Five minutes of hate news
- Thread starter PsihoKekec
- Start date
You are wonderfully naive. This has been going on for decades. And nothing ever happens. Yet these assholes will still act like it's a big deal when one of their dogs die or get killed. The closest to consequences I've seen any of these assholes suffer is I saw one who managed to shoot himself in the leg as he was trying to shoot an excited puppy that was jumping up on him.
Police showed up to search my house with no warrant when I was younger. Tried to intimidate us into letting them search. We said no, but they still decided to hop our fence and search the outside. At which point they did clearly threaten to shoot our completely harmless dog.
For the record, they didn't shoot the dog, but they had no business there, and would have if the dog got out. And they wanted to search our house for a meth lab that didn't exist.
Fuck the police.
He's not naive, he's a fucking glowie. Of course he will refuse to acknowledge any criticisms of his colleagues.
Isn't that reasonable grounds for castle doctrine? People intruding on your home despite being told to stay away?
I am not a glowie.
I will call out cops doing bad things.
Always will.
Yes snd no.
Reasonable search in some states allows cops to search anything they can see. Unless they have a warrant, if they see something that causes them to have a reason they can then search anything within sight.
Here they are allowed outside all they want. They aren't allowed inside without a warrant.
So if they want to walk around outside and look through windows, they can do that.
They harassed us a lot. On the third visit they showed up with the fire department and I was alone and they managed to intimidate me into letting them search the house.
At this point I was tired of being harassed, and didn't have anything to hide but a small bag of weed so I let them search.
They never did come back, but still, fuck the police.
Yeah some places have that.
I think it should be you need a warrant foe all property
mrttao
Well-known member
If you read, every time it goes to trial the judges assert that police dindu nuffin
Your dog is property (unless you are on trial for animal abuse). The police killing your dog counts as property seizure. The constitution defends you against unreasonable property seizure. key word unreasonable. Judges thinks it is perfectly reasonable for a cop to shoot your dogs.
Then appeal it.
mrttao
Well-known member
they do, the appeal is rejected. as mentioned.
pigs kill a LOT of dogs and the only punishment they ever get for it is that sometimes they accidentally shoot themselves in the process
Appeal appeal appeal.
Best I can do
Bear Ribs
Well-known member
Appeal how? Double Jeopardy is illegal, if a cop is found not guilty, which they pretty much inevitably are because the Police are known to the Judge and DA, they work together all the time, constantly, and the Judge and DA have to work with the police in the future too, then you can't appeal because that would be trying them twice for the same crime. There are no appeals for that kind of case.
You just go 'appeal it' to cover your own ass, but you know damn well those appeals won't go anywhere most of the time.
The dog is still dead, while the DA's and Judge's often won't do shit to cops over unjustly killing a dog, and the Thin Blue Line will protect the cops from most punishments.
There is a reason the police have been losing support on both the Right and Left; cops only protect themselves, their unions, and their paymasters when the rubber hits the road.
Man, they keep pushing people, sooner or later the uniforms will end up just disappearing while on patrol.
this has happened in other countries, our south american friends have stories.
call me racist, but there's a reason why there are so many black people in prison in the USA
Marcus Trafalgar (@dolce65023071) / Twitter
whole twitter account full of reasons
and almost none of this ever appears on TV stations
the "race war" has started.
except Whites, Hispanics, Asians, South Asians, Natives, and some Blacks are on one side, while Black gangbangers and thugs and rapefugees are on the other
@DarthOne I think the vid you posted was on this guys twitter as well
Marcus Trafalgar (@dolce65023071) / Twitter
whole twitter account full of reasons
and almost none of this ever appears on TV stations
the "race war" has started.
except Whites, Hispanics, Asians, South Asians, Natives, and some Blacks are on one side, while Black gangbangers and thugs and rapefugees are on the other
@DarthOne I think the vid you posted was on this guys twitter as well
Last edited:
Qctually he can if you pursue civil charges against him.
Unless he is in a police Union, and even then he is paying fees for ot
Bear Ribs
Well-known member
How that lawsuit stuff is going:
www.forbes.com
A federal appeals court dismissed a civil-rights lawsuit filed against a Georgia deputy who tried to shoot a family’s dog, but instead hit a 10-year-old boy lying down on the ground. Instead of having to face a $2 million lawsuit for excessive force, Coffee County Deputy Sheriff Michael Vickers was entitled to “qualified immunity” for his actions and cannot be sued in federal court, the Eleventh U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled last week.
