Five minutes of hate news


Washington Post Pulitzer-winning cartoonist, who portrays Republicans as groomers and predators, arrested for possession of child porn

link contains samples of his "art"
H-How does AI 🍕 even work? For an AI image generator to produce a photo realistic image of something it has to have reference material in its da...😳...🤮...🤮...
 
H-How does AI 🍕 even work? For an AI image generator to produce a photo realistic image of something it has to have reference material in its da...😳...🤮...🤮...
That's not true at all, AI can put multiple things together to get a final result that is not made up entirely of anything within it's database. It's how you can make photorealistic photos of trail camera footage of humanoid hotdogs skateboarding alongside turkey-fish.

In otherwords if it contains pictures of kids, and pictures of lewds, it can make pictures of lewd kids. Doesn't need a single illegal picture within it's database.
 

Washington Post Pulitzer-winning cartoonist, who portrays Republicans as groomers and predators, arrested for possession of child porn

link contains samples of his "art" (conservative mocking, not the ones he was arrested for)
article-678911f556640.jpg

Jej I like this one, artist casually ignoring the massively fucked up shit that was happening in Weimar Germany. If the Nazis could be praised for anything their immense hatred of groomers was neato. Nobody seems interested in finding out what books they were burning lmao.
 
article-678911f556640.jpg

Jej I like this one, artist casually ignoring the massively fucked up shit that was happening in Weimar Germany. If the Nazis could be praised for anything their immense hatred of groomers was neato. Nobody seems interested in finding out what books they were burning lmao.
He probably hates nazies specifically because of their hate of pedos.
As he himself was arrested for 134 counts of child pornography

Also, the MAGA yelling "groomer" at the camera (at him) is very apt consider he literally is a pedo
 
I hope we don't see another Lula mandate in 2026 but it's not like I have high hopes. I think we have slightly better chances with Trump in power. But I am not going to count on it. We should need a Meloni or, preferably, a Milei. Or someone like El Salvador's president.
Brazil will have to get much worse before they allow another 'outsider' in the president's chair. Not that I think it will matter - Brazil is a parliamentary republic in all but name now.
 
Brazil will have to get much worse before they allow another 'outsider' in the president's chair. Not that I think it will matter - Brazil is a parliamentary republic in all but name now.
So you think that even with the fact that Lula was supported by Biden and co and the treatment given to Musk's x/twitter, Trump won't have a way to influence Brazil?
 
So you think that even with the fact that Lula was supported by Biden and co and the treatment given to Musk's x/twitter, Trump won't have a way to influence Brazil?
He will have a way to influence Brazil in individual issues, not on the general trend.

I don't expect him to do much more than stop the Brazilian government from harassing Twitter and Facebook, and ease the pressure on Bolsonaro(even then, not much). Which is... good, I guess, but it doesn't solve the problem of Brazilian government being what it is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ATP


If they did nothing wrong, why pre-emptive pardons?

Fauci and Miley are the most notable, but the cunt was sneaky and did it last minute. I don't see them holding up for long after Trump arrives.

Apparently I am not the only one in the Internet to have that reasoning.

WHICH MEANS ONLY IF YOU ALREADY COMMITTED A CRIME YOU CAN HAVE A PRESIDENTIAL PARDON.

Hopefully some of them, BUT ESPECIALLY FAUCI, will have to deal with a recknonkng.
 
Apparently I am not the only one in the Internet to have that reasoning.

WHICH MEANS ONLY IF YOU ALREADY COMMITTED A CRIME YOU CAN HAVE A PRESIDENTIAL PARDON.

Hopefully some of them, BUT ESPECIALLY FAUCI, will have to deal with a recknonkng.
Was Biden competent enough to issue a pardon though? As others have pointed out he wasn't competent to stand trial.
 
Apparently I am not the only one in the Internet to have that reasoning.

WHICH MEANS ONLY IF YOU ALREADY COMMITTED A CRIME YOU CAN HAVE A PRESIDENTIAL PARDON.

Hopefully some of them, BUT ESPECIALLY FAUCI, will have to deal with a recknonkng.
This is unsettled law. There's dictum (a non-binding statement as part of a SCOTUS majority opinion) in Burdick v US (1915) that says it is, but again, that isn't precedent. In 2021, the 10th Circuit of Appeals found the opposite.

Was Biden competent enough to issue a pardon though? As others have pointed out he wasn't competent to stand trial.
That's likely irrelevant. The Pardon is a constitutional power, and the rule of incompetence for presidents is the 25th amendment, section 4:
Section 4. Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.


Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department [sic] or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue, assembling within forty-eight hours for that purpose if not in session. If the Congress, within twenty-one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress is not in session, within twenty-one days after Congress is required to assemble, determines by two-thirds vote of both Houses that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the President shall resume the powers and duties of his office.
Given no declaration was made of the President's inability, he's likely to be constitutionally able. Now there's no precedent here saying either way, but I doubt that the Court wants to start making precedent here either.

Also, note that Biden wasn't quite found legally incompetent, but just that a sympathy plea by him off his meds would mean no jury would convict.

tl;dr: Incompetence for constitutional powers like pardoning is (likely) completely different than incompetence for standing trial.
 
chaeiry-png.6886437


Destiny is being accused of sharing recordings of women he had sexual relations with. There are two accusers so far.

The degenerate man child might be going down, and may be sharing a bunk with big Tyrone soon if the criminal allegations actually go anywhere.

Please, dear lord, let the deranged midget get Me-too’d because it’d be hilarious.

Edit: Also. Joshua Moon, owner of Kiwi Farms, donated to the GoFundMe for one of the accusers legal expenses. Which I find deeply funny.

Edit 2:
For clarification. He's not being accused of rape, but of the non-consensual sharing of nudes and recorded material.

Which is illegal under anti-revenge porn laws
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top