"A Product of an Overwhelmingly White, Straight European and Male Cadre"

That logic is backwards because the way you arrive at objectivity is through seeking universal consistency in order to overcome historical, cultural and personal biases.

Just go and realise that they’re not really out to help or improve anything or correct any actual wrongs

They just want something to “fight” whilst essentially roleplaying as revolutionaries, so they will dig up or come up with new problems they have no problems with or can ignore the very next day

There’s nothing much wrong with most great knowledge and literature having come from white dudes. Even non-white dudes like me can appreciate their stuff without having an inferiority complex. After all, I’m not a writer myself and nor do I take much pride in guys like Manny Pacquiao being the same nationality as me
 
At the same time they believe that white people are genetically incapable of understanding Mayan cultural works, and any attempt to do so would only produce the result of racist thoughts thus whites are only permitted to praise the works of other cultures without making any attempt at critical thinking.
Well, in this specific example, they're not actually wrong. White people can't understand Mayan cultural works. Of course, neither can the Mayan, because the Spanish burned it all!

S
eriously, there are only 4 known Mayan codices left in the whole world due to the Spanish going all Conquistador on them. It's only in the past half century we even figured out how to read Mayan, and we have no clue the extent of what as lost thanks to the Spanish destroying them.
 
That logic is backwards because the way you arrive at objectivity is through seeking universal consistency in order to overcome historical, cultural and personal biases.
Overcoming historical, cultural, and personal biases is the goal of a lot of postmodern thinkers. They just have some rather... creative means to get there.

To understand how this works, check out this video deconstructing the idea of human rights from a postmodern perspective.



In short, they'd take a look at things we'd all think are "objectively true" and go "well, what if what we think is objective actually isn't? Dum dum dum!"
 
The problem with the far left/SJWs is that they think race and culture are the same thing. To them, a person of Hispanic descent cannot understand the western canon on a genetic level, which is why teaching them the western cannon is racist. At the same time they believe that white people are genetically incapable of understanding Mayan cultural works, and any attempt to do so would only produce the result of racist thoughts thus whites are only permitted to praise the works of other cultures without making any attempt at critical thinking.

The pattern is entirely consistent, whenever you criticize a culture, it is treated as the criticism of a genetic race.
Which is hilariously exactly what whire nationalists believe.
 
You've seen this story again and again.




This follows the trend of Humanities Courses being cancelled at another college for similar reasons.

At this rate, I think the far right is going to lay claim to all of the classics of the Western Canon. Yay?

Oh for fucks sake...
 
Anyone can understand a work, but the level of effort required is simply much harder for those of different cultures, because you have to study the entire culture to truly appreciate the work. This makes it much easier to be misinterpreted—accidentally or intentionally.
 
Which is hilariously exactly what whire nationalists believe.
But Leftists believe the exact opposite of what white nationalists believe though.

Leftists assimilate genetic race into culture, claiming that so-called "genetic" differences are a result of culture.

White nationalists assimilate culture into genetic race, claiming so-called "cultural" differences are a result of genetics.

Both are reductionists who think race and culture are the same thing, but they would differ in how they arrive at that conclusion.
 
You see ... they don't believe in objectivity!

There's even a not-inconsiderable strain of them that believe thought and belief literally alter reality.

Oh god, they believe we live in MtA! Which is pretty hilarious, sad, and possibly even "dangerous", though it is hard to use that word given how abused it is. After all dateless women call men having standards, "dangerous".
 
Oh god, they believe we live in MtA! Which is pretty hilarious, sad, and possibly even "dangerous", though it is hard to use that word given how abused it is. After all dateless women call men having standards, "dangerous".


And they dislike women willingly being traditional
 

And they dislike women willingly being traditional

Just them being jealous, I think. Since such women, even if it is for show, are going to be more appealing then them. Also there is the ideology, but I am pretty sure we can all attest to these people being quite driven by jealousy.
 
Just them being jealous, I think. Since such women, even if it is for show, are going to be more appealing then them. Also there is the ideology, but I am pretty sure we can all attest to these people being quite driven by jealousy.

I'm of the opinion that the worst feminists actually HATE other women for making choices like being feminine and/or sexy without being a bitch about it. Because being either of the two ultimately panders to males.

Therefore, even if they voluntarily choose to do things like NOT chop off their boobs in Hollywood, they're victims of the patriarchy. Should direct that at Islam with their actual "Internalised Mysogyny" in practice
 
I'm of the opinion that the worst feminists actually HATE other women for making choices like being feminine and/or sexy without being a bitch about it. Because being either of the two ultimately panders to males.

Therefore, even if they voluntarily choose to do things like NOT chop off their boobs in Hollywood, they're victims of the patriarchy. Should direct that at Islam with their actual "Internalised Mysogyny" in practice

Those are not at all mutually exclusive, and I think that is quite a valid take. They do hate other women for making those choices, in part due to them being jealous of them, and of course their ideology, and I am sure a few other things. Since, things seldom boil down to being solely caused by one thing, or another.
 
Those are not at all mutually exclusive, and I think that is quite a valid take. They do hate other women for making those choices, in part due to them being jealous of them, and of course their ideology, and I am sure a few other things. Since, things seldom boil down to being solely caused by one thing, or another.

Intersectionalism kinda makes multiple reasons as to why they hate this "Overwhelmingly White, Straight European and Male Cadre"
 
Yes, that too. But I am sure you apprehend my meaning, that people's sentiments seldom spring solely from one (or a handful of) source(s), Humans are complicated after all.

I know, it's why this may take awhile, I think those people know the contradictions deep down and that's what's driving them to more and more insanity alongside that one last contradiction.

Deep down, they aren't sure if they actually care or they may not care to begin with.

To be a fanatic for something you don't believe in or know intellectually deep down is wrong, is a horrible sort of suffering. Albeit self inflected and also the result of hanging around specific douchebag cliques
 
Last edited:
Oh god, they believe we live in MtA! Which is pretty hilarious, sad, and possibly even "dangerous", though it is hard to use that word given how abused it is. After all dateless women call men having standards, "dangerous".

One of MtA's developers even refused to write down how one of the in-game factions does their magic ... because he was worried players might accidentally cast real spells at the game table!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top