me be evil so this never happens again’.

Depending on how far they go, that could be a very dark day indeed. Which is kind of why I’m hoping it happens sooner rather than later.

One, because it’s better to have it happen now before people grow even more radicalized and we have a ‘Furhrer of the West’ situation.

Two, because I fear at this point that a counter-response is inevitable at this point. And, adding to my earlier point, I’d rather get it over with sooner than later.
 
Cherico said:
ok there is clearly something deeply wrong with our culture that needs to be adressed right now.
Click to expand...

DarthOne said:
The phrase ‘careful what you wish for’ springs to mind. Because they’re going to keep calling people nonsense until one day people have enough and decide ‘then let me be evil so this never happens again’.

Depending on how far they go, that could be a very dark day indeed. Which is kind of why I’m hoping it happens sooner rather than later.

One, because it’s better to have it happen now before people grow even more radicalized and we have a ‘Furhrer of the West’ situation.

Two, because I fear at this point that a counter-response is inevitable at this point. And, adding to my earlier point, I’d rather get it over with sooner than later.
Click to expand...

Very much so. The longer you wait, the worse things get, and the worse the reaction will be. A simple matter of built-up pressure.

Regrettably, the establishment continues to do everything it can to make a timely course-correction impossible. If Trump had been allowed to carry out his intended programme completely unimpeded, 2016-2024, most of the pressing matters would have been addressed. Not fundamentally solved, but handled enough to take the really sharp edge off. And if Perot had been free to do the same, 1992-2000, a good chuck of the most pressing issues America faces today would not exist. Get that: if people had cast aside globalist lies in the '90s, there would never have been a need for Trump.

Same here in the Netherlands. Even now, they do all they can to prevent Wilders from forming a government. If they just let him do whatever he wanted for eight years, things would be managable again. And if Fortuyn hadn't been murdered in 2002 and had been in charge 2002-2010, again: nobody would have even heard about Wilders. There wouldn't have been a need for him.

If they continue to work against Trump, Wilders, Le Pen... they'll only ensure that their far more radical heirs ultimately get into power somewhere down the line. If things can't be turned around at the ballot box (because of "fortified elections" and such trickery), then they'll eventually be turned around at the point of a bayonet.

Now, I am by inclination a man of peace. I'd prefer change to be bloodless. As much as I despise the establishment, I'd happily forego any vengeance -- even personal justice -- in the name of peace and sanity. I'd let them get away with all their crimes, if they'd just have that last shred of decency to fade into retirement. But they don't have that decency. And when I think of all the teenage girls who have been raped by "refugees", and all the small businesses destroyed, and the workers whose pensions were stolen, just in the last twenty years... all of which could have been completely avoided...

Well. Let's just say I won't be crying when the day comes that the bayonets are fixed. It's not the kind of outcome I wanted, but these fuckers brought it on themselves. They continue to invite it, every single day.
 
Skallagrim said:
Very much so. The longer you wait, the worse things get, and the worse the reaction will be. A simple matter of built-up pressure.

Regrettably, the establishment continues to do everything it can to make a timely course-correction impossible. If Trump had been allowed to carry out his intended programme completely unimpeded, 2016-2024, most of the pressing matters would have been addressed. Not fundamentally solved, but handled enough to take the really sharp edge off. And if Perot had been free to do the same, 1992-2000, a good chuck of the most pressing issues America faces today would not exist. Get that: if people had cast aside globalist lies in the '90s, there would never have been a need for Trump.

Same here in the Netherlands. Even now, they do all they can to prevent Wilders from forming a government. If they just let him do whatever he wanted for eight years, things would be managable again. And if Fortuyn hadn't been murdered in 2002 and had been in charge 2002-2010, again: nobody would have even heard about Wilders. There wouldn't have been a need for him.

If they continue to work against Trump, Wilders, Le Pen... they'll only ensure that their far more radical heirs ultimately get into power somewhere down the line. If things can't be turned around at the ballot box (because of "fortified elections" and such trickery), then they'll eventually be turned around at the point of a bayonet.

Now, I am by inclination a man of peace. I'd prefer change to be bloodless. As much as I despise the establishment, I'd happily forego any vengeance -- even personal justice -- in the name of peace and sanity. I'd let them get away with all their crimes, if they'd just have that last shred of decency to fade into retirement. But they don't have that decency. And when I think of all the teenage girls who have been raped by "refugees", and all the small businesses destroyed, and the workers whose pensions were stolen, just in the last twenty years... all of which could have been completely avoided...

Well. Let's just say I won't be crying when the day comes that the bayonets are fixed. It's not the kind of outcome I wanted, but these fuckers brought it on themselves. They continue to invite it, every single day.
Click to expand...

it doesn't help that they have lost their fucking minds and plan much much worse nightmares for humanity.
 
mrttao said:
notthebee.com

For those who think we're exaggerating this "Satanic abortion" stuff, please listen to this witch explain her spells that take power from the "life that has been conceived"

We aren't being witty or clickbaity when we say abortion is demonic.
notthebee.com notthebee.com

Witch posts video explaining how she has abortions as part of magic rituals
Also, refers to herself as "womb body"

Cosmo also promotes it
Click to expand...
Fortunately, these people are nutcases and outliers compared to most other women who have abortions.

I'm pro-choice to an extent, but I seem to be a minority with my views because people are apparently all polarized; they seem to fall into the "my body, my choice a murder machine" or "even if kids are knocked up, they must carry the baby to term despite it certain to kill both" nuts.

My views?

Women, especially those in their late teens and twenties, tend to view abortion as a "get out of motherhood" free card; a form of birth-control, much like the Pill or a condom, for their cock carousel-riding lifestyles. These women deserve scorn because they're basically killing a kid without care or thinking of the consequences.

