Wait, wait wait. Silicone?! I’m gonna need a source for the ‘materials for it can only be found in one desert in Africa’ claim. Because I think you got that bit wrong.

I should clarify, silicon of the proper purities(generally speaking, Quartz Sand is used). But I'll admit to having been working off bad info there; should have looked into it.

And not silicone, that is something very different.
 
Note that the whole "one place in the world" thing in manufacturing supply chains almost always means "this is the purest known natural deposit of this stuff in the world, and that makes it exponentially more affordable than any other deposit since it requires that much less chemical refining." When such deposits exist, they pretty much have total market dominance for as long as the deposit lasts, but that doesn't mean the entire industry is gone forever when that one source is gone; it's just they have to go with the next purest deposit for whatever price that comes to.

For example, right now the world's sole source of ultra-pure quartz is Spruce Pines, North Carolina. The lesser grade quartz out of here is crushed to make the pure white sand that's used to 'stock' the finest artificial beaches and golf courses for the rich. The best is critical to silicon semiconductor production; the only way to process electronic-grade refined polysilicon without contaminating it is to use fused crucibles made of this finest-grade quartz. And that best stuff comes solely from Spruce Pines; it's the world's only current commercial source of Iota 8 grade quartz, which is 99.9992% purity and sells for $10,000 a ton. For comparison, ordinary construction-grade quartz sand costs a couple of bucks per ton.

(For the silicon itself, you use high quality silica, but you *don't* use this super high purity stuff because it's pointless; you're refining silicon metal out of that silica, as opposed to the quartz crucibles which are solid silicon dioxide.)
 
Last edited:
Amy Coney Barret and Brett Kavanaugh are institutional simps. Pathetic rino fucks who are John Roberts clones. Gorsuch was the only pick Trump got worth a damn. And only then because Gorsuch is crazy and undermines our institutions by existing. so yeah the establishment got what it wanted there as well minus one schizo.

Trump's first term is only saved from being a lame duck"more of the same" presidency because he managed to temporarily wrest control of the economy from the globalists.

The abortion thing was really important to me, so I do give him credit for that. Last time this topic came up someone pointed that out to me so, yeah, credit where credit is due.
 
Also, the system won't 'come apart', because too many people are invested in the status quo and quite frankly do not want a civil war or revolution, even if they do think DC is corrupt or working against them.
I don't think it matters what anyone wants; the system cannot sustain itself indefinitely under the best conditions. Something is going to give. We've already seen it propped up in the past (too big to fail), and the longer our global economy is kept on life support the harder it falls after every stumble.
 
Note that the whole "one place in the world" thing in manufacturing supply chains almost always means "this is the purest known natural deposit of this stuff in the world, and that makes it exponentially more affordable than any other deposit since it requires that much less chemical refining." When such deposits exist, they pretty much have total market dominance for as long as the deposit lasts, but that doesn't mean the entire industry is gone forever when that one source is gone; it's just they have to go with the next purest deposit for whatever price that comes to.

For example, right now the world's sole source of ultra-pure quartz is Spruce Pines, North Carolina. The lesser grade quartz out of here is crushed to make the pure white sand that's used to 'stock' the finest artificial beaches and golf courses for the rich. The best is critical to silicon semiconductor production; the only way to process electronic-grade refined polysilicon without contaminating it is to use fused crucibles made of this finest-grade quartz. And that best stuff comes solely from Spruce Pines; it's the world's only current commercial source of Iota 8 grade quartz, which is 99.9992% purity and sells for $10,000 a ton. For comparison, ordinary construction-grade quartz sand costs a couple of bucks per ton.

(For the silicon itself, you use high quality silica, but you *don't* use this super high purity stuff because it's pointless; you're refining silicon metal out of that silica, as opposed to the quartz crucibles which are solid silicon dioxide.)

Ah, did the other source run dry? As said, working off old info.
 
Ah, did the other source run dry? As said, working off old info.

No, I don't know what element is sourced from the African desert.

I'm saying there are multiple steps in the process where there's that kind of one-highly-specific-source dependency, and it's not because that's the sole source in the world and we're all screwed forever without it, but because the best current source ends up being orders of magnitude cheaper than any other.
 
