Well then...I reassert my criticism!It didn't, it happened months ago.
Just don't have time to watch the videos at work.
Well then...I reassert my criticism!It didn't, it happened months ago.
TL;DW - The WEF has taken over management of the Gobekli Tepe archeological site, halted all major excavation for the foreseeable future, and turned the site into a tourist spot, and in doing so has damaged or destroyed parts of the ruins. It's almost like they want to keep our history buried or something.![]()
Honestly, the concept of history in and of itself is a threat to their dreams of an authoritarian utopia. That's why they have to destroy the past; so that you'll never be exposed to the fact that the boot stomping on your face wasn't always there, and imagine that one day it might not be.Some how I am not surprised.
If human prehistory has things in it that might be uncomfortable for some current narratives, controlling access and excavation at sites like Gobekli Tepe is a very logical step to take.
It is not the only structure like this, not by a long shot, and I think there is an explanation to it that is less religious, and more...shelter-from-airblast/debris related.
From an engineering perspective, those pillars would be really good supports for the primitive equivalent of a fallout/blast shelter from something like repeated trips through the orbit of a fragmenting comet. Fragmenting comets that we travel through the tail of, around the end of October/early November is much of the world, when many cultures have days dedicated to worship of the dead/offerings to death gods.
But stories like this extend the pre-history of humanity into realms of conversation which can also impact current/future events, because asteroid/comet defense is no longer a theoretical.
Thanks to Musk, we no longer would even have the old 'massive effort for emergency launch like in Armageddon. We'd just have like 3 weeks with no new Starlink launches while they put together an intercept package out of whatever Falcon 9's are serviceable at that moment.
Frankly Musk is the hard counter to the WEF in so many ways.
The dems have no candidate who would stans a chance.Biden is now nearly a coin flip to drop out according to gambling markets, which sucks for Trump. Trump is not a good candidate in the general, a large number of people are turned off by him. You can say he's a good president, but as a candidate he sucks. His only way to win was by beating up awful D candidates.
PredictIt
www.predictit.org
So yeah, support Biden.
No, he isn't. The Dem's have a ton of candidates who could win. Biden's one of the ones that won't. You completely underestimate Indy dislike of Trump. They just dislike Biden more. Trump's approval/disapproval has stayed basically flat. Trump hasn't made gains over the past 4 years, Biden's been losing.The dems have no candidate who would stans a chance.
Biden is that chance
Well it is to late to change who is on the ballot in two key states.No, he isn't. The Dem's have a ton of candidates who could win. Biden's one of the ones that won't. You completely underestimate Indy dislike of Trump. They just dislike Biden more. Trump's approval/disapproval has stayed basically flat. Trump hasn't made gains over the past 4 years, Biden's been losing.
![]()
Donald Trump : Favorability Polls
The latest political polls and polling averages from FiveThirtyEight.projects.fivethirtyeight.com
This is how they are going to steal the election again.
No it isn't. The earliest state that hits is Ohio, and that happens August 8th, IIRC. You can absolutely swap someone out.Well it is to late to change who is on the ballot in two key states.
And...who are they going to run? Harris? Who would probably get more black votes turned away due to her time as prosecutor
Newsome...they would have to get another VP...
Newsom would force a new VP pick.No it isn't. The earliest state that hits is Ohio, and that happens August 8th, IIRC. You can absolutely swap someone out.
And currently, Harris is at a 32% chance to win the D nomination. And Harris is better for the Dems than Biden. Yes, she currently doesn't match up well, but she might do well enough with media help. Right now, Media got Biden through 3 years of presidency until he finally flopped (when they wanted him too, IMO). They can get Harris past the finish line.
The worst case scenario is Gavin Newsom. Because if he wins, he'll be horriffic.
Sure. But she's more of a nothing than Trump is. Trump is hated by indies, they just don't respect Kamala at all. Faced with a choice between the two, I could see it going Kamala's way.Newsom would force a new VP pick.
Amd...Harris is hated. She literally lost in the initial primaries in 2019...she was that bad.
Personally, I think you overestimate the validity of polls. Remember when most of them said that Hillary was going to win the 2016 election in a landslide?No, he isn't. The Dem's have a ton of candidates who could win. Biden's one of the ones that won't. You completely underestimate Indy dislike of Trump. They just dislike Biden more. Trump's approval/disapproval has stayed basically flat. Trump hasn't made gains over the past 4 years, Biden's been losing.
![]()
Donald Trump : Favorability Polls
The latest political polls and polling averages from FiveThirtyEight.projects.fivethirtyeight.com
This is how they are going to steal the election again.
Harris is more hated than Hillary dude. Literally just need to blast ads going "she said she was in charge of the border, but she never even visited" along with facts about what she did as a prosecutor and she looses.Sure. But she's more of a nothing than Trump is. Trump is hated by indies, they just don't respect Kamala at all. Faced with a choice between the two, I could see it going Kamala's way.
Newsom would get even more benefit from a VP pick, which sucks.
It's a classic example of how to get info from an unreliable source: compare polls to themselves. A single opinion poll means nothing. But if you take one every week for years, you can detect shifts in opinions, even if the actual number is very different. Trump's numbers has been basically flat. There's been no change.Personally, I think you overestimate the validity of polls. Remember when most of them said that Hillary was going to win the 2016 election in a landslide?
Let's look at the polls. Again, not perfect, but they are going to be about equally wrong, so we can use them to compare Trump's competitors:Harris is more hated than Hillary dude. Literally just need to blast ads going "she said she was in charge of the border, but she never even visited" along with facts about what she did as a prosecutor and she looses.
And Newsom? Gruesome Newsom? He who murdered grandma?
It's a classic example of how to get info from an unreliable source: compare polls to themselves. A single opinion poll means nothing. But if you take one every week for years, you can detect shifts in opinions, even if the actual number is very different. Trump's numbers has been basically flat. There's been no change.
Let's look at the polls. Again, not perfect, but they are going to be about equally wrong, so we can use them to compare Trump's competitors:
Gavin Newsom is about a full point better than Biden. Harris is half a point better than Biden. Whitmer is about 2-2.5 points better than Biden.
A Biden swap would be a huge win for the D's. That's why they are doing it: they want to win.
Well, let's look at the polls, and apparently the answer is "More than Biden". Also, that was Cuomo."Governor Newsom put covid patients into nursing homes while telling you that republicans wanted the vulnerable to die. Do you trust him with your grandma?"
I'd rather someone that doesn't actually do anything vs someone that intends harm watching over my family.Well, let's look at the polls, and apparently the answer is "More than Biden". Also, that was Cuomo.
And that Brexit was "never going to happen"? Cue shocked Pikachu faces when it happened.Personally, I think you overestimate the validity of polls. Remember when most of them said that Hillary was going to win the 2016 election in a landslide?
Both of them did it. And no ads have been run against him nor has he actually... spoken much in public. Neither of these would be the same if he actually ran.Well, let's look at the polls, and apparently the answer is "More than Biden". Also, that was Cuomo.