Of course, but can't I have fun with it until then? Even if it falls flat?
I agree, she is a reputable lawyer and these things take time.
Election 2020 Election Fraud: Let's face it, this year will be a shitshow
- Thread starter MelancholicMechanicus
- Start date
Of course, but can't I have fun with it until then? Even if it falls flat?
I agree, she is a reputable lawyer and these things take time.
Arch Dornan
Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
It's up to you.
Trump campagins was literally ordered to pay legal fees to the other side because their lawsuit was that bad.
The biased liberal judge who wrote this ruling was appointed by Donald Trump
And? It is almost like supreme court is still able to get invovled.
As well as the possibility to make it so no EC is chosen, therefore Trump stays president.
He has two choices to win that
Duke Nukem
Hail to the king baby
PA State court is compromised so this is to be expected, this needs to go to SCOTUS.
DarthOne
☦️
It's also possible that a large metorite might hit the United States tommorow killing everyone and rendering the case mute. Neither possibility have a probability worth considering
This was in federal court with a judge appointed by Donald Trump. Probably a hint about how the supreme court is going to behave.
Actually, GOP of PA may elect Trump EC. So, yeah. States like GA may not elect some
The word you're looking for is moot not mute. One means silent the other means irrelevant.
ReggieLedoux
Well-known member
Being Asteroid'd would make you pretty silent, tbf
lordmcdeath
Well-known member
Lets leave aside, that they will first need to call an emergency session of the PA legislature into session, and manage the vote. They haven't done it yet, and that same stay that prevents certification of elections means that in a couple days they won't have a legislature.
Beyond that, they don't have a veto proof majority. So unless they get dems to cross the governor, the govenor can slap it down. Its why they've always needed either the courts to intervene to delay certification.
lordmcdeath
Well-known member
She could have the best arguments in the world, but the filling is hot garbage. No lawyer I have found has remotely found it satisfactory. Redacted witnesses, using affidavits from other dismissed lawsuits with out disclosure.
Not show direct harm to her plantiffs or directly siting the witness testimony.
The list goes on. She really should have let this cook more and maybe added those receipts, for voter harvesting to the evidencary findings.
Not show direct harm to her plantiffs or directly siting the witness testimony.
The list goes on. She really should have let this cook more and maybe added those receipts, for voter harvesting to the evidencary findings.
She is not having the time to do it.
As someone who does a lot of work that takes time or a mistake can mean something big, having to do something under the clock is a big pain in the ass
Yeah, people keep forgetting that these sorts of cases usually takes months to prep and file, while here they are having to do it in weeks.
lordmcdeath
Well-known member
You can deal with that, by having a larger team and partitioning out the work, it's not perfect. But this is the law, it doesn't award participation trophies. If you screw up, there are consequences. And I might appreciate that this was hard. But Lawyers are without pity. Its not just typos.
DarthOne
☦️
DOOOOOOOM! DOOOOM!
And Trump's campaign (and Sidney) will be worse, they will work on actual facts and actual logic (and will reach levels of spice that not even Leto the Second couldn't, and he merged himself into a sandworm) and not sophistry like you think will your side's day. Because going after people for minor errors when they are under pressure is the very definition of sophistry.
Not that far off, see above.
lordmcdeath
Well-known member
I am not talking about the bloody typos. I am talking about issues with her first exhibit. You can't just redact the identity of a witness and say that you will reveal it in court. Setting up the viel for a witness who you have demonstrated has legitimate fear for their safety requires a completely seperate process. None of which has been done.
That is her lead, the star to the major portion of her Dominion claims. And its going to get chucked. Because that isn't how the law works. You don't get suprise witnesses.
And other errors like using affadavits from dismissed cases without disclosing that they have been dismissed are actively sanctionable. That is the downside to the bloody shotgun approach to lawsuits.
