That would be bad....how?P.S i have friend,who argue the same - deep state are good people who knew how to govern USA,without them state would cease to exist.
That would be bad....how?P.S i have friend,who argue the same - deep state are good people who knew how to govern USA,without them state would cease to exist.
What causes you to think this is a case of Slander? I genuinely can't see how that charge could possibly apply.slandering the staff is not something anyone should let stand
She's a rape victim who didn't want men around her. That's completely understandable.slandering the staff is not something anyone should let stand
slandering the staff is not something anyone should let stand
See the issue is that her past cause lost against current cause. Trans has more victim points then sick or injured women.Not wanting to be treated by someone is not slander. Where are you drawing this inane conclusion from? All she wanted was for her personal beliefs and her psychological needs respected. This is literally part of proper medical practice. There are a multitude of legitimate reasons for seeking particular accommodations during medical care. Would you fault a man or woman not wanting to be served by the opposite sex due to religious reasons, or would you want to force them to violate their deeply held beliefs.
They literally canceled a life-saving procedure, because someone had differing beliefs and stood up for their right to be reasonably accommodated. This is textbook retaliation and medical malfeasance, and you are trying to apologize for it.
This specific hospital is one of the few private ones in the UK. I'm not entirely sure how that would affect a suit, way too complex and involves too many facts I don't know. They still work with the NHS and this level of cooperation is also something above my pay grade.If I were her, I'd bring up a civil case against the hospital. There are plenty of solicitors in the UK who'd be happy to take a bite out of the NHS's jugular, given how badly its management (especially in regards to its allocation of funds) has degraded over the decades.
So remember when I said to use this tactic on idiots gluing themselves to stuff?Naw, save the painting (They actually usually have a discreet shield protecting a painting like this, though I doubt the activists knew that, if you look closely at the second picture you can see the soup is casting a shadow behind it, so most of the damage will be to the frame) and leave the vandals glued to the wall.
I suspect their cause will seem a lot less glamorous after they've been sitting in a pool of their own urine and feces for ten hours.
I have no desire to discuss a victim of traumas poor decision making she had the right make her request, the hospital could not accommodate her. it's not the only hospital in the world, odds are she will wise up or find someone who will humor her or better yet get the mental help she obviously needs to at least function in a world near 50% male and then surgical intervention before her health fails her
if it does fail her, the ER just goes ahead and saves her life anyway, well unless she's prepared a living will stating it can't be done outside of her preconditions in that case talk to a judge or let it stand and she dies as she wants.
victim of trauma
facing surgery starts setting precondition that prevent her from going under the knife
decides someone doesn't pass her standards of beauty claims that they are really a man
gets to avoid surgical trauma
this is not the fact group of someone I want to rely on and now shes claiming a member of staff is misrepresenting themselves in a professional setting
no bullshit
it's simpleI I think she in the wrong and of the two parties is acting poorly in this case
she said give me x or no surgery
they said ok, no surgery
either way she got what she wanted
The hospital accepted her terms an sent her on her way
I disagree she is in the wrong and still got what she wanted
how is this politics?
how is this politics?
Surely this is trollinghow is this politics?
she set preconditions to treatment
oh veiled threats mature , at least your better at then the puppy
no what happened is she decided someone must be a man, and that voided her precondition
her statement says she says saw a man in a wig ergo she made a call , she made a choice which was respected
I'm quoting just you, but this goes for everyone. Why are you engaging with a self-admited political activist and low effort troll?Do you have any way to support this, or is it just a raw assertion?
I'm quoting just you, but this goes for everyone. Why are you engaging with a self-admited political activist and low effort troll?