SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade
- Thread starter The Original Sixth
- Start date
Although this looks bad...
Might be a rough night for DC...
Might be a rough night for DC...
Sure, though I think I went into details on this in a CPS is bad thread back in 2020, if you wanna search through the pages in this section
Vyor
My influence grows!
that isn't what... artificial wombs are.
The Gay Latino with a lisp who initiated YouTubes Adpocalypse because Steven Crowder "bullied" him is now calling for glorious violence. Go Carlos Maza Go!
And one of his glorious ReTweets!
And one of his glorious ReTweets!
I think we may have a more fundamental disagreement about the value of human life itself.
Killing something is any action that directly results in the death of that thing. Abortion kills an unborn child, a human being - it's often killed before being extracted, and there is no attempt to save its life, often no possibility of it.
There is no way to leave the island, and survive, in this scenario. I don't think it's morally permissible to shoot the sailor. That is unjustly taking the life of another human being. It would be wrong, and it would be evil.
I would not be forcing anything. I do not need to force them to carry the unborn child in order for it to happen, it is already happening. Forcing someone to take an action is not the same as preventing someone from taking an action. Preventing a mother from killing her unborn child is the latter.
No, but even as your next post noted, shit is heating up.
Things do not have to get to the level of the George Floyd riots to be a bad thing for the public in general.
Edit: The brick pallets are back:
Wolf of Arrakis
Active member
From the perspective of a moderate pro-lifer (I believe that abortion should only be an option in cases of rape, incest and if the mother's life is in danger) the repeal isn't shocking really (especially given the current line-up of SCOTUS) but this isn't an end all to the abortion debate if anything the debate will escalate further. I will continue to monitor the situation.
LordsFire
Internet Wizard
You are showing a fundamental disregard for human life.
The reason that the woman is in an ugly situation is because of a crime. That crime was rape, one of the three most heinous crimes a person can commit. If it wasn't doing nasty things to someone, putting them in a painful situation, it wouldn't be a crime.
The fact that a crime was committed against her, does not remove the baby's rights and value as a human being.
So now you have a sub-optimal situation, where there is no good option, because someone committed rape. We have no ideal way out of this situation.
We now have two options in this situation:
1: The woman suffers through months of increasing discomfort and impairment, culminating in the painful process of giving birth.
2: Commit murder.
Clearly neither of these is good.
Equally clearly one is objectively worse than the other in all ways.
When you are in a sub-optimal situation, you have a moral and legal obligation to choose the least-bad outcome. And the least-bad outcome here is not murder.
This is pretty basic moral reasoning. You don't need a degree in philosophy to understand these concepts.
A lot of people with degrees in philosophy apparently don't understand these concepts.
Counterpoint: Nothing happened to the left when that whackjob shot up the Republican congressional baseball team or Rand Paul's neighbor committed attempted murder.
It only ever goes one way.
Arch Dornan
Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
There will be sanctuary states for them just like guns and illegal migrants regardless of your opinion. Illinois is strengthening theirs.
Duke Nukem
Hail to the king baby
Least deranged Redditor
Least deranged Redditor
People in rural areas have guns, and these communities actually know each other, this is also the area that supplies the cities with food and supplies. In other words once the shock is over, there are going to be a whole lot of dead redditers if they try this.
Not only that, many rural folks have access to nitrates, tons and tons of nitrates.
Last edited:
Someone's going for the Darwin Award.Least deranged Redditor
Arch Dornan
Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
See?
Local Officials Beef Up Abortion Sanctuary Cities
Cities bracing for an influx of abortion seekers are taking action to remain havens for reproductive care. But many have acknowledged their resource and legal limits.
www.bloomberg.com
Californians Ready to Help People From Out of State Receive Abortion Care. State May Offer Money for Travel, Child Care | KQED
The U.S. Supreme Court decision triggered actions to ban abortion in 26 states. California lawmakers and nonprofits prepare to help women with the travel and lodging costs associated with seeking abortion care here.
Bear Ribs
Well-known member
But he's talking about sending 100 guys at once. Granted since they're from areas with severe gun control, they're probably going to be armed with bats and pipes and they can maybe throw bricks. But still, 100 guys, how could any country town with a measly several thousand hunters and farmers equipped with long arms and with a much higher percentage of military veterans hold up against that kind of onslaught?