Five minutes of hate news

Er, is this sex without consent like rape or consenting sex with non-consensual recordings? Is the latter even illegal?
it very clearly says in the twatter post that it is consensual sex + non-consensual recording of the sex.
Destiny is being accused of sharing recordings of women he had sexual relations with. There are two accusers so far.

The degenerate man child might be going down, and may be sharing a bunk with big Tyrone soon if the criminal allegations actually go anywhere.
who is Destiny and why should I care about him?
 
it very clearly says in the twatter post that it is consensual sex + non-consensual recording of the sex.

who is Destiny and why should I care about him?

Deranged leftist YouTuber/streamer. Influential in the breadtuber side of it. He’s also the guy who was going on a lot of Redpill/manoshphere channels bragging about his open marriage, only to lose his wife to a Swedish twink, and the guy that said Trump supporters deserved to get shot during the assassination attempt.

Sad human being pictured below:

1737567647585.jpeg
 
Er, is this sex without consent like rape or consenting sex with non-consensual recordings? Is the latter even illegal?
I don't know if making the recording without consent is illegal; that may depend on whether they're in a one-party or two-party consent state.

What absolutely is not legal, is sharing sexual imagery of someone without their consent.
 
Deranged leftist YouTuber/streamer. Influential in the breadtuber side of it. He’s also the guy who was going on a lot of Redpill/manoshphere channels bragging about his open marriage, only to lose his wife to a Swedish twink, and the guy that said Trump supporters deserved to get shot during the assassination attempt.

Sad human being pictured below:

View attachment 2159
An open marriage leading to divorce? What a shocking surprise.
 
I need a "legalese" to English translation please.
Gotcha.

Okay, first the topic:
ONLY IF YOU ALREADY COMMITTED A CRIME YOU CAN HAVE A PRESIDENTIAL PARDON.
Or more clearly, "does accepting a pardon means acceptance of guilt?"

Right now there's no Supreme Court Case that says a) one way or another, and is b) binding.

In one SCOTUS case's opinion (that's what the judges write to say what the law is), they said "Accepting a pardon means accepting guilt", BUT that was in "dicta", short for Obiter Dictum. Dicta is legalese for something a judge puts in their opinion that isn't the main point of the case, and also isn't binding precedent, but may be a useful argument.

So a lower court can come to a different conclusion when some SCOTUS said was in dicta, but not when what they said was NOT in dicta. The stuff not in dicta (the vast majority of what is written usually) is binding, and lower courts are bound by that case and aren't allowed to disagree with it.


Because the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals (think 1.5 steps below SCOTUS) wasn't bound by the above decision, because it was Dicta, The 10th Circuit instead found that accepting a pardon wasn't an admission of guilt, the opposite of what SCOTUS thought in 1915.


tl;dr: no body knows if accepting a pardon means admitting guilt.
 
Gotcha.

Okay, first the topic:

Or more clearly, "does accepting a pardon means acceptance of guilt?"

Right now there's no Supreme Court Case that says a) one way or another, and is b) binding.

In one SCOTUS case's opinion (that's what the judges write to say what the law is), they said "Accepting a pardon means accepting guilt", BUT that was in "dicta", short for Obiter Dictum. Dicta is legalese for something a judge puts in their opinion that isn't the main point of the case, and also isn't binding precedent, but may be a useful argument.

So a lower court can come to a different conclusion when some SCOTUS said was in dicta, but not when what they said was NOT in dicta. The stuff not in dicta (the vast majority of what is written usually) is binding, and lower courts are bound by that case and aren't allowed to disagree with it.


Because the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals (think 1.5 steps below SCOTUS) wasn't bound by the above decision, because it was Dicta, The 10th Circuit instead found that accepting a pardon wasn't an admission of guilt, the opposite of what SCOTUS thought in 1915.


tl;dr: no body knows if accepting a pardon means admitting guilt.
Much better and thanks!

So basically we might still see justice?
 
Deranged leftist YouTuber/streamer. Influential in the breadtuber side of it. He’s also the guy who was going on a lot of Redpill/manoshphere channels bragging about his open marriage, only to lose his wife to a Swedish twink, and the guy that said Trump supporters deserved to get shot during the assassination attempt.

Sad human being pictured below:

View attachment 2159
Man, I am glad I didn't have a personal PC until 2013 and that the internet connection I had sucked arse so I was stuck with single player games.
 
chaeiry-png.6886437


Destiny is being accused of sharing recordings of women he had sexual relations with. There are two accusers so far.

The degenerate man child might be going down, and may be sharing a bunk with big Tyrone soon if the criminal allegations actually go anywhere.

Please, dear lord, let the deranged midget get Me-too’d because it’d be hilarious.

Edit: Also. Joshua Moon, owner of Kiwi Farms, donated to the GoFundMe for one of the accusers legal expenses. Which I find deeply funny.

Edit 2:
For clarification. He's not being accused of rape, but of the non-consensual sharing of nudes and recorded material.

Which is illegal under anti-revenge porn laws
Oh god I hatehatehatehatehatehatehaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaate this person. Honestly I'm surprised I could hate someone so much and not even physically have met them in person. It's astonishing really.
 
So apparently YouTube decided to piss off the entire planet tonight:


This is why I hate corporations and technology. I can easily see myself going full-blown Ted Kaczynski at some point in my future, along with a litany of others, at this point.

Looks like it's just a bug that they intend to fix...not that big of a deal.
 
So apparently YouTube decided to piss off the entire planet tonight:


This is why I hate corporations and technology. I can easily see myself going full-blown Ted Kaczynski at some point in my future, along with a litany of others, at this point.


I’m headed that way more or less. Probably not full blown- if only because I’m not that crazy and electronic storage does have some advantages over going pure physical media- but in that general direction.
 

Someone steals a car and takes it to a storage unit to chop it apart, then leaves the chopped up hulk behind. The storage unit then goes after the car's owner and shakes her down for the rental fee on the unit. Seems like the kind of thing that the police should investigate, especially since this apparently isn't the first time this has happened.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top