Yeah. It's a whole process. Literally everything is done by vote/process.
I'm pretty sure they did?
Five minutes of hate news
- Thread starter PsihoKekec
- Start date
Skitzyfrenic
Well-known member
Dems controlled the House then, iirc, so it probably wasn't a big deal to get the vote to 'start' investigations.
mrttao
Well-known member
the RINO cuck party.
"sure the last 10 times dems impeached our president they didn't need to jump through this hoop. but we are refusing to even try to impeach their president without it first. because we are the party of losers"
TheRejectionist
TheRejectionist
I am not involved in any way shape or form to what is happening in Hawaii, but this would make my blood boil and probably cuss like a Venetian at them. Oprah's bullshit has resurfaced yet again in the last few months and not only she has the gut to show her mug and ask the common men and women of the working class to DONATE FOR MAUI ?!
DarthOne
☦️
TheRejectionist
TheRejectionist
DarthOne
☦️
As if we need more proof for just how bad it’s going to get.
Next they’ll start arming the damn things with weapons.
Last edited:
Bassoe
Well-known member
...about that...
SPUR rifle app adds sniper fire to robot dog's bag of tricks
Specialist security company Sword Defense develops the SPUR sniper rifle unit for mounting and deployment by quadruped dog robots.
dronedj.com
DarthOne
☦️
Neither were the first airplanes and guns. But we don’t fight wars with knights and crossbows anymore, do we?
Karmic Acumen
Well-known member
Stop being "ahahaha i'm a contrarian smartass and i'm going to say my fantasies could be true at 0,0000001% probability so you have to believe them as a prophecy" about things you know nothing about.
Teletank - Wikipedia
Almost a century ago, there were people saying that by the XXI century radio controlled tanks will rule the battlefields, and they probably knew this stuff better than you do.
Ever thought why they didn't keep getting more common since the friggin 1930's?
No, but we also don't have unmanned everything doing the fighting.
You need troops on the ground
Yet is far away.
Further then you think.
Robots can't clear a building.
Karmic Acumen
Well-known member
First, apples and oranges. Not cool, man. It doesn't matter that a robot can't slice wood with a handsaw if it its only job is to blow the tree up.
Secondly, sure they can. Toss a few gas grenades in through the window or just machine gun it.
What robots can't do yet is occupy territory.
There's a lot technology can do, a number quickly rising. That they can't do some specific things at the moment is, quite frankly, not a good argument against their future prospects by any stretch.
There's actually 5 or 6 people posting concern about this, and only you and Zach arguing against it.Stop being "ahahaha i'm a contrarian smartass and i'm going to say my fantasies could be true at 0,0000001% probability so you have to believe them as a prophecy" about things you know nothing about.
Consider this...Teletank - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Almost a century ago, there were people saying that by the XXI century radio controlled tanks will rule the battlefields, and they probably knew this stuff better than you do.
Ever thought why they didn't keep getting more common since the friggin 1930's?
That makes you the contrarian. But I never expected anything better out of you.
Funny how the people concern posting about this are not the people who know the most about the topic in question.
This stuff has a lot of inherent problems that can be solved for good only by serious AI, and if that becomes not only possible but compact and cheap enough to stick in semi-expendable combat vehicles, then we will be living in a society as different from today as today is from ancient Greece.
DarthOne
☦️
Appeal to authority.
Use of wrong definitions of terms.
No one said you can't possibly argue for your case... But then you would have to do so and present some knowledge of the subject matter in the process. But so far no "concerner" is interested in doing that, just empty "concerning".
DarthOne
☦️
But you aren’t an expert. Your appealing to the authority of being one.
And you aren't a smart person who can into reading comprehension. Read the fucking link again.
It's very telling that you whine about me not being an expert (as if you know either way), yet you nor any other of the "concerners" have even attempted to argue their case on the subject matter. Just concerning nebulously and retreating to this sort of whining "OMG i'm being oppressed by authority" counterarguments when someone says you don't know what you are talking about.
Last edited: