Alternate offensive in Hungary 1945

sillygoose

Well-known member
Unfortunately I was unable to attach here a situation map from January 7th from Glantz's symposium on the war situation in late 1944 to the start of the Berlin operation which makes this TL easier to understand, but you can access it here, slide #707:
1986 Art of War Symposium : from the Vistula to the Oder, Soviet offensive operations, October 1944 - March 1945 ; transcript of proceedings.

This particular scenario is an enhancement of the historical Zamoly offensive (look for the 3rd and 23rd Panzer divisions on the map, part of the 1st Cavalry Corps opposite the Soviet 20th GRC) launched on January 7th and ran for a few days to draw Soviet forces off of the axis of advance of the IV SS Panzer Corps to the north and happened during the end of Operation Konrad I and the first part of Konrad II.

During OTL battle of the bulge several units were thrown into the meat grinder in the west very late, showing up around December 28th. In an ATL where the Aachen bulge is the objective I don't think they'll be needed in the west, since it would largely be wrapped up or at least nearly wrapped by units already there by the 28th. That means they would be available for Hungary where there was a serious lack of infantry, especially for the Zamoly operation.

The units would be the 167th Volksgrenadier division (already training in Austria, so close by) and the 9th VG division (training in Denmark), both of which would have at least an extra 2 weeks to train and prepare for combat. I could probably toss in the 79th VG division as well, but let's say it was used in the west per OTL so as not to make it too easy. At the same time as those two divisions were sent to the Bulge IOTL an artillery brigade and rocket launcher brigade were also sent with them, so I'm having both of those sent to Hungary ITTL too.

Historically both divisions were at full strength, about 10,000 men each, while Soviet rifle divisions were averaging about 5000 men or less in Hungary as of January given that they had been attacking since October and hadn't had a chance to refit yet nor were they the priority for replacements. So where I'm going to have them added in each will be at least twice the strength of the opposing individual Soviet divisions.

I'm having them put opposite the Soviet 135th RC which at this point had the 1st Guards Fortified Region (a static defensive formation very light on infantry, but heavy on firepower and engineers to hold a specific sector), 69th Guards Rifle Division, 252nd Rifle Division, and 84th Rifle division. On the 7th the 69th GRD moved to Székesfehérvár to defend the city, where the 4th Guards Army HQ was (also on German situation maps, so they knew it) and to that point only defended by 1 depleted regiment of the 84th RD, but wasn't there as of the morning when the German offensive started. So they'll still be on the line away from the city when this extra element of the offensive would be started.

I'd say that the 167th VGD would be used to replace the 1st Panzer division on the line opposite the 1st GFR and 69th GRD on January 1st so it would have time to rest and prepare for their part in the offensive, rather than being stuck holding the line and launching some feints to distract the Soviets. ITTL the 167th would launch those feints to pin the 69th GRD in place...and since it would have twice the strength of the 69th it would be able to effectively screen the fortified region and feint as well (the Hungarian divisions in the area would help too, which might give them a handy superiority in overall numbers and firepower).

Meanwhile on January 7th when the Zamoly offensive would be launched the 9th VGD and 1st PzD would attack east toward Székesfehérvár since the Zamoly axis is already filled up with attacking armored units. The Panzer-infantry combat team would breach the juncture of the 252nd and 84th RDs (the 84th is already distracted and somewhat engaged by the 23rd PzD attacking to it's right flank) with the infantry pushing the breach into a full opening for the 1st PzD to exploit through toward Székesfehérvár and 4th Guards HQ. Given the weakness of the defenses of the city on the 7th and fact that the 69th GRD wouldn't be there yet and instead pinned down by the 167th VGD 1st PzD should be able to capture the city on it's own while the 9th VGD pushes against the flank of the 84th and 252nd RDs to prevent them from doing anything.

Given that during Operation Konrad III which attacked in this very region with tremendous success, in fact causing the Soviet infantry to run away and leave what meager AT weapons they had to the mercy of the combined arms assault teams, the even weaker Soviet defenses at this time should largely evaporate in the face of a joint infantry-panzer assault and would have no reserves capable of stopping them given that the Zamoly operation was more threatening and consuming the Soviet reserves in the area.

Now I've left out the role of the extra artillery, which is a massive enhancement over OTL for this area. The rocket brigade would be immensely helpful, as the Zamoly attack was actually outgunned by Soviet artillery by a large margin even before Soviet reserves were committed, though they were somewhat saved by the fact that the Soviets were very short on artillery ammo (their major counter offensive on the 9th of January in this area could only muster a 3 minute artillery prep before running out of ammo, which resulted in the offensive failing badly with heavy losses).

I'd say have the rockets committed to the Zamoly operation, which may well make it succeed given how the Soviets counterattacked often and rockets are at their most deadly against troops and armor in the open in denser formations as the Soviets were wont to do. Shattering Soviet counterattacks as well as having a very powerful suppressive fire unit during their attacks would probably allow the offensive to start really making progress compared to the OTL results of just shoving a bulge in Soviet lines.

The Volksartilleriekorps (an army level support unit) would be used to support 9th VGD and 1st PzD, which would give them a massive firepower advantage as not only would it have it's 8 battalions of divisional artillery (4 per division), but 6 additional heavy artillery battalions (including 3x 210mm heavy howitzers) that were entirely motorized. That unit, IIRC, also had a fire direction center that could mass the fires of the entire brigade AND any divisional artillery regiments, which means they'd be heavily outgunning the Soviet rifle corps, which was little more than a heavily reinforced division even at full strength. Historically Konrad III was supported by 1 such unit and achieved firepower dominance which enabled a quick breach of the Soviet lines. Here with fewer divisions attacking and a more focused section of the line to be breached they'd be able to ensure maximum fire support for the limited number of troops they were attacking with as well as heavy concentrations against the limited number of Soviet defenders. Extremely bad news for the Soviets.

IMHO the 84th RD would basically be crushed on the 1st day of the offensive and the 252nd put in such a bad position that it would be a non-factor against the offensive once the initial breach happened and probably have to require support from the 69th GRD just to survive.

That effectively leaves Székesfehérvár virtually undefended and probably taken no later than the afternoon of January 7th...which means 4th GA HQ is overrun by 1st PzD. That means the entire Soviet defense is fucked since they'd have lost their army command as well as major supply center and now have a massive flank breach that would allow both the 9th VGD and 1st PzD to slam into the flank of the Soviet troops trying to hold Zamoly and counterattacking the 1st Cav Corps. At that point IV SS Panzer Corps to the north, 1st Cav Corps attacking Zamoly, and the Székesfehérvár attack group would be able to pincer the 4th Guards Army corps between them (68th RC, 5th GCC, 20th GRC, parts of the 31st and 21st GRCs, and part of the 135th GRC). Maybe I lack imagination, but it seems like a plausible course of action by the Germans given their historical goals for the Zamoly operation had they had the extra forces ITTL.

Crushing all those Soviet corps in several days instead of Operation Konrad II (butterflied by the success on the 7th) would free up enormous German resources to continue to advance on Budapest, as that would free up at least 2 corps on their side, plus eliminate the major southwestern flank threat that hampered the SS corps AND opens up major new supply routes for the offensive. The Soviets lose massive amounts of men, equipment, and supplies, as the 4th Guards Army would virtually cease to exist, leaving only the 46th army, the force attacking Budapest from the west of the Danube, to hold the line. Not only that, but the 3rd Ukrainian Front would lose virtually ALL of its armor and non-infantry divisions/corps.

That'd force 2nd Ukrainian Front to break off it's assaults east of the Danube on Budapest as 3rd UkF would require at least 2 rifle corps to hold its positions or have to pull back over the Danube ASAP. 46th Army would also have to break off any attacks on Budapest, which means that the city, virtually on the brink of collapse, would be able to hold its positions with much less stress and be able to organize attacks to aid relieving forces.

57th Army (not pictured on map, it's south Lake Balaton) would also have to contribute corps to reestablish lines south of Székesfehérvár, which in turn makes it vulnerable to attacks by the German 2nd army (or 2nd Panzer army, I forget which), which was holding the line opposite the Soviet 57th (historically that was called Operation Icebreaker, a plan to help support Konrad III as 57th Army corps were heading north to stem the breach in Soviet lines). If also supported by Army Group F in Croatia holding the Drava river line, they could also then cut off the 3rd UkF supply lines to (and escape routes of) the 57th Army via Mohacs, which would be fatal to the 3rd UkF and require a retreat by any surviving units over the Danube and probably leave them unable to attack again probably for the rest of the war even with replacement armies sent from STAVKA reserve. They'd just be able to hold the Danube line, which would be too strong for them to breach if properly defended by a German-Hungarian army given breathing room to set up proper defenses, which they weren't when the Soviets originally crossed it in early December 1944.

Also the Bulgarian army would be trapped by the Army Group F attack over the Drava river and wiped out, which creates some interesting political issues for the Soviets, while the Yugoslavs now have to face the Germans in Croatia without any Soviet support, something that would probably cause major problems for them and prevent their historical advance in the region and collapse of German defenses in Spring.

All of that prevents the fall of Budapest and saves at least 70,000 Axis troops (half German, half Hungarian) in the capital, preserves Axis positions in the region and frees up a lot of economic resources that had been lost in December 1944 (including important oil refineries in Budapest) probably results in substantial new manpower resources (both PoW labor AND Hungarian volunteers since after experiencing Soviet occupation all the men who had been dodging the draft or actually supporting the Soviets in the hopes of good treatment and a quick end to the war found out what Soviet occupation really meant and resulted in them mobbing German units to try and volunteer to fight every time a village was liberated per a number of accounts of the campaign). Also all those captured Soviet weapons and supplies could be in turn used to equip the Hungarians, who were notoriously ill-equipped by this point in the war, which would tremendously boost their combat effectiveness, both as a result of being able to match Soviet firepower, but also by improved morale, as they wouldn't be going into a fight knowing they'd be outgunned and outnumbered.

It's a complete game changer event for this front and prevents the Soviets from being able to advance into Austria and Czechoslovakia in April. Plus it means 6th Panzer Army when shipped East won't go to Hungary, it goes to Poland where it was really needed. Not only that, but a lot of powerful German units in the area now are freed up to go after the 2nd UkF and won't suffer the losses they took IOTL launching Konrad III and barely surviving Soviet counterattacks when the operation stalled. 2nd UkF would be on it's own for a long while while 3rd UkF is rebuilt, so would be quite vulnerable to the now freed up Axis forces, which would amount to at least 2 panzer corps, one of them a powerful, well led, and highly experienced SS unit. A panzer corps was equivalent to Soviet tank army and at this point there was only a single such Soviet unit in Hungary, the heavily depleted 6th Guards Tank Army, which was down to about 20-25% strength by January 20th as a result of a failed offensive north of the Danube.

If able to get it moving quickly enough after the liberation of Budapest IV Panzer Corps had the strength to attack east of the Danube via Budapest and crush what was left of the 6th GTA and whatever significant residual Soviet armored units were available to the overstretched and worn down 2nd UkF. That pretty much means the Soviets are stuck reinforcing a collapsing front rather than reinforcing Poland or the East Prussian offensive in January-February, while the Germans can send two very powerful SS panzer corps (I and II, the corps making up the 6th Panzer Army) to Poland. Even assuming the Soviets do just as well there as they did IOTL by February the addition of the 6th Panzer army to Operation Solstice then Zhukov's Belarussian Front is likely to have a bad end and require the Soviets to pull back their lines to cover the massive gapping hole that would result. Plus now they'd lack the necessary reinforcements/replacements they got to continue pushing against Berlin/East Prussia as a result of needing to reinforce to prevent from being run out of Hungary entirely.

Thoughts? Any opinions that it would have on the rest of the war?
 
Last edited:

History Learner

Well-known member
frRQfwue_o.png


Here's the map, in case anybody has trouble pulling it up.
 

PsihoKekec

Swashbuckling Accountant
At that point IV SS Panzer Corps to the north, 1st Cav Corps attacking Zamoly, and the Székesfehérvár attack group would be able to pincer the 4th Guards Army corps between them (68th RC, 5th GCC, 20th GRC, parts of the 31st and 21st GRCs, and part of the 135th GRC).
Crushing all those Soviet corps in several days
You are making an assumption that Soviets will just give up and die as soon as Germans breach their flanks, assumption that derailed multiple German operations during the war.

Also the Bulgarian army would be trapped by the Army Group F attack over the Drava river and wiped out,
And where is army group F supposed to find the resources to carry out offensive on such scale? They had strength to launch local attacks and establish bridgeheads but don't have reserves and logistics to push into operational depth.
 

sillygoose

Well-known member
You are making an assumption that Soviets will just give up and die as soon as Germans breach their flanks, assumption that derailed multiple German operations during the war.
You are making the flawed assumption that because the Soviets had done it in specific circumstances that they could in this specific circumstance, which would not have been the case given how worn down they were and fully committed to certain actions. This wasn't March 1945.

I'd like to know specifically in this instance how the Soviets could have stopped or gotten out of it with the forces on hand.

And where is army group F supposed to find the resources to carry out offensive on such scale? They had strength to launch local attacks and establish bridgeheads but don't have reserves and logistics to push into operational depth.
Using the 3 divisions that were already guarding the Drava and who actually did cross that river in March 1945 during Spring Awakening. I'd like to know why you think they didn't have the reserves and logistics to cross the river when they did just that less than two months later in worse war cirucmstances.
 

PsihoKekec

Swashbuckling Accountant
First of all can you explain some discrepancies, some of the units involved in this operation by your timeline should OTL be still getting mauled in the Ardennes and Schnee Eifel. What are the butterflies that enabled them participation here?.

You are making the flawed assumption that because the Soviets had done it in specific circumstances that they could in this specific circumstance, which would not have been the case given how worn down they were and fully committed to certain actions. This wasn't March 1945.

I'd like to know specifically in this instance how the Soviets could have stopped or gotten out of it with the forces on hand.
I'm not denying Soviets would get badly mauled and pushed towards Budapest, but units of the 4th GTA would break out and would suffer heavy casualties in doing so, rendering them combat incapable, but not completely annihilated. Soviets would have to abandon siege of Budapest (a huge propaganda blow) and suffer considerable casualties, but they would be able to bog down German offensive, especially due to German logistic issues.

Using the 3 divisions that were already guarding the Drava and who actually did cross that river in March 1945 during Spring Awakening. I'd like to know why you think they didn't have the reserves and logistics to cross the river when they did just that less than two months later in worse war cirucmstances.
I said they can launch local attacks and establish bridgeheads, but they can't make push into operational depth, thus making capture of Mohacs very unlikely. The problem is that army group F was fully committed to counteroffensive on Srem front during the January so they weren't able to carry out such attack. Also the March attack wasn't carried out by the defending divisions but by Army Group reserves, which meant those reserves were not available when Yugoslav Army breached the Bihač defense line, outflanking the Srem front (104th was transported directly from Drava to Bihač but arrived too late).
 

ATP

Well-known member
If germans keep rolling 6,and soviets 1.....it would be possible.
But so what? at that point,they arleady lost.Only difference would be that part of Yugoslavia and maybe Hungary would be taken by Allies,not soviets.
So - we would have western yugoslavia and maybe western Hungary.Which mean less bloody balkans wars and stronger Serbia,croatia and maybe Hungary in our times.
 

sillygoose

Well-known member
First of all can you explain some discrepancies, some of the units involved in this operation by your timeline should OTL be still getting mauled in the Ardennes and Schnee Eifel. What are the butterflies that enabled them participation here?.
Strictly speaking they weren't really necessary in the Ardennes, but as mentioned early in the OP this was written originally in conjunction with the 'Small Solution' against the Aachen Bulge western offensive instead of Hitler's 'Big Solution' through the Ardennes.


I'm not denying Soviets would get badly mauled and pushed towards Budapest, but units of the 4th GTA would break out and would suffer heavy casualties in doing so, rendering them combat incapable, but not completely annihilated. Soviets would have to abandon siege of Budapest (a huge propaganda blow) and suffer considerable casualties, but they would be able to bog down German offensive, especially due to German logistic issues.
They did historically, but that's the entire point of having the extra infantry and artillery here ITTL; the reason the Soviets were able to break out against Konrad III was the lack of infantry involved. Having 20,000 infantry fixes that problem, as the Soviet forces at Zamoly, not counting the ~5000 men of the 84th RD (maybe less, that was roughly the average for the 4th GA) only numbered about 10,000 men total. So in addition to the roughly 5000 German infantry present IOTL there are now 10,000 more infantry (not counting the 167th VGD and part of two Hungarian divisions, which are dealing with the 69th GRD and 1st GFR). The Soviets can't really break out, since the units deep in the pocket are already engaged, while the flanking units are defending against heavy assaults by veteran panzer divisions; these extra infantry division and the freed up 1st PzD overload the Soviet defenses around Zamoly and Székesfehérvár, while the 69th GRD is pinned by the 167th and prevented from reinforcing the 4th GA HQ.

So tell me, which area do the Soviet break out from, the one sector with the IV SS Panzer Corps or the one with the 23rd and 1st Panzer divisions and 9th VGD backed up by a Volksartilliekorps and rocket artillery brigade? Keep in mind that thanks to said rocket artillery the Soviets around Zamoly are even more hard pressed than IOTL and their counterattacks will have to be split, so something is going to have to give somewhere.

