See, that doesn't actually refute my statement. I didn't say individualism works at everything. I said collectivism is the root of the worst evils. And you simply pointed out that yes, war works via collectivism, which is 100% in line with my position.
No, I mean there are extreme individualist libertarians who aren't open borders because of libertarian ideals.
That one of many. I can give more even if you wish.
I could give more if interested, as I mentioned above, considering the research is vast by both Jewish and non-Jewish individuals. I listed other potential reasons above.
I could say the same thing on how you react on certain subjects or group of people, but the vaguely accusatory tone is having the same effect of someone calling me either a right winger or a leftist, primarily because I am a maternally and paternally descendant from the group this thread is about.
And a leftist can give a long list of reasons why whitey is evil.
Interesting. Know any examples?
True. Worse than that: it leads to misidentifying the true cause of the problem, as I had stated here.
Yes, there is. And not just ze Germans, but white people in general. And some ethnicities (Germans, Croatians) have it worse than others.
Is it bad when you do it and apply it too all Arabs or Muslims when one Muslim in the UK commits a crime?
Most of the Mises Caucus, which currently runs the US Libertarian National Party, including the prominent members such as Dave Smith, etc.
The problem isn't diversity. It's diversity in a group that isn't designed to handle it. Meanwhile the US is great at handling racial diversity, but shit at handling view diversity (i.e. internal commies).
Thanks.
No, it isn't. US are shit at handling racial diversity, but pretend they are great at it because until late 1900s the only meaningful diversity was between various European ethnicities, who rather easily melted together due to commonalities in culture and ancestry. Basically, from 1790 until 1990, US were 80%+ white. The only diversity they had to worry about was cultural diversity, but that was a problem which basically solved itself due to not-to-high scale of immigration as well as the origin of the immigrants. In such conditions, dominant group can keep order simply by enforcing its own values and order.
That renders your point true only in the most banal sense. "War is bad" is nothing beyond a shibboleth. War is often better than the alternative, and demanding people not treat a war as a war is nothing more than demanding suicide. It's certainly not doing anything against the common criticism, which I don't even agree with, of libertarianism as voluntary suicide.
Yeah, this is something I don't think a lot of foreigners actually understand very well.
My statement is that collectivism leads to very bad stuff.
My statement:
Where's the demand?
Vargas'Brazil efficiently integrated lots of immigrants' population by... forcing them to speak Portugues.Thanks.
And yeah, that is a good concept.
No, it isn't. US are shit at handling racial diversity, but pretend they are great at it because until late 1900s the only meaningful diversity was between various European ethnicities, who rather easily melted together due to commonalities in culture and ancestry. Basically, from 1790 until 1990, US were 80%+ white. The only diversity they had to worry about was cultural diversity, but that was a problem which basically solved itself due to not-to-high scale of immigration as well as the origin of the immigrants. In such conditions, dominant group can keep order simply by enforcing its own values and order.
But once US started becoming more diverse...
The only real way to "handle" racial - or any other type of - diversity is to give each group its own territory. Roman Republic and Roman Empire did that, Holy Roman Empire did that (see etymology of stem duchies!).
"Integrating" different groups together is a modern concept, and just like most modern concepts, it is a fundamentally retarded one. If you look at all historical cosmopolitan cities - Rome, Constantinople, name it - you will see one common characteristic (beyond the obvious - diversity and trade). That characteristic is high murder rate, and propensity towards extreme violence in general.
And now West is implementing it on level of whole countries! There is just no way such an experiment can go terribly wrong.</sarcam>
Hmm . . .
Hmm, what's that? You demanding something not be done even if it objectively works? Because it's automatically bad, right?
Again, you totally ignored my point about the origin.
Again, I made a claim about collectivism in general. It's quite falsifiable: tell me origins of horrors that occurred because of treating people as individuals, not as a collective. And give me more than a few, as I said most.
