Floridaman
Well-known member
A journalist for a certain news network that called Arizona for Biden Wayy to early.I'm not familiar with Kyle Becker, who is he?
A journalist for a certain news network that called Arizona for Biden Wayy to early.I'm not familiar with Kyle Becker, who is he?
*Dons Blackadder costume* Nothing suspicious there.Speaking of election software...
What does this mean for previous elections?My god, this is bloody hilarious. Every swing state?
4: All voting machines must generate a paper receipt either by a ballot or by the computer printing one out.
5: Every election, 10% of precincts randomly selected will be fully audited with their paper receipts being compared to the electronic tally.
Bigger question what does this mean for this one? Biggest question what does this mean for future ones?What does this mean for previous elections?
The Andrew Jackson solution.Bigger question what does this mean for this one? Biggest question what does this mean for future ones?
Insert JoJo To be continued....Bigger question what does this mean for this one? Biggest question what does this mean for future ones?
We shall next time in Donald Ball Z!
No lie kinda hoping someone in the Trump Administration saw the name of the software a long while ago and like a sane person decided to be suspicious and look into it. If it turns out the freaking name is what tipped them off and made sure they knew what to expect 2020 would all have been worth it.The Andrew Jackson solution.
No, just that when you punch the choices into the screen and are done with your ballot, the machine also prints out a receipt with the ballot information. Not who voted it, but what the votes were.(Again, please note I'm not an US citizen)
I assume from 5. that 4. means a receipt showing who you voted for. I'm against this one solely for the fact it means your vote isn't secret anymore. I'd be rather... wary of having my vote being tracked down.
Other than that, I see no issues.
Well then, they should have no problem with an auditFalse claims from Ronna McDaniel have no merit
In response to the false claims made by Republican National Committee chairwoman Ronna McDaniel, the Michigan Department of State issues the following statements of fact:www.michigan.gov
"The correct results always were and continue to be reflected on the tabulator totals tape and on the ballots themselves. Even if the error in the reported unofficial results had not been quickly noticed, it would have been identified during the county canvass. Boards of County Canvassers, which are composed of 2 Democrats and 2 Republicans, review the printed totals tape from each tabulator during the canvass to verify the reported vote totals are correct."
"As Detroit officials have stated, hundreds of challengers from both parties were inside their absent voter counting board all afternoon and evening. And even after some left, there were always challengers from both parties in the room. Dozens of reporters were in the room as well. Further, some windows were covered to stop those outside from filming the people and private information in the counting board, while other windows were left uncovered to ensure additional transparency."False claims from Ronna McDaniel have no merit
In response to the false claims made by Republican National Committee chairwoman Ronna McDaniel, the Michigan Department of State issues the following statements of fact:www.michigan.gov
"The correct results always were and continue to be reflected on the tabulator totals tape and on the ballots themselves. Even if the error in the reported unofficial results had not been quickly noticed, it would have been identified during the county canvass. Boards of County Canvassers, which are composed of 2 Democrats and 2 Republicans, review the printed totals tape from each tabulator during the canvass to verify the reported vote totals are correct."
"As Detroit officials have stated, hundreds of challengers from both parties were inside their absent voter counting board all afternoon and evening. And even after some left, there were always challengers from both parties in the room. Dozens of reporters were in the room as well. Further, some windows were covered to stop those outside from filming the people and private information in the counting board, while other windows were left uncovered to ensure additional transparency."
Yeah thats a f*ing lie.
The Detriot/Michigan Dem machine is one of the most corrupt in the nation.Well then, they should have no problem with an audit
Then we only need to look further in the past for past allegations of voter fraud. What happens then can happen now.The Detriot/Michigan Dem machine is one of the most corrupt in the nation.
Treat everything said by their elected officials as potential misinformation trying to bury voter fraud and assist in Biden cheating his way to victory.
No more likely that when you get the ballot you sign a log book, they trace the logbook back to you. The ballot itself is completely anonymous. But the tally must match.(Again, please note I'm not an US citizen)
I assume from 5. that 4. means a receipt showing who you voted for. I'm against this one solely for the fact it means your vote isn't secret anymore. I'd be rather... wary of having my vote being tracked down.
Other than that, I see no issues.
Hey, wanna see down ballot GOP was able to get through, but Trump is having issues? Take a gander at this:
I suspected this what was happening; after all it's easier to make a lot of fake ballots quickly if you don't bother filling in the down ballot choices.