What German logistical issues did they have at the time in Hungary? They had little problem with supply as they had multiple major rail lines from Vienna, while the Soviets were supplying over a couple of pontoon bridges over the Danube and their main rail line over the river was blocked by Budapest. Strategic bombing hadn't really impacted much in the area and the main industrial hub left unbombed at this point was in Upper Silesia, which was close by with relatively undamaged rail lines. The WAllies didn't bomb the area until March, months after this POD.


I said they can launch local attacks and establish bridgeheads, but they can't make push into operational depth, thus making capture of Mohacs very unlikely. The problem is that army group F was fully committed to counteroffensive on Srem front during the January so they weren't able to carry out such attack. Also the March attack wasn't carried out by the defending divisions but by Army Group reserves, which meant those reserves were not available when Yugoslav Army breached the Bihač defense line, outflanking the Srem front (104th was transported directly from Drava to Bihač but arrived too late).
You're basing that on...?
Again the divisions that would do it in March were at this point already guarding the Drava against the Bulgarians. The divisions were not involved in the offensive on the Srem. Note when I say AG-F that includes AG-E forces as well, which were under command of AG-F.

The Yugoslavs weren't ready to do what they did in March against AG-F in January.

Also as part of the Aachen offensive POD the Alsace offensive won't happen, which means the 2nd Mountain division is available for the operation across the Drava. Something I should have mentioned earlier. It wasn't involved in the operation in Alsace, but was posted there to free up forces who would particpate.
 
Last edited:

sillygoose

Well-known member
If germans keep rolling 6,and soviets 1.....it would be possible.
You're basing that on...? The Germans did do almost exactly this in late January during Konrad III and it was only the lack of infantry divisions that allowed the Soviets to break out and the pocket in this area from being liquidated.

But so what? at that point,they arleady lost.
So we're only allowed to discuss the PODs that you deem worthwhile?

Only difference would be that part of Yugoslavia and maybe Hungary would be taken by Allies,not soviets.
So - we would have western yugoslavia and maybe western Hungary.Which mean less bloody balkans wars and stronger Serbia,croatia and maybe Hungary in our times.
I'd say that is a pretty huge POD for the Cold War and those peoples. Not only that, but Stalin takes a hit and might have his 1945 heart attack and stroke sooner than he did.
 

ATP

Well-known member
You're basing that on...? The Germans did do almost exactly this in late January during Konrad III and it was only the lack of infantry divisions that allowed the Soviets to break out and the pocket in this area from being liquidated.


So we're only allowed to discuss the PODs that you deem worthwhile?


I'd say that is a pretty huge POD for the Cold War and those peoples. Not only that, but Stalin takes a hit and might have his 1945 heart attack and stroke sooner than he did.

Hmm...you are right.They need to roll 6 only once,and soviets do not need roll 1 to lost.
And you are right again,that POD which do not change history fully are still worthwile.
Rescuing any amount of people from soviet hell is always worthy change,and stronger Hungary and Serbia now would help Europe.
But you are mistaken about Stalin - he was almost surely murdered.Idiot forget,that people which he plan purge could do that first to him.
 

sillygoose

Well-known member
But you are mistaken about Stalin - he was almost surely murdered.Idiot forget,that people which he plan purge could do that first to him.
You're mistakenly referring to his death in 1953. I'm talking about the earlier stroke and later in the year heart attack in 1945 that crippled him for the remainder of his life:
.
Stalin's health deteriorated towards the end of World War II. He suffered from atherosclerosis as a result of heavy smoking, a mild stroke around the time of the Victory Parade (May 1945), and a severe heart attack in October 1945.[1]
Medvedev, Zhores A. (2006). The Unknown Stalin. London: I.B. Tauris. p. 6. ISBN 978-1-85043-980-6.
 

sillygoose

Well-known member
Hmm...you are right.They need to roll 6 only once,and soviets do not need roll 1 to lost.
Not sure if you're being sarcastic or not.