Trump appointed three SCOTUS judges, a full third of the sitting court. If we're going with the idea the Establishment prevented him from doing anything, please explain how he got those three judges appointed and his tax bill passed.
I am under the impression that he just rubber stamped the judges that the Republican establishment handed to him, so there's no conflict at all there.

As for the implication that Trump and the Republican establishment weren't both completely on board with tax cuts ... I literally don't know what to say here. Please refer to the past century?
Let it all burn and then come in and pillage the remnants and reorganize them into what we want and then return to ignoring them once we got what we want
What, again?
 
I am under the impression that he just rubber stamped the judges that the Republican establishment handed to him, so there's no conflict at all there.

Agreed; I've stated many times Trump can only be considered as ineffectual or in on it. I lean towards the former myself but if others don't find him culpable, the only other explanation is being ineffectual.

As for the implication that Trump and the Republican establishment weren't both completely on board with tax cuts ... I literally don't know what to say here. Please refer to the past century?

I agree, which is where my criticisms come in, in that he could get that big tax cut through but he couldn't get the border funding for four years? Etc.
 
Blocked by the courts and the states that are dem controlled.

States can't block Federal funding bills, and if Courts can cuck Trump, why would I vote for him again when they can just cuck him again? Likewise, you evaded my question: show me the funding bill in question.
 
States can't block Federal funding bills,

They can block it from being implemented.

and if Courts can cuck Trump, why would I vote for him again when they can just cuck him again?

Why should you vote for anyone?


show me the funding bill in question.

Please keep up, I never said he got a bill(something that both parts of congress fought him on), I said he got funding.
 
They can block it from being implemented.

They can't, no.

Why should you vote for anyone?

Vote for someone willing to actually fight the system, or dispense with the niceties of it. Personally I've only voted seriously on local and State issues since 2018; in 2020 I voted for Huey Long lol. Electoralism to me at this stage is mostly a dead end, it's just waiting for the system to collapse to rebuild.


This is him vetoing a bill, not securing funding.


This was him diverting funds from the military, in late 2019, to build just 175 miles of barriers, not the 20 foot concrete wall and not along the entire border.

Please keep up, I never said he got a bill(something that both parts of congress fought him on), I said he got funding.

Nor did I claim you did, but this is the first time you specified this distinction, which takes me back to the point I made to you originally: he had both chamber of Congress in 2017-2018 to pass a clear cut bill. If your contention is that the entirety of Congress was against him, which I make no judgements on in of itself, then why wasn't he seeking to get as many of them replaced as possible in their primaries?

Ultimately, you come back to the point he's either ineffectual or in on it.
 
To what are you referring to? I ask sincerely.


Now, he ultimately won this case by going all the way to the supreme court(the first judgement agreed with him, the second didn't, then the supreme did), shown here: Supreme Court sides with Trump on building border wall with diverted military funds

But that was after a year of being stalled.
 
Nah we can design and innovate all of that, the various empires within western civilization has been doing that for 6,000 years after all.




Nah, not the Copts or the Persians, but the ethnic group that got into Iran and Egypt and spent 9 centuries conquering them by genocide via rape.

Those guys? Yeah they're a civilization of locusts who rape and kill and steal and have been doing that since before their false prophet organized them and made them more efficient at it.




Because it's high time those ancient and August peoples rise up and eject the Arab vandals from their societies and take their nations back and as long as we are meddling in their affairs they won't do that.

And because the Americas can be self sufficient.

The Dream of the Pax Americana as envisioned in the 18th century and what the European Empires of old feared as a new world order dominated by New York, Buenos Aires, Havana and Rio De Janeiro.

Not some bureaucratic cesspit in a dying country run by a bunch of self hating peoples who chose cultural suicide.
Meanwhile in Mexico........
 
Let's be real, Mexico as a superpower was just cope from Santa Ana

Its honestly amazing mexico is doing as well as it is, their geography is terrible, I mean the arable land is basically in pockets in scattered about highlands. This is where the best land is so people move there but it also means that Mexico has a hard time developing a naval tradition, it means that its hard to centralize power.

Meanwhile the us had the greatist navagable river system in the world with a great coastal system to boot, and for Mexico to project power to the north they had to pass a massive fucking desert that makes for a natural land boarder. This is the geography of a failed state and yet mexico is doing pretty well for itself dispite it all.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top