Then there are the other types of women who have abortions, which I can agree to;
  • Medical (such as if it endangers the mother/child or both), e.g. ectopic pregnancies
  • Functionally dead (such as not developing a brain or critical organs which means the child wouldn't survive a second out of the womb)
  • Victims of sexual assault (it's also their choice whether to carry the child to term or terminate it, but they can give the child up for adoption straight after birth if they desire)
  • Children who were raped and knocked up, with the gestation and birth process putting their lives at risk, so a termination is sadly necessary
  • A couple or a woman that talked it through, understands the gravity of the situation and the heavy price/toll they'll/she'll pay, and then makes the heavy decision to go through with a termination (very different from women who think it's just a form of birth-control); these people I respect
But, again, women who view such a terrible procedure as just "birth-control"? Ugh.
 
Jormungandr said:
Fortunately, these people are nutcases and outliers compared to most other women who have abortions.

I'm pro-choice to an extent, but I seem to be a minority with my views because people are apparently all polarized; they seem to fall into the "my body, my choice a murder machine" or "even if kids are knocked up, they must carry the baby to term despite it certain to kill both" nuts.

My views?

Women, especially those in their late teens and twenties, tend to view abortion as a "get out of motherhood" free card; a form of birth-control, much like the Pill or a condom, for their cock carousel-riding lifestyles. These women deserve scorn because they're basically killing a kid without care or thinking of the consequences.

Then there are the other types of women who have abortions, which I can agree to;
  • Medical (such as if it endangers the mother/child or both), e.g. ectopic pregnancies
  • Functionally dead (such as not developing a brain or critical organs which means the child wouldn't survive a second out of the womb)
  • Victims of sexual assault (it's also their choice whether to carry the child to term or terminate it, but they can give the child up for adoption straight after birth if they desire)
  • Children who were raped and knocked up, with the gestation and birth process putting their lives at risk, so a termination is sadly necessary
  • A couple or a woman that talked it through, understands the gravity of the situation and the heavy price/toll they'll/she'll pay, and then makes the heavy decision to go through with a termination (very different from women who think it's just a form of birth-control); these people I respect
But, again, women who view such a terrible procedure as just "birth-control"? Ugh.
Click to expand...

We litterally have the pill, condoms, the morning after pill the sponge, little implants and a host of other birth control options and have had some of these options for literal generations now, in general if a woman doesn't want to get pregnant she's more or less covered.
 
Cherico said:
We literally have the pill, condoms, the morning after pill the sponge, little implants and a host of other birth control options and have had some of these options for literal generations now, in general if a woman doesn't want to get pregnant she's more or less covered.
Click to expand...
Yep! And yet they still use/treat such a terrible procedure for what's basically birth-control.

It's a woman choice if they want to terminate, but the utterly cavalier way they treat such a procedure is horrifying to me.
 
See, my wife sees it this way.
Due to no contraceptive except abstinence to be 100 percent effective, there is always a chance even with safe sex.
Does that still constitute an abortion?
No.
Now, if someone is medically not able to carry it to term because it will lead to the woman's death, or even the baby's death outside or both.
That is viable in her eyes.
As are minors below 16 (in some states that is the legal age that's why I put that age) I think it should be an option given, because often times it is due to incestuous rape, or sexual assault from a stranger rape.
In which case, should b3 considered viable due to that.

women who got pregnant due to rape also in her eyes should be considered as well
 
Zachowon said:
See, my wife sees it this way.
Due to no contraceptive except abstinence to be 100 percent effective, there is always a chance even with safe sex.
Does that still constitute an abortion?
No.
Now, if someone is medically not able to carry it to term because it will lead to the woman's death, or even the baby's death outside or both.
That is viable in her eyes.
As are minors below 16 (in some states that is the legal age that's why I put that age) I think it should be an option given, because often times it is due to incestuous rape, or sexual assault from a stranger rape.
In which case, should b3 considered viable due to that.

women who got pregnant due to rape also in her eyes should be considered as well
Click to expand...
There's always a chance, yeah, but even if one method (e.g. a condom) fails, having a second being used reduces the already very low likelihood to near-zero. If a man uses an intact condom even if it splits, and the woman is on the Pill (or uses any other options), getting knocked up is pretty much an act of god by that point (statistically), lol.
 
The pill is honestly pretty immoral itself, not only does it make women go insane because they were never intended to have those chemicals in them 24/7, it gets into the water and now we're experiencing generations of men who don't even look like men anymore.
 
Rape and Incest abortion constitutes less than 1% of all abortions. And has since according to this from 2019 and this from 1989.

According to this from Pew in 2023, less than 2% of abortions involve medical complications.

Only, generously, four per cent of abortions are because of reasons beyond 'I can't afford it,' 'I want to have sex without consequences and need a way to get rid of the consequences,' or 'I don't want the responsibility.'

Like I tell my liberal friends, medical, rape, and incest abortions are functionally different conversations compared to general abortion conversations, because of how relatively rare they are.
 
Skitzyfrenic said:
Rape and Incest abortion constitutes less than 1% of all abortions. And has since according to this from 2019 and this from 1989.

According to this from Pew in 2023, less than 2% of abortions involve medical complications.

Only, generously, four per cent of abortions are because of reasons beyond 'I can't afford it,' 'I want to have sex without consequences and need a way to get rid of the consequences,' or 'I don't want the responsibility.'

Like I tell my liberal friends, medical, rape, and incest abortions are functionally different conversations compared to general abortion conversations, because of how relatively rare they are.
Click to expand...
That is the kind of conversation I have with my wife all the time
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top