Not sure what this is in reference to?So one part is insane.
Wooptie doo.
The rest is pretty damn goodm
The deboonkers and thier going on about the Texas caseNot sure what this is in reference to?
Has any other state bypassed thier legislature to pass something?SCOTUS might be reluctant to take this up, if only for the precedent it sets. Imagine if any state can object to the application of law within another state. California being able to object to the application of Texas law. I honestly don't think they are going to want to get anywhere near this.
Has any other state bypassed their legislature to pass something?
And I see no reason why states can't sue each other.Yes. Repeatedly. Either due to court settlements or the executive action.
Putting aside that it looks like it's already docketed.SCOTUS might be reluctant to take this up, if only for the precedent it sets. Imagine if any state can object to the application of law within another state. California being able to object to the application of Texas law. I honestly don't think they are going to want to get anywhere near this.
PA replied saying "YOU CANT DO THAT!!!"
Zerohedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
You were saying?
PA replied by attempting to argue things that have no bearing on the constitutional claim made by Texas.PA replied saying "YOU CANT DO THAT!!!"
Oh I know, I am making the joke that PA is crying Texas is being the national police.PA replied by attempting to argue things that have no bearing on the constitutional claim made by Texas.
The fact is the Texas case is a simple question of "Was it constitutional for these states to change their election laws without going through the legislature?". The fact that a bunch of ballots will get thrown out if the Surpreme Court decides "no", is in fact immaterial.
They are explicitly allowed to sue each other, and that is one of the very few areas the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction given how even before the Civil War there was an instance where militia from one state attacked militia from another.And I see no reason why states can't sue each other.
Hell this may lead to Texas suing cali over its gun laws...
Zerohedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
You were saying?
Did they do that before they started the civil war?They are explicitly allowed to sue each other, and that is one of the very few areas the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction given how even before the Civil War there was an instance where militia from one state attacked militia from another.
Did not know that, but PA is trying to claim act 77 is not an issue.They are explicitly allowed to sue each other, and that is one of the very few areas the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction given how even before the Civil War there was an instance where militia from one state attacked militia from another.