The Dems cry out that Voter ID is racist and a way to curtail elections. Maybe we should demand they prove this in a court of law?
You can't just "demand they prove" something in court. You have to bring suit for laws broken, or injury caused. Or alternatively, have such rules imposed somewhere and let them bring suit against it. Your post sounds like angsty teen edge lord stupidity. I'm sure you're better than that.
You are living in a fantasy world.
1. The Steel Dossier was explicitly the source used to justify much of the beginnings of the investigation.
Were they supposed to know before investigating it that it was shit? Should they have stopped looking into the actual concerns raised by that investigation just because the initial source was unsound?
2. Trump made a joke at a public rally. It was obviously a joke, it was not a subtle joke, yet the Democrats and their toadies keep insisting this was a super-serious attempt by Trump to get Russia to commit espionage. It was as blatant a lie as it was pathetic. That you are actually taking this blatant lie seriously makes it clear that you are willingly buying into leftist propaganda lies.
Oh! It's a joke! I get it. It's hilarious! He asked a country, known for meddling in democracies overseas, which is inimicable to the US led order, who's brutal dictator he's repeatedly expressed admiration for, to interfere with an election
but he didn't really mean it! God, it's so obvious now. And if that dictator he's tried so hard to upsell had actually done it, why that would just be putin not getting the joke too!
What, exactly, makes it a joke?
3. The courts did not appropriately or adequately handle accusations of corruption into the 2020 elections. Lawsuits brought before hand were often dismissed for 'lack of injury/standing,' and lawsuits brought afterwards were mostly kicked out without the evidence even being examined. Yes, some were handled, and fascinatingly they were generally the ones that were the least well-put-together, and the media strangely focused exclusively on those.
I'm quite happy to go through those cases one by one, if you feel like it. I will bet you real money you can't find one that actually could represent standing and and was kicked for lacking it. Or find one dismissed without consideration that didn't deserve it. The cases heard weren't "the ones that were the least well-put-together". They were the only ones that hit the bare minimum requirements and they all got torn to shreds under any kind of serious examination.
There is a laundry list of claims of corruption that had extremely serious evidence supporting them. The Maricopa County investigation alone proved that there were enough mail-in ballots counted that didn't even have signatures on the envelopes they came in to swing the state of Arizona, and that's before you get into all the other issues.
No, it didn't. There's a claim of
forged signatures on ballots, and that claim is BS.
More recently, it has come out that enough people born in Wisconsin in, IIRC, '1910' voted to swing that state.
This seems to be entirely your imagination.
There is footage showing illegal ballots arriving at counting centers.
There is footage showing all sorts of things. There is no footage that proves or even suggests convincingly that Illegal ballots arriving anywhere. How would footage even show that? Does it follow a truck rocking up to the center, follow containers inside, then show them opened to reveal ballots marked "fake"?
There is footage of ballots literally being pulled out from under tables after the election observers left for the night.
Did they somehow stack up massive piles of fake ballots under the tables whilst the observers were still there? Should the government employees tasked to complete the count ASAP stop counting because the volunteers got tired and left for the night?
Some idiot actually ran a major article explaining how the election had been 'fortified.'
And did you actually read that article, dumbass? Does it reveal and discuss illegal behaviour? Or talk about some grand conspiracy to undermine democracy? Coz pretty sure when I read it, it just talked about the same kind of shit that has always been done by both side, in every election.
The most decisive indicator of all that funny business was up though, is how much leftist social media will ban people for bringing it up, and how they have to use the term 'conspiracy theorist' to try to poison the well of the argument. Yet, for some reason, Hillary doesn't get in trouble for continuing to insist that she really won the 2016 election, and neither do those supporting her.
They wouldn't be trying so hard to suppress the message if they weren't afraid of its contents.
Hahaha! The most decisive indicator is that social media will ban you for peddling it? So, now you're pro toddler rape and murdering everyone darker than chalk? Coz ya know, they'll ban you for peddling that bullshit too. But after all "They wouldn't be trying so hard to suppress the message if they weren't afraid of its contents." As for Hilary election denial, show me some. There's plenty of talk about her winning the popular vote. Because she did. There aren't dozens of frivolous lawsuits from her and her supporters seeking to overturn the election, because that's idiotic. There's no lunatic fringe claiming she actually won the 2016 election and has been running the government in secret from some bunker, just waiting to impose martial law and sweet up every right wing voter in the country. There aren't claims from major media channels that actually she did win the election but magic technology lied in her favour.
I could go on for literal hours with various arguments demonstrating the absurdity of the 'securest election ever,' but I'll leave it at this:
What, exactly, is it about Biden that's supposed to have won him the most votes ever? The man who barely campaigned, was in visible mental and physical decline, and has a history of racist remarks? What is it about him that people loved so much to push him past Trump, who won substantially more votes than he did the first time?
I know a crazy homeless guy who can go on for hours about the aliens that turned him into a man when he really, truly, used to be a dog. Doesn't make it true.
As for what pushed Biden over the line? He wasn't trump. Effectively 0% of democrat voters were ever likely to swing to trump. Simultaneously, trump alienated plenty of republicans. There were entire republic movements against him. Sure he got plenty of votes, because he's (For some reason.) incredibly motivating for a specific type of idiot. He's also insanely divisive. trump burned many, many bridges. He never built a single one. Do you think trump ever did a single solitary thing to change the minds of people who didn't like him to start with? Can you not see how plenty of his choices, stances and behaviours would drive away some of the people who did?
www.newsweek.com
www.google.com
en.m.wikipedia.org