And you are right again,that POD which do not change history fully are still worthwile.
How does this not change history dramatically? The Soviets losing the majority of an entire front and breaking the siege of Budapest in 1945 before Yalta is an enormous change. Not only that, but this could butterfly away Yalta, as Stalin is either suffering from an early stroke or just decides to delay the conference to clean up the mess first to get a better deal at the conference. Beyond that 6th Panzer Army not being needed in Hungary means it is available for Operation Solstice:
There is a real chance that the 1st Belorussian Front could be largely destroyed in early February. Here is a discussion started by our very our @History Learner :

In addition to the historical 6th Panzer army used for Operation Spring Awakening, several other divisions from Hungary can be used in this ATL Soltice, like 16th SS panzergrenadier division and IV SS Panzer Corps:

Plus then without 3rd Ukrainian Front there is no Vienna offensive in March:

Rescuing any amount of people from soviet hell is always worthy change,and stronger Hungary and Serbia now would help Europe.
Not just them, but quite a few others, including the Austrians and maybe Czechs.
 

ATP

Well-known member
You're mistakenly referring to his death in 1953. I'm talking about the earlier stroke and later in the year heart attack in 1945 that crippled him for the remainder of his life:
.
Death of Stalin in 1945? that would be BIG gamechanger.Soviets leader would start kill each other to become next stalin,and it means more states free.
If we get lucky,we could even get soviet cyvil war.In that case entire Europe could be free.

But if there would be no cyvil war,all we get would be few free states.Well,better that then nothing.

P.S about german counteroffensive - they arleady have up to 1000 infrared optics for their tanks,but for unknown reason most was never used.
You could add them to help german defeat soviets.
 

History Learner

Well-known member
@History Learner care to comment on the impact my scenario playing out as described above would have on Solstice/the rest of the war?

Been a minute since I reviewed/wrote all that, so I'm kinda rusty on this era of the war.

Hard to see what, exactly, the Germans would do at this juncture but using 16th SS Panzergrenadier division as flank guard (along with the OTL divisions used in that capacity) would screen 6th Panzer Army's advance on Poznan nicely. If the railway network could support it, using IV SS Panzer Corps in Pomerania would be advantageous, in that it would tie down Soviet forces as cover for the 6th to advance; should Zhukov re-orient to face the latter, the Germans forces to his rear could strike given the relative forces available.
 

sillygoose

Well-known member
Been a minute since I reviewed/wrote all that, so I'm kinda rusty on this era of the war.

Hard to see what, exactly, the Germans would do at this juncture but using 16th SS Panzergrenadier division as flank guard (along with the OTL divisions used in that capacity) would screen 6th Panzer Army's advance on Poznan nicely. If the railway network could support it, using IV SS Panzer Corps in Pomerania would be advantageous, in that it would tie down Soviet forces as cover for the 6th to advance; should Zhukov re-orient to face the latter, the Germans forces to his rear could strike given the relative forces available.
Assuming they did that and they achieved their goal of defeating Zhukov, how do you think that would impact the rest of the conflict?
 

stevep

Well-known member
All

The partition zones were agreed at Yalta in 4th-11th Feb. Is a relatively brief Soviet set back here going to change those considerably. Especially since Roosevelt was still seeing Stalin as a reliable partner and was already in his last weeks so probably isn't going to have the will and energy to seek to push him hard.

If this operation goes a little better it might delay the final German collapse - provided that Hitler allows them to withdraw into better defensive positions after it. [Otherwise you might end up speeding things up a little as the Soviet counter strike could find them in exposed conditions]. If so the US might get a bit more of Bohemia but if Yalta isn't changed they will still return it. British forces in Italy might occupy a little more territory before Tito's partisans and the Red Army get there but even if this isn't handed over as well I can't see it being significant.

You need a markedly earlier POD for the allies to decide that Stalin is a clear future threat and think what they can do to limit this while still needing the Soviets for the bulk of the fighting and dying against the Nazis.
 

sillygoose

Well-known member
The partition zones were agreed at Yalta in 4th-11th Feb. Is a relatively brief Soviet set back here going to change those considerably. Especially since Roosevelt was still seeing Stalin as a reliable partner and was already in his last weeks so probably isn't going to have the will and energy to seek to push him hard.
I think you're misunderstanding the dynamic at play. The Wallies didn't think Stalin was challengeable due to the power of his armies and their need for said armies to keep Wallied losses down. By this point both FDR and Churchill were worried over Stalin's foot dragging over helping them deal with the Bulge and his entire behavior over Poland, but there was nothing they could actually do about it other than hope for the best and placate him, especially given FDR's desire to bring him into the war against Japan. If Stalin's forces however suffer major reverses in the meantime and it's clear they are weaker than thought and unable to likely be able to help against Japan, then the line can become tougher at Yalta.