Sued for shooting the dog? They can't even be sued for shooting the kid who was lying facedown on the floor next to the dog.
Police shoot a dog roughly every hour and a half...
In 2013, The Bullock family’s dog, Jack, was shot and killed by Blue Ash, Ohio police. When the Bullocks returned home from a family member’s funeral, they found blood and three bullets on their front porch — along with a note to call the Blue Ash Police Department about their dog. The Bullocks learned that Jack had gotten out of the backyard when two officers who tried to catch him ended up shooting and killing him right on the family’s front porch. Jack was a 7-pound Chihuahua-mix.
And per court precedent, an officer can legally shoot a dog if it moves in any way or barks once. This includes moving away from the officer or only moving a few inches.
One officer testified that he shot the first dog after it “had only moved a few inches” in a movement that he considered to be a “lunge.” The dog then ran away from the officer to the basement, where it was shot again and killed.
The second dog was shot in the Brown’s basement after it was simply barking at the police, court documents said. The officer “testified that after he shot and killed the first dog, he noticed the second dog standing about halfway across the basement,” the court’s opinion explained. “The second dog was not moving towards the officers when they discovered her in the basement, but rather she was ‘just standing there,’ barking and was turned sideways to the officers.” The same officer shot the dog twice before a second officer “didn’t want to see it suffer,’ so he put her out of her misery and fired the last shot,” killing her.
“Given the totality of the circumstances and viewed from the perspective of an objectively reasonable officer, the dog poses an imminent threat to the officer’s safety,” Judge Eric Clay wrote in the decision. “The standard we set out today is that a police officer’s use of deadly force against a dog while executing a search warrant to search a home for illegal drug activity is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment when…the dog poses an imminent threat to the officer’s safety.”
Cop Who Accidentally Shot 10-Year-Old When Aiming For Family Dog Can’t Be Sued, Federal Court Rules
Created by the Supreme Court, “qualified immunity” lets government officials dodge federal civil-rights lawsuits.
www.forbes.com
A federal appeals court dismissed a civil-rights lawsuit filed against a Georgia deputy who tried to shoot a family’s dog, but instead hit a 10-year-old boy lying down on the ground. Instead of having to face a $2 million lawsuit for excessive force, Coffee County Deputy Sheriff Michael Vickers was entitled to “qualified immunity” for his actions and cannot be sued in federal court, the Eleventh U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled last week.
Sued for shooting the dog? They can't even be sued for shooting the kid who was lying facedown on the floor next to the dog.
Police shoot a dog roughly every hour and a half...
Police Shoot Dogs Every 98-Minutes, Shocking Study Says
“This post contains affiliate links, and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking on my links.” Why are dogs – our best friends, our companions, our children – such a threat that police shoot dogs every 98 minutes; when not one single police officer in recorded history has...
www.dogingtonpost.com
And per court precedent, an officer can legally shoot a dog if it moves in any way or barks once. This includes moving away from the officer or only moving a few inches.
Federal Court Ruling: Police Can Shoot a Dog if it Moves or Barks When Officers Enter a Home - The Dogington Post
“This post contains affiliate links, and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking on my links.” A ruling by the 6th Circuit Federal Court in Michigan last week gave police nationwide the authority to shoot a dog if it moves or barks when officers enter a home. The decision...
www.dogingtonpost.com
The second dog was shot in the Brown’s basement after it was simply barking at the police, court documents said. The officer “testified that after he shot and killed the first dog, he noticed the second dog standing about halfway across the basement,” the court’s opinion explained. “The second dog was not moving towards the officers when they discovered her in the basement, but rather she was ‘just standing there,’ barking and was turned sideways to the officers.” The same officer shot the dog twice before a second officer “didn’t want to see it suffer,’ so he put her out of her misery and fired the last shot,” killing her.
“Given the totality of the circumstances and viewed from the perspective of an objectively reasonable officer, the dog poses an imminent threat to the officer’s safety,” Judge Eric Clay wrote in the decision. “The standard we set out today is that a police officer’s use of deadly force against a dog while executing a search warrant to search a home for illegal drug activity is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment when…the dog poses an imminent threat to the officer’s safety.”