This is NOT surprising at all. It's intentional and a REALLLY big problem we HAVE to fix.
'Climate Change' and the coming 'Climate Lockdown'
- Thread starter DarthOne
- Start date
This is NOT surprising at all. It's intentional and a REALLLY big problem we HAVE to fix.
DarthOne
☦️
EXCLUSIVE: Met Office Uses Junk Temperature Measurements to Fill "World Treasure" 350-Year Temperature Record – The Daily Sceptic
Exclusive: The Met Office has been caught using near-junk temperature measurements to fill the 350-year Central England Temperature record – described by Prof William Happer in Climate: The Movie as a "world treasure".
dailysceptic.org
Compilation from polish press
1.We hear in media about infernal temperatures - becouse they were ordered to show normal things as something new.
2.Jacob Nordangard in his book "Rockefeller:Controlling the gane show how oil barons support ecologist and green madness now,to transform society and humans into something else.
3.There is no possible to create model which discover how exactly one thing change weather - becouse wather is too chaotic for that
4.There is 0,04% CO 2 in athosphere - once there was 0,1%,and notching bad happened.But,if it would be less then 0,02,then we would die,becouse plants could not work then.
5.Even if they were right - only EU care about green energy,which mean,that whatever we do would not matter.
1.We hear in media about infernal temperatures - becouse they were ordered to show normal things as something new.
2.Jacob Nordangard in his book "Rockefeller:Controlling the gane show how oil barons support ecologist and green madness now,to transform society and humans into something else.
3.There is no possible to create model which discover how exactly one thing change weather - becouse wather is too chaotic for that
4.There is 0,04% CO 2 in athosphere - once there was 0,1%,and notching bad happened.But,if it would be less then 0,02,then we would die,becouse plants could not work then.
5.Even if they were right - only EU care about green energy,which mean,that whatever we do would not matter.
Doomsought
Well-known member
Environmentalists need to be declared Hostis Humanis Generalis.
mrttao
Well-known member
modern architecture is trash.
The romans built concrete structures that lasted thousands of years.
because they relied on the concrete's compressive strength (use arches dummy).
we build trash made of concrete and rebar that relies on the rebar (steel) tensile strength. but the rebar rusts and breaks. meaning any large scale construct needs to be demolished in about 50 years or so.
Moreover, the roman structures are beautiful while modern structures are gross looking.
We can make steel that basically doesn't even rust, but noooooooooooooooooooooo that shit is too expensive apparently so we need everything metal to turn to powder in a couple decades...
Russian rescue ship Kommuna - Wikipedia
This Russian ship has survived over 100 years of Soviet+Russian maintenance schedules (AKA, none) without corroding into dust.
If they pulled it off 100 years ago, I refuse to believe we struggle today with it.
The secret is that Black Sea is half as salty as your average ocean water, it's not used much, and Russia doesn't mind keeping half rusted through ships in service.We can make steel that basically doesn't even rust, but noooooooooooooooooooooo that shit is too expensive apparently so we need everything metal to turn to powder in a couple decades...
Russian rescue ship Kommuna - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
This Russian ship has survived over 100 years of Soviet+Russian maintenance schedules (AKA, none) without corroding into dust.
If they pulled it off 100 years ago, I refuse to believe we struggle today with it.
Of course ships in general last longer than most things, for example the first US nuclear aircraft carrier is still in service.
Not to mention museum battleships...
Nope, people looked into why this centenarian has remained intact for the years, the steel is in fact basically rust-proof.
Something to do with it being slathered in some sort of oils when it was built.
Myths or propaganda. The ship simply served in relatively light conditions and didn't have much harsh use, as opposed to typical warship or commercial ship, it mostly hung out in port awaiting an emergency due to its role.
What a discovery, if something is used very little it suffers less wear and tear, wow.
Here's something close to a very mundane western equivalent:
Legendary Liberty: Inside the only remaining Liberty ship from D-Day
Almost none of the ships that took part in the D-Day invasion remain, but this is one: the legendary Liberty ship SS Jeremiah O’Brien. Here’s how it looks today.
www.cnet.com
Obviously ships that remained in use after the war didn't last nearly that long.
Last edited:
Liberty ships are like 30-40 years more modern, and had the benefit of being in the US.Myths or propaganda. The ship simply served in relatively light conditions and didn't have much harsh use, as opposed to typical warship or commercial ship, it mostly hung out in port awaiting an emergency due to its role.
What a discovery, if something is used very little it suffers less wear and tear, wow.
Here's something close to a very mundane western equivalent:
Legendary Liberty: Inside the only remaining Liberty ship from D-Day
Almost none of the ships that took part in the D-Day invasion remain, but this is one: the legendary Liberty ship SS Jeremiah O’Brien. Here’s how it looks today.
Need I remind you what the Kuznetsov's innards look like? Kommuna surviving 30 years of Russian abuse is a miracle. Surviving 100 is proof there is a god.
Yet out of the thousands built only the few spared long term use remained in decent condition, duh, why didn't the same excuses apply to two thousand more of them?
Again, Kommuna was not taking much abuse because it's a fucking salvage ship, it didn't do long regular patrols through world's oceans like your typical warship, including Kuznetsov. If it was, it would be long gone.
I think you underestimate how comically terrible the Russians are at ship maintenance, that's the point. ;V Anyways, this discussion is going nowhere, will not be replying to any more of it.
mrttao
Well-known member
I have never seen anyone use rebar that was not already fully rusted before they even inserted it into the concrete.We can make steel that basically doesn't even rust, but noooooooooooooooooooooo that shit is too expensive apparently so we need everything metal to turn to powder in a couple decades...
Russian rescue ship Kommuna - Wikipedia
This Russian ship has survived over 100 years of Soviet+Russian maintenance schedules (AKA, none) without corroding into dust.
If they pulled it off 100 years ago, I refuse to believe we struggle today with it.
apparently common rebar is made from tempered steel instead of stainless steel.
gotta save every cent, right?
its not quite tofu dregs like china. but it is still trash.
there is apparently a site dedicated to pushing stainless steel rebar... it lists a sad 30 examples of structures built with it.
Applications - Stainless Steel Rebar - worldstainless
In Europe stainless steel rebars have been widely used since the mid-80s. In North America, their use in highway bridges has been steadily growing since the mid-90s. Below, you can find some examples of structures that have used stainless steel rebar.
www.stainlesssteelrebar.org
interestingly, the oldest example is from, 1941. progresso pier in mexico
Last edited:
Oh yeah, I've only ever seen pre-rusted rebar get used. Which is fucking weird.I have never seen anyone use rebar that was not already fully rusted before they even inserted it into the concrete.
apparently common rebar is made from tempered steel instead of stainless steel.
gotta save every cent, right?
its not quite tofu dregs like china. but it is still trash.
there is apparently a site dedicated to pushing stainless steel rebar... it lists a sad 30 examples of structures built with it.
Applications - Stainless Steel Rebar - worldstainless
In Europe stainless steel rebars have been widely used since the mid-80s. In North America, their use in highway bridges has been steadily growing since the mid-90s. Below, you can find some examples of structures that have used stainless steel rebar.
interestingly, the oldest example is from, 1941. progresso pier in mexico
Agree.In Poland,for example,building before WW2 was build to last 200 years without serious remont,after 1945 commies changed it to 100,and after 1970 to 50,which is still norm.
Even Churches,which before WW2 was built to last at least 500 years,are built cheaper now.
redstaphocu
Active member
Planned obsolescence only makes sense if you want to make new things to replace what is obsolete. After the architecture we have, terrible it may be, decays, what will replace it?
Will we have cubicle suburbs, pod-houses like worker bees? Or more of the brutalist minimalist trend with a splash of green here and there from cacti houseplants?
Will we have cubicle suburbs, pod-houses like worker bees? Or more of the brutalist minimalist trend with a splash of green here and there from cacti houseplants?
Depend who win.
1.Caliphate - lot of shitty houses
2.China - the same,but bigger
3.lgbt green gulag - gulags
Or,if ,by some miracle,West survive,we would have normal architecture again.