Five minutes of hate news

bintananth

behind a desk
FO6u1AqWQAI9QdI



The new WHO guidelines are here Abortion care guideline: executive summary

and yes, their goal is access to abortion without any limitations, regardless of gender.
Gender is probably in there to include transmen who get pregnant. With male hormones it's very unlikely, but can happen. Without male hormones? Same chances as your typical woman.

Read enough news and you'll eventually come across a story about a pregnant transman.

Can we dismantle WHO already?
Sadly, no. Nonsense aside, the WHO is net benefit for stuff like sanitation standards and lists of essential medicines.
 

LordsFire

Internet Wizard
WHO is pure negative, everything they do is bad. They are a badness train without breaks

If you want people to take your arguments seriously, hyperbole like this isn't helping.

I'd agree that the WHO is easily an organization the world would be better off without, if only so that a number of smaller organizations could take its place and do everything it's supposed to do more efficiently.

However, absolute statements like this defy even just simple common sense. In any sufficiently large organization, someone is going to be doing something productive, just as a result of how large organizations and numbers work.
 

Bacle

When the effort is no longer profitable...
Founder
If you want people to take your arguments seriously, hyperbole like this isn't helping.

I'd agree that the WHO is easily an organization the world would be better off without, if only so that a number of smaller organizations could take its place and do everything it's supposed to do more efficiently.

However, absolute statements like this defy even just simple common sense. In any sufficiently large organization, someone is going to be doing something productive, just as a result of how large organizations and numbers work.
You might have had a leg to stand on with this criticism before the Wu Flu happened.

Now, after everything that has come out regarding the Wu Flu and WHO's behavior regarding it/it's origins, the WHO is effectively just a dept of the CCP, and thus must be treated the same way the CCP is; as an enemy power or tool of enemy powers.

Any good the WHO ever did has been completely and utterly nullified by their behavior the past few years.

This is even before we tocuh the 'WHO Constitution' they want to push to override national laws in 'emergencies'.

The WHO has nothing beneficial left in it's carcass, and is nothing more than a puppet of the CCP now. There is no redeeming it now.
 

mrttao

Well-known member
Twitch Streamer Destiny got banned for getting too close to the sun:

the left eats itself. every canceller leftist is going to one day get cancelled by newer and more extremist woke cultists
 

Bacle

When the effort is no longer profitable...
Founder
Did you actually read the post you're quoting, or is this whole response here just one big knee-jerk?
You were the one saying/implying 'absolute statements are hyperbole/shouldn't be taken seriously' to someone claiming the WHO is all bad, even if you admit the org is not a positive thing.

I pointed out why the WHO is corrupted by far more than just a few individuals, 'productive' work at the WHO hasn't existed for years now, and why the view of the WHO as 'all bad' is far from hyperbole these days.

You were trying for a "I am calling out your 'hyperbole' and nitpicking the issue to seem so mature and wise." stance with mrttao, I just pointed out that his view of the WHO as 'all bad' is not at all unreasonable.
 

mrttao

Well-known member
You were the one saying/implying 'absolute statements are hyperbole/shouldn't be taken seriously' to someone claiming the WHO is all bad, even if you admit the org is not a positive thing.

I pointed out why the WHO is corrupted by far more than just a few individuals, 'productive' work at the WHO hasn't existed for years now, and why the view of the WHO as 'all bad' is far from hyperbole these days.

You were trying for a "I am calling out your 'hyperbole' and nitpicking the issue to seem so mature and wise." stance with mrttao, I just pointed out that his view of the WHO as 'all bad' is not at all unreasonable.
anyone who was actually doing productive work at WHO got cancelled fired held accountable (sic), as doing productive work is not woke enough

speaking of being held accountable
 

The Immortal Watch Dog

Well-known member
Hetman
If you want people to take your arguments seriously, hyperbole like this isn't helping.

I'd agree that the WHO is easily an organization the world would be better off without, if only so that a number of smaller organizations could take its place and do everything it's supposed to do more efficiently.

However, absolute statements like this defy even just simple common sense. In any sufficiently large organization, someone is going to be doing something productive, just as a result of how large organizations and numbers work.

Or how about this.

Pedantry and sophistry are for psuedointellectuals and nuance is for topics that aren't centered around the closest thing you can find to outright demonic in a biblical sense; evil.

Which the WHO absolutely is.

Save the nitpicking for people who aren't raising a legitimate point.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top