Granted those child raping degenerates need to follow their own advice but really.
I will happily concede that not all Jewish people are members of those groups, but all of those groups are usually jewish. Much like crime in America, a certain ethnicity is a cruel victim of pattern recognitionNo, no it does not 'help'. You want to point out that they're wealthy, powerful and people in that group are linked to each other beyond just having the same ethnicity/religion, fine and dandy. But singling out the fact that they happened to be Jewish does no one any favors.
Not taking sides because I know nothing on it. But Wikipedia? Really?I'd say you should proabably read up more on the whole context:
Kent State shootings - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
It isn't THAT bad of a source.Not taking sides because I know nothing on it. But Wikipedia? Really?
Eh, agree to disagree. But sure.It isn't THAT bad of a source.
The thing is, it is still largely unknown on why the soldiers opened fire
You should read the article in detail; they claimed a sniper took a shot at them and that the NG feared for thier lives.It isn't THAT bad of a source.
The thing is, it is still largely unknown on why the soldiers opened fire
What they claim doesn't mean anything.You should read the article in detail; they claimed a sniper took a shot at them and that the NG feared for thier lives.
I am going off what I readEh, agree to disagree. But sure.
I was actually still talking about Wikipedia just to be clear. Still don't know much about what you guys are talking about.I am going off what I read
One of the problems with pattern recognition, though, is the fact that it often leads to making certain false assumptions; especially when you don't actually have all of the facts, or worse, ignore the ones that don't match your preferred conclusion.I will happily concede that not all Jewish people are members of those groups, but all of those groups are usually jewish. Much like crime in America, a certain ethnicity is a cruel victim of pattern reconition
A glow-in-the-dark sniper.You should read the article in detail; they claimed a sniper took a shot at them and that the NG feared for thier lives.
It might be in a specific instance a false assumption, that doesn't matter. What matters from a 'will this harm me?' perspective says be on guard. Like i might only get robbed by 1 in 7 purple people and only robbed by 1 in 10 green people. It's wise of me to keep a better eye on purple. Such is the case with blacks and jews for me. I try not to judge every individual for the record, but i would have to be stupid not to be more alert around certain people. I don't have a preferred solution except not be robbed.One of the problems with pattern recognition, though, is the fact that it often leads to making certain false assumptions; especially when you don't actually have all of the facts, or worse, ignore the ones that don't match your preferred conclusion.
Upon contacting appropriate officers of the Ohio National Guard at Ravenna and Akron, Ohio, regarding ONG radio logs and the availability of service record books, the respective ONG officer advised that any inquiries concerning the Kent State University incident should be directed to the Adjutant General, ONG, Columbus, Ohio. Three persons were interviewed regarding a reported conversation by Sgt Lawrence Shafer, ONG, that Shafer had bragged about "taking a bead" on Jeffrey Miller at the time of the ONG shooting and each interviewee was unable to substantiate such a conversation.
A Gallup Poll taken the day after the shootings reportedly showed that 58 percent of respondents blamed the students, 11 percent blamed the National Guard and 31 percent expressed no opinion.[51] However, there was wide discussion as to whether these were legally justified shootings of American citizens, and whether the protests or the decisions to ban them were constitutional.
In a speech at Kent State University to mark the 49th anniversary of the shootings, guest speaker Bob Woodward revealed a 1971 recording of Richard Nixon discussing the Attica Prison riot, in which he compared the uprising to the shootings at Kent State and considered that they might have a "salutary effect" on his administration. Woodward labelled the previously-unheard remarks "chilling" and among the "most outrageous" of the President's statements.
Students from Kent State and other universities often got a hostile reaction upon returning home. Some were told that more students should have been killed to teach student protesters a lesson; some students were disowned by their families.
So basically nothing happened to anyone, and it was handwaved away by judges talking out of both sides of their mouths.A grand jury indicted five guardsmen on felony charges – Lawrence Shafer, 28, and James McGee, 28, both of Ravenna, Ohio; James Pierce, 30, of Amelia Island, Florida.; William Perkins, 38 of Canton, Ohio; and Ralph Zoller, 27, of Mantua, Ohio. Barry Morris, 30, of Kent, Ohio; Leon Smith, 27, of Beach City, Ohio; and Matthew McManus, 28, of West Salem, Ohio, were indicted on misdemeanor charges. The guardsmen claimed to have fired in self-defense, testimony that was generally accepted by the criminal justice system.
On November 8, 1974, U.S. District Judge Frank J. Battisti dismissed civil rights charges against all of the accused on the basis that the prosecution's case did not warrant a trial.[9] “It is vital that state and National Guard officials not regard this decision as authorizing or approving the use of force against demonstrators, whatever the occasion of the issue involved," Battisti said in his opinion. "Such use of force is, and was, deplorable.”
Civil actions were also attempted against the guardsmen, the state of Ohio, and the president of Kent State. The federal court civil action for wrongful death and injury, brought by the victims and their families against Governor Rhodes, the President of Kent State, and the National Guardsmen, resulted in unanimous verdicts for all defendants on all claims after an eleven-week trial.[61] The judgment on those verdicts was reversed by the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on the ground that the federal trial judge had mishandled an out-of-court threat against a juror.
Cops don't even bother chasing down criminals anymore.So basically nothing happened to anyone, and it was handwaved away by judges talking out of both sides of their mouths.
And considering the efforts to dehumanize people like us, and paint us all as terrorists, does anyone doubt that this could happen again with the same lack of consequences?
All because of a big idiot called Derek Chavin who couldn't just shove Floyd in the car and drive him away ASAP.
It is from the 80sExactly, finding out terrorist who carry out vile attacks, like printing ''It's OK to be white'' signs, is super important.
And?It is from the 80s