I want Trump's helicopter that's for sale
Jesus! You can't post that kinda stuff in the open! All of this talk about helicopters will get you put on a watch list!
I want Trump's helicopter that's for sale
I want a personal communication with him just so we can share shit posts.I want Trump's helicopter that's for sale
These were both 5-3 decisions it seems, which means Roberts is trying to get these cases through before ACB can fully read up on them and vote on them.
This is some dirty pool, and shows that Roberts may be one of Bush Jrs. most damaging legacies.
I thought Iraq was worse than A-Stan.Nah, still the intervention in Afghanistan
They wernt lying. We just did not act quick enough before the weapons were removed.I thought Iraq was worse than A-Stan.
A-stan at least was harboring bin Laden; Iraq was just Bush Jr trying to impress daddy and using lies to justify the invasion.
Yeah, Iraq had some chem/bio stuff, but not nukes like was sold to the US people.They wernt lying. We just did not act quick enough before the weapons were removed.
There has always been weapons, and multiple sources and arguments on here have shown it.
A-stan has the taliban.
The justification was Chemical weapons and perhaps unknown nukes. Nukes were never the main reason. Iraq was justified.Yeah, Iraq had some chem/bio stuff, but not nukes like was sold to the US people.
A-stan was justified, Iraq wasn't.
Yeah, we should have pulled out of A-stan once Osama was no longer in the country, or after he was killed.The justification was Chemical weapons and perhaps unknown nukes. Nukes were never the main reason. Iraq was justified.
A-stan was only justified when we knew Osama was there, once we knew he left we should have pulled the fuck out, or after he was killed
He made sure he would not be caught with them and got rid of them before we got to them.Yeah, we should have pulled out of A-stan once Osama was no longer in the country, or after he was killed.
But those rare earth metals in A-stan the media never talk about are rather tempting in their own right. Keeping them secure/out of Chinese hands I think was the real impetus to stay after the first few years.
As for Iraq, come on, I'm not some scrub who's uninformed about some of the intricacies of what happened there.
The chem/bio stuff turned out to have been mostly destroyed/dismantled by Saddam due to anti-coup paranoia, but he kept acting like he still had them to scare other countries, and he at most had some uranium cake, not anything close to a usable nuke. I've heard the rumors from a former scout sniper that it was most about getting rid of Saddam's sons because they were worse than the old man.
Getting rid of chemical weapons on short notice isn't exactly as easy as what your describing here, as their are only a select few facilities that can do so properly, doing otherwise would leave traces especially when it involves burning them in the open.He made sure he would not be caught with them and got rid of them before we got to them
I will leave the argument, but real quick. I am not saying he destroyed them.Getting rid of chemical weapons on short notice isn't exactly as easy as what your describing here, as their are only a select few facilities that can do so properly, doing otherwise would leave traces especially when it involves burning them in the open.
Edit: Lets leave this discussion or take it to PM or make a thread to avoid a derail.
Pretty sure he's meant the alleged nukes, not the bio/chem stuff.Getting rid of chemical weapons on short notice isn't exactly as easy as what your describing here, as their are only a select few facilities that can do so properly, doing otherwise would leave traces especially when it involves burning them in the open.
These were both 5-3 decisions it seems, which means Roberts is trying to get these cases through before ACB can fully read up on them and vote on them.
This is some dirty pool, and shows that Roberts may be one of Bush Jrs. most damaging legacies.