Stalin also understood the power dynamic, so might end up delaying Yalta until he could get a better hand to bargain with during the conference, as the entire reason said conference was called was because it looked like the Soviets were very close to ending the war and seizing their goals (this was before Op. Solstice that then caused Stalin to delay the final push on Berlin until April).

If this operation goes a little better it might delay the final German collapse - provided that Hitler allows them to withdraw into better defensive positions after it. [Otherwise you might end up speeding things up a little as the Soviet counter strike could find them in exposed conditions]. If so the US might get a bit more of Bohemia but if Yalta isn't changed they will still return it. British forces in Italy might occupy a little more territory before Tito's partisans and the Red Army get there but even if this isn't handed over as well I can't see it being significant.
If this operation goes as I laid out, it isn't simply better, rather it goes outstandingly and drags out the war for months, leaving the Wallies the ones to make it to Berlin first especially if 6th Panzer army enables the destruction of most of Zhukov's Front during Solstice. Not even Stalin could handle losing most of two Fronts by this point in the war.

How would the Soviets counterstrike them? From where and with what forces???

Yalta might very well be delayed and the borders set significantly further east and by then Truman is president and quite a bit more hostile to the Soviets.

You need a markedly earlier POD for the allies to decide that Stalin is a clear future threat and think what they can do to limit this while still needing the Soviets for the bulk of the fighting and dying against the Nazis.
No need to consider him a threat (which Churchill did), though Truman did and would be a harder negotiator if Yalta were delayed and he got to set the terms. IOTL Truman was hamstrung by FDR's agreement at Yalta.

Frankly the Soviets staying in the war would enable the Wallies to overrun Germany and get the majority of German forces to surrender without much of a fight as they were already collapsing as of February in the west.

What the Wallies wanted was Stalin's help in Asia more than Europe at that point, but that was mainly FDR's initiative and if it is Truman's foreign policy that is setting the table at the alt-Yalta things could end up very different from OTL.

From the Wikipedia on the Yalta conference:
Each of the three leaders had his own agenda for post-war Germany and liberated Europe. Roosevelt wanted Soviet support in the U.S. Pacific War against Japan, specifically for the planned invasion of Japan (Operation August Storm), as well as Soviet participation in the United Nations; Churchill pressed for free elections and democratic governments in Eastern and Central Europe (specifically Poland); and Stalin demanded a Soviet sphere of political influence in Eastern and Central Europe as an essential aspect of the USSR's national security strategy. Stalin's position at the conference was one which he felt was so strong that he could dictate terms. According to U.S. delegation member and future Secretary of State James F. Byrnes, "it was not a question of what we would let the Russians do, but what we could get the Russians to do."[9]

Without Stalin feeling he could dictate terms would he really want to do the conference at that date or wait until he could get a better strategic position to dictate terms from?
 
Last edited:

History Learner

Well-known member
Assuming they did that and they achieved their goal of defeating Zhukov, how do you think that would impact the rest of the conflict?

I'm with you, it seems, fully. Very likely the Western Allies meet the Soviets at the Oder, if not further East. Austria likely ends up in the Western Zone and thus joins NATO, while the liberation of Bohemia by the Anglo-Americans would probably result in them being neutral in the coming Cold War. I still foresee Stalin joining the Pacific War at some point, but if he's become...uncooperative...in Europe or something of the sort, it's up in the air how effective and when said cooperation would be.
 

sillygoose

Well-known member
I'm with you, it seems, fully. Very likely the Western Allies meet the Soviets at the Oder, if not further East. Austria likely ends up in the Western Zone and thus joins NATO, while the liberation of Bohemia by the Anglo-Americans would probably result in them being neutral in the coming Cold War. I still foresee Stalin joining the Pacific War at some point, but if he's become...uncooperative...in Europe or something of the sort, it's up in the air how effective and when said cooperation would be.
Think the Wallies might be able to force more fair elections in other areas? Might Hungary end up split in half?
 

History Learner

Well-known member
Think the Wallies might be able to force more fair elections in other areas? Might Hungary end up split in half?

OTL there was a serious insurgency in both Poland and Romania, so I would be surprised if Stalin doesn't find himself facing a better armed one in Poland and one in Hungary too. Presuming something like 1956 happens, that'll be interesting given a NATO land connection with Hungary